Mon onthly W Webinar ar Ser Series April, 2018 Todays A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mon onthly w webinar ar ser series
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mon onthly W Webinar ar Ser Series April, 2018 Todays A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Traditional vs. Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis TREATMS Mon onthly W Webinar ar Ser Series April, 2018 Todays A Agenda Announcements Amanda Bistran-Hall News and Updates Amanda Bistran-Hall 90-day Start-Up


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mon

  • nthly W

Webinar ar Ser Series

Traditional vs. Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis TREATMS

April, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Today’s A Agenda

  • Announcements

Amanda Bistran-Hall

  • News and Updates

Amanda Bistran-Hall

  • 90-day Start-Up Overview: Go Live to Site Activation

Karen Lane

  • Q & A

Team

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Announcements

  • The Onboarding Webinar was held March 1st and March 2nd
  • Both a PDF copy of the slide presentation and a video recording are available through your Site Managers
  • Monthly Webinars will be held on the 1st Wednesday at 3pm Eastern and 1st

Thursday at 9am Eastern of every month

  • In order to attend, you must register
  • Contact your Site Managers with any questions!
  • Carolyn: carolynhkoenig@gmail.com
  • Sarah: slenington@optonline.net
slide-4
SLIDE 4

TREAT-MS M S March Monthly W Webinar

  • March 1st at 9am
  • 41 attended out of 54 registered (76%)
  • March 2nd at 11am
  • 63 attended out of 74 registered (85%)

Sites Represented:

  • Advanced Neurology Specialists
  • Billings Clinic - Billings, MT
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center
  • Central Texas Neurology Consultants
  • Christiana Care Health System – Newark, DE
  • Dignity Health Sacramento (CA)
  • EvergreenHealth Medical Center
  • Georgetown University
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
  • Holy Name Medical Center
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard University
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Neurology Specialists of Tidewater / Meridian Clinical

Research

  • New York Presbyterian / Columbia University of Medical

Center

  • New York University School of Medicine
  • Norton Neurology Services
  • Ohio Health
  • Providence Health (OR)
  • Neurology Specialists of Tidewater / Meridian Clinical Research
  • New York Presbyterian / Columbia University of Medical Center
  • New York University School of Medicine
  • Norton Neurology Services
  • Ohio Health
  • Providence Health (OR)
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Stony Brook University
  • Swedish Medical Center
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)
  • University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Florida, Gainesville
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC)
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of Louisville (KY)
  • University of Miami
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University Rochester
  • University of South Florida Health
  • University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW)
  • University of Utah
  • University of Washington
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Wayne State University
slide-5
SLIDE 5

O U R S I T E M A N AG E R S W I L L B E AWAY

Carolyn: Sarah: April 7 – 21 April 12-19 Back-up Managers: Noeleen Amanda Katie Tracey Your back-up Site Managers will be conducting your weekly meetings as scheduled.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Vacation S

  • n Sub

ubstitutes es

slide-7
SLIDE 7

In Development: Patient Brochure

slide-8
SLIDE 8

To learn more about the TREAT-MS study, please visit: [insert website]

Resources

Please see the NMSS and CMSC websites for information on MS: https://www.nationalmssociety.org http://www.mscare.org/

Funded by:

Togetherwe arestronger

Join us in our fight to improve treatment for Multiple Sclerosispatients

Didyouknow?

There is an unmet need to evaluate initial therapeutic strategies and strategies for switching therapies during the relapsing-remitting phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). Currently there is a lack of evidence- based guidelines to help MS providers determine which treatment strategy is best for patients with MS. There are many treatments for MS, but in this study doctors are trying to understand which types of treatments are most appropriate to begin with. Medical care only improves with the help

  • f volunteers like you. Your participation

can help improve the treatment and

  • utcomes of future MS patients.

[Insert POC name] [Insert POC number]

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why should Iparticipate?

Satisfaction that you may contribute to improved care for future MS patients Help improve decision-making for providers and greater community Help better understand how to treat people with MS

Whatmedicinewill I take?

Most treatments in the TREAT-MS study are FDA-approved for relapsing-remitting MS. If you participate, you will be randomly assigned (like a flip of a coin) to one of two standard types of therapy:

Whathappensat studyvisits?

A screening visit to see if the study is right for you Visit with your MS provider every 6 months for 4 years for medical check-ups and questionnaires Brain MRI at least yearly Brief online questionnaires collected between visits

HowdoIgetinvolved?

Please talk with your MS provider to see if TREAT-MS is a good fit for you. For more information, please e-mail TREATMS@jhmi.edu or visit [insert website]. [Insert POC name] [Insert POC number]

What isTREAT-MS?

TREAT-MS is a study where we hope to identify specific treatments that can prevent, delay, or lessen disabling effects of multiple sclerosis (MS) over time.

Who canparticipate?

You may be able to participate if you: Are 18-60 years of age Have relapsing-remitting MS (symptom flare-ups followed by periods with few to no symptoms) Have not been on chemotherapy in the past year Have never been treated with rituximab,

  • crelizumab, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone
  • r cladribine

Have not been on any disease modifying therapy for MS for > 6 months duration Have not been on any MS treatment in the past 6 months Are HIV negative Traditional therapy, such as a shot or

  • ral medication

Early aggressive therapy, such as an infusion With the advice and guidance of your MS provider, you will choose the specific therapy within the group you are assigned to that is the best fit for you. We value your participation, and you will be financially compensated for your time.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

In Development: Physician Flyer and I/E Card

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis (TREAT-MS) Trial

Protocol Number: IRB00143534 There is an unmet need to evaluate initial therapeutic strategies and strategies for switching therapies during the relapsing-remitting phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). Currently there is a lack of evidence- based guidelines to help clinicians determine which treatment strategy is best for patients with MS. Randomized controlled trial in people with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) N=900 Stratified by higher vs. lower risk for long term disability Randomized 1:1 to early aggressive vs. traditional disease-modifying therapy (DMT) class (specific therapy within assigned therapy class at the discretion of you and your patient)

Inclusion Criteria

Aged 18-60 RRMS by 2017 McDonald criteria No chemo in last year HIV negative Must be EITHER JC virus antibody negative or low positive (index antibody titer <0.9), OR negative for: Hepatitis B and C, tuberculosis

About the Study Exclusion Criteria

Use of any MS DMT in the past 6 months Prior use of rituximab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone or cladribine Prior use of any other MS DMT for > 6 months duration Use of other investigational drugs for MS Use
  • f teriflunomide in past 2 years without a
washout Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or of child-bearing age who are considering conception during the study

Study Activities

Study participation: 48+ months Evaluation includes: standardized neurologic exam/disability measures and other performance measures Standard-of-care brain MRIs at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter Routine Optical Coherence Tomography tests annually at select sites Clinic evaluation every 6 months Collect electronic patient reported outcomes Principal Investigators: Ellen M. Mowry, MD, MCR and Scott D. Newsome, DO

Contact Information

POC Name: [Insert] Email: [Insert] Phone: [Insert] Funded by:
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Updates from Trial Leadership

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TREAT-MS Trial Update

Protocol v1.6 & consent template approved by JHM IRB!

March 27

Protocol, consent form template and local context questionnaire (LCQ) to sites

April 5 (today!)

Completed LCQ due (2 weeks)

April 19

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Payment for Start-Up Activities

Once sites receive JHM IRB approval, subcontracts will be finalized and executed Once 90 day activities are completed, sites will be activated and start-up payments will be sent!!!

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Updates Regarding our Website

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

IRB Reliance & Subcontracts

Karen Lane

slide-20
SLIDE 20

cIRB and Study Agreements Status

Site FWA SMT IRB Exchange Portal LOI Subcontract Sent

Advanced Neurology Specialists

Y N N N

Yes

Baylor Scott & White Health (Dallas, TX)

Y Y N Y

Yes

Billings Clinic (Billings, MT)

Y N N N

Yes

Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Y Y Y Y

Yes

Central Texas Neurology Consultants

Y N N N

Yes

Christiana Care Health System - Newark, DE

Y Y Y Y

Yes

Dignity Health Sacramento (CA)

Y N N N

Yes

EvergreenHealth Medical Center (WA)

Y N N N

Yes

Georgetown University

Y Y Y N

Yes

Hackensack University Medical Center

Y Y N N

Yes

Holy Name Medical Center

Y N N N

Yes

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Y Y Y Y

Yes

Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard University

Y Y Y N

Yes

Mayo Clinic

Y Y Y Y

Yes

Neurology Specialists of Tidewater / Meridian Clinical Research

N N N N

Yes

New York Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center

Y Y Y Y

Yes

New York University School of Medicine

Y Y Y Y

Yes

Northwestern University

Y Y Y N

Yes

Norton Neurology Services

Y N N Y

Yes

Ohio Health

Y Y Y Y

Yes

Providence Health (OR)

Y Y N N

Yes

Rush University Medical Center

Y Y Y N

Yes

Data as of 3/30/2018

slide-21
SLIDE 21

cIRB and Study Agreements Status

Site FWA SMT IRB Exchange Portal LOI Subcontract Sent

Stony Brook University

Y Y Y N Yes

Swedish Medical Center

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Y Y Y N Yes

University of Cincinnati

Y Y Y N Yes

University of Florida, Gainesville

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC)

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of Louisville (KY)

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of Massachusetts

Y Y Y N Yes

University of Miami

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of Michigan

Y Y Y N Yes

University of Pittsburgh

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of Rochester

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of South Florida Health

Y Y N N Yes

University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW)

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of Utah

Y Y Y Y Yes

University of Vermont

Y Y Y N Yes

University of Washington

Y Y Y Y Yes

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Y Y Y Y Yes

Wayne State University

Y Y Y Y Yes

Data as of 3/30/2018

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Final S Step IRB C Ceding Ac Accept t the S e Study-Speci cifi fic c Rel eliance P e Plan

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Milestones Met

All subcontracts at sites 30 sites with reliance documents complete

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Feature Presentation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Go Live to Site Activation

90 Day Start-Up Overview for

TREATMS

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Introduction

Start-up performance is the dress rehearsal for enrollment performance and overall study performance. A rapid start-up not only improves trial performance but helps everyone feel confident & good about a job well done. We will organize ourselves with a schedule of deliverables, an order of start-up events, and use general tools and processes to accomplish your TREAT-MS site activation Together, we will use an electronic time manager over the 90 days for easier communication and progress tracking.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

“Start-Up Performance is the Dress Rehearsal to Enrollment Performance”

  • Our first efficiency is to organize the start-up process into monthly,

sequential, time-sensitive objectives:

  • By the end of each month, staged tasks are completed as milestones

met to accelerate progress through the start-up phase and onto site activation

Month 1

IRB Submission & Contracts FWAs

Month 2

Collection of Essential Documents & IP Supply

Month 3

Training: Focus

  • n Local

Personnel

Site Activation

IM/SIV/Remote Commence enrollment FPFV

  • Site managers will aid

institutions in reaching monthly deadlines to achieve activation within 90 days and FPFV immediately following.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

We’ve gained a head start

Our first month has been spread over 1.5 months

slide-29
SLIDE 29

In April, we will get back into sync!

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The Plan is Designed to Eliminate the Highest Risk Delays

  • The start-up activities are purposely sequenced to begin

with your steps that take the longest.

Local IRB Submission Contracts & Agreements Delegation of Responsibilities Certifications Highest Risk Steps

 Most setbacks in clinical trials occur during

these 4 activities

 We will use checklists and methods to aid in

protecting efficiencies and avoiding delays.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Month 1

GO LIVE IRB Submission & Contracts FWAs

Month 2

Collection of Essential Documents & IP Supply

Month 3

Training: Focus

  • n Local

Personnel

Site Activation

IM/SIV/Remote Commence enrollment ACTIVATE (FPFV)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

June-July 2018

Remote Activations

slide-33
SLIDE 33

What response best describes your experience in starting a trial in 90 days?

  • A. We are skilled at activating trials in 90 days
  • B. We activated once in a 90-day time
  • C. We tried to activate in 90 days, but took longer
  • D. This will be our first start-up experience
  • E. We do not believe we can meet this deadline
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Key Factors for a successful 90-Day Plan

Weekly ZOOM meetings

1

Staging our work plan

2

Checklists to map & gauge progress

3

Deadline compliance

4

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Weekly Zoom Meetings ARE KEY

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Key: Weekly Zoom Meetings

Set up Zoom Meetings; slide presentation; IRB website; Contract routing; weekly goals table Global eTM access; Meeting with contract contacts-results IRB update IRB & Contract progress; plan Month 2 Delegation log; vision training; documents to collect & upload Document uploading; pharmacy (or device engineering) meeting 3-way call: setting up with pharmacy or clinical engineering Training plan and notifications to those to be trained Recruitment plan; screening plan Consent training Local in-service debriefing; Log of those trained Screening log practice and submission timelines

slide-37
SLIDE 37

22

Staging is Key:

  • Discrete,
  • Sequential, one task at a time
  • Agree to time-sensitive
  • bjectives
  • Month and Done!
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Checklists are Key

Sign In Time Out Sign Out Induction Room Operating Room PACU Induction Room Departure Checklist Operating Room Arrival Checklist Operating Room Departure Checklist PACU Arrival Checklist Pre-Start Up Go Live Site Activation

Prior to 90 Day Phase

Month 1 Month 2 Planning (Pre-Start) Checklist Month 1 Checklist Month 2 Checklist Month 3 Checklist Month 3

Low, et al. Surgical Checklist Start-Up Checklist

slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40

TREAT-MS

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Email Notifications to Help Us

Email 1: Reminder of an Approaching Deadline

Subject Line: [Date and timestamp] – [study_id] [site_name] Deadline Approaching Your deadline for completing [insert_task_name] is

  • approaching. This is a reminder to visit the Global

eTM and complete the activity or item(s). Click here to logon and review:

Email 2: Congratulations on a Completed Task

Subject Line: [Date and timestamp] – [study_id] [site_name] Task Completed Congratulations for completing [insert_task_name]! We thank you for your continued vigilance and dedication to the site startup process. Please visit the Mount Everest Tab to view your latest score and placement on the climb! [insertmt Everest link here]

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Go Live to Site Activation in 90 Days

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Table 1-1. Figure 1-1 represented as a table. Please see Appendices for monthly checklists. Start-up Activity: 3 Month Overview Month 1 Week 1 Local Context Review IRB Submission Week 1 Standard Agreement/ SOW / Contract Received by your Local Contracts Office Week 3 Local IRB Context Questionnaire (LCQ) signed and returned to CCC Week 3 Local Red-lined Contract returned to JHU Contracts Office Week 3 Remaining Start-up Activities Planned Month 2 Consent & Approval Documents Uploaded Regulatory (Essential) Documents Uploaded Pharmacy engagement and planning Month 3 Local Protocol Training Completed Note: It is assumed GCP Compliance Training (CITI) is in place before Go Live. Those without CITI training will have to be trained in Month 1. Local In-Service and Grand Rounds

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Month 1

We Start with What Takes the Longest!

slide-45
SLIDE 45

IRB and Contracts

Month 1 Week 1 Local Context Review IRB Submission Week 1 Standard Agreement/ SOW / Contract Received by your Local Contracts Office Week 3 Local IRB Context Questionnaire (LCQ) signed and returned to CCC Week 3 Local Red-lined Contract returned to JHU Contracts Office Week 3 Remaining Start-up Activities Planned

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Be prepared to devote the first week to TREAT-MS

  • activities. Week 1 is

the most intense; the rest of the 90 day period will be easier.

Idea: Give this presentation and/or your guideline booklet to your team and your contracts administrators!

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Which best describes YO YOUR local IRB’s agreement to rely on the Hopkins cIRB?

  • A. We have a reliance with Hopkins through the

CTSA

  • B. We are not a CTSA but have a reliance

agreement with Hopkins

  • C. TREAT-MS will be our IRB’s first reliance with

Hopkins

  • D. Our institution does not rely on outside IRBs
  • E. We have not yet explored our cIRB reliance

status

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Month 2

Regulatory(Essential) documents collected in a specific order

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Deploy Week 5 Upload or electronically sign

  • ff no later than

Week 8

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Regulatory Documents

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Month 3

Training: Focus on local personnel

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Training Modules

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Online Training

Interactive features to enhance transparency and collaboration Retraining throughout the study

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Grand Rounds & Nursing In-service

RELY ON COLLEAGUES TO SUPPORT TRIALS AND REFER PATIENTS

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Site Activation

Your reward for three months of challenging work and herding others at your institution to stay

  • n course.
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Traversing the 90-Day Start-Up

Activation! End of Month 3 End of Month 2 End of Month 1 First Zoom Telephone Call Receipt of Protocol and Contract

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Your Mt. Everest Sherpas

  • Sarah and Carolyn are your Site

Navigator-Sherpas

  • Who will reach the summit first?
  • We hope one of those celebrated

sites will be you and your team!

Carolyn Koenig Amanda Bistran- Hall Sarah Lenington

slide-58
SLIDE 58

We know your team will easily manage the start-up process

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Our r respon

  • nsibility

as y you

  • ur C

CCC is to

  • help you
  • u a

ach chieve the k know-how

  • w

We c e can m make e it happen t tog

  • gether!

The system is dedicated to steadfast, orderly staging. We compartmentalize and concentrate on one month at a time. Stay loyal to the effectiveness of weekly meetings. Spread the word to your colleagues that you consider meeting the TREAT-MS 90-day timeline a professional responsibility.

slide-60
SLIDE 60

What is the most important VALUE you see for YOU a and nd YOUR T R Tea eam?

  • A. Weekly Zoom calls to help us through the

process

  • B. Automated checklists with due dates to keep

us on track

  • C. Staging the process to start with the hardest

parts first

  • D. Help in navigating local IRB approvals and

contracts

  • E. Having a site manager as a highly accessible

partner

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Celebrate Your Accomplishments!

THANK YOU FOR AGREEING TO BE SUCH A MOTIVATED AND HIGH PERFORMING PARTNER !

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Acknowledgements and Thanks

Shannon Hillery Co-author of the Guidelines Ying Wang Software developer and builder in Prelude’s VISION™ Ryan Majkowski Software developer Cindy MacInnis Contributor to the IRB and contracts Guidelines & software Megan Singleton Contributor to the IRB Guidelines TIC PL, PMs, Navigators Reviews and critiques Site Managers who are disseminating this innovative package and platform to the trial teams!

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Open en f for

  • r Q

Ques estions

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Thank You for attending today’s webinar!

May’s Monthly Webinar will be held on the 2nd at 3pm and 3rd at 9am Eastern