Nationalism Lecture 11: Ethnic Conflict Prof. Lars-Erik Cederman - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nationalism
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nationalism Lecture 11: Ethnic Conflict Prof. Lars-Erik Cederman - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nationalism Lecture 11: Ethnic Conflict Prof. Lars-Erik Cederman Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS) Seilergraben 49, Room G.2 lcederman@ethz.ch


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nationalism

Lecture 11: Ethnic Conflict

  • Prof. Lars-Erik Cederman

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS) Seilergraben 49, Room G.2 lcederman@ethz.ch http://www.icr.ethz.ch/teaching/nationalism Assistant: Kimberly Sims, CIS, Room E 3, k-sims@northwestern.edu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Ethnic Conflict

  • Definitions
  • Competing explanations
  • Empirical cases
  • How to stop ethnic conflict?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Definitions

  • Ethnic conflict = conflict targeting members
  • f ethnic group(s) because of their ethnicity
  • Ethno-nationalist violence is a subtype of

the above:

– The struggle is over state control or boundaries and involves at least one nationalist movement – Conflict involves violent acts

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definitions II

  • Spectrum of inter-ethnic relations

– Inter-ethnic trust – Inter-ethnic mistrust (discrimination, assimilation, induced migration) – Sporadic acts of violence – Mass killing – Genocide

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Definitions III

  • Genocide = deliberate attempt to destroy an

entire ethnic group

  • Ethnocide = deliberate attempt to destroy an

ethnic identity (e.g. through genocide)

  • Ethnic cleansing = deliberate attempt to

remove from a certain territory an “undesirable” ethnic group through deportation and/or systematic killings

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Competing explanations

  • “Ancient hatred”
  • “Security dilemma”
  • Constructivist explanations

– Fixed state borders: “Scapegoat hypothesis” – Changing state and national boundaries

slide-7
SLIDE 7

“Ancient hatred”

  • Derived from essentialist theories
  • Old ethnic communities, old conflicts
  • Emerges due to state collapse
  • Culture of aggression (e.g. Balkan

“personality”)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

“Security dilemma”

  • Constructivist / rationalist perspective

based on Hobbesian principles

  • Emerging anarchy after state collapse

(Posen): collective-choice dilemma due to mistrust

  • Does not assume ancient hatred,

instead situational violence

  • Ex. Ignatieff, Posen, Fearon
slide-9
SLIDE 9

A game-theoretic illustration

Security Dilemma: Prisoner’s Dilemma don’t kill kill don’t kill kill 2,2 1,4 4,1 3,3 Ancient Hatred: Deadlock Game don’t kill kill don’t kill kill 3,3 1,4 4,1 2,2 Nash Equilibrium

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Graphic illustrations of the 3 perspectives

Ancient Hatred Construc- tivism

trust mistrust hatred war time trust mistrust hatred war time anarchy hierarchy indepen- dence A B A B

?

inter-ethnic relations inter-ethnic relations trust mistrust hatred war inter-ethnic relations time anarchy hierarchy indepen- dence A B trust mistrust hatred war time indepen- dence A B A' 2 3 1 4 nationalization campaign inter-ethnic relations

Puzzle Security Dilemma

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Toward a constructivist explanation

  • Ethno-nationalist violence modern
  • Critique of security dilemma account:

– actor reification: essentialism – actor unity: group cohesion – actor types: where’s the state?

  • Need a theory of identity formation, especially

how state policies trigger conflict

  • See Gagnon’s “scapegoat theory”
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Mann’s macro-sociological theory

  • f ethnic cleansing
  • Draws on Gellner’s modernism
  • Large-scale ethnic cleansing involves modern

states and nations for mobilization and infra- structure

  • Threatened rather than collapsed states
  • Elites and polarized populations
  • Nationalizing states in Central and Eastern

Europe, and post-colonial states

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Weiner’s “Macedonian syndrome”

  • Focus on boundaries
  • Actor types

– national minority (shared ethnic group) – nationalizing state – external national homeland (also nationalizing)

  • Irredentist tensions radicalize societies
  • Conflict spreads across borders
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Yugoslavia before ethnic cleansing

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Bosnia’s new borders (see white line)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Rwandan case

  • History: Tutsi kingdom
  • Germans arrive in 1897
  • Belgians take over after WWI and favor

the Tutsi

  • Ethnic riots in 1959
  • Independence in 1962
  • Rwanda “model LDC” but violence

under surface

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Rwanda

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Toward the genocide

  • Economic decline and social conflict in

1980s

  • In 1990, exile Tutsi troops try to invade

from Uganda

  • Peace agreement signed in August

1993

  • Preparations for genocide
slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Rwandan genocide

  • In April 1994, Hutu President

Habyarimana’s plane is shot down

  • Hutu extremists exploit the incident
  • Mass killings of Tutsi leaders start

immediately: about 800k dead, 130k survive

  • Western world passive, except France

which helps the government

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Policy solutions

  • Essentialists

– Inaction – Partition – Conflict management – Confidence building

  • Constructivists

– Democratization – Intervention – Sanctions – Minority rights – Education