Neutrino Factory RCNP 20 10 21 Neutrino Factory Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

neutrino factory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Neutrino Factory RCNP 20 10 21 Neutrino Factory Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Neutrino Factory RCNP 20 10 21 Neutrino Factory Overview Neutrinos from Pion Decay and Muon Decay Pion-decay based


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Neutrino Factory

大阪大学大学院理学研究科 久野良孝 RCNP研究会 ミューオン科学と加速器研究 平成20年10月21日

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Neutrino Factory Overview

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Neutrinos from Pion Decay and Muon Decay

  • Pion-decay based neutrino beam
  • prompt decays
  • backgrounds (electron neutrino)
  • Beam normalization ~ 10%
  • Muon-decay based Neutrino

beam

  • delayed decay after all pions

and kaons decay.

  • four different neutrino falvors

are available.

  • Less beam backgrounds
  • Beam normalization can be

better known.

π + → µ +ν µ π − → µ−ν

µ

K → µν,K → πlν µ → eνν

µ + → e+νeν µ µ− → e−ν

eν µ

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Accelerate to Get More Neutrinos !

  • Given the proton beam power,

numbers of pions and muons are similar.

  • Acceleration of the parent

particles gives more neutrinos by Lorentz boosting.

  • Pion has too short lifetime of 26

nsec.

  • Only muon live long enough to

accelerate (lifetime = 2.2 micro sec.

  • pion production is peaked

around 200 MeV.

N ∝ E

2

d2Nν µ ,ν µ dydΩ = 4nµ πL

2mµ 6 Eµ 4y2(1−β cosϕ)

×[ 3mµ

2 − 4Eµ 2y(1−β cosϕ

{ }

mP

µ mµ 2 − 4 Eµ 2y(1− βcosϕ)

{ }]

d

2Nν e,ν e

dydΩ = 24nµ πL2mµ

6 Eµ 4y 2(1−β cosϕ)

×[ mµ

2 −2Eµ 2y(1−β cosϕ

{ }

mP

µ mµ 2 − 2Eµ 2y(1− βcosϕ)

{ }]

y = E

ν

Eµ ; β = 1− mµ

2 / Eµ 2 ; nµ =#of muons;

ϕ = angle between beam and detector; L = distance

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Storage Ring is Needed !

  • Muons accelerated at high

energy do not decay quickly !

  • at 10 GeV, muon lifetime is

about 200 microseconds.

  • A storage ring is needed with

long straight sections.

  • Two straight sections give

automatically two experiments (with different baselines) at a time.

At 50 GeV, γ=500 and beam spread is 2 mrad. (At 100m, +-20cm beam size.)

θ ∝ 1 γ N ∝γ

2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Neutrino Cross Sections

  • Deep Inelastic Scattering

Processes at High Energy.

  • Quasi Elastic Scattering

Processes at 1 GeV

ν µ + N → µ + X

σ(ν) ≈ 0.67 ×10

−38cm 2 × Eν (GeV )

σ(ν ) ≈ 0.34 ×10−38cm2 × Eν(GeV ) σ(ν ) /σ(ν) ≈ 0.5

νµ + N → µ + N'

σ(ν ) /σ(ν) ≈1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Lepton Spectra from CC events

  • neutrino CC events
  • different for neutrinos and

antineutrinos

  • low energy region is important

for neutrino events (not antineutrino events.)

  • Detector threshold issue.

ν(ν ) + N → l

−(l +) + X

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Advantages of Neutrino Factory

  • Very highly intense neutrino source
  • a few orders of magnitude higher

at a few 10 GeV energy range.

  • intensity proportional to E2
  • Both muon (anti-)neutrinos and

electron (anti-)neutrinos are available.

  • Many variety of oscillation

modes can be studied.

  • Extremely low backgrounds
  • for wrong signed muon

detection, a background level would be less than 10-4.

  • Precise Knowledge on Neutrino

Flux

  • Neutrino flux normalization can

be done at the level of 0.1%.

  • polarization, beam divergence
slide-9
SLIDE 9

12 Oscillation Processes in a Neutrino Factory

12 Oscillation Processes from (simultaneous) beams of positive and negative muons in a neutrino Factory.

Table 6: Oscillation processes in a Neutrino Factory µ+ → e+νeνµ µ− → e−νe νµ → νµ νµ → νµ disappearance νµ → νe νµ → νe appearance (challenging) νµ → ντ νµ → ντ appearance (atm. oscillation) νe → νe νe → νe disappearance νe → νµ νe → νµ appearance: “golden” channel νe → ντ νe → ντ appearance: “silver” channel

µ− → e−¯ νeνµ

golden silver platinum

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Event Rates

  • Charged Current (CC) Event Rates
  • example
  • 1021 muons decay /year with a

10 kton detector

  • Oscillation Event Rates

L=1000km L=1500km Eµ=20 GeV 3.2x105 1.4x105 Eµ=30 GeV 1.1x106 4.8x105

MINOS (low energy 3GeV, 732 km) : 5000 CC events/10 kton/year

NCC(ν → ) ∝ Nν · σ ∝ E2 L2 · E = E3 L2

Nosc(ν → ) ∝ Nν · σ · P(ν → ν) ∝ E3 L2 · L2 E2 = E

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Neutrino Oscillation Signature at NuFact

  • The signature of neutrino
  • scillation is wrong-signed

leptons.

  • Charge identification of the

lepton(s) is needed.

  • Muons are easy.
  • Electrons are difficult.

µ

− → e − ν e ν µ

ν

µ

µ

µ

+

  • scillation

µ

+ → e + ν e ν µ

ν µ µ

+

µ

  • scillation

Look for wrong signed Muons.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Neutrino Factory Complex

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Neutrino Factory Components

  • Proton Driver
  • 1 - 4 MW beam power
  • Pion Capture
  • high acceptance
  • Phase Rotation and bunching
  • narrow energy spread
  • Muon Ionization Cooling
  • reduce beam emittance
  • Muon Acceleration
  • accelerate muons
  • Muon Storage Ring
  • store muons to decay
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Proton Drivers

  • 1 - 4 MW proton beam power is

needed.

  • only beam power matters.
  • Proton energy is not important

(next slide), but 5-15 (about 10) GeV would be the best.

  • Considerations
  • slow repetition rate with many

protons in each pulse (0.1 - 1 Hz).

  • high repetition with less protons

in each pulse. (10-100 Hz)

  • Options
  • 200 MeV Linac + 3 GeV

Booster synchrotron + Proton FFAG (10 GeV)

  • 8 GeV Fermilab

superconducting LINAC (20 Hz upgrade) + accumulator buncher

  • SPL at CERN (50 Hz) +

accumulator/buncher

  • or existing machines (BNL,

Japan, etc.)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Optimum Proton Energy

Simulation by MARS14

Optimum proton energy for high-Z target is broad, but drops at low-energy

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2.2 GeV 4 MW

Protons Current of 300 kA π B∝1/R B = 0

Target and Pion Capture

  • Achieve highly intense muon

beam by maximizing pion production and collecting as many of them as possible.

  • soft pion production
  • high Z material
  • sustain high beam power

(1-4 MW)

  • Neutrino Factory Concept
  • Liquid mercury target ?
  • Pion capture system
  • 20 T superconducting

magnet, then reduced.

  • Magnetic horn system

horn capture (EU) solenoid capture (US,Japan)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Tests of Mercury Liquid Target

Issues : Jet disperse by proton beam ? How does a magnetic field affect ?

E951

  • 1 cm
  • v=2.5 cm/s
  • 24 GeV 4 TP p beam
  • No B field

CERN/Grenoble

  • 4 mm
  • v=12 m/s
  • No p beam
  • 0,10,20T B field

Hg jet dispersal properties :

  • proportional to beam intensity
  • velocities ~½ times that of “confined thimble” target
  • largely transverse to the jet axis
  • delayed 40 ms
  • The Hg jet is stabilized by the 20 T B field
  • Minimal jet deflection for 100 mrad angle of entry
  • Jet velocity reduced upon entry to B field
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Bunching and Phase Rotation

  • bunching to fit in an RF system

(200 MHz?).

  • originally muon beam

spread longitudinally due to different energy.

  • Phase rotation : accelerate slow

muons and decelerate fast muons to align muon beam energy.

Bunched Beam Rotation with 200 MHz RF (Neuffer)

dt dE

Drift RF Buncher RF Rotate

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Reduction of Beam Emittance (Cooling)

  • Emittance = a volume in phase

space occupied by beam particles

  • for transverse
  • Reduce the muon beam

emittance so that as many muons as possible can be accepted in the following accelerating system (Cooling)

Accelerator acceptance R ≈ 10 cm, x’ ≈ 0.05 rad rescaled @ 200 MeV π and µ after focalization

(x, dx dz , y, dy dz )

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Ionization Cooling

  • Ordinary beam cooling

(stochastic cooling etc.) is too

  • slow. A novel method for

muons are needed.

  • ionization cooling system

consists of degraders (absorber) and accelerating RF cavities.

  • to minimize heating, degrader

should have a large radiation length (X0) and strong focusing system make the beta function small.

principle reduce pt and pl increase pl heating

2 3 2

2 ) 014 . ( 1 1 X m E E ds dE ds d

n n µ µ µ µ

  • +
  • =

cooling heating

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Acceleration

  • Rapid Acceleration (to 20-50

GeV) is needed.

  • a synchrotron not work.
  • Options

1.Scaling FFAG (Fixed Field Alternating Gradient) accelerator

  • Japanese design

2.Non-Scaling FFAG

  • US Study 2A

3.RLA (Recirculating Linear Accelerator )

  • racetrack or dog-bone
  • US Study 2

Scaling FFAG Non-Scaling FFAG RLA

slide-22
SLIDE 22

µ+ µ-

Storage Ring

  • Triangle Ring
  • more fraction of straight

sections (up tp 48 %), but less flexibility

  • two rings in single tunnel
  • Racetrack Ring
  • less fraction of straight

section (up to 38 %), but more flexibility to beam directions.

  • one rings in two tunnels.
  • Both signed muons are

circulated with timing discrimination.

  • Dependent on accelerator and

detector locations.

µ+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ+ µ- µ- µ- µ- µ-

400ns 400ns 100ns

Two identical rings, one for µ+, one for µ-, stacked vertically side by side in same tunnel. Muon bunches interleaved in time

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Neutrino Factory

CERN Layout

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Proton Driver
  • primary beam on production

target

  • Target, Capture, Decay
  • capture pions, which decay

into muons.

  • Bunching, Phase Rotation
  • reduce energy spread of

bunch

  • Cooling
  • reduce transverse

momentum

  • Acceleration
  • from 200 MeV to 20-50 GeV
  • Decay Ring
  • store for about 500 turns
  • long straight sections

Decay Channel Linear Cooler Buncher 1-4 MW Proton Source Hg-Jet Target Pre-Accelerator

Acceleration Decay Ring ~ 1 km

5-10 GeV 10-20 GeV 1.5-5 GeV

ν

US Neutrino Factory

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Neutrino Factory at J-PARC

FFAG-based Scenario

4 FFAG rings + storage ring

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Neutrino Factory Detector Options

  • Segmented Magnetized Detector
  • Totally Active Scintillator Detector
  • Liquid Ar Detector
  • Emulsion Detector

iron (4 cm) scintillators (1cm)

ν beam

20 m 10 m 10 m B=1 T

15 m 15 m 1 m

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Neutrino Factory Sensitivities And Optimization

slide-28
SLIDE 28

limit for (sin22θ13)eff sin22θ13 systematics correlations degeneracies

statistical limit

(all parameters fixed)

limit for sin22θ13 from *THIS* experiment only

precise knowledge of some parameter combination = precision of the experiment synergies = combine with other experiments  gain more than statistics

Comments : Definitions of Sensitivity Plots with Systematics, Correlations, degeneracies

a la M. Lindner et al.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Exclusion Sensitivity to

sin2 2θ13

T2K T2K+NOvA T2HK 5E20 decays 50 kton, 8 years, golden mode only

Huber, Lindner, Winter, hep-ph/0204352

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Exclusion Sensitivity to Mass Hierarchy

T2K NOvA T2HK 5E20 decays 50 kton, 8 years, golden mode only 1E20 decays 10 kton, 5 years, golden mode only

Huber, Lindner, Winter, hep-ph/0204352

slide-31
SLIDE 31

CP (anti-) Coverage for Different

Sin22θ13=10-1

T2HK and NF Comparable

Sin22θ13=10-3

Synergy between T2HK and NF

Sin22θ13=10-4

NF outperforms

sin2 2θ13

slide-32
SLIDE 32

CP violation sin22θ13 Mass hierarchy

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Summary of Neutrino Factory Optimization

  • A lot of works have been done and more works are being undertaken.
  • For there is a strong case for a neutrino factory, which

gives the best sensitivity of CP violation.

  • For , T2HK and a neutrino factory are comparable. For a

neutrino factory, systematic uncertainty, in particular from matter density, is important and should be reduced. (The study is going.)

sin2 2θ13 < 0.01

sin2 2θ13 > 0.01

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Summary

  • Neutrino Oscillation Physics
  • Objectives are
  • Eight-fold Degeneracies
  • Future Neutrino Facilities
  • Superbeams
  • Beta beam
  • Neutrino factory
  • Neutrino Factory

Complex and R&D

  • New physics beyond the

standard neutrino oscillation

θ13

Search for Mass Hierarchy

δ

Discovery of Leptonic CP Violation