- P. Casella - Soton BH Variability
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 1
Beyond X-ray timing II:
multi-wavelength variability from jets in X-ray binaries
Piergiorgio Casella
(University of Southampton)
multi-wavelength variability from jets in X-ray binaries - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets P. Casella - Soton BH Variability /34 1 Beyond X-ray timing II: multi-wavelength variability from jets in X-ray binaries Piergiorgio Casella (University of Southampton) Beyond X-ray timing II:
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 1
Piergiorgio Casella
(University of Southampton)
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 2
why jets why jets variability jets variability!
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 3
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 4
why are jets important?
AGN - X-ray Binaries - GRBs - WDs - SNe - Protostars - (ULX?) General phenomenon >>> general knowledge
M
i v a t i
a l S l i d e
AGN XB SN remnant protostar
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 5
why are jets important?
AGN - X-ray Binaries - GRBs - WDs - SNe - Protostars - (ULX?) General phenomenon >>> general knowledge They influence the evolution of the launching system They influence their surroundings (ISM, IGM) Jet launching mechanisms are unknown Jet structure and composition are often unknown They can be launched from, or close to, a strong-gravity environment Jets in XBs vary on timescales from years to milliseconds
M
i v a t i
a l S l i d e
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 6
Jet companion star high energy tail (inner regions)
X-ray IR opt radio
BH
hard state
Disc
multi-wavelength spectrum
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 7
companion star
X-ray IR opt radio
BH
soft state
Jet high energy tail (inner regions) Disc
multi-wavelength spectrum
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 8 Fender, Belloni & Gallo 2004
jet evolution: coupling with X-rays
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 9 Gallo et al. 2003 ; Soleri et al. 2010
Swift J1753.5-0127 Swift J1753.5-0127 3 upper limits
1E1740.7-2942 4U 1543-47 A0620-00 GRO J0422+32 GRS 1758-258 GS 1354-64 GX 339-4 GX 339-4, 3 upper limits IGR J17497-2821, 3 upper limits XTE J1118+480 XTE J1550-564 XTE J1550-564, 3 upper limits XTE J1650-500 XTE J1720-318, 3 upper limits XTE J1720-318 V404 Cyg Swift J1753.5-0127 detections 3 upper limits
Outliers, from Gallo (2007): Data used in Gallo et al. (2006):
H 1743-322, from Jonker et al. (2010) and McClintock et al. (2009): bG06~0.58 b~1.0 b~1.4
jet evolution: coupling with X-rays
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 10
The radio-flat jet paradigm
ν
Flux
νobs
Total spectrum results from summed contributions at each distance z along the jet z
synchrotron losses should act very fast.. ...need for extra energy for the electrons!
a problem: the missing re-heating
picture from Markoff 2010
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 11
The radio-flat jet paradigm
ν
Flux
νobs
Total spectrum results from summed contributions at each distance z along the jet z
synchrotron losses should act very fast.. ...need for extra energy for the electrons!
a problem: the missing re-heating
picture from Markoff 2010
Unless B-field is very low:
much lower than equipartition with electron energy. In this case, maybe, you can make it without re-heating...
Pe’er & Casella 2009
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 12
illustration of shells in our jet model. If the outer boundary of the inner shell, (j), contacts the inner boundary of the outer
Jamil, Fender & Kaiser 2010
a possibility: internal shocks between discrete shells with different velocity.
The radio-flat jet paradigm
a problem: the missing re-heating
IS THE JET POWERED BY VARIABILITY FROM THE ACCRETION FLOW?
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 13
illustration of shells in our jet model. If the outer boundary of the inner shell, (j), contacts the inner boundary of the outerJamil, Fender & Kaiser 2010
IS THE JET POWERED BY VARIABILITY FROM THE ACCRETION FLOW?
The radio-flat jet paradigm
courtesy of Omar Jamil
!"#$%&%'(%)#!**+ ,-./#01.2%)3.45 !*!"#$%&'()*+',-.'
!"#$%&#'(')'*$%+,-(.%$/(01%020$%*(','345(#+--'-
67,'345( '8"%&03$%$%+,( 2'$.'',( 904,'$%*:( '#'*$3+,:(0,1( $/'390#(','345 6;<4=(')'*$%+,( 40&(>(?- 6@%9=(1"30$%+,A BC?DE(- 6F,%$%0#(%,$'3,0#( ','345(%,)'*$%+,( !"#"$$%&'
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 14
first there was X-ray emission then the jet
Hesiod 8th-7th century BC
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 15 Mirabel et al. 1998
from X-rays...all the way into the jet
radio follows IR which follows X-rays
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 16 Mirabel et al. 1998
from X-rays...all the way into the jet
radio follows IR which follows X-rays
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 17 Fender & Pooley 1998
from X-rays...all the way into the jet
radio follows IR by a 7 (or 33) minutes
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 18
from X-rays...all the way into the jet
clear need for a proper timing analysis either longer observations
teo’s talk: we can go fast in optical!
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 19
CCFfg(t)=
8 + 8
.
Hynes et al. 2009
Reprocessed variability:
O’Brien et al. 2002
let’s go faster: X-ray/optical CCFs
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 20
X-ray/opt CCF
The optical variability is anti-correlated, and precedes the X-rays! Not reprocessing...what?
Kanbach et al. 2001 ( e.g. Hynes et al. 2003 )
Reprocessed variability:
O’Brien et al. 2002
let’s go faster: X-ray/optical CCFs
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 21
X-ray/opt CCF
The optical variability is anti-correlated, and precedes the X-rays! Not reprocessing...what?
Kanbach et al. 2001 ( e.g. Hynes et al. 2003 )
let’s go faster: X-ray/optical CCFs
Hynes et al. 2003
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 22
The “common reservoir model” (Malzac, Merloni & Fabian 2004) jet-corona coupling through common energy reservoir accretion flow (reservoir)
from the jet X-rays from the corona
an explanation: a powerful jet
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 23
The “common reservoir model” (Malzac, Merloni & Fabian 2004) jet-corona coupling through common energy reservoir if the system is “jet dominated”, it works:
an explanation: a powerful jet
Data Model
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 24
2001: XTE J1118 (a BH) 2008 (other 2 BHs): GX 339-4 SWIFT J1753 too many components?
Kanbach et al. 2001 Gandhi et al. 2008 Durant et al. 2008
reality seems more complex: The “common reservoir model” (Malzac, Merloni & Fabian 2004) jet-corona coupling through common energy reservoir
an explanation: a powerful jet
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 25
let’s go faster: X-ray/optical QPOs (jet?)
Hynes et al. 2003 Gandhi et al. 2009
GX 339-4 XTE J1118+480
0.01 0.1 1 10 Frequency [Hz] 0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 Power [ (rms/mean)2 Hz-1 ] Optical Optical X-ray X-ray 0.01 0.1 1 10 Frequency [Hz] 0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 Power [ (rms/mean)2 Hz-1 ] Optical Optical X-ray X-ray 0.01 0.1 1 10 Frequency [Hz] 0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 Power [ (rms/mean)2 Hz-1 ] Optical Optical X-ray X-ray 0.01 0.1 1 10 Frequency [Hz] 0.001 0.010 Freq x Power [ Hz (rms/mean)2/Hz ] Optical Optical X-ray X-ray 0.01 0.1 1 10 Frequency [Hz] 0.001 0.010 Freq x Power [ Hz (rms/mean)2/Hz ] Optical Optical X-ray X-ray 0.01 0.1 1 10 Frequency [Hz] 0.001 0.010 Freq x Power [ Hz (rms/mean)2/Hz ] Optical Optical X-ray X-rayBUT: the same QPO COULD be present in X-rays. the only ‘fact’ is that in optical the QPO is relatively stronger
Gandhi et al. (submitted)
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 26
Jet companion star high energy tail (inner regions)
X-ray IR opt radio
BH
hard state
Disc
if you want the jet..go where the jet is
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 27
GX 339-4 - ISAAC@VLT - 62.5ms - K=12.5
23’’ x 23’’
let’s go redder: infrared fast photometry!
So far, in optical. The jet/disk ratio is (much) higher in infrared
X-rays infrared
I S A A C R X T E
Casella, Maccarone et al. 2010
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 28
X-rays infrared
I S A A C R X T E
let’s go redder: infrared fast photometry!
So far, in optical. The jet/disk ratio is (much) higher in infrared
R X T E I S A A C
GX 339-4 - ISAAC@VLT - 62.5ms - K=12.5
Casella, Maccarone et al. 2010
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 29
Jet companion star high energy tail (inner regions)
X-ray IR opt radio
BH
hard state
Disc
let’s go redder: infrared fast photometry!
Russell et al (in prep.)
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 30
let’s go redder: infrared fast photometry!
So far, in optical. The jet/disk ratio is (much) higher in infrared GX 339-4 - ISAAC@VLT - 62.5ms - K=12.5
Infrared and X-rays are correlated Infrared lag X-rays by 0.1 s Very high brightness temperature (>106K) We are observing the JET It takes 0.1s for the matter to get there
Γ > 2 (model dependent)
Casella, Maccarone et al. 2010
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 31
let’s go redder: infrared fast photometry!
So far, in optical. The jet/disk ratio is (much) higher in infrared GX 339-4 - ISAAC@VLT - 62.5ms - K=12.5
rmax ~ γ-4/3 β-2/3 D 2/3 sinθ-1/3 Φ-1 L2/3 ν-1 ( “standard” formula by Blandford & Königl ’79 )
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 32
let’s go redder: infrared fast photometry!
So far, in optical. The jet/disk ratio is (much) higher in infrared GX 339-4 - ISAAC@VLT - 62.5ms - K=12.5
rmax ~ γ-4/3 β-2/3 D 2/3 sinθ-1/3 Φ-1 L2/3 ν-1 ( “standard” formula by Blandford & Königl ’79 )
Γ > 2
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 33
let’s go redder: infrared fast photometry!
So far, in optical. The jet/disk ratio is (much) higher in infrared GX 339-4 - ISAAC@VLT - 62.5ms - K=12.5
We are measuring physical quantities... ...many uncertainties, but this is “day zero”
Beyond X-ray timing II: variability from jets
/34 34
This is a relatively new field. There is much to do Jets vary, we just don’t know how yet. We can learn a lot!
Jets are ubiquitous: general knowledge: easy to sell! Parallel observational/theoretical/numerical efforts:
Nevertheless, we need new instrumentation
The future: E-ELT: huge statistics! population statistics
X
will
discussion - conclusions - future