N ON - LINEAR T HEORY OF FQH E DGE : F RACTIONALLY C HARGED S OLITONS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

n on linear t heory of fqh e dge
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

N ON - LINEAR T HEORY OF FQH E DGE : F RACTIONALLY C HARGED S OLITONS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

N ON - LINEAR T HEORY OF FQH E DGE : F RACTIONALLY C HARGED S OLITONS , E MERGENT T OPOLOGY IN N ON - LINEAR W AVES , Q UANTUM H YDRODYNAMICS OF FQH LIQUID P . Wiegmann (Discussions with friends: Abanov, Bettelheim, Cappelli) Phys. Rev. Lett.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NON-LINEAR THEORY OF FQH EDGE:

FRACTIONALLY CHARGED SOLITONS, EMERGENT TOPOLOGY IN NON-LINEAR WAVES, QUANTUM HYDRODYNAMICS OF FQH LIQUID P . Wiegmann

(Discussions with friends: Abanov, Bettelheim, Cappelli)

  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 206810 (2012)

Florence May 25, 2012

1 / 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Messages

  • Waves on the Edge of FQH are essentially non-linear;
  • Emergence of quantization in non-linear dynamics;
  • FQH - hydrodynamics "Hall-viscosity" in the bulk propels to the boundary

(a universal corrections to Chern-Simon "theory")

  • Relation between FQHE and CFT - revised

Only Laughlin’s states (for now).

2 / 1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

FQHE -LAUGHLIN’S STATE(S)

Particles on a plane in a quantized magnetic field (with a strong Coulomb Interaction) Ψ0(z1,...,zN) = ∆(z1,...,zN)β e−

  • i |zi|2/4ℓ2

B

  • ∆ =
  • i=j(zi − zj)- VanDerMonde determinant
  • ℓB -magnetic length;
  • ν = 1/β - is a filling fraction;
  • β = 1 - IQHE;

β = 3- FQHE. Important features:

  • Wave-function is holomorphic;
  • Degree of zero at zi → zj is larger than 1;

3 / 1

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SPECTRUM IN THE BULK:

  • The ground state is β = ν−1 - degenerate;
  • All excitations are gapped: ∆1/3 ∼ 10 − 30K,

kT ≪ ∆1/3 ≪ ħ hωc

  • Coherent States: deformation of Laughlin’s state by a holomorphic function

Ψ0(z1,...,zN) = ∆(z1,...,zN)β e− 1

2

  • i |zi|2/2ℓ2

B

ΨV(z1,...,zN) = Ψ0e

  • i V(zi),
  • Singularities of V are vortices (or "quasi-holes")

σ = − 1 4π∆V = Real

4 / 1

slide-5
SLIDE 5

EDGE STATES: FQHE IN A CONFINING POTENTIAL

  • Potential well lifts a degeneracy:

H0 → H = H0 +

  • i

U(|ri|)

  • Low energy states emerge. They are localized on an edge → Edge States;
  • Smooth potential: Curvature of the potential is small compared to the gap

but a slope is larger than electric field ℓ2

B∇2 yU ≪ ∆ν,

ℓ2

B∇yU ≫ e2

FIGURE: Boundary waves: the boundary layer is highlighted

y(x)

x y

5 / 1

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LINEAR EDGE STATES THEORY (WEN, 1991)

  • Density is a chiral field:

ρ(x) =

  • k

eikxρk, ρk = ρ†

−k,

[ρk,ρl] = νkδk+l, (∂t − c0∇x)ρ = 0,

  • c0 = ħ

h−1ℓ2

B|∇yU| is a slope of the potential well (non-universal);

  • factor ν proliferates to the exponent in edge tunneling
  • Common believe ( I disagree with):

c = 1 - CFT of free bosons with a compactification radius ν = β−1.

6 / 1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Propagation of a wave-packet

The linear theory does not answer a question: how does a smooth non-equilibrium state (a wave packet) propagate? ˙ ρ − c0∇ρ = 0, wave equation, ρ(x,t) = ρ(x − c0t,t = 0) The shape does not change !? A new scale must be included in the theory; New scale: ∆1/3 ≪ ħ hωc - energy of a hole or a vortex (non-universal scale); Most phenomena do not depend on the scale and are universal;

7 / 1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

NON-LINEAR THEORY OF EDGE STATES

  • Linearized version (fails in 10ps): (∂t − c0∇x)ρ = 0
  • Universal description of non-linear chiral boson at FQHE edge

(∂t − c0∇x)ρ − κ∇

  • 1

2ρ2 − 1−ν 4π ∇ρH

  • = 0

[ρ(x), ρ(x′)] = ν∇δ(x − x′), fH(x) = 1 πP.V.

  • f(x′)

x − x′ dx′

  • New scale: κ ∼ ∆νℓ2

B/ħ

h - energy of a quasi-hole less cyclotron energy (non-universal scale) but the form of equation is universal;

  • The universal coefficient (important!)

8 / 1

slide-9
SLIDE 9

OVERSHOOT: DIPOLE MOMENT OF FQHE DROPLET

Ψ0 =  

  • i>j

(zi − zj)  

β

e− 1

2

  • i |zi|2/4ℓ2

B,

d = R (r − R)ρ(r)dr = 1 − 2ν 8π Dipole moment of a spherical droplet 〈ρ〉 = lim

N→∞

  • |z − zi|2β|∆|2βe−
  • i |zi|2/2ℓ2

B

  • i

d2zi

9 / 1

slide-10
SLIDE 10

No overshoot at β = 1

ν ≤ 1.

10 / 1

slide-11
SLIDE 11

6 7 8 9 10 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

ρ" ρI" η(r)"

2 4 6 8 10

  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3

ρ"ρI#

ρ(y) ≈ ρI(y) + ηδ′(y) η =

  • y(ρ − ρI)dy = 1 − ν

11 / 1

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Benjamin-Ono Equation: Properties

(∂t − c0∇)ρ − κ∇

  • 1

2ρ2 − 1−ν 4π ∇ρH

  • = 0
  • Classical Benjamin-Ono equation describes surface waves of interface of

stratified fluids;

  • Integrable (despite being non-local);

12 / 1

slide-13
SLIDE 13

BENJAMIN-ONO EQUATION: FRACTIONALLY QUANTIZED

SOLITONS

(∂t − c0∇)ρ − κ∇

  • 1

2ρ2 − 1−ν 4π ∇ρH

  • = 0
  • Two branches of solitons:
  • subsonic: holes propagating to the left;

Charge ν = 1/β:

  • ρhdx = integer × ν
  • ultrasonic: particles propagating to the right:

Charge 1:

  • ρpdx = integer

ρ = q π A (x − Vqt)2 + A2 q = 1, −ν, Vq = qκA

  • Classical Benjamin-Ono equation has only one branch - particles

Benjamin-Ono is the only integrable equation with a quantized charge of solitons

13 / 1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Two branches of excitations: Separation between holes (moving right) and particles (moving left)

ii

14 / 1

slide-15
SLIDE 15

QUANTIZATION THROUGH EVOLUTION

15 / 1

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Input: Quantum Hydrodynamics

  • Laughlin’s coherent states:

(i) Analyticity, (ii) Degree of zeros β = 3 ΨV =

  • i<j

(zi − zj)βe−

  • i |zi|4/2ℓ2

B+

  • i V(zi)
  • Galilean Invariance

H = m 2 v†ρv, ∆1/3 ∼ ħ h mℓ2

B

  • Velocity v = vx − ivy

v |Ψ0〉 = 0, i 2ħ hmνvi = ∂zi − e 2cA(zi) −

  • j=i

β zi − zj , β = 1 ν .

16 / 1

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Incompressible Chiral Quantum Fluid

  • Laughlin’s coherent states:

ΨV =

  • i<j

(zi − zj)βe−

  • i |zi|2/2ℓ2

B+

  • i V(zi)
  • Velocity

i 2ħ hmνvi = ∂zi − e 2cA(zi) −

  • j=i

β zi − zj , β = 1 ν .

  • Velocity matrix elements

mv |ΨV〉 = −2i∂zV|ΨV〉

  • Incompressibility

∇ · v = 0, v = ∇ × Ψ

  • Edge states dynamics - irrotational flow (no vortices)

∇ × v = 0, ∆Ψ = 0

17 / 1

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Subtleties and main steps

18 / 1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Chiral Constraint (Property of Laughlin’s states)

Relation between velocity and density ν(∇ × v) = ρ − ρI + 1 − ν 4π ∆logρ (Wiegmann, Zabrodin, 2006)

19 / 1

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Potential flow and the Boundary Waves

∆v = 0, imv = ρν − ρI z − z′ d2z′ 2πν + 1 − ν 4πν ∂ logρ Boundary value of velocities m(vx − c0) = −ν−1 ¯ ρy(x), mvy = 1 − ν 4πν yH

xx

Kinematic Boundary Condition ˙ y + vx∇xy + vy = 0 leads to Quantum Benjamin Ono Equation.

20 / 1

slide-21
SLIDE 21

QUANTUM HYDRODYNAMICS IN THE BULK

  • Laughlin’s state reformulated as a hydrodynamics if the bulk:

[v(r),ρ(r′)] = −i∇δ(r − r′); canonical hydro-variables, ˙ ρ + ∇(ρv) = 0, continuity equations ∇ · v = 0; incompressibility, [v(r) × v(r′)] = 4πν−1iδ(r − r′), Heisenberg algebra ν(∇ × v) = ρ − ρI + 1 − ν 4π ∆logρ Chiral constraint

21 / 1

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SUBTLETIES

  • Short-distance anomaly or OPE

〈ρv〉 = 〈ρ〉〈v〉 − 1 4ν ∇∗〈ρ〉

  • Dipole moment and singularity on the boundary

d = R (r − R)ρ(r)dr = 1 − 2ν 8π

22 / 1

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Subtleties: Stress energy tensor

  • Input: Gallilean invariance E = mρv2

2

  • Outcome: Stress energy tensor - "Hall-viscositiy"

Txx = mρvxvx + ħ h 4ν ρ

  • ∇xvy + ∇yvx
  • 23 / 1
slide-24
SLIDE 24

BENJAMIN-ONO EQUATION AS A DEFORMED BOUNDARY CFT

  • Boundary CFT exterior of the droplet;
  • Boundary stress energy tensor component

Tnn = 1 2(∇nϕ)2 + ν − 1 4ν ∇n∇sϕ, −∇ϕ = ρ

  • Benjamin-Ono Equation is a deformation of CFT:

˙ ρ = ∇Tnn

  • Deformation of a boundary is generated by the normal components of the

stress-energy tensor.

24 / 1

slide-25
SLIDE 25

CFT AND FQHE

  • FQHE Edge hydrodynamics is a deformation of Boundary CFT with

c = 1 − 6ν − 1/ν2 < 1

  • CFT lives outside of a droplet;

Contrary to a common believe that FQHE c = 1 bulk CFT.

25 / 1

slide-26
SLIDE 26

SUMMARY

  • Boundary waves in FQHE are essentially nonlinear;
  • Two branches of solitons with charges 1 and -ν;
  • Deformation of the boundary are generated by a stress energy tensor of CFT

situated outside of the dropletwith c = 1 − 6ν−1(ν − 1)2 < 1

  • An origin of shifting the central charge is a dipole moment located on the

boundary of the droplet

26 / 1