N = 1: Defying Retention Convention (Session 76-CI) Kurt Stimeling, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

n 1 defying retention convention session 76 ci
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

N = 1: Defying Retention Convention (Session 76-CI) Kurt Stimeling, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

N = 1: Defying Retention Convention (Session 76-CI) Kurt Stimeling, Dean of Students Cathy Clark, Associate Vice President Student Success Center Introductions Cathy Clark Associate VP for Student Success Accommodative Services,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

N = 1: Defying Retention Convention (Session 76-CI)

Kurt Stimeling, Dean of Students Cathy Clark, Associate Vice President – Student Success Center

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introductions

Cathy Clark – Associate VP for Student Success Accommodative Services, Student Support Services, T utoring, Study Skills, Time Management, First Year Seminar Kurt Stimeling – Dean of Students Residence Life, Student Activities & Organizations, Student Center, Student Life and Engagement, Wellness and Campus Safety

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Potsdam, NY

Where is Clarkson?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Our Campus…

slide-5
SLIDE 5

…during many months!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

N=1

  • Private
  • 2600 undergraduates
  • 400 graduate students
  • 50% engineering
  • 25% Business
  • 21% Arts & Sciences
  • Rural
  • Research-driven
  • Division 1 and 3 athletics
slide-7
SLIDE 7

N=1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Defy Convention

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Our Retention “Problem”

First Year to Sophomore Retention = 88% Goal of 92% by 2014

slide-10
SLIDE 10

So what’s the problem?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Defy Retention Convention

We had to rethink who impacts retention and how they can do it.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

5 T arget Populations

  • 1. Overall population of freshmen
  • 2. Separated and readmitted

students

  • 3. Incoming “at risk” based on

numerous pre-matriculation data

  • 4. Summer Pre-Calculus test scores
  • 5. Late admitted students (last to

come fjrst to leave)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

3 Overarching Strategies

  • 1. Develop Advising models
  • 2. Reform First-Year curricula
  • 3. Intervention strategies for

at-risk students

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Advising Models

  • School of Business ofgers a

centralized professional advising

  • Engineering school advising

evolving

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FY Curriculum

The BIG 3…the Trifecta: Calculus, Chemistry, Physics

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Intervention Strategies

  • Academic Standing & Messages
  • Fully integrate CSI and RT data

across the university to identify all “at-risk” students to make connections to resources

  • Intervention and recovery plan for

students in academic jeopardy.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Intervention strategies: CU connect Mentoring program College student inventory (csi) Calling all Knights

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CU Connect Mentoring

Why mentor all First-Year students?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Offjces represented

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Steps and timing…

  • 1. Meet

fjrst week of classes

  • 2. Connect within fjrst month of classes
  • 3. Support:

mid-semester

  • 4. Closure: end of semester
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Step 1… Meet your students

FYS class section FYS Interview Sheet Mentor contact information to students Tracking Mentees through Peoplesoft

slide-22
SLIDE 22

College Student Inventory

CSI: 3 main categories: 1.Academic Motivation 2.General Coping Skills 3.Receptivity to Support Services Additional background characteristics:

  • .high school GPA
  • .hours the student plans to work
  • .family educational background
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Step 2…Connect

  • Individual meetings to

review CSI

  • Integration and Action Plan
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Step 3…support

Mid semester check-in individually or in a group. Funds to support activities

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Calling All Knights

  • Contacted all fjrst-year student

families at the sixth week of the semester.

  • Callers were student peer mentors,

peer educators, RA’s and Knightline callers.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results…

Conversations Left messages/Responded Follow up 299 348/25 45 Conversations Left messages/Responded Follow up 236 302/5 15

Fall 2009 Fall 2010

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Step 4…closure

  • Wrap up communication via

email

  • Evaluation to student and

mentor

  • President’s Recognition
slide-28
SLIDE 28

CU Connect feedback

Do you feel you and your mentor made a connection? 268 = YES, 69 = NO, 22 = “OTHER”

  • “Yes, I do feel that I made a connection with my stafg mentor.

She is a great woman and actually helped me get an on- campus job and was easy to talk to. It was great.”

  • “Yeah, we tight”
  • “So far, I have not contacted my mentor, but the idea of

having one is good because there is someone to go to if I need to.”

  • “I feel like we made a connection because I emailed her a lot,

and every time she would email me back. When I see her around campus she always smiles and asks how I’m doing.”

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Please don’t forget to complete your program evaluations. Session 76-CI Kurt Stimeling Cathy Clark

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Spring 2011

“Project Success” T argeting true “at risk” students in academic jeopardy. Engineering specifjc changes: experiential course (pilot 11-12)