na lina li
play

Na (Lina) Li Electrical Engineering & Applied Mathematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Electricity Market for Distribution Networks Na (Lina) Li Electrical Engineering & Applied Mathematics Harvard University University of Maryland, College Park Oct. 17 th , 2016 Electricity Grid 1.0 Power plant Transmission Distribution


  1. Electricity Market for Distribution Networks Na (Lina) Li Electrical Engineering & Applied Mathematics Harvard University University of Maryland, College Park Oct. 17 th , 2016

  2. Electricity Grid 1.0 Power plant Transmission Distribution Users Supply = Demand Unresponsive Predictable Energy Time 12 AM 12 AM

  3. Electricity Grid 1.0 Power plant Transmission Distribution Users Supply = Demand Controllable Unresponsive Predictable

  4. Transmission market Power plant Transmission Distribution Users Supply = Demand A Monthly Trans. Market Controllable Unresponsive Bill Predictable Forward Energy Market e.g., Day ‐ ahead market (one day forward); Real ‐ time Energy Market e.g., Every five minutes in PJM; Ancillary service market e.g., Spinning reserve market; (short ‐ term, unexpected changes)

  5. Transmission market Power plant Transmission Distribution Users Supply = Demand Market Controllable Unresponsive Predictable Forward Energy Market e.g., Day ‐ ahead market (one day forward); Real ‐ time Energy Market e.g., Every five minutes in PJM; Ancillary service market e.g., Spinning reserve market; (short ‐ term, unexpected changes)

  6. www.dsireusa.org/ March2015 Renew able energy

  7. Random and intermittent Real power output (MW) 4 3 2 1 0 0 2000 4000 6000 Seconds since start of day Source: Rosa Yang, EPRI

  8. • Small CHP (Combined Heat & Power) More distributed • Large CHP (Combined Heat & Power) • Wind Denmark’s progress over the past decades

  9. Tomorrow’s Grid 2.0 Power plant Transmission Distribution Users Supply = Demand Less controllable Responsive Unresponsive Highly uncertain Distributed Large scale

  10. Tomorrow’s Grid 2.0 Power plant Transmission Distribution Users DR appliances Storage EV Supply = Demand Less controllable Responsive Highly uncertain Distributed Large scale Distributed Smart appliances Solar PVs Energy Storage Wind turbines Resources Electric vehicles

  11. Transforming Electricity Grid: DER

  12. Debate over solar rates simmers in the Nevada desert February 27, 2016 Sources: PBS

  13. Electricity Market for Distribution Netw orks: Challenges Power Engineering: Power flow, system dynamics, operation constraints Human Incentive: Strategic behavior, self-interested, market power Uncertainties: Renewable energy, user’s behavior, emergency

  14. Electricity Market for Distribution Netw orks: Challenges Power Engineering: Power flow, system dynamics, operation constraints Human Incentive: Strategic behavior, self-interested, market power Uncertainties: Renewable energy, user’s behavior, emergency

  15. Transmit and Distribute Pow er Kirchhoff’s law

  16. Transmit and Distribute Pow er: Kirchhoff’s Law Capacity constraint on any line or node limit the entire flow

  17. Challenges: An Example 2 2 2 25 1 3 1 3 1 3 50 100 100 150 150 150 Transaction 2  3 alleviates Line 1 ‐ 2 capacity: 25 congestions on line 1 ‐ 2 1, 2: generation nodes/buses; 3: load bus (two users)

  18. How much to pay for public distribution service? Social Welfare Benefit Cost Physical Constraints

  19. How much to pay for public distribution service? Social Welfare Individual ( d, g ) price How to set the price?

  20. How to choose the prices? Social Welfare Given an convex problem, duality of the optimization provide efficient prices, p *

  21. Challenges: Nonconvexity Nonconvex Optimal Power Flow         2 min + | |   C P U p r I 0 , ,  j i i i j i j c g   s s (0, ) , j i i j j j       : : over : ( , , , , ) s p iq S P iQ x S v p q j j j j j j 2   2  : | |  ,  2 : | | s. t. I S v Nonconvex v V , ij i j ij ij i i i   2    * 2 Re  , Branch flow model v v z S z j i ij ij ij ij         , S z S s ij ij ij jk j   i j j k Convexification gives   , v v v i i i exact solutions   , q q q i i [Lavaei 2011, Li 2012, Gan i   , p p p 2012, 2013] i i i Baran & Wu 1989, Chiang & Baran 1990

  22. Efficient Prices: Market Equilibrium (d * , g * , p * ) * p 1 Utility Company * p 2 * p 3 Social Welfare Individual ( d * , g * )

  23. A Distributed Algorithm to Reach the Equilibrium Utility Company Utility company gathers requests MOPF : No info about individuals’ Privacy for costs and benefits function individuals Utility company updates price g p n d p 1 1 n Individual i receives the price User i optimizes  max ( ) B d p d d i i i i i Individual i updates its request max - ( ) p g C g g i i i i i Theorem [Li et al. 2012, 2014] : The distributed algorithm converges to market equilibrium over a radial distribution network. Recent work : Distributed algorithms with limited communication . [2015, 2016]

  24. Case studies Substation 45 Schematic Diagram of a South California Edison distribution System

  25. Real power calculated by the user ( MW ) 0.06 bus 3 bus 6 0.05 bus 14 bus 54 0.04 0.03 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Iteration Real power calculated by the utility company ( MW ) 2 1 0 bus 3 bus 6 -1 bus 14 Zoom in bus 54 -2 0.05 0.03 bus 3 bus 6 0.01 bus 14 bus 5 0 -0.01 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Iterations

  26. How about decentralized market? Bilateral Transaction? Decentralized? Challenge: Externality: Any local change induces a (complicated) global change! Delivery Service (in distribution networks)   • Voltage support (constraint): v v v i i i • Power loss

  27. Market rule    [ , ] [ , ] [ , ] v v v v v v v v v j j j k k k i i i Line loss Line loss Bus i Bus j Bus k Buy voltage right at each bus Pay for line loss rent Each Bilateral Transaction  Buy voltage right (constraint) at each bus  Pays for line loss rent of each line Q: Budget balance on the voltage right and also the power loss? Voltage right at each bus = Σ i voltage right bought by transaction i Power losses at each line = Σ i Losses paid by transaction i

  28. Market Prices and Equilibrium    [ , ] [ , ] [ , ] v v v v v v v v v j j j k k k i i i Line loss Line loss rent rent Bus i Bus j Bus k Electricity price Electricity price Electricity price Voltage right price Voltage right price Buy voltage right at each bus Pay for line loss rent  Each user/generator maximizes net benefit/profit given elec. prices

  29. Market Prices and Equilibrium    [ , ] [ , ] [ , ] v v v v v v v v v j j j k k k i i i Line loss Line loss rent rent Bus i Bus j Bus k Electricity price Electricity price Electricity price Voltage right price Voltage right price Buy voltage right at each bus Pay for line loss rent  Each user/generator maximizes net benefit/profit given elec. price  For each unit transaction between any two node i and k Elec. Price i = Elec Price j + Sum(Voltage right price*Quantity 1 ) + Sum (Line loss rent * Quantity 2 )  Voltage right price is 0 if there is excess voltage capacity supply Question: How to determine Quantity 1 ,Quantity 2 ?

  30. How to determine the quantities? Duality of the Social Welfare Maximization Quantity 1 Quantity 2 Prices Budget Balance Constraints on Voltage Right and Line Losses For each unit transaction between any two node i and k Price i = Price j + Sum(Voltage right price*Quantity 1 ) + Sum (Line loss rent * Quantity 2 )

  31. How to determine the quantities? One Allocation Rule for Voltage Right and Line Losses Quantity 1 : R: resistance V: voltage Quantity 2 : p: power injection P,Q: real/reactive power flow L: line losses For each unit transaction between any two node i and k Price i = Price j + Sum(Voltage right price*Quantity 1 ) + Sum (Line loss rent * Quantity 2 )

  32. Competitive Market Equilibrium    [ , ] [ , ] [ , ] v v v v v v v v v j j j k k k i i i User i User j User k Voltage right price Voltage right price Voltage right price Electricity price Electricity price Buy voltage rights at each bus Pay for line loss rent Theorem (Li 2015): Under the designed market rule, there exists a competitive market equilibrium that is socially optimal.

  33. So far... Utility Scheme 1: Company Markets are efficient Scheme 2: Bilateral Transaction? Decentralized?

  34. Electricity Market for Distribution Netw orks: Power Engineering: Power flow, system dynamics, operation constraints Markets efficiently allocate delivery costs to individuals (transactions) Human Incentive: Strategic behavior, self-interested, market power Uncertainties: Renewable energy, user’s behavior, emergency

  35. Electricity Market for Distribution Netw orks: Power Engineering: Power flow, system dynamics, operation constraints Markets efficiently allocate delivery costs to individuals (transactions) Human Incentive: Strategic behavior, self-interested, market power Uncertainties: Renewable energy, user’s behavior, emergency

  36. Recall… Utility Company Social Welfare Individuals need to report info. What if they DON’T report true info.?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend