nitrogen fertiliser requirements for representative
play

Nitrogen fertiliser requirements for representative soils of the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nitrogen fertiliser requirements for representative soils of the Lower Burdekin cane growing district Julian Connellan 1 , Phil Moody 2 1 Sugar Research Australia, Burdekin 2 Queensland DSITI, Dutton Park 13 th October 2015 David Defranciscis


  1. Nitrogen fertiliser requirements for representative soils of the Lower Burdekin cane growing district Julian Connellan 1 , Phil Moody 2 1 Sugar Research Australia, Burdekin 2 Queensland DSITI, Dutton Park 13 th October 2015 David Defranciscis (Chairman) Steering committee

  2. Background  October 2009 the Great Barrier Reef Protection Amendment Act was introduced requiring growers to follow a regulated method for determining N application rates.  In response to industry concern DEHP funded a number of trials across the Burdekin.  The trials began in 2011  Aim is to assess the suitability of nitrogen application rates in the Burdekin, giving consideration to profitability, sustainable production and the potential for impacts on the environment.

  3. Current status  To date established 23 replicated block trials in the Delta and BRIA cane growing areas  10 established in 2011, 4 established in 2012, 1 in 2013, 4 established in 2014 and 4 established in 2015  Active sites include: • four plant • four 1 st ratoon • one 2 nd ratoon • three 3 rd ratoon • possibly two 4 th ratoon  Sites range in size from 4 to 10 hectares

  4. Trial design Three to four treatments • Treatment 1 – low rate (P130 kg N/ha, R170 kg N/ha) • Treatment 2 – rate determined by the Regulated Method/Six Easy Steps (P170 kg N/ha, R210 kg N/ha) • Treatment 3 – traditional grower rate (P210 kg N/ha, R250 kg N/ha) • Treatment 4 – a high rate (P250 kg N/ha, R290 kg N/ha)  Three to four replications at each site  Six Easy Steps rate based on DYP of 180 t cane/ha and discount for soil mineralisation potential

  5. 2 2 3 5 3 7 1

  6. 2014 Harvest results Mean cane yield (tc/ha) for each nitrogen rate treatment at six 2 nd ratoon trial sites Treatments Grower ID 170 kg N/ha 210 kg N/ha 250 kg N/ha 290 kg N/ha 2 107.5 105.8 106.2 6 107.7 b 111.4 ab 115.7 a 117.2 a 7 128.2 124.6 124.5 125.5 8 79.1 b 81.6 b 81.5 b 85.6 a Sites with P<0.05 are highlighted Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at the 5% level *Indicates elevated levels of nitrates in irrigation water (>2 mg/L of NO 3 -N) Mean sugar yields (ts/ha) for each nitrogen rate treatment at six 2 nd ratoon trial sites Treatments Grower ID 170 kg N/ha 210 kg N/ha 250 kg N/ha 290 kg N/ha 2 16.3 16 15.9 6 18.8 19.2 19.1 19.4 7 20 19.4 19.2 19.2 8 13.7 14 14 14.4

  7. Mean cane yield (tc/ha) for each nitrogen rate treatment for a plant crop Treatments Grower ID 150 kg N/ha 190 kg N/ha 230 kg N/ha 15 196.6 201.4 198.5 Mean sugar yields (ts/ha) for each nitrogen rate treatment for a plant crop Treatments Grower ID 150 kg N/ha 190 kg N/ha 230 kg N/ha 15 26.2 25.7 25.5 Note. Moddus was applied to this trial site

  8. Apparent nitrogen fertiliser use efficiency (aNUE) - k g of N applied to produce 1 tonne of sugarcane kg of applied N to produce 1 tonne of sugarcane for 4 plant crops Applied N Yield (tc/ha) kg of N applied to produce Grower ID (kg/ha) 1 tonne of sugarcane 2 170 141 1.2 6 170 111 1.5 8 170 131 1.3 15 150 197 0.8

  9. Apparent nitrogen fertiliser use efficiency (aNUE) - k g of N applied to produce 1 tonne of sugarcane kg of applied N to produce 1 tonne of sugarcane for 4 plant crops Applied N Yield (tc/ha) kg of N applied to produce Grower ID (kg/ha) 1 tonne of sugarcane 2 170 141 1.2 6 170 111 1.5 8 170 131 1.3 15 150 197 0.8

  10. Improving our understanding of where the applied N is going  Can use a simplistic method of looking at kg of N applied to produce 1 tonne of sugarcane as shown in the previous slide however this is only part of the story • It does not explain: • Where has the N has gone • How much N the plant used • How much N is left in the soil after the crop is harvested  To develop a better understanding of where the N is going a partial nitrogen budget can be used

  11. Partial Nitrogen Budget B C Fertiliser Denitrification Above ground Amendment Biomass uptake inputs C oxidation Mineralisation E A Final soil Initial soil pools pools Runoff, sediment Leaching D Below ground biomass uptake Nutrient inputs, outputs and status components of a partial nitrogen budget

  12. Initial soil pools (A) • Prior to planting all trial sites soil sampled – Soil cores down to 1m in 20cm increments – Soil samples tested for mineral N (Nitrate N +Ammonium N) • Kg/ha of mineral N in the top 60cm of the soil profile calculated – Generally mineral N levels vary widely from site to site (15 kg N/ha – 114 kg N/ha)

  13. Fertiliser amendment inputs (B) • Fertiliser applied using purpose build fertiliser box with load cell technology – Recommend N application rate for plant crop according to regulated method (Six Easy Steps) is generally around 150-170 kg N/ha

  14. Above ground biomass uptake (C) • Conducted at harvest • Stalks are sampled and broken down to components such as millable stalk, leaf, cabbage and trash and analysed for N content • Using yield data and the N content of the plant components able to determine the amount of nitrogen captured by the crop Crop N varies widely from site to site (80 – >200kg N/ha)

  15. Below ground biomass uptake (D) • Roots and stool • Below ground biomass N is approximately 30% of the total above ground biomass N • Little knowledge about the dynamics of N accumulation in the below ground biomass 100 kg N/ha A crop with 100kg N/ha in the above ground biomass will have approximately 30kg N/ha in the below ground biomass 30 kg N/ha

  16. Final soil pools (E) • Following harvest soil samples taken from all strips in each trial site • Soil samples taken in 20cm increments (0-20cm, 20- 40cm, 40-60cm, 60-80cm and 80-100cm) down to 1m and analysed for mineral N • Mineral N following harvest was found to be low in all treatments at all sites across the Burdekin. • Often less than 30kg N/ha in the top 60cm of the soil profile

  17. Partial Nitrogen Budget B C Fertiliser Denitrification Above ground Amendment Biomass uptake inputs C oxidation Mineralisation E A Final soil Initial soil pools pools Runoff, sediment Leaching D Below ground biomass uptake Nutrient inputs, outputs and status components of a partial nitrogen budget

  18. Partial Nitrogen Budget B C Fertiliser Denitrification Above ground Amendment Biomass uptake inputs C oxidation Mineralisation E A Final soil Initial soil pools pools Runoff, sediment Leaching D Below ground biomass uptake Nutrient inputs, outputs and status components of a partial nitrogen budget

  19. N Budget N inputs = N outputs Sugar Mill Grower 6. Plant Crop (yield = 111 tc/ha) N Inputs kg of N/ha N Outputs kg of N/ha Crop Biomass Fertiliser 170 118 Soil profile mineral N (above-ground) 26 kg N/ha is unaccounted for 32 (0-60cm) Crop Biomass (below-ground) 35* Irrigation 0 Mineral N remaining in soil post 23 harvest (0-60cm) Soil N mineralisation Unknown Subtotal (A) 202+ Subtotal (B) 176 Sugar Mill Grower 6. Plant Crop (yield = 113 tc/ha) N Inputs kg of N/ha N Outputs kg of N/ha Fertiliser 210 Crop Biomass 120 Soil profile mineral N (above-ground) 27 (0-60cm) Crop Biomass (below-ground) 36* Irrigation 0 Mineral N remaining in soil post 51 kg N/ha is unaccounted for 30 harvest (0-60cm) Soil N mineralisation Unknown Subtotal (A) 237+ Subtotal (B) 186 Note. This budget does not take into account soil N mineralisation * Below ground biomass N is estimated as 30% of above ground biomass N

  20. N Budget N inputs = N outputs Sugar Mill Grower 15. Plant Crop (yield = 197 tc/ha) N Inputs kg of N/ha N Outputs kg of N/ha Crop Biomass Fertiliser 150 196 Soil profile mineral N (above-ground) 112kg N/ha is being supplied 27 (0-60cm) Crop Biomass (below-ground) 59* through soil N mineralisation Irrigation 0 Mineral N remaining in soil post 34 harvest (0-60cm) Soil N mineralisation Unknown Subtotal (A) 177+ Subtotal (B) 289 Sugar Mill Grower 15. Plant Crop (yield = 199 tc/ha) N Inputs kg of N/ha N Outputs kg of N/ha Fertiliser 230 Crop Biomass 233 Soil profile mineral N (above-ground) 27 (0-60cm) Crop Biomass (below-ground) 70* Irrigation 0 Mineral N remaining in soil post 70 kg N/ha is being supplied 24 harvest (0-60cm) Soil N mineralisation Unknown through soil N mineralisation Subtotal (A) 257+ Subtotal (B) 327 Note. This budget does not take into account soil N mineralisation * Below ground biomass N is estimated as 30% of above ground biomass N

  21. Closing comment • N requirement calculated by the Regulated Method/Six Easy Steps was more than enough for maximum cane and sugar yields for most crops harvested in 2014.

  22. THANK YOU

  23. Soil moisture monitoring

  24. 2012 Harvest data- Plant crops Mean yield (tc/ha) for each treatment at 10 trial sites Treatments Grower ID 130 kg N/ha 170 kg N/ha 210 kg N/ha 250 kg N/ha 125 a 118 a 128 a 133 a 1 * 2 135 b 141 ab 144 a 153 b 157 ab 163 a 163 a 3 * 4 * 143 a 145 a 139 a 144 a 6 106 a 111 a 113 a 113 a 7 * 150 a 152 a no data 151 a 8 126 b 131 ab 134 a 136 a 9 90 a 96 a 95 a 96 a 10 122 b 129 a 130 a 133 a 11 127 c 137 b 142 a Mean yield (tc/ha) 128 132 132 134 Sites with P<0.05 are highlighted Means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at the 5% level * Indicates elevated levels of nitrates in irrigation water (>3 mg/L of NO 3 -N )

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend