Nason LWP First Bend Nason LWP First Bend Nason LWP First Bend - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nason lwp first bend
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nason LWP First Bend Nason LWP First Bend Nason LWP First Bend - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nason LWP First Bend Nason LWP First Bend Nason LWP First Bend Reach geomorphology Straightening and confinement Legacy incision Sediment transport conditions Riparian vegetation Accelerated meander scrolling Nason


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nason LWP First Bend

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Nason LWP First Bend

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Nason LWP First Bend

Reach geomorphology

– Straightening and confinement – Legacy incision – Sediment transport conditions – Riparian vegetation – Accelerated meander scrolling

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Nason LWP First Bend

Site conditions

– Accelerated bank erosion – No woody streambank or riparian vegetation – Low floodplain roughness (in oxbow and on field) – Log jam at downstream end of bend – Poor margin habitat along bank

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nason LWP First Bend

Site conditions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Nason LWP First Bend

Planform geometry analysis

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nason LWP First Bend

Other indicators of imminent avulsion

– Headcut along railway embankment

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Nason LWP First Bend

Other indicators of imminent avulsion

– Large bar deposits

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Nason LWP First Bend

Hydraulic modeling

Depth 50-year event

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Nason LWP First Bend

Existing avulsion risk

  • Created by human disturbance

– Denuded streambank vegetation (root strength) – Denuded floodplain roughness (across oxbow) – Legacy incision – Sediment imbalance

  • Consequences of avulsion

– Additional straightening of reach – Loss of pool-riffle habitat – Probable stranding of existing log jam

slide-11
SLIDE 11

No Action Alternative

slide-12
SLIDE 12

No Action Alternative

Benefits

  • Low cost and effort
  • Wait and see approach

Risks/Constraints

  • Does not decrease avulsion risk
  • Avulsion likely to decrease habitat quantity and

quality

  • Potential abandonment of pool-riffle habitat, and

existing log jam, due to avulsion

  • Uncertain human actions may result from flood

damage

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Alternative 1

LW and riparian enhancement of existing alignment

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Alternative 1

LW and riparian enhancement of existing alignment

Benefits

  • Reduce the human-caused accelerated erosion rate
  • Limit the likely future increase in avulsion risk
  • Restore long-term riparian health and LW recruitment
  • Provide salmonid cover and complexity until riparian recovery

Risks/Constraints

  • Does not decrease avulsion risk
  • Avulsion likely to decrease habitat quantity and quality
  • Potential abandonment of project, and log jam, due to avulsion
  • Nearby private property and infrastructure
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Alternative 2

Re-alignment and creation of off-channel habitat

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Alternative 2

Re-alignment and creation of off-channel habitat

Benefits

  • Reduce the human-caused accelerated

erosion rate

  • Significantly reduce avulsion risk
  • Restore long-term riparian health and LW

recruitment

  • Create connected off-channel habitats
  • Provide salmonid cover and complexity until

riparian recovery Risks/Constraints

  • Nearby private property and infrastructure
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Alternative 3

Enhance existing off-channel habitat

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Alternative 3

Enhance existing off-channel habitat

Benefits

  • Establish year-round connected off-channel

habitat

  • Add LW cover and complexity to existing off-

channel areas

  • Compatible with other alternatives

Risks/Constraints

  • Areas are connected now except at very low

flows

  • Potential to lower water levels and decrease

rearing capacity

  • Private property and infrastructure
  • Both channels could potentially be

abandoned if an avulsion