NAYANTARA SEN Equity Consulting, Training & Storytelling E: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nayantara sen
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NAYANTARA SEN Equity Consulting, Training & Storytelling E: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NAYANTARA SEN Equity Consulting, Training & Storytelling E: Nayantara.sen@gmail.com @NayantaraS NPIC ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE = WHITE PROFESSIONALISM WHITE PRIVILEGE &SUPREMACY IN NON-PROFITS (A FEW SOBERING EXAMPLES )


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NAYANTARA SEN

Equity Consulting, Training & Storytelling E: Nayantara.sen@gmail.com @NayantaraS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

NPIC ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE = WHITE PROFESSIONALISM

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WHITE PRIVILEGE &SUPREMACY IN NON-PROFITS

(A FEW SOBERING EXAMPLES) Organizational Policies Organizational Practices

“Accrual” policies for paid leave or vacation time that prevent immigrant workers from going home… Racial Microaggressions… Missing/inadequate equity strategies (like affirmative action, staff and supervisor evaluations based on racial equity metrics, “racial climate” assessments)… Expectations of “professional” behavior, including dress code, language, voice, writing style, etc. No space allowed for creative “code-switching”… “Diversity hiring requirements” without adequate supports for staff of color, resulting in diversity pitfalls like tokenization, exceptionalizing etc… Emphasis on tracking and evaluating performance (as “work ethic”) without attention to racial dynamics…. Deprioritizing mentorship, leadership development and retention of staff of color while lifting up “professional and skills development”… Expecting staff of color to shoulder “educational burden” on race/racism… ….etc.

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

CONCEALING RACISM: COMMON INSTITUTIONAL TECHNIQUES

  • 1. Denying: Ignore racism or actively asserting it doesn’t exist.
  • 2. Deflecting: Insist that inequity is based on anything but race, such as class, culture,

family values, or work ethic

  • 3. Coding: Use placeholder words, symbols or images to allude to racial fears. “Eg. Inner

city, urban, terrorist,” etc.

  • 4. Scapegoating: Blame those adversely affected by racism for their own plight in order to

allocate responsibility on individuals instead of biased institutions.

  • 5. Exceptionalizing: Acknowledge “bad apples” but refuse wider institutional patterns of

discrimination.

  • 6. Confusing: Use people of color as spokespersons or authority figures to refute claims of

racism.

  • 7. Mythologizing: Downplay racism by appealing to popular cultural myths, such as:

meritocracy or “bootstraps”; level playing field, and colorblindness.

INTERRUPT THESE DYNAMICS BY: NAMING, FRAMING, EXPLAINING AND PROVING RACISM

Source: Terry Keleher, RaceForward

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Just as racism operates institutionally and systemically, so too must racial equity in

  • rder to perpetually supplant racism.

In organizations, implicit/unconscious racial biases becomes cumulative, compounded, institutionalized and

  • perationalized over time.

Implicit Racial Bias is the default setting for organizations. We must learn to anticipate, predict and prevent it.

Source: RaceForward.org

slide-7
SLIDE 7

INSTITUTIONAL SOLUTIONS:

Create organizational culture and practice of equity through:

  • Diffusing responsibility for racial equity (vs siloing)
  • Operationalizing
  • Systematizing
  • Embedding/”Baking In” into organizational culture
  • Creating new habitual norms and behaviors
slide-8
SLIDE 8

SOME TOOLS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE:

  • Equity P

Primes es, T , Trigger ers a and P Protocols

Short-Term Long-Term

Primes/Prompts à à Protocols

  • Organi

nizationa nal C l Cho hoice P Point nts

  • Equity F

y Filt lters a and nd B Budgeting ng

  • Racial E

Equity Im Impact As Asses essmen ents ( (REIA) IA)

  • Staff T

Traini ning ngs a and nd C Coachi hing ng

  • Di

Disaggregated Da Data a and nd M Metrics b by R y Race a and nd E Ethni hnicity y

  • Workp

kpla lace C Campaigni ning ng

  • Equity-F
  • Focused P

Program P m Pla lanni nning ng a and nd E Evalu luation Gu n Guides

  • Organizational Wh

Wheel eel o

  • f C

Change e

  • Workplace A

e Advocacy a and O Organizing F Frameworks a and S Strateg egies es* ( (March 7 7, , 20 2016) 6) No Note: Crea eate b e both s standardized ed a and c custom eq equity a approaches es f for y your

  • rganization.

.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

!

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11