multicenter black holes with superpotentials
play

multicenter black holes with superpotentials Jan Perz Katholieke - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Non-supersymmetric extremal multicenter black holes with superpotentials Jan Perz Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Non-supersymmetric extremal multicenter black holes with superpotentials Jan Perz Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Based on: P


  1. Non-supersymmetric extremal multicenter black holes with superpotentials Jan Perz Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

  2. Non-supersymmetric extremal multicenter black holes with superpotentials Jan Perz Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Based on: P . Galli, J. Perz arXiv:0909.???? [hep-th]

  3. Single-center vs multicenter solutions ‣ superposition holds for linear systems ‣ typically not possible for black holes in GR • but: (Weyl)–Majumdar–Papapetrou solutions in Einstein–Maxwell theory —arbitrary distribution of extremally charged dust —static (as in Newtonian approximation) —described by harmonic functions

  4. Single-center vs multicenter solutions ‣ superposition holds for linear systems ‣ typically not possible for black holes in GR • but: (Weyl)–Majumdar–Papapetrou solutions in Einstein–Maxwell theory —arbitrary distribution of extremally charged dust —static (as in Newtonian approximation) —described by harmonic functions

  5. Single-center vs multicenter solutions ‣ superposition holds for linear systems ‣ typically not possible for black holes in GR • but: (Weyl)–Majumdar–Papapetrou solutions in Einstein–Maxwell theory —arbitrary distribution of extremally charged dust —static (as in Newtonian approximation) —described by harmonic functions

  6. Supersymmetric black hole composites ‣ extremal multi-RN solutions are susy [Gibbons, Hull] ‣ susy (hence extremal) multicenter solutions in 4d supergravity with vector multiplets N = 2 • with identical charges [Behrndt, Lüst, Sabra]

  7. Supersymmetric black hole composites ‣ extremal multi-RN solutions are susy [Gibbons, Hull] ‣ susy (hence extremal) multicenter solutions in 4d supergravity with vector multiplets N = 2 • with identical charges [Behrndt, Lüst, Sabra] • with arbitrary charges [Denef]

  8. Supersymmetric black hole composites ‣ extremal multi-RN solutions are susy [Gibbons, Hull] ‣ susy (hence extremal) multicenter solutions in 4d supergravity with vector multiplets N = 2 • with identical charges [Behrndt, Lüst, Sabra] • with arbitrary charges [Denef] —relative positions of centers constrained

  9. Supersymmetric black hole composites ‣ extremal multi-RN solutions are susy [Gibbons, Hull] ‣ susy (hence extremal) multicenter solutions in 4d supergravity with vector multiplets N = 2 • with identical charges [Behrndt, Lüst, Sabra] • with arbitrary charges [Denef] —relative positions of centers constrained —single-center solution may not exist, where a multicenter can

  10. Non-susy extremal composites

  11. Non-susy extremal composites ‣ via timelike dimensional reduction [Gaiotto, Li, Padi] • generate solutions (both susy and non-susy) as geodesics on augmented scalar manifold [Breitenlohner, Maison, Gibbons]

  12. Non-susy extremal composites ‣ via timelike dimensional reduction [Gaiotto, Li, Padi] • generate solutions (both susy and non-susy) as geodesics on augmented scalar manifold [Breitenlohner, Maison, Gibbons] ‣ almost-susy [Goldstein, Katmadas] • reverse orientation of base space in 5D susy solutions

  13. Non-susy extremal composites ‣ via timelike dimensional reduction [Gaiotto, Li, Padi] • generate solutions (both susy and non-susy) as geodesics on augmented scalar manifold [Breitenlohner, Maison, Gibbons] ‣ almost-susy [Goldstein, Katmadas] • reverse orientation of base space in 5D susy solutions ‣ here: superpotential approach

  14. supergravity in 4 dimensions N = 2 ‣ bosonic action with vector multiplets n v � � ¯ b ( z ) d z a ∧ ⋆ d¯ b R ⋆ 1 − 2 g a ¯ z I 4D ∝ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J � ‣ target space geometry: (very) special

  15. supergravity in 4 dimensions N = 2 ‣ bosonic action with vector multiplets n v I = ( 0, a ) � � ¯ b ( z ) d z a ∧ ⋆ d¯ b a = 1, . . . , n v R ⋆ 1 − 2 g a ¯ z I 4D ∝ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J � ‣ target space geometry: (very) special

  16. supergravity in 4 dimensions N = 2 ‣ bosonic action with vector multiplets n v I = ( 0, a ) � � ¯ b ( z ) d z a ∧ ⋆ d¯ b a = 1, . . . , n v R ⋆ 1 − 2 g a ¯ z I 4D ∝ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J � ‣ target space geometry: (very) special z a = X a X a X b X c F = − 1 6 D abc X 0 X 0

  17. supergravity in 4 dimensions N = 2 ‣ bosonic action with vector multiplets n v I = ( 0, a ) � � ¯ b ( z ) d z a ∧ ⋆ d¯ b a = 1, . . . , n v R ⋆ 1 − 2 g a ¯ z I 4D ∝ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J � ‣ target space geometry: (very) special z a = X a X a X b X c F = − 1 6 D abc X 0 X 0 g a ¯ b = ∂ z a ∂ ¯ b K z ¯

  18. supergravity in 4 dimensions N = 2 ‣ bosonic action with vector multiplets n v I = ( 0, a ) � � ¯ b ( z ) d z a ∧ ⋆ d¯ b a = 1, . . . , n v R ⋆ 1 − 2 g a ¯ z I 4D ∝ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J � ‣ target space geometry: (very) special z a = X a X a X b X c F = − 1 6 D abc X 0 X 0 g a ¯ b = ∂ z a ∂ ¯ b K z ¯ � �� X I � � � � 0 − 1 X I � K = − ln i ∂ I F 1 0 ∂ I F

  19. Black holes in 4d supergravity N = 2 ‣ bosonic action with vector multiplets n v � � ¯ b ( z ) d z a ∧ ⋆ d¯ b R ⋆ 1 − 2 g a ¯ z I 4D ∝ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J � ‣ static, spherically symmetric ansatz (1 center) τ = 1 d s 2 = − e 2 U ( τ ) d t 2 + e − 2 U ( τ ) δ ij d x i d x j | x | ‣ charged solution p I � � ∂ L � � p I ∝ F I q I ∝ = : Q ∂ F I q I S 2 S 2 ∞ ∞

  20. Black hole potential (single-center) � � ¯ b ( z ) d z a ∧ ⋆ d¯ b R ⋆ 1 − 2 g a ¯ z I 4D ∝ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J �

  21. Black hole potential (single-center) � ˙ � ˙ = d ¯ b ( z ) d z a ∧ ⋆ d¯ U 2 b d τ − 2 g a ¯ z I eff ∝ d τ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J �

  22. Black hole potential (single-center) � ˙ � ˙ = d ¯ z a ˙ U 2 b d τ + g a ¯ z I eff ∝ b ˙ ¯ d τ + Im N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ ⋆ F J + Re N IJ ( z ) F I ∧ F J �

  23. Black hole potential (single-center) ‣ action with effective potential [Ferrara, Gibbons, Kallosh] � ˙ � ˙ = d ¯ z a ˙ U 2 b + e 2 U V BH � d τ + g a ¯ z I eff ∝ b ˙ ¯ d τ V BH = | Z | 2 + 4 g a ¯ b ∂ a | Z | ∂ ¯ b | Z |

  24. Black hole potential (single-center) ‣ action with effective potential [Ferrara, Gibbons, Kallosh] � ˙ � ˙ = d ¯ z a ˙ U 2 b + e 2 U V BH � d τ + g a ¯ z I eff ∝ b ˙ ¯ d τ V BH = | Z | 2 + 4 g a ¯ b ∂ a | Z | ∂ ¯ b | Z | X I � � � � � 0 − 1 Z = e K /2 � p I q I 1 0 ∂ I F

  25. Black hole potential (single-center) ‣ action with effective potential [Ferrara, Gibbons, Kallosh] � ˙ � ˙ = d ¯ z a ˙ U 2 b + e 2 U V BH � d τ + g a ¯ z I eff ∝ b ˙ ¯ d τ V BH = | Z | 2 + 4 g a ¯ b ∂ a | Z | ∂ ¯ b | Z | ‣ rewriting not unique [Ceresole, Dall’Agata] V BH = Q T M Q = Q T S T M SQ S T M S = M

  26. Black hole potential (single-center) ‣ action with effective potential [Ferrara, Gibbons, Kallosh] � ˙ � ˙ = d ¯ z a ˙ U 2 b + e 2 U V BH � d τ + g a ¯ z I eff ∝ b ˙ ¯ d τ V BH = | Z | 2 + 4 g a ¯ b ∂ a | Z | ∂ ¯ b | Z | ‣ rewriting not unique [Ceresole, Dall’Agata] V BH = Q T M Q = Q T S T M SQ S T M S = M ‣ ‘superpotential’ not necessarily equal to | Z | W V BH = W 2 + 4 g a ¯ b ∂ a W ∂ ¯ b W

  27. Flow equations ‣ effective Lagrangian as a sum of squares U 2 + g a ¯ b + e 2 U ( W 2 + 4 g a ¯ ¯ z a ˙ b ∂ a W ∂ ¯ L eff ∝ ˙ b W ) b ˙ z ¯ ‣ first-order gradient flow, equivalent to EOM ‣ when : non-supersymmetric

  28. Flow equations ‣ effective Lagrangian as a sum of squares U 2 + g a ¯ b + e 2 U ( W 2 + 4 g a ¯ ¯ z a ˙ b ∂ a W ∂ ¯ L eff ∝ ˙ b W ) b ˙ z ¯ � 2 2 � � � z a + 2e U g a ¯ U + e U W b ∂ ¯ ˙ b W � ˙ + � � ∝ � ‣ first-order gradient flow, equivalent to EOM ‣ when : non-supersymmetric

  29. Flow equations ‣ effective Lagrangian as a sum of squares U 2 + g a ¯ b + e 2 U ( W 2 + 4 g a ¯ ¯ z a ˙ b ∂ a W ∂ ¯ L eff ∝ ˙ b W ) b ˙ z ¯ � 2 2 � � � z a + 2e U g a ¯ U + e U W b ∂ ¯ ˙ b W � ˙ + � � ∝ � ‣ first-order gradient flow, equivalent to EOM U = − e U W ˙ z a = − 2e U g a ¯ b ∂ ¯ b W ˙

  30. Flow equations ‣ effective Lagrangian as a sum of squares U 2 + g a ¯ b + e 2 U ( W 2 + 4 g a ¯ ¯ z a ˙ b ∂ a W ∂ ¯ L eff ∝ ˙ b W ) b ˙ z ¯ � 2 2 � � � z a + 2e U g a ¯ U + e U W b ∂ ¯ ˙ b W � ˙ + � � ∝ � ‣ first-order gradient flow, equivalent to EOM U = − e U W ˙ z a = − 2e U g a ¯ b ∂ ¯ b W ˙ ‣ when : non-supersymmetric W � = | Z |

  31. Geometrical perspective ‣ IIA string theory compactified on a CY 3-fold X � D a : basis of H 2 ( X , Z ) D abc = X D a ∧ D b ∧ D c ‣ scalars: in the normalized period vector ‣ charges: branes wrapping even cycles of ‣ central charge

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend