n ross chapman and yong min jiang university of victoria
play

N. Ross Chapman and Yong-Min Jiang University of Victoria, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

N. Ross Chapman and Yong-Min Jiang University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 14 November 2008 Estimate sediment attenuation from single bounce reflections from sea bottom and sub- bottom


  1. N. Ross Chapman and Yong-Min Jiang University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  2. Estimate sediment attenuation from single bounce reflections from sea bottom and sub- bottom • Experimental site & set up • The method of estimating sediment attenuation • Data processing • Supporting parameters in estimating attenuation • Discussion of the results • Conclusions and future works Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  3. • Varying source depth + VLA to ensure angular coverage Moray site • Water depth ~ 79m • Range ~ 230m • Source depth: 15-65m in 10m steps • Receiver depth: 14.25-70.5m @ 3.75m Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  4. p V p T T V ( ) − α + = ( ) - + - · + 0 r 1 r = ( r r ) ( f ) ( r r ) bott 0 ws sw s a a p e , p e e w 2 w 3 4 s 5 6 + b sb + + + r r r r r r 1 2 3 4 5 6 • = + + • α ' 20 log( p / p ) b ( r r ) ( f ) Estimated at different frequencies b sb 5 6 s by band pass filtering the signal From data Constant under frequency independent assumption and ignori the attenuation in the water Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  5. Signal frequency band Sea bottom reflection Sub- bottom reflection 1500~4500Hz Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  6. fo=1750 Hz fo=2550 Hz Signals after band passing fo=1750-4150Hz, 200Hz separation Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  7. Difference of bot. & sub-bot., 06243145200, iphone:11, zs=45.0m, zr=33.00m 35 30 Amplitude (dB) 25 20 15 10 5 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Frequency (Hz) The slope = (r 5 + r 6 )* α ’ s , where (r 5 + r 6 ) is the path length in the sediment, α ’ s is in dB/m.kHz Need to be inverted α ( λ) = α ’ s *c s /1000 c s is the sound speed in the sediment, α (λ) is in dB/ λ Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  8. • Invert for water depth, range, source depth and array tilt fro SD=65m data; • Invert for water column SSP for desired source depth data; • Invert for sediment sound speed and layer thickness by us inverted geometric parameters and SSP in the water;  optimal inversion approach  use of travel time information  forward model is based on ray theory Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  9. iphone:13, zs=35.0m, zr=26.00m, a=8.72024 35 30 25 Amplitude ratio(dB) Receiver depth = 26m 20 15 10 iphone:12, zs=35.0m, zr=29.75m, a=8.30714 35 5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Frequency (Hz) 30 25 Amplitude ratio(dB) Receiver depth = 29.75m 20 15 10 5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Frequency (Hz) Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  10. Ray prediction from the inversion 0 10 20 22.25m 26.00m 30 29.75m Source=35m Depth (m) 33.50m 37.25m 40 41.00m 44.75m 48.50m 50 52.25m 60 70 Sea bottom 80 90 Sub-bottom 100 0 50 100 150 200 250 Range (m) Sediment Sound speed: 1602.2 m Sediment layer thickness: 20.8m RD: 26.00 m Path length in the sediment: 95.1 m RD: 29.75 m Path length in the sediment: 97.8 m Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  11. Source depth (m) 35 45 Receiver depth (m) 26.0 29.75 26.0 33.5 Attenuation 0.092 0.085 0.101 0.088 (dB/m•kHz) Attenuation (dB/ λ) 0.15 0.14 0.16 0.14 • The signal fluctuation caused by the variable water environment and the interference of the reflections of fine structure in the sediment • The errors of sediment sound speed and layer thickness estimates introduced by travel time picking Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  12. • The marine sediment sound attenuation at low frequency can be estimated from single bounce sub-bottom reflections • The estimated attenuation values are consistent with previous result done in the vicinity by use of transmission loss inversion (Carey) • The method could be used for future experimental design • The uncertainty analysis of the estimate • Compare with the circle data at ‘Moray’ site and SWAMI 32 site • Office of Naval Research: for sponsoring the research • Drs. William Hodgkiss and Peter Gerstoft from MPL: acoustic data Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  13. iphone:13, zs=45.0m, zr=26.00m, a=11.28274 35 30 25 Amplitude ratio(dB) Receiver depth = 26.0 m 20 15 10 iphone:11, zs=45.0m, zr=33.50m, a=10.52286 35 5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Frequency (Hz) 30 25 Amplitude ratio(dB) Receiver depth = 33.5 m 20 15 10 5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Frequency (Hz) Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

  14. Ray prediction from the inversion 0 10 20 22.25m 26.00m 29.75m 30 33.50m Depth (m) 37.25m 40 41.00m Source=45m 44.75m 48.50m 50 60 70 Sea bottom 80 90 100 Sub-bottom 0 50 100 150 200 250 Range (m) Sediment Sound speed: 1618.2 m Sediment layer thickness: 22.2 m RD: 26.00 m Path length in the sediment: 112.1 m RD: 33.50 m Path length in the sediment: 119.1 m Chapman and Jiang ASA156, Miami, Florida, 10 – 14 November 2008

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend