multiple hurdle models in r the mhurdle package
play

Multiple hurdle models in R : The mhurdle Package Fabrizio CARLEVARO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multiple hurdle models in R : The mhurdle Package Fabrizio CARLEVARO Yves CROISSANT Stphane HOAREAU University of Geneve University of Lyon 2 University of La Runion logo2


  1. Multiple hurdle models in R : The mhurdle Package Fabrizio CARLEVARO Yves CROISSANT Stéphane HOAREAU University of Geneve University of Lyon 2 University of La Réunion logo2

  2. ����������������������� ���������������� ����� � ����� �!��������"!�#���"�!��� ��������������������������� ������������������ ��$���#������ �������%��#��!��� logo2

  3. ���������� �������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������ �������������������������������������������� ��$�!#�$%�&����$��&�� )�#������ ��� �!"� %!!'�#�"����� �$"#�*��$�+� #��!�#���� ������������ ��������,������(��� $������������������� ��������(��������� ��������(��������� logo2

  4. Seminal papers Single equation models Model Author censoring mechanism Tobit Model T OBIN (1958) Lack of resources C RAGG (1971) Single hurdle model Good refusal Double hurdle model C RAGG (1971) Good refusal and B LUNDELL (1987) lack of resources P-Tobit model D EATON and I RISH (1984) Purchase infrequency and lack of resources Systems of demand equations Author censoring mechanism W ALES and W OODLAND (1982) Lack of resources H ANEMANN (1984) Good refusal R OBIN and M EGHIR (1992) Purchase infrequency B OIZOT , R OBIN and V ISSER (2001) Purchase infrequency logo2

  5. A comprehensive econometric framework : The triple-hurdle model Latent variable relation censoring rule  1 if y ⋆ 1 > 0 ′ y ⋆ 1 x 1 + ǫ 1 I 1 = Good selection = β 1 1 ≤ 0 0 if y ⋆  1 y ⋆ if 2 > 0 ′ Good consumption y ⋆ = β 2 x 2 + ǫ 2 I 2 = 2 0 y ⋆ 2 ≤ 0 if  1 y ⋆ 3 > 0 if ′ Good purchase y ⋆ = β 3 x 3 + ǫ 3 I 3 = 3 0 y ⋆ 3 ≤ 0 if (1) 2 3 0 2 3 2 3 1 ǫ 1 0 1 σρ 12 ρ 13 σ 2 5 ∼ N 5 ; ǫ 2 0 σρ 12 σρ 23 (2) 4 @ 4 4 5 A ǫ 3 0 ρ 13 σρ 23 1 y ⋆ Observation equation : y = P { I 1 I 2 I 3 = 1 } I 1 I 2 I 3 2 logo2

  6. Using a priori information to specify particular hurdle models One or more censoring mechanisms are ineffective. If the “lack of resources” mechanism is inoperative, the desired consumption equation is respecified to enforce non negative consumption levels according to the following specifications : log-normal : ln y ∗ 2 ∼ N ( β ′ 2 x 2 , σ 2 ) , truncated normal : y ∗ 2 ∼ NT R + ( β ′ 2 x 2 , σ 2 ) some or all correlation coefficients ρ 12 , ρ 13 , ρ 23 may be set equal to zero entailing a partial or total independance between the censoring mechanisms logo2

  7. The full set of mhurdle models × logical inconsistent model DIST RES IFR « l » ��������� « n » � TRUE « t » ��������� SEL FALSE « l » TRUE « n » ���������� « t » « l » FALSE � �������������������������� « n » TRUE ������� TRUE « t » ��������� « l » FALSE ������� « n » « t » ��������� « l » ���������� TRUE « n » FALSE « t » ��������� FALSE « l » TRUE « n » ��������� « t » « l » FALSE « n » TRUE « t » � « l » FALSE � « n » � « t » logo2

  8. mhurdle rationale Syntax : mhurdle(formula, data, subset, weights, na.action, start = NULL, dist = c("l","t","n"), res = FALSE, sel = TRUE, ifr = FALSE, corr = FALSE, ...) two-parts formula y ~ x1 + x2 | s1 + s2 Starting values Numerical optimisation methods : maxLik logo2

  9. An expenditure model for cigarettes in France (2001) Survey time length excludes purchase infrequency as a relevant censoring mechanism A priori relevant censoring mechanisms ✓ Good selection mechanism ( SEL ), ✓ Lack of ressources mechanism ( RES ), ✓ Good selection and lack of ressources mechanisms ( SEL/RES ). logo2

  10. Choice of explanatory variables Good selection equation : Socio-professional status, Socio-demographic characteristics of family head Stress factors Health Good consumption equation : Income Socio-professional status, Socio-demographic characteristics of family head Education-Training Financial situation Sports practice logo2

  11. Model validation and selection Quality of fit measures RES RES/SEL SEL Censored observations 0.34 0.32 0.35 Uncensored observations 0.03 0.06 0.13 Vuong test RES RES/SEL SEL H 0 : A ∼ B ⇔ t α < V < t 1 − α RES � H 1 : A ≻ B ⇔ V → ∞ RES/SEL 6.82 � H 2 : A ≺ B ⇔ V → −∞ logo2 SEL 9.87 7.05 �

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend