Narrow band excitation simulations Hector Garcia Morales Royal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

narrow band excitation simulations
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Narrow band excitation simulations Hector Garcia Morales Royal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Narrow band excitation simulations Hector Garcia Morales Royal Holloway University of London Joschka Wagner, Roderik Bruce, Stefano Redaelli Motivation Motivation Experimental results (presented by Joschka) look promising but not fully


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Narrow band excitation simulations

Hector Garcia Morales Royal Holloway University of London Joschka Wagner, Roderik Bruce, Stefano Redaelli

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation Motivation

  • Experimental results (presented by Joschka) look

promising but not fully conclusive (yet).

  • To fully understand the results we need to

understand the physics involved.

  • Tracking codes (MADX, SixTrack) would give a more

precise description but the physics of the narrow band excitation might be difficult to extract clearly.

  • A simple model with the minimum physics could give

a better understanding of the principle.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Toy Model Toy Model

Map with octupole

Map with ADT kick

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Matching octupole strength Matching octupole strength

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Simulation set up and limitations Simulation set up and limitations

  • Set up

– Allows to run an unlimited number of turns and particles.

(<1ms/turn/part)

– Allows fixed and scan – Allows frequency scan in steps or continuously – ADT amplitude ramp up and down

  • Limitations

– No chromaticity – No other nonlinear effects – No repopulation – ...

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Simulation results (fixed frequency) Simulation results (fixed frequency)

  • Q(ADT) = 0.295 (as in promising result)
  • Npart = 1e5
  • Turns = 5e5 (45 sec in real time)
  • 1sigma (nominal) and 2sigma (blown up)

bunches

slide-7
SLIDE 7

0 turns 5e4 t 1e5 t 1.5e5 t 2e5 t 2.5e5 t 3e5 t 3.5e5 t 5e5 t

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Final amplitude Final amplitude vs vs Initial amplitude Initial amplitude

1sigma 2sigma

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Final amplitude Final amplitude vs vs Initial amplitude Initial amplitude

1sigma 2sigma

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Initial distribution
  • Particles which end

beyond 5sigma

Particles lost Particles lost

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Losses and emittance Losses and emittance

Emittance stays constant everywhere Not too many losses...

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Simulation results (frequency scan) Simulation results (frequency scan)

  • Q(ADT) = 0.290-0.295
  • Npart = 1e5
  • Turns = 5e3 (0.5 sec in real time)
  • 1sigma (nominal) and 2sigma (blown up)

bunches

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tail depletion Still some tail population Core affected

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Initial vs final distribution Initial vs final distribution

  • Initial distribution
  • Particles which end

beyond 5sigma

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Losses and emittance Losses and emittance

Although the core is clearly affected, the core emittance stays constant

1.8% particles lost (Not far from measurement results)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conclusions

  • The model shows some of the features expected

from the narrow band excitation principle.

  • Results for fixed frequency still not conclusive.

Need to explore a bit more

  • Results for frequency scan look promising but

need to find a way to keep core unaffected.

  • Complete simulation with toy model before using

realistic tracking codes.