New Topical Medications Sunita Radhakrishnan, M.D. Glaucoma Center - - PDF document
New Topical Medications Sunita Radhakrishnan, M.D. Glaucoma Center - - PDF document
New Topical Medications Sunita Radhakrishnan, M.D. Glaucoma Center of San Francisco, Glaucoma Research and Education Group Financial Disclosure Consultant: Netra Systems, Inc Latanoprostene bunod Netarsudil FDA approval Nov 2017 Dec 2017
Latanoprostene bunod Netarsudil
FDA approval Nov 2017 Dec 2017
Uveoscleral outflow
- Prostaglandins
- Alpha agonists
Trabecular outflow
- Pilocarpine
- Latanoprostene
bunod
- Netarsudil
Aqueous inflow
- Beta blockers
- Alpha agonists
- CAIs
Rudkin et al. Recognizing congenital glaucoma. Med J Aust 2009; 191: 466-467
NEW
Netarsudil and latanoprost fixed combination
New Medications
Latanoprost with potassium sorbate (non BAK) FDA approval Sept 2018 Mar 2019
Latanoprostene bunod
- Latanoprost + Nitric oxide donating component
(butanediol mononitrate)
- Dual mechanism of action
– Latanoprost increases uveoscleral flow – NO relaxes TM and increases trabecular outflow
Latanoprostene bunod
- Efficacy:
– IOP reduction of 8-9 mm Hg (30 to 33%) in OAG/OHTN with mean baseline IOP of ~27mm Hg.
(pooled phase-3 studies APOLLO, LUNAR; Weinreb et al. J Glaucoma 2018)
– IOP reduction of at least 22% (4.3 mm Hg) in Japanese patients with mean baseline IOP of 19.6 mm Hg (JUPITER study, Kawase et al. Adv Ther. 2016; 12 month follow-up)
Latanoprostene bunod
- Side effects
– Similar to latanoprost – Stinging
Netarsudil
- RhoKinase inhibitor
- Multiple mechanisms of action
– Increases trabecular outflow by relaxing TM – Reduces episcleral venous pressure – Reduces aqueous production
Netarsudil
- Efficacy:
– IOP reduction of 3.3 to 5.1 mm Hg (15 to 22%) in 3 phase 3 trials (ROCKET-1, 2, 4) with mean baseline IOP 20.7 to 23.4)
– In ROCKET-4, netarsudil demonstrated non-inferiority to timolol across various IOP ranges (<25, <27, <30)
Serle et al, ROCKET 1,2 AJO 2018, Khour et al. ROCKET 4, AJO Aug 2019
Netarsudil
- Side effects reported in ROCKET -4 study
with 6 month follow-up – Hyperemia: 48%, mostly mild – Subconjunctival hemorrhages: 16% – Instillation site pain: 24% – Cornea verticillata: 25%
- Onset at ~ 3 months
- Mild, no visual consequence
- Resolved upon discontinuation in 60%
www.aeriepharma.com
Netarsudil
- Discontinuation rate:
– From all adverse events (mostly ocular): 19% – Due to conjunctival hyperemia: 4%
ROCKET-4, Khouri et al. AJO, Aug 2019
Latanoprost emulsion with potassium sorbate (Xelpros)
- Efficacy:
– In one Phase 3 trial, IOP reduction was 5.0 – 6.2 mm Hg (22 – 25%) in Xelpros group versus 5.7 – 6.6 m Hg (25-
26%) in Xalatan group.
- Side effects:
– 67% reported eye pain with Xelpros versus 47% with Xalatan
- Storage:
– No refrigeration required
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2018/206185Orig1s000MedR.pdf
Netarsudil and latanoprost fixed combination (Rocklatan)
- Efficacy:
– IOP reduction of 6.8 to 9.2 mm Hg (31 to 37%) from
mean baseline IOP of 22.4 to 24.7 mm HG
– Additional IOP lowering IOP of
- 1.8–3.3 mmHg vs netarsudil
- 1.3–2.5 mm Hg vs latanoprost
Asrani et al, MERCURY-1, AJO June 2019; Walters et al, MERCURY – 2, Ophthalmolog Glaucoma 2019, In Press
- Side effects:
– 53 to 55% conjunctival hyperemia (similar to netarsudil) – 2.5 to 7% discontinuation rate (lower than netarsudil)
Asrani et al, MERCURY-1, AJO June 2019; Walters et al, MERCURY – 2, Ophthalmolog Glaucoma 2019, In Press
Netarsudil and latanoprost fixed combination (Rocklatan)
Frequency of administration
PGA
β- α2+
CAI-
α2+ α2+
CAI- CAI-
AM PM
PGA+NO
RhoK-
PGA
CAI-
PGA+NO
RhoK-
Choosing first line therapy
- Effective
- Good side effect profile
- Inexpensive
- Once a day dosing
- 24 hour IOP control
Van der Walk R, et al. IOP lowering effects of all commonly used glaucoma drugs: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1177-85
Newer options for first line therapy
- Latanoprostene bunod and Netarsudil
– Advantages:
- May help maintain the physiological aqueous outflow pathways
- Convenient dosing
– Disadvantages
- Cost/Access
- Netarsudil: Side effects
Adjunctive treatment
- Many glaucoma patients require more than one
medication to adequately lower IOP
– OHTS, 40% required 2 or more meds by year 5 – CIGTS, 75% required 2 or more meds after 2 years of treatment
- With PGA monotherapy, consider trying a
different PGA before adding another medication
Choosing adjunctive therapy
- Additional IOP lowering
- Other factors
– Side effects – Impact on adherence
- Dosing schedule
- Cost
Adjunctive therapy to PGAs
- Beta blockers
– Easy once daily dosing schedule – Poor nocturnal IOP control
- Rho Kinase inhibitor
– Easy qd dosing – Diurnal and nocturnal IOP control
- Topical CAIs
– At least BID – Diurnal and nocturnal IOP control
- Brimonidine
– At least BID – Poor nocturnal IOP control
New medications versus latanoprost
- Netarsudil/latanoprost fixed dose combination
– Additional IOP lowering of 1.8mm – 2.5 mm Hg – Higher proportion of patients achieving IOP ≤ 15 mm Hg
- 42 to 44% with netarsudil/latanoprost FDC versus 18-
25% with latanoprost alone
First line and adjunctive therapy
- No one-size-fits-all algorithm
- Treatment has to be individualized for
each patient
Clinical experience - Early
- Initially tried both Latanoprostene bunod and
Netarsudil in patients who were already on multiple medications
Early experience
- Cost:
- Access:
– Prior authorization for almost every prescription – Created template statement about mechanism of action
- f new meds
- Side effects:
– Warned patients of hyperemia from netarsudil; tends to get better after first few days of use
Early experience
- Efficacy of netarsudil:
– Greater than expected in some patients – Able to achieve single digit IOPs even in patients on multiple medications
- Side effects with netarsudil
– Follicular conjunctivitis and eyelid dermatitis similar to brimonidine induced reaction
- Takes longer to resolve?
– Discontinuation rate higher than reported in trials
Early experience
Brimonidine induced follicular
- conjunctivitis. Eyerounds.org
Initial survey
- 64 patients started on netarsudil treatment
- 25% discontinued due to side effects:
– Conjunctival hyperemia (n=6) – Follicular conjunctivitis (n=5) – Eyelid dermatitis (n=3) – Tearing, discomfort, or severe itching (n=2)
New medications in 2019
- More likely to consider latanoprostene bunod as
first line agent, especially in younger patients
– Good efficacy – Tolerated well – Potential advantage of maintaining trabecular pathways open
New medications in 2019
- Netarsudil can be a good adjunct to PGA
- Side effects are relatively more common but has
several advantages over other agents
– Once daily dosing – Night-time efficacy – May keep trabecular pathways open – May achieve very low IOPs in some patients
- Cost is still an issue for many patients
– Competing against very cheap generics
New medications in 2019
- Access is improving
New medications in 2019
Summary
- New medications with novel mechanisms of
action are a welcome addition to our treatment portfolio
- Cost and access is not optimal
- Side effects/discontinuation rate with Rho Kinase