+ Neonatal Pain Management : Barriers to and Facilitators of data - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

neonatal pain management barriers to and facilitators of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

+ Neonatal Pain Management : Barriers to and Facilitators of data - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

+ Neonatal Pain Management : Barriers to and Facilitators of data entry in the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario Information System Catherine Larocque, BScN, 1,2 Jessica Reszel, RN, MScN, 2 Sandra Dunn, RN, PhD, 2,3 Denise


slide-1
SLIDE 1

+

Neonatal Pain Management:

Barriers to and Facilitators of data entry in the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario Information System

Catherine Larocque, BScN,1,2 Jessica Reszel, RN, MScN,2 Sandra Dunn, RN, PhD,2,3 Denise Harrison, RN, PhD1,2

1School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 2Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 3Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN Ontario)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

+ Background – Neonatal Pain

Need:

Identify barriers and facilitators to capturing new data element

Epidemiology: All newborn infants have blood work for screening in the first days of life Effects of pain: Blood work causes pain, distress, and physiological changes Evidence: Breastfeeding (BF), Skin-to-Skin care (SSC), and sucrose reduce pain Measurement tool: Pain management data element was added to the BIS in April 2014

slide-3
SLIDE 3

+ New data element

Pain Relief Measures During Newborn Screening

  • r Serum Bilirubin

[PPC,NICU] New pick list values:

  • Breastfeeding
  • Skin to skin
  • Sucrose
  • Other
  • None
  • Unknown
slide-4
SLIDE 4

+ Purpose/Aims

To identify the barriers and facilitators to:

1)

Data entry of the newborn pain management data element into the BORN information system (BIS), and

2)

Implementation of pain treatment during newborn screening. To ensure high quality data is available to identify gaps in practice for subsequent planning of practice improvements

slide-5
SLIDE 5

+ Design & Methods

 Descriptive qualitative

Design Sampling and Data Collection

 Purposive sampling of nurse managers (or their delegates) in the

province of Ontario from maternal/newborn hospitals

 E-mail invitations were sent to potential participants in blocks of 12  Used a semi-structured interview guide  Interviews continued until saturation of concepts

Data analysis

 Interviews were transcribed verbatim and conventional content

analysis was completed

 Descriptive statistics to summarize demographic data

slide-6
SLIDE 6

+ Participant flowchart

Total responses received: n=20 Total completed interviews: n=15

No site contact (n=4) Total eligible level I/II maternal newborn sites in Ontario

N=88 N=84

slide-7
SLIDE 7

+ Demographics

Hospital site demographics 15 (100%)

Health Region #1-4- SW and Central Ontario #5-8- Greater Toronto Area #9-11- Eastern and SE Ontario #12-14- Northern Ontario 5 (33%) 4 (27%) 2 (13%) 4 (27%) Level of Care Level I Level II 8 (53%) 7 (47%) Birth Volume 101-500 501-1000 1001-2499 2500-4000 5 (33%) 6 (40%) 1 (7%) 3 (20%)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

+ Demographics cont’d

Participant demographics 16 (100%)

Role Director Manager Resource Nurse/Nurse Educator/Nurse Specialist Care Facilitator 4 (25%) 5 (31%) 4 (25%) 2 (13%) 1 (6%)

Results n=15

Participant aware of new data element? Yes No 11 (73%) 4 (27%) Self-reported use of any pain management at site Always Most of the time/Sometimes Rarely/Never Unknown 8 (53%) 5 (33%) 2 (13%)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

+ Results

BIS data entry and use

Barriers

Time Documentation IT Issues Resources Issues with element Lack of communication Lack of awareness & staff perception Non- nursing staff

Facilitators

User- Friendly system BORN support Documentation Who enters the data Data Quality measures Low birth volume Knowing the patient Staff attitude

Pain management practice

Barriers

Staff Patient health status Resources Red Tape Parent factors Unit factors Lack of education & awareness Lack of policies Type of procedure Traditions

Facilitators

BFI BPGs, Guidelines, Policies Education Staff Parent advocacy Initiatives and management involvement Familiarity & Experience Type of Procedure Unit factors Advantages for staff Driving Practice Change

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Participant 009

It’s an element in BORN which means we’ve now included it in our charting, which we should do but it gives you a kick-start right? Well if it’s on BORN we gotta have it in our charting. And

  • nce you have it in the charting, then the trigger is there for the

staff right? They’re seeing it all the time […]. If every time they’re pulling up their intervention screen they’re seeing this stuff, then they’re gonna remember right? ”

slide-11
SLIDE 11

+ Results- BIS entry

BIS data entry and use

Barriers

Time

Documentation

IT Issues Resources

Issues with element

Lack of communication Lack of awareness & staff perception Non- nursing staff

Facilitators

User- Friendly system BORN support

Documentation

Who enters the data Data Quality measures Low birth volume Knowing the patient Staff attitude

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Participant 004

I think sometimes the, the front line staff don’t necessarily understand the complete importance of BORN and you know kind of the real reason why it’s done and why it’s so important […]. Because they are doing the actual hands-on work you know that’s their, they’re very task oriented […]. So I think it’s hard sometimes to look at the big picture. ”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

+ Results- Pain Management Practice

Pain management practice

Barriers

Staff

Patient health status Resources Red Tape Parent factors Unit factors Lack of education & awareness Lack of policies Type of procedure Tradition

Facilitators

BFI BPGs, Guidelines, Policies Education

Staff

Parent advocacy Initiatives and management involvement Familiarity & Experience Type of Procedure Unit factors Advantages for staff

slide-14
SLIDE 14

+ Results- Model

CONTEXT

BARRIERS

FACILITATORS

RESOURCES

slide-15
SLIDE 15

+ Implications and Next Steps

 Disseminate study findings

 Report distributed to all

maternal/newborn hospitals in Ontario which will include strategies to address the identified barriers

 Disseminate study findings through

conference presentations, poster presentations, etc.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

+

Acknowledgements

  • All the participants who graciously

agreed to participate in our study

  • The Be Sweet to Babies research team

Especially:

  • Dr. Denise Harrison
  • Jessica Reszel
  • Amanda Bowman
  • BORN Ontario

Especially:

  • Dr. Sandra Dunn, Knowledge Translation

Specialist

  • Canadian Institutes for Health

Research (CIHR)

  • Health professional Student Research

Award

Catherine Larocque, BScN clarocque@cheo.on.ca Student Research Assistant for Denise Harrison, RN, PhD Chair in Nursing Care of Children, Youth and Families

slide-17
SLIDE 17

+ Important references

 Qualitative Description

 Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Research in

Nursing & Health, 23, 334-340. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(2000008)23:4<334::AID- NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

 Sandelowsi, M. (2010). What’s in a Name? Qualitative Description Revisited. Research in

Nursing & Health, 33, 77-84. doi: 10.1002/nur.20362

 Graneheim, U.H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research:

concepts, procedures and methods to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

 Hsieh, H.F. & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.

Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288. doi: 10.1177/10497323052305276687

 Data Saturation

 Fusch, P.I. & Ness, L.R. (2015). Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative

  • Research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408-1416. Retrieved from:

http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/9/fusch1.pdf

 Mason, M. (2010). Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies using Qualitative

  • Interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). Retrieved from:

http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428

slide-18
SLIDE 18

+ Visual coding scheme- themes and subthemes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

+ Survey Questions

slide-20
SLIDE 20

+ BFI one pager (resource)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

+ Sucrose policies

slide-22
SLIDE 22

+ CHEO playlist