Natural Resource Value of Edison Farms/Agripartners Through Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

natural resource value of edison farms agripartners
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Natural Resource Value of Edison Farms/Agripartners Through Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Natural Resource Value of Edison Farms/Agripartners Through Research and Science Through Research and Science Presented by: Jessica Stubbs, Natural Resources Specialist Introduction to Edi Edison Farms F Almost 4,000 acres , Within


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Natural Resource Value of Edison Farms/Agripartners Through Research and Science Through Research and Science

Presented by: Jessica Stubbs, Natural Resources Specialist

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction to Edi F

  • Almost 4,000 acres

Edison Farms

,

  • Within Estero Bay

watershed

  • East of I‐75 between

Bonita Beach Road and Corkscrew Road Corkscrew Road

  • Contiguous with CREW

to the east to the east

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction to Edi F Edison Farms

  • Over 3,500 acres of

, wetlands

  • Approximately 425 acres

f d b d

  • f undisturbed, native

uplands

  • FPL easement and some

FPL easement and some disturbed land in the southeast corner

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction to Edi F Edison Farms

  • Majority of wetlands

j y consist of cypress

  • Contains Hydric Pine

l d Flatwoods – underrepresented natural community

  • Uplands are mostly dry

prairie and pine flatwoods

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Scientific Support for Public Acquisition of Edi F Edison Farms

  • Landscape‐Level Natural Resource Value

p

  • Florida Forever Ranking
  • Lee County Master Mitigation Plan
  • Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project (CLIP)
  • Southwest Florida Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
  • Southwest Florida Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
  • Water Quality
  • Estero Bay Impaired Waters List
  • Estero Bay TMDLs and BMAPs

Estero Bay TMDLs and BMAPs

  • Southwest Florida Feasibility Study (SWFFS)
  • Lee County Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource (DR/GR) Study
  • Hydrology / Water Supply

y gy / pp y

  • Lee County DR/GR Study
  • Dover Kohl Study
  • SWFFS
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Scientific Support for Public Acquisition of Edison Farms

  • Wood Stork Protection

Edison Farms

  • South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan for Wood Storks
  • Wood Stork Recovery Plan
  • Wood Stork 5 Year Review
  • Prospects for Southeast Lee County Report
  • Prospects for Southeast Lee County Report
  • Large Mammal Protection
  • How Much is Enough? Landscape‐scale Conservation for the Florida Panther
  • Florida Panther Recovery Plan

Florida Panther Recovery Plan

  • Closing the Gaps in Florida’s Wildlife Habitat Conservation System
  • Wildlife Habitat and Corridor Protection
  • Southwest Florida EIS
  • Everglades Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge Proposal
  • Coastal Conservation Corridor Plan
  • Integrated Wildlife Habitat Ranking System
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Landscape‐Level Natural Resource Value p

Florida Forever Ranking Florida Forever Ranking

  • Board of Trustees

Board of Trustees approved priority list March 2010 ‐ “Group A” d d

  • ARC recommended

priority list June 2010 ‐ #3 in “Partnerships and p Regional Incentives Projects”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Landscape‐Level Natural Resource Value p

Lee County Master Mitigation Plan Lee County Master Mitigation Plan

  • Acquisition of Edison Farms is Project #1 listed in Appendix B
  • Identifies Biodiversity and Hydrogeology as key benefits
  • Lee County Future Land Use (FLU) Map identifies Edison Farms

as an “Environmentally Critical Area”

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Landscape‐Level Natural Resource Value p

Critical Lands and Waters Identification Project Identification Project (CLIP)

  • Strategic Habitat Conservation

g Area

  • Biodiversity Hotspots
  • Rare Species Habitat

Rare Species Habitat Conservation Priorities

  • Under‐protected Natural

Communities Communities

  • Ecological Greenways
  • Wetlands
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Landscape‐Level Natural Resource Value p

Southwest Florida Environmental Impact Environmental Impact Statement

  • 5 ensembles for future

development and preserve areas

  • All ensembles show Edison

Farms as “preserve” Farms as preserve

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Water Quality Q y

i d Estero Bay Impaired Waters List

  • Most prevalent

impairment is DO with / TN and/or TP being the causative pollutant

  • Also have Fecal
  • Also have Fecal

Coliform impairments

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Water Quality Q y

Estero Bay TMDLs and BMAPs and BMAPs

  • Future TMDLs –

dit t l d credit to load reductions?

  • Imperial River

BMAP dit? BMAP credit?

  • SWFFS identifies

DO as vital to t ti protecting downstream resources

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Water Quality Q y

/G Lee County DR/GR

  • Restoring flowways
  • Wetlands naturally

filter nutrient pollution filter nutrient pollution

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Hydrology / Water Supply Supply

/G Lee County DR/GR

  • DR/GR area = high

DR/GR area = high aquifer recharge

  • 2 well field protection

areas

  • Groundwater

connections connections

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hydrology / Water Supply y gy / pp y

SWFFS SWFFS

  • Focus on

water storage

  • Corkscrew

watershed watershed received the highest score for surface for surface water hydrology

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Wood Stork Protection

  • South Florida Multi

S i R Pl Species Recovery Plan

  • Wood Stork Recovery

Plan Plan

  • Wood Stork 5 Year

Review

  • Prospects for

Southeast Lee County Report Report

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Large Mammal Protection g

  • Kautz et al Study
  • Florida Panther

Recovery Plan

  • Edison Farms is 100%

Primary Panther habitat

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Large Mammal Habitat g

  • Closing the Gaps in

g p Florida’s Wildlife Habitat Conservation System System

  • SHCA for “umbrella

species”

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Wildlife Habitat and Corridor and Corridor Protection

  • SWF EIS
  • Everglades

Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge Proposal p

  • Coastal Conservation

Corridor Plan

  • Integrated Wildlife

Habitat Ranking System y

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Public Acquisition of Edison Farms is Vital q

  • Vast amounts of literature highlight

natural resource value

  • Many reports recommend public

acquisition of the property

  • Numerous partnerships for acquisition

exist

  • Request CLASAC to forward this

i ti hi h i it nomination as a high priority acquisition project

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Questions?

Jessica Stubbs Jennifer Hecker

jessicas@conservancy.org jenniferh@conservancy.org

(239) 403‐4231 (239) 325‐2661