national association for state community services
play

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS Eric - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS Eric Behna, Communications and Policy Manager Amy Klusmeier, WAP State Assistance Director 1 WAP Orientation Part 1- Welcome What to Expect in Arlington NASCSP &


  1. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS Eric Behna, Communications and Policy Manager Amy Klusmeier, WAP State Assistance Director 1

  2. WAP Orientation Part 1- Welcome •  What to Expect in Arlington  NASCSP & Partner Organizations Part 2- History & Background •  Terminology & Acronyms  Roles & Responsibilities Part 3- Funding and Legislation •  Statute  Regulations & Rules  WPN’s & Guidance 2 Part 4- Resources •

  3. What to Expect in Arlington • Arriving at the airport Navigating DC Metro • Conference agenda • • Monday – WAP Orientation Tuesday – WAP Manager’s Training • Wednesday – Core Conference Begins • • Thursday – WAP Core Sessions with DOE Friday – WAP Core Sessions • • What to wear & bring along Who will be at the Conference… •

  4. About NASCSP NASCSP provides research, analysis, training and technical assistance to State CSBG and WAP grantees , Community Action Agencies, and State Associations in order to increase their capacity to prevent and reduce poverty and build economic and energy security. @NASCSP https://nascsp.org/

  5. NASCSP Board of Directors  NASCSP Executive Board  Willie Fobbs, President  Beverly Buchanan, Vice-President  Melanie Sanford, Secretary  Matt Fitzgerald, Treasurer  Ditzah Wooden-Wade, CSBG Program Chair  Bruce Hagen, WAP Program Chair  Bill Brand, Past President 5

  6. WAP Regional Representatives & Alternates  Representatives  Alternates  Region 1 – Kiahnna Burney  Region 1 – Karen Brooks  Region 2 – Andrea Schroer  Region 2 – Susan Hill  Region 3 – Gwen Howe  Region 3 – Robert Garber  Region 4 – Jeffery Heino  Region 4 – Jake McAlpine  Region 5 – Amanda Rains  Region 5 – Brad Carpenter 6

  7. NASCSP Partners Community Action Partnership • • Denise Harlow NCAF (National Community Action Foundation) • • David Bradley CAPLAW (Community Action Program Legal Services) • • Eleanor Evans NEUAC (National Energy & Utility Affordability Coalition) • • Katrina Metzler NEADA (National Association of Energy Assistance Directors) • • Mark Wolfe NASEO (National Association of State Energy Officials) • • David Terry

  8. History and Background

  9. THE PURPOSE OF THE WAP • Mission Statement of the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) Department of Energy • “To reduce energy costs for low-income families, particularly for the elderly, people with disabilities, and children, by improving the energy efficiency of their homes while ensuring their health and safety.” Grantees (States, Territories & Tribes) • 40+ Year Record of Success • Operating since 1976 • Over 7.4 million homes weatherized Local Providers (Sub-grantees) • Saves low-income families an average of $250 to $450 per year Low Income Households 9

  10. Legislative History • 1976 : Title IV of the Energy Conservation and Production Act • 1978 : National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA) • 1980 : Energy Security Act (ESA) • 1982 : Job Training Partnership Act • 1984 : Human Services Reauthorization Act of 1984 • 1990 : State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act (SEEPIA) • 2000 : Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPACT) • 2005 : Energy Policy Act (EPACT) • 2007 : Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) • 2009 : American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act)

  11. Examples of Most Recent Changes (Recovery Act) 2009 – American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Increased Increased the eligibility to 200% average cost to of the poverty $6,500 per home*. rate. Changed the reweatherization date to Sept 30, 1994 .

  12. Terminology & Acronyms  DOE – Department of Energy  EERE – Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy  WAP – Weatherization Assistance Program  WPN – Weatherization Program Notice  WAP Memorandum  HHS – Health & Human Services  LIHEAP- Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program 12

  13. Terminology & Acronyms  CFR – Code of Federal Regulations  WAPTAC – Weatherization Assistance Program Technical Assistance Center  CR – Continuing Resolution  Grantee – State or territory administering the WAP  Sub-grantee – Local entity providing Weatherization services  CAA’s/CAP’s- Community Action Agencies, Community Action Programs 13

  14. WAP Landscape Congress • Authorization • Presidents budget Appropriations • Department of Energy • Work of national partners • Funds received Grant guidance • • State Plans Grantees (States, Territories & Tribes) • Distribution of funds • State plans • Public Hearings Leveraging other • funds Grant Awards • Local Providers (Sub-grantees) • Client recruitment • Staffing • Contracting Deployment • Low Income Households • Customer service Client education • • Quality Control

  15. Roles & Responsibilities  Who is involved?  DOE  Federal funding source  WAP Grantee  Steward between DOE & Sub-grantee  WAP Sub-Grantee  Service delivery following rules of the two entities above

  16. DOE Role  Funds received  Funds distributed according to formula  Grant guidance  Incorporate updates  Issue to Grantees  State Plans  Provide guidance & instructions to Grantees  Review upon receipt  Move to next phase of approval process  Distribution of funds  Based upon formula  Based upon approved State Plan

  17. DOE Role  WAP Updates  Weatherization Program Notices (WPN)  WAP Memorandums  Standard Work Specification (SWS) update process  Healthy & Safety update process  Weatherization Certifications  Quality Assurance  Grantee Monitoring  Sub-grantee visits

  18. State Level – Grantees  Adherence to Federal Guidelines  Quality Assurance  Monitoring & Accountability  Sub-grantee Evaluation 19

  19. State Level - Grantees  State plans  Guidance posted by DOE  Establish timeline  Engage PAC  Engage Sub-grantees  Policy manual up to date?  Budget concerns?  Sub-grantee concerns?  RFP processes for coming year?  ACSI results & DOE expectations  Sub-grantee monitoring

  20. State Level - Grantees  Public Hearings  Proper notice  How publicize?  Official transcript  Issues raised during plan preparation?  Leveraging or blending other funds  Include in budget or not?  What type of funds?  How are they used

  21. State Level - Grantees  Distribution of Funds  Approval of State Plan [by DOE]  Receipt of funds  Run through formula or funding process  Prepare contracts

  22. State Level – Grantees  Training & Technical Assistance  Develop training plan  Part of State Plan preparation & submission  Review monitoring results  Consult DOE requirements  Examine WAP Network needs  Who provides the training?  Use of DOE T&TA funds  Feedback from technical committees, training center, Sub-grantees

  23. Funding and Legislation

  24. Authorization vs. Appropriations

  25. Authorization • Underlying statute creating the program • Lays out Congressional intent • Authorizes Congress to appropriate funds to the program for X amount of years • Authorizations expire -> Need reauthorization • Reauthorization • What can be changed/improved? • What should stay the same? • What is better addressed by DOE rather than legislation? • How can the program grow and innovate? • Often must be part of larger bill

  26. Appropriations • Yearly, regular process of funding government agencies and programs • 12 Appropriations bills that fund different areas of the government • Energy and Water Appropriations Bill • Funds WAP , rest of DOE, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, etc. • Labor- HHS Appropriations Bill • Funds LIHEAP , CSBG, Headstart, rest of HHS, Dept. of Education, Dept of Labor

  27. Appropriations Process…in Theory Fully Funded 12 President’s Government by Congressional Budget start of fiscal Appropriations year (Feb.) Bills (Oct. 1) *Hasn’t happened on time for all 12 since 1996

  28. Appropriations • President’s budget • Mostly a policy statement, non-binding because Congress makes final funding decisions • House and Senate Appropriations Committees pass their respective appropriations bills one by one • Then a conference committee reconciles differences • What usually happens… • Congress doesn’t get its work done in time, passes a “Continuing Resolution” to keep funding flat at past year levels • Omnibus- One large package of the 12 bills passed at once • Minibus- Smaller packages of maybe 3 or 4 bills passed at a time If nothing is passed  Government Shutdown •

  29. 2019 Funding Other $ LIHEAP $ WAP- $257 million ($6 million increase from • FY 2018 level of $251 million) $253.5 Million formula, $3 million TTA • DOE for DOE HQ, $500,000 vermiculite $ Additional $9 million in prior year funds • recovered from OMB LIHEAP- $3.69 Billion (Slight increase over • FY 2018 level of $3.64 billion) Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend