Monitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLIDE 1 1 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Monitoring & Transparency:

Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung LogisticsDigital Conference Hypermotion 2017

Frankfurt, den 22. November 2017

• Prof. Dr.-Ing. Michael Benz

Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Benz + Walter GmbH Wiesbaden

SLIDE 2 2 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung" 0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 S yr ian Ar ab Republic Haiti S

• malia

M aurit ania E quator ial Guinea Lesot ho S ierr a Leone Tajikistan Lao PDR Zimbabwe Afghanistan M adagascar Cameroon Iraq Chad Kyrgyz Republic E r itr ea Gabon Liber ia Turkm enistan Arm enia Angola Bolivia Libya Djibouti Bhutan Fiji S enegal S ao Tom é and Príncipe Geor gia Cuba Guinea Guinea- B is sau M ontenegro Nepal Congo, R ep. E t hiopia Congo, Dem . R ep. Venezuela, R B Uzbekis tan J am aic a Belarus Tr inidad and Tobago Albania S

• lomon Is

lands Zam bia Benin Hondur as M yanmar Guetamala M ali Tunes ia M aledives P apua New Guinea M acedonia, FY R Bur undi M ongolia Nicaragua S udan Niger P araguay Russ ian Federat ion Com oros Cote d´Ivoire Iran, Is lam ic R ep. Bosnia and Her z egovina M olddova Colom bia Togo Niger ia Dominicam R epublic Costa R ica Bangladesh Ghana Guyana M or occo M ozam bique E l S alvador Lebanon Bur kina Fas

• Namibia

Ukr aine Kaz akhstan Bahamas S er bia Algeria E cuador Cambodia Bulgar ia P hilippines Brunei Daruss alam P eru P akistan Argent ina J

• rdan

Ur uguay Indonesia Vietnam Rom ania Tanzania Rwanda Cypr us Uganda Botswana M alta Brazil M exic

• Kuwait

Croatia S audi A r abia E gy pt S lovenia Om an Gr eece Chile Thailand Bahr ain Kenya Latvia P anama S lovak Republic Iceland E stonia New Zealand P

• rt ugal

Turkey India Hungary M alays ia P

• land

Qatar Lit huania China Is r ael Vz ech R epublic Taiwan, C hina Korea, Rep. Norway S pain Italy S

• uth A

f rica Ireland Austr alia Denmark France Finland Canada Unit ed Arab E mirates J apan Unit ed S tates S wit z erland Unit ed Kingdom Hong Kong Austr ia Belgium S ingapore Netherlands S weden Luxembourg Germany

Logistic Performance Index 2016

Logistic friendly Consisent performers Partial performers Logistics unfriendly

• 1. Logistics-friendly:

Includes top performers, mostly high- income countries.

• 2. Consistent performers:

Includes countries rated better on logistics performance than most others in their income group.

• 3. Partial performers:

Includes countries with a level of logistics constraints most often seen in low- and middle-income countries.

• 4. Logistics-unfriendly:

Includes countries with severe logistics constraints, such as the least developed countries.

20% 30%

Top 10 Performers

SLIDE 3 3 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

2016 THE WORLD BANK

SLIDE 4 4 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

We are the

Champions!

Oh, really?

SLIDE 5 5 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

LogisticsPerformance Index (LPI)

 LPI focus on transport rather than on Supply Chain Management.  Furthermore IT is not enough considered…

Inputs Areas for policy regulations Outcome Service delivery performance

(Time, cost, reliability)

Supply Chain Service Delivery

• Definition: E

fficiency of customs and border clearance

• Rating: very low (1) – very high (5)

Customs

1

• Definition: Quality of trade and

transport infrastructure

• Rating : very low (1) – very high (5)

Infrastructure

2

• Definition: Ease of arranging

competitively priced shipments

• Rating : very difficult (1) – very

easy (5)

International shipments

3

• Definition: Competence and quality of

logistics services

• Rating : very low (1) – very high (5)

Logistics quality and competence

4

• Definition: Ability to track and trace

consignments

• Rating : very low (1) – very high (5)

Tracking and tracing

5

• Definition: Frequency with which

shipments reach consignees within scheduled/ expected delivery times

• Rating : hardly ever (1) – always (5)

Timeliness

6

Panel 2016: 1,051 Logistics Professionals

SLIDE 6 6 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

LPI: Questions for calculating the LPI…

Definitionen und Überschriften aus Report 2016 (S . 55 ff): https:/ / wb-lpi-media.s3.amazonaws.com/ LPI_Report_2016.pdf LPI Fragebogen: https:/ / lpi.worldbank.org/ sites/ default/ files/ LPI_2014_Questionnaire.pdf

1) Customs Question: Rate the efficiency of the clearance process (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities) by border control agencies, including Costums in… . -> Rate 8 countries 2) Infrastructure Question: Evaluate the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology) in … . -> Rate 8 countries 3) International shipments Question: Asses the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to …

• > Rate 8 countries

4) Logistics quality and competence Question: Evaluate the overall Level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers) in …

• >

Rate 8 countries 5) Tracking and tracing Question: Rate the ability to track and trace your consignments when shipping to… > Rate 8 countries 6) Timeliness Question: When arranging shipments to the countries listed below, how often do the reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time… > Rate 8 countries

SLIDE 7 7 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Indicatorsfor Digitalization…

Number of Internet users in relation to all citizen of a country and Speed of fixed broadband. 1) Networks Number of smartphones in relation to all citizen (Percentage of smartphone users) 2) Smartphones Number of start-ups in a country (Maturity grade of pushing new technologies - rank of innovation) 3) Start-ups Number of Universities and schools that offer SCM programs (Number of well educated people) 4) Know-How The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 5) DESI

SLIDE 8 8 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Indicatorsfor Digitalization…

Number of Internet users in relation to all citizen of a country and Speed of fixed broadband. 1) Networks

Internet Users by Country – Penetration (2016)

http:/ / www.speedtest.net/ global-index

 Germanies Internet users are ranked with 88% penetration, right before Aruba…  Furthermore we are on rank 27 for fixed Broadband…

44 45 47 48 49 51 52 54 54 60 61 61 61 62 63 67 69 70 71 74 76 77 79 86 87 98 108 134 137 148 Bulgaria Latvia Barbados Germany United Kingdom Reunion Portugal Belgium China S pain Jersey Luxembourg France New Zealand Canada Japan Norway Denmark Lithuania United States Hungary S witzerland S weden M acau (S AR) Netherlands Romania S

• uth Korea

Iceland Hong Kong (SAR) S ingapore

Rank Germany:

27

Fixed Broadbands (2016) - M bps Rank Germany:

24

S

• urce: http:/ / www.internetlivestats.com/ internet-users-by-country/

SLIDE 9 9 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Indicatorsfor Digitalization…

Number of smartphones in relation to all citizen (Percentage of smartphone users) 2) Smartphones

 Smartphones are key to success.

They are a commodity.

 In Smartphone download speed (Mbps) we are behind developing countries…

Rank Germany:

9

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Kuw ait Cyprus Portugal M oldova Lebanon Alban ia Oman Germany United St at es United Kingdom Slovakia Romania Lat via M acau (SAR) It aly France Slovenia China Turkey Serbia Bulgaria Spain Finland Eston ia Ho ng Kong (SAR) Aust ria Greece Qatar Czech Republic Croat ia M ontenegro Sw eden M aced onia Lithuania Taiw an Sw itzerland New Zealand Canada Sout h Korea Belgium Denmark Luxembourg United Arab Emirates Aust ralia Hun gary Singapore M alt a Net herlands Iceland Norway

Smartphone Penetration (2016)

# Country Penetration

1

United Arab Emirates

80,60% 2

S weden

72,20% 3

S witzerland

71,70% 4

S

• uth Korea

71,50% 5

Taiwan

70,40% 6

Canada

69,80% 7

United S tates

69,30% 8

Netherlands

68,80% 9

Germany

68,80% 10

United Kingdom

68,60% 11

Australia

67,70% 12

Belgium

67,30% 13

S pain

66,80% 14

Azerbaijan

66,40% 15

Italy

65,80% 16

France

65,30% 17

S audia Arabia

65,20% 18

Portugal

65,00% 19

Czech Republic

64,80% 20

M alaysia

64,10%

Smartphone Download M bps (2016) Top Performers Rank Germany:

46

http:/ / www.speedtest.net/ global-index S

• urce: https:/ / newzoo.com/ insights/ rankings/ top-50-

countries-by-smartphone-penetration-and-users/

Rank Germany:

9

SLIDE 10 10 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Number of start-ups in a country (Maturity grade of pushing new technologies - rank of innovation) 3) Start-ups

Indicatorsfor Digitalization…

 Israel has 8.5 million people, yet they brought 92 companies to the US stock exchange Nasdaq, more

than any other company except the US and China (Germany has eight).

0,0 20,0 40,0 60,0 80,0 100,0 120,0 140,0

Startups/ M io. Citizen

Rank Germany:

8

Rank Germany:

6

S

• urce: https:/ / www.startupranking.com/ countries

SLIDE 11 11 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Number of Universities and schools that offer SCM programs (Number of well educated people) 4) Know-How

Indicatorsfor Digitalization…

 Most SCM-Institutes are in the United States  KIT is ranked on 55, WHU on 74 and Technische Universität München on 94…

S

• urce: https:/ / web.archive.org/ web/ 20170225231258/ http:/ www.scmworld.com/ top-100-universities

# S core Name Country Continent 1 1149 M ichigan S tate University U.S .A. North America 2 736 Penn S tate University U.S .A. North America 3 671 University of Tennessee U.S .A. North America 4 641 M assachusetts Institute of Technology U.S .A. North America 5 464 Arizona S tate University U.S .A. North America 6 464 University of Texas at Austin, M cCombs S chool of Business U.S .A. North America 7 382 Western M ichigan University U.S .A. North America 8 306 University of M ichigan U.S .A. North America 9 285 Harvard Business S chool U.S .A. North America 10 271 Auburn University U.S .A. North America 11 241 Iowa S tate University U.S .A. North America 12 233 C ranfield School of M anagement U.K. Europe 13 212 Vlerick Business School Belgium Europe 14 205 Georgia Institute of Technology U.S .A. North America 15 176 S tanford University U.S .A. North America 16 174 University of S

• uth Carolina

U.S .A. North America 17 143 Texas C hristian University U.S .A. North America 18 135 North Carolina S tate University U.S .A. North America 19 129 INSE AD France Europe 20 113 The Ohio State University U.S .A. North America 21 112 C ambridge University U.K. Europe 22 110 Purdue University U.S .A. North America 23 106 Texas A& M University U.S .A. North America 24 84 University of Wisconsin M adison U.S .A. North America 25 78 Northwestern University U.S .A. North America 26 77 Eindhoven University of Technology Netherlands Europe 27 74 C arnegie M ellon University U.S .A. North America 28 60 Duke University U.S .A. North America 29 60 London Business S chool U.K. Europe 30 60 C

• penhagen Business S

chool Denmark Europe 31 59 Indian Institute of M anagement Bangalore India Asia 32 52 IM D S wiss Europe 33 50 Oxford University U.K. Europe 34 48 Indiana University U.S .A. North America 35 48 University of M innesota U.S .A. North America 36 47 C

• rnell University

U.S .A. North America 37 45 University of Pennsylvania, The Wharton S chool U.S .A. North America 38 44 Rutgers Business School U.S .A. North America 39 44 Bocconi University Italy Europe 40 43 Zaragoza Logistics C enter S pain Europe 41 43 C lemson University U.S .A. North America 42 42 Rotterdam S chool of M anagement Netherlands Europe 43 42 C

• lumbia University

U.S .A. North America 44 40 Yale University U.S .A. North America 45 38 Bowling Green S tate University U.S .A. North America 46 38 University of M aryland U.S .A. North America 47 37 IE SE Business S chool S pain Europe 48 36 ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich S wiss Europe 49 33 C halmers University of Technology S weden Europe 50 31 University of S

• t. Gallen

S wiss Europe 51 31 C ardiff University Wales Europe 52 31 M anchester Business School U.K. Europe 53 30 University of C alifornia Berkeley U.S .A. North America 54 29 University of Virginia U.S .A. North America 55 29 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Germany Europe

# Score Name Country Continent 1 1149 Michigan State University U.S.A. North America 2 736 Penn State University U.S.A. North America 3 671 University of Tennessee U.S.A. North America 4 641 Massachusetts Institute of Technology U.S.A. North America 5 464 Arizona State University U.S.A. North America 6 464 University of Texas at Austin, McCombs School of Business U.S.A. North America 7 382 Western Michigan University U.S.A. North America 8 306 University of Michigan U.S.A. North America 9 285 Harvard Business School U.S.A. North America 10 271 Auburn University U.S.A. North America

Rank Germany:

55

SLIDE 12 12 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 5) DESI

Indicatorsfor Digitalization…

 Denmark, Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands have the most advanced digital economies in the EU  There was low increase in Portugal, Latvia and Germany (below 0.02).

Rank Germany:

11

S

• urce: https:/ / ec.europa.eu/ digital-single-market/ desi

SLIDE 13 13 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Ask Uncle Sam…

„People think we got big by putting big stores into small cities – really we got big by replacing inventory with information !“

Samuel „Sam“ Moore Walton, Founder of Wal-Mart (* 29. März 1918 ; † 5. April 1992)

SLIDE 14 14 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

How owns t he dat a – owns t he busi ness!

SLIDE 15 15 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Famous last words: Business in the 21st Century

There are three choices in the new economy. All companies are: (1) already data companies, (2) will become data companies, or (3) will cease to be relevant.

Stephen Brobst CTO Teradata 2016

SLIDE 16 16 „ M onitoring & Transparency: Logistikinfrastruktur in der digitalen Weltordnung"

Kontakt

• Prof. Dr.-Ing. Michael Benz

Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Dr.-Ing. Stefan Walter Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Benz + Walter GmbH Hirschgraben 18 65183 Wiesbaden michael.benz@benz-walter.de

Big Data Analytics

Unternehmensberatung

Forschung und Projektentwicklung

Supply Chain

Cluster Logistik + Mobilität

Business Intelligence

Digitalisierung

Veranstaltungsentwicklung