Nab: precise experimental study of unpolarized neutron beta decay - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nab precise experimental study of unpolarized neutron
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nab: precise experimental study of unpolarized neutron beta decay - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nab: precise experimental study of unpolarized neutron beta decay Dinko Po cani c, (for the Nab collaboration) University of Virginia 2015 Fall Meeting of the APS Division of Nuclear Physics Santa Fe, NM 28 31 October 2015 Neutron


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nab: precise experimental study of unpolarized neutron beta decay

Dinko Poˇ cani´ c, (for the Nab collaboration)

University of Virginia

2015 Fall Meeting of the APS Division of Nuclear Physics Santa Fe, NM 28 – 31 October 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Neutron beta decay observables (SM)

dw dEedΩedΩν ≃ peEe(E0 − Ee)2 ×

  • 1 + a

pe · pν EeEν + b m Ee + σn ·

  • A

pe Ee + B pν Eν

  • + . . .
  • where in SM:

a = 1 − |λ|2 1 + 3|λ|2 A = −2|λ|2 + Re(λ) 1 + 3|λ|2 B = 2|λ|2 − Re(λ) 1 + 3|λ|2 λ = GA GV (with τn ⇒ CKM Vud) also proton asymmetry: C = κ(A + B) where κ ≃ 0.275 .

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Basic definitions 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 2 / 14

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Neutron beta decay observables (SM)

dw dEedΩedΩν ≃ peEe(E0 − Ee)2 ×

  • 1 + a

pe · pν EeEν + b m Ee + σn ·

  • A

pe Ee + B pν Eν

  • + . . .
  • where in SM:

a = 1 − |λ|2 1 + 3|λ|2 A = −2|λ|2 + Re(λ) 1 + 3|λ|2 B = 2|λ|2 − Re(λ) 1 + 3|λ|2 λ = GA GV (with τn ⇒ CKM Vud) also proton asymmetry: C = κ(A + B) where κ ≃ 0.275 . ⇒ SM overconstrains a, A, B observables in n β decay! Fierz interf. term b brings add’l. sensitivity to non-SM processes!

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Basic definitions 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 2 / 14

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Goals of the Nab experiment (at SNS, ORNL)

◮ Measure the e–ν correlation a in neutron decay with precision

∆a/a ≃ 10−3

  • r ∼ 50× better than:

current results:

−0.1054 ± 0.0055 Byrne et al ’02 −0.1017 ± 0.0051 Stratowa et al ’78 −0.091 ± 0.039 Grigorev et al ’68

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Goals and motivation 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 3 / 14

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Goals of the Nab experiment (at SNS, ORNL)

◮ Measure the e–ν correlation a in neutron decay with precision

∆a/a ≃ 10−3

  • r ∼ 50× better than:

current results:

−0.1054 ± 0.0055 Byrne et al ’02 −0.1017 ± 0.0051 Stratowa et al ’78 −0.091 ± 0.039 Grigorev et al ’68

◮ Measure b (Fierz interf. term) in n decay with

∆b ≃ 3 × 10−3 current results: none (not yet reported for n decay)

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Goals and motivation 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 3 / 14

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Goals of the Nab experiment (at SNS, ORNL)

◮ Measure the e–ν correlation a in neutron decay with precision

∆a/a ≃ 10−3

  • r ∼ 50× better than:

current results:

−0.1054 ± 0.0055 Byrne et al ’02 −0.1017 ± 0.0051 Stratowa et al ’78 −0.091 ± 0.039 Grigorev et al ’68

◮ Measure b (Fierz interf. term) in n decay with

∆b ≃ 3 × 10−3 current results: none (not yet reported for n decay)

◮ Nab will be followed by the ABba/PANDA polarized program to

measure A, electron, and B/C, neutrino/proton, asymmetries with ≃ 10−3 relative precision.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Goals and motivation 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 3 / 14

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Goals of the Nab experiment (at SNS, ORNL)

◮ Measure the e–ν correlation a in neutron decay with precision

∆a/a ≃ 10−3

  • r ∼ 50× better than:

current results:

−0.1054 ± 0.0055 Byrne et al ’02 −0.1017 ± 0.0051 Stratowa et al ’78 −0.091 ± 0.039 Grigorev et al ’68

◮ Measure b (Fierz interf. term) in n decay with

∆b ≃ 3 × 10−3 current results: none (not yet reported for n decay)

◮ Nab will be followed by the ABba/PANDA polarized program to

measure A, electron, and B/C, neutrino/proton, asymmetries with ≃ 10−3 relative precision. Motivation:

  • multiple independent determinations of λ (test of CKM unitarity),
  • independent and competitive limits on S, T currents (BSM).
  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Goals and motivation 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 3 / 14

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Electron–neutrino angle from Ee and Ep

− ν

ν

e θ e n p

Conservation of momentum in n beta decay,

  • pp +

pe + pν = 0 , yields p2

p = p2 e + 2pepν cos θeν + p2 ν .

Neglecting proton recoil energy, Ee + Eν = E0, so that pν = E0 − Ee. Therefore: cos θeν is uniquely determined by mea- suring Ee and Ep (or pp ⇒ TOFp).

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 4 / 14

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Nab measurement principles: proton phase space

e (MeV) p 2 (MeV2/c2)

E p cos θeν = -1 cos θeν = 1 cos θeν = 0 proton phase space Yield (arb. units) Ee = 100 keV 300 keV 500 keV 700 keV

0.5 1 1.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

NB: For a given Ee, cos θeν is a function of p2

p only.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 5 / 14

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Nab measurement principles: proton phase space

e (MeV) p 2 (MeV2/c2)

E p cos θeν = -1 cos θeν = 1 cos θeν = 0 proton phase space Yield (arb. units) Ee = 100 keV 300 keV 500 keV 700 keV

0.5 1 1.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

NB: For a given Ee, cos θeν is a function of p2

p only.

Slope ∝ a

❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❑ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❑ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❑ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❆ ❑

Numerous consistency checks are built-in!

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 5 / 14

slide-11
SLIDE 11

◮ Collect and detect

both electrons and protons from neutron beta decay.

◮ Measure Ee and TOFp

and reconstruct decay kinematics

◮ Segmented Si det’s:

PPPP P q

LANL/Micron development

P ✐ ✛ P P ✐ ❆ ❑ ❈ ❈ ❖ ❈ ❈ ❖ ❈ ❈ ❖ ❈ ❈ ❖ ❈ ❈ ❖ ✻

Nab principles of measurement

✟✟✟✟✟✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✡ ✣

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 6 / 14

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Spectrometer Coil design and B field profile

upper detector lower detector

NBL NBU F TOF

TOF’

NBU’ NBL’ UDET’ UDET LDET LDET’

neutron beam z [m] r [m]

0.2 0.4 5

  • 1

3.5 m flight path omitted Magnetic field B [T] 1 2 3 4

  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 fiducial volume lower detector upper detector

z [m] z [cm] Magnetic field B [T]

1 2 3 4 fiducial volume B (on axis)

z

B (off axis)

z

Filter

  • 30-20 -10 0

10 20 30

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 7 / 14

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nab Si detectors (LANL-Micron development)

◮ 15 cm diameter ◮ full thickness: 2 mm ◮ dead layer ≤100 nm ◮ 127 pixels

Front Back

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 8 / 14

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Nab Si detectors (LANL-Micron development)

◮ 15 cm diameter ◮ full thickness: 2 mm ◮ dead layer ≤100 nm ◮ 127 pixels

Front Back

How well do they work?

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 8 / 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Nab Si detectors (LANL-Micron development)

◮ 15 cm diameter ◮ full thickness: 2 mm ◮ dead layer ≤100 nm ◮ 127 pixels

Front Back

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Channels 5000 10000 15000

Proton normalized yield Noise 20 25 30 1mm thick Si det.

  • A. Salas-Bacci et al., NIM A 735 (2014) 408

35 kV 15

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 8 / 14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Analysis strategy (methods “A” and “B”)

2

1/t ’ [1/μs ]

p 2

Yield

0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008

E = 150 keV

e

E = 300 keV

e

E = 450 keV

e

E = 600 keV

e

E = 750 keV

e

◮ Use edges to determine and

verify shape of detection function Φ(pp, 1/tp);

◮ Use central part of Pt(1/t2 p)

(∼ 70%) to extract a.

  • A. parametrize edges and width of Φ(pp, 1/tp) by fitting; use central part
  • f Φ (∼ 70%) to extract a in a multiparameter fit, and
  • B. specify accessible parameters of Φ by direct measurement; ⇒ treat a,

µ = 1/t2

p(pp), and Ndecays as free parameters in a two-step fit, ◮ as well as a HYBRID OF THE TWO METHODS.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 9 / 14

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Analysis strategy (methods “A” and “B”)

2

1/t ’ [1/μs ]

p 2

Yield

0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008

E = 150 keV

e

E = 300 keV

e

E = 450 keV

e

E = 600 keV

e

E = 750 keV

e

◮ Use edges to determine and

verify shape of detection function Φ(pp, 1/tp);

◮ Use central part of Pt(1/t2 p)

(∼ 70%) to extract a.

  • A. parametrize edges and width of Φ(pp, 1/tp) by fitting; use central part
  • f Φ (∼ 70%) to extract a in a multiparameter fit, and
  • B. specify accessible parameters of Φ by direct measurement; ⇒ treat a,

µ = 1/t2

p(pp), and Ndecays as free parameters in a two-step fit, ◮ as well as a HYBRID OF THE TWO METHODS.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 9 / 14

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Analysis strategy (methods “A” and “B”)

2

1/t ’ [1/μs ]

p 2

Yield

0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008

E = 150 keV

e

E = 300 keV

e

E = 450 keV

e

E = 600 keV

e

E = 750 keV

e

◮ Use edges to determine and

verify shape of detection function Φ(pp, 1/tp);

◮ Use central part of Pt(1/t2 p)

(∼ 70%) to extract a.

  • A. parametrize edges and width of Φ(pp, 1/tp) by fitting; use central part
  • f Φ (∼ 70%) to extract a in a multiparameter fit, and
  • B. specify accessible parameters of Φ by direct measurement; ⇒ treat a,

µ = 1/t2

p(pp), and Ndecays as free parameters in a two-step fit, ◮ as well as a HYBRID OF THE TWO METHODS.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Principles of measurement 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 9 / 14

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Projected statistical uncertainties for a and b

Statistical uncertainties for a

Ee,min 100 keV 100 keV 100 keV 300 keV tp,max – – 40 µs 30 µs 40 µs σa 2.4/√Nu 2.4/√Nu 2.6/√Nu 2.8/√Nu 3.1/√Nu σa† 2.6/√Nu 2.6/√Nu 2.8/√Nu 3.1/√Nu 3.5/√Nu σa§ 3.3/√Nu 3.4/√Nu 3.6/√Nu 4.0/√Nu 4.6/√Nu

† with Ecalib and LTOF variable; § using inner 75% of p2

p data.

[ Nu . . . number of protons detected in upper detector. ]

Statistical uncertainties for b

Ee,min 100 keV 200 keV 300 keV σb 7.5/ √ N 10.1/ √ N 15.6/ √ N 26.3/ √ N σb†† 7.7/ √ N 10.3/ √ N 16.3/ √ N 27.7/ √ N

†† with Ecalib variable.

[ N . . . number of n-decay electrons detected in either detector. ]

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Uncertainties 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 10 / 14

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Projected statistical uncertainties for a and b

Statistical uncertainties for a

Ee,min 100 keV 100 keV 100 keV 300 keV tp,max – – 40 µs 30 µs 40 µs σa 2.4/√Nu 2.4/√Nu 2.6/√Nu 2.8/√Nu 3.1/√Nu σa† 2.6/√Nu 2.6/√Nu 2.8/√Nu 3.1/√Nu 3.5/√Nu σa§ 3.3/√Nu 3.4/√Nu 3.6/√Nu 4.0/√Nu 4.6/√Nu

† with Ecalib and LTOF variable; § using inner 75% of p2

p data.

[ Nu . . . number of protons detected in upper detector. ]

Statistical uncertainties for b

Ee,min 100 keV 200 keV 300 keV σb 7.5/ √ N 10.1/ √ N 15.6/ √ N 26.3/ √ N σb†† 7.7/ √ N 10.3/ √ N 16.3/ √ N 27.7/ √ N

†† with Ecalib variable.

[ N . . . number of n-decay electrons detected in either detector. ]

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Uncertainties 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 10 / 14

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Nab systematic uncertainties: Method B

Experimental parameter (∆a/a)SYST Magnetic field: curvature at pinch 5 × 10−4 ratio rB = BTOF/B0 2.5 × 10−4 ratio rB,DV = BDV/B0 3 × 10−4 LTOF, length of TOF region (*) U inhomogeneity: in decay / filter region 5 × 10−4 in TOF region 1 × 10−4 Neutron beam: position 4 × 10−5 width 2.5 × 10−4 Doppler effect small unwanted beam polarization small Adiabaticity of proton motion 1 × 10−4 Detector effects: Ee calibration (*) Ee resolution 5 × 10−4 Proton trigger efficiency 2.5 × 10−4 Accidental coinc’s (will subtract out of time coinc) small Residual gas

  • ngoing parametric studies

small Background

  • ngoing parametric studies

small Overall sum 1 × 10−3 (*) Free fit parameter

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Uncertainties 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 11 / 14

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Nab systematic uncertainties: Method B

Experimental parameter (∆a/a)SYST Magnetic field: curvature at pinch 5 × 10−4 ratio rB = BTOF/B0 2.5 × 10−4 ratio rB,DV = BDV/B0 3 × 10−4 LTOF, length of TOF region (*) U inhomogeneity: in decay / filter region 5 × 10−4 in TOF region 1 × 10−4 Neutron beam: position 4 × 10−5 width 2.5 × 10−4 Doppler effect small unwanted beam polarization small Adiabaticity of proton motion 1 × 10−4 Detector effects: Ee calibration (*) Ee resolution 5 × 10−4 Proton trigger efficiency 2.5 × 10−4 Accidental coinc’s (will subtract out of time coinc) small Residual gas

  • ngoing parametric studies

small Background

  • ngoing parametric studies

small Overall sum 1 × 10−3 (*) Free fit parameter

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Uncertainties 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 11 / 14

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Nab systematic uncertainties: Method B

Experimental parameter (∆a/a)SYST Magnetic field: curvature at pinch 5 × 10−4 ratio rB = BTOF/B0 2.5 × 10−4 ratio rB,DV = BDV/B0 3 × 10−4 LTOF, length of TOF region (*) U inhomogeneity: in decay / filter region 5 × 10−4 in TOF region 1 × 10−4 Neutron beam: position 4 × 10−5 width 2.5 × 10−4 Doppler effect small unwanted beam polarization small Adiabaticity of proton motion 1 × 10−4 Detector effects: Ee calibration (*) Ee resolution 5 × 10−4 Proton trigger efficiency 2.5 × 10−4 Accidental coinc’s (will subtract out of time coinc) small Residual gas

  • ngoing parametric studies

small Background

  • ngoing parametric studies

small Overall sum 1 × 10−3 (*) Free fit parameter

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Uncertainties 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 11 / 14

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Nab apparatus in FnPB/SNS

extends:

  • ∼6 m above beam height,
  • ∼2 m below beam height (pit).

Fully funded (NSF-MRI, plus DOE constr. + operating funds); Project so far on track to be ready for beam in 2016.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Apparatus; drawings 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 12 / 14

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Status: some drawings of the Nab apparatus

Parts List DESCRIPTION QTY ITEM Axial tie rod fixing 4 1 16.5 inch US CF flange 2 2 Axial tie rod fixing 2 3 Sumitomo SRDK -415D 1.5W cryocooler 4 4 Radial tie rod fixing 4 5 Instrumentation flange 2 6 CF 160 flange 4 7 Magnet terminals 10 8 NW50KF evacuation valves 2 9 Rotation plate 2 10 Lifting eye 2 11 6 57 Plain washers - Normal series - Product grade A 120 59 Hexagon Socket Head Cap Screw 120 60 2 61 Plain washers - Normal series - Product grade A 72 63 Hexagon head bolt - product grades A and B 72 64 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 A A B B C C D D

CRYOGENIC LTD

QUANTITY CUSTOM FINISH MATERIAL SPECIFICATION DRAWN BY: REVIEWED BY: JOB NUMBER TOLERANCE (UNLESS STATED)

`0.1

DIMENSION STD.PART No. THIS DRAWING BELONGS TO CRYOGENIC LTD AND IS ISSUED ON THE CONDITION THAT IT IS NOT COPIED, REPRINTED OR DISCLOSED EITHER IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF: CRYOGENIC LTD, ACTON PARK IND. ESTATE. THE VALE, LONDON W3 7QE

MM

THIS DRAFT:

THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION DWG No. OF SHEET

FIRST DRAFT:

External View GA03 3658 1 1 1 24/06/2013 06/03/2014

11:51:06

3658 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 10 8 11 11 A A 16.50 7.93 11.50 9.75 29.26 7.63 18.13 24.75 3.95 16.50 7.93 5.38 11.50 5.63 SECTION A-A SCALE 1 : 4 D C B A A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

WEIGHT: Detector Assembly_nab VARIED RAMSEY 8/6/2014 COMMENTS: SHEET 1 OF 3 Q.A. MFG APPR. ENG APPR. CHECKED DRAWN DATE NAME DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES UNLESS SPECIFIED: FRACTIONAL ANGULAR: MACH BEND TWO PLACE DECIMAL 0.01 THREE PLACE DECIMAL 0.003 FINISH MATERIAL REV. B
  • DWG. NO.
SIZE SCALE:1:8

P-25

SUBATOMIC PHYSICS LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY LOS ALAMOS, NM, 87545 126Y-1766781 B1 QUANTITY REQUIRED 1 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR PRODUCTION
  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Apparatus; drawings 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 13 / 14

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Summary

◮ Nab is part of a broad experimental effort, to exploit the unparalleled

theoretical precision in electroweak processes in general. The program

  • f precision studies is timely, complementary, and valuable for proper

interpretation of collider data.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Summary 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 14 / 14

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summary

◮ Nab is part of a broad experimental effort, to exploit the unparalleled

theoretical precision in electroweak processes in general. The program

  • f precision studies is timely, complementary, and valuable for proper

interpretation of collider data.

◮ Nab is expected to resolve the longstanding consistency problem with

λ = GA/GV , and provide new constraints on non-SM processes; ABba will add independent constraints.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Summary 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 14 / 14

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Summary

◮ Nab is part of a broad experimental effort, to exploit the unparalleled

theoretical precision in electroweak processes in general. The program

  • f precision studies is timely, complementary, and valuable for proper

interpretation of collider data.

◮ Nab is expected to resolve the longstanding consistency problem with

λ = GA/GV , and provide new constraints on non-SM processes; ABba will add independent constraints.

◮ Nab is fully funded and all parts of the project are proceeding apace;

it is expected on the floor at SNS in 2016.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Summary 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 14 / 14

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Summary

◮ Nab is part of a broad experimental effort, to exploit the unparalleled

theoretical precision in electroweak processes in general. The program

  • f precision studies is timely, complementary, and valuable for proper

interpretation of collider data.

◮ Nab is expected to resolve the longstanding consistency problem with

λ = GA/GV , and provide new constraints on non-SM processes; ABba will add independent constraints.

◮ Nab is fully funded and all parts of the project are proceeding apace;

it is expected on the floor at SNS in 2016.

◮ Significant synergies and joint interest exist between the LANL UCNx

and Nab/ABba programs.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Summary 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 14 / 14

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Summary

◮ Nab is part of a broad experimental effort, to exploit the unparalleled

theoretical precision in electroweak processes in general. The program

  • f precision studies is timely, complementary, and valuable for proper

interpretation of collider data.

◮ Nab is expected to resolve the longstanding consistency problem with

λ = GA/GV , and provide new constraints on non-SM processes; ABba will add independent constraints.

◮ Nab is fully funded and all parts of the project are proceeding apace;

it is expected on the floor at SNS in 2016.

◮ Significant synergies and joint interest exist between the LANL UCNx

and Nab/ABba programs. Home page: http://nab.phys.virginia.edu

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Summary 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 14 / 14

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Active and recent Nab collaborators (as of Oct 2015)

  • R. Alarcona, S. Baeßlerb,c∗, S. Balascutaa§, L. Barr´
  • n Palosd, N. Birgee§,
  • D. Borissenkob§, J.D. Bowmanc†, L. Broussardm,c, J. Byrnef , J.R. Calarcog,
  • T. Chupph, V. Ciancioloc, C. Crawfordi, J. DuBoisb§, W. Fanb§, W. Farrarb§,
  • N. Fomine, E. Frleˇ

zb, J. Fryb, M.T. Gerickej, F. Gl¨ uckk, G.L. Greenec,e, R.K. Grzywacze, V. Gudkovℓ, C. Hendrush§, F.W. Hersmang, T. Itom, H. Lib§, M.F. Makelam, J. Martinn, M. Martineza§, P.L. McGaugheym, C.D. McLaughlinb§,

  • P. Muellerc, S.A. Pagej, D. van Petten§, S.I. Penttil¨

ac‡, D. Poˇ cani´ cb†, N. Roaneb§, K.P. Rykaczewskic, A. Salas-Baccib, E.M. Scotte§, A. Smithb§, A. Sprowi§,

  • E. Stevensb§, J. Wexlero§, R. Whiteheade§, W.S. Wilburnm, A.R. Youngo.

aArizona State U.

  • bU. of Virginia

cORNL dUNAM, Mexico

  • eU. of Tennessee

f U. of Sussex

  • gU. New Hampshire
  • hU. of Michigan
  • iU. of Kentucky
  • jU. of Manitoba
  • kUni. Karlsruhe

ℓU. of South Carolina mLANL

  • nU. of Winnipeg
  • N. Carolina State U.

∗Project Manager †Co-spokesmen ‡On-site Manager §Nab students, or recent Nab students

Home page: http://nab.phys.virginia.edu/

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Collaboration 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 15 / 14

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Current status of Vud and λ, from n decay

. . . remains an unresolved mess:

λ = gA/gV Vud PIBETA [Pocanic04] ft(0+→0+) [Hardy09] CKM unitarity [PDG 2012] τn [PDG 2012] PKO1 DD-ME2 ft(0+→0+) [Liang09] λ [PDG 2012] λ [UCNA 2010] λ [PERKEO II 2012]

0.96 0.965 0.97 0.975 0.98

  • 1.29
  • 1.28
  • 1.27
  • 1.26

✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✂ ✍

τ −1

n

∝ |Vud|2|gV |2(1 + 3|λ|2)

  • 1.28
  • 1.26
  • 1.24

Stratowa (1997) PERKEO I (1986) Liaud (1997) PERKEO II (1997) ( ) ( ) PERKEO II (2002) PERKEO II (2013) UCNA (2010) ( ) UCNA (2013) Mostovoi (2001) Yerozolimskii (1997) Byrne (2002)

Average:

  • 1.2724(21)

Δ λ/ = 0.03% (Nab goal) λ

Very low CL! ∆λ λ ≃ 0.27∆a a ≃ 0.24∆A A λ sensitivity to a, A is similar.

◮ Nab+abBA ⇒ several independent ∼ 0.03% determinations of λ, ◮ Combined with b ⇒ new limits on non-SM terms, esp. Tensor.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Collaboration 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 16 / 14

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Limits on T, S couplings from beta decay

0.0010 0.0005 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02

T S

b 103 bΝ b 103 b0 2.2 4.3 103

0.0010 0.0005 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02

T S

b 103 bΝ 103 b0 2.2 4.3 103

Measurement of b with δb < 10−3 ⇒ > 4-fold improvement on the current limit for ǫT from π+ → e+νγ decay.

From T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, S.D. Cohen, A. Filipuzzi, M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso, M.L. Graesser, R. Gupta, H-W. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 054512.

  • D. Poˇ

cani´ c (UVa) The Nab experiment: Backup slides 30 Oct ’15/DNP2015 17 / 14