Momentum-space treatment of the Coulomb force: Screening and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

momentum space treatment of the coulomb force screening
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Momentum-space treatment of the Coulomb force: Screening and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Momentum-space treatment of the Coulomb force: Screening and renormalization A. Deltuva Vilnius University In collaboration with A. C. Fonseca and P . U. Sauer Outline Momentum-space description of few-body scattering: screening and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Momentum-space treatment

  • f the Coulomb force:

Screening and renormalization

  • A. Deltuva

Vilnius University

In collaboration with A. C. Fonseca and P . U. Sauer

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Momentum-space description of few-body scattering: screening and renormalization for Coulomb [Taylor, Alt, Sandhas, ...] S&R variations and other methods Applications: 3N, 4N, nuclear reactions, ...

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Screened Coulomb

w

R(r) = w C(r)e−( r R)n

standard scattering theory

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Screened Coulomb

w

R(r) = w C(r)e−( r R)n

standard scattering theory nature: Coulomb is screened at large distances large R: physical observables insensitive to screening, screened and full Coulomb physically indistinguishable

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Screened Coulomb

w

R(r) = w C(r)e−( r R)n

standard scattering theory nature: Coulomb is screened at large distances large R: physical observables insensitive to screening, screened and full Coulomb physically indistinguishable in the R → ∞ limit physical results are recovered

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Screened and full Coulomb physically indistinguishable

? p′|TR|p − − − →

R→∞

p′|T

C|p

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Screened and full Coulomb physically indistinguishable

? e2iφRp′|TR|p − − − →

R→∞

p′|T

C|p

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Screened and full Coulomb physically indistinguishable

initial physical state: wave packet ϕin(p)

  • utgoing wave packet

ϕout(p′) =

  • d3pp′|S|pϕin(p)

? ∼

  • d2 ˆ

pe2iφRp′|TR|pϕin(p) − − − →

R→∞

  • d2 ˆ

pp′|T

C|pϕin(p)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Screened and full Coulomb physically indistinguishable

initial physical state: wave packet ϕin(p)

  • utgoing wave packet

ϕout(p′) =

  • d3pp′|S|pϕin(p)

? ∼

  • d2 ˆ

pe2iφRp′|TR|pϕin(p) − − − →

R→∞

  • d2 ˆ

pp′|T

C|pϕin(p)

p′ = p : e2iφRp′|TR|p − − − →

R→∞ p′|T C|p

as distribution

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Screened and full Coulomb physically indistinguishable

initial physical state: wave packet ϕin(p)

  • utgoing wave packet

ϕout(p′) =

  • d3pp′|S|pϕin(p)

? ∼

  • d2 ˆ

pe2iφRp′|TR|pϕin(p) − − − →

R→∞

  • d2 ˆ

pp′|T

C|pϕin(p)

p′ = p : e2iφRp′|TR|p − − − →

R→∞ p′|T C|p

as distribution φR− − − →

R→∞ [σL −ηLR]−

− − →

R→∞ αeM/p [ln(2pR)−C/n]

[J. R. Taylor, Nuovo Cimento B23, 313 (1974)]

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Screened and full Coulomb wave functions

r < R : w

R(r) ≈w C(r)

⇓ eiφLRr|ψ(+)

LR (p) ≈r|ψ(+) LC (p)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Screened and full Coulomb wave functions

r < R : w

R(r) ≈w C(r)

⇓ eiφLRr|ψ(+)

LR (p) ≈r|ψ(+) LC (p)

eiφR|ψ(+)

R (p) −

− − →

R→∞ |ψ(+) C (p)

[ V. G. Gorshkov, Sov. Phys.-JETP 13, 1037 (1961)]

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Screening and renormalization

Renormalization of the on-shell screened Coulomb transition matrix TR = wR +wRG0TR and wave function in the limit R → ∞ yields Coulomb amplitude and Coulomb wave function

TRz−1

R −

− − →

R→∞ T C as distribution

(1+G0TR)|pz−1/2

R

− − − →

R→∞ |ψ(+) C (p)

zR = e−2iφR

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Two-particle scattering

transition matrix T (R) = v+wR +(v+wR)G0T (R)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Two-particle scattering

transition matrix T (R) = v+wR +(v+wR)G0T (R)

with long-range and Coulomb-distorted short-range parts T (R) = TR +(1+TRG0) ˜ T (R)(1+G0TR) ˜ T (R) = v+vGR ˜ T (R)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Two-particle scattering

transition matrix T (R) = v+wR +(v+wR)G0T (R)

with long-range and Coulomb-distorted short-range parts T (R) = TR +(1+TRG0) ˜ T (R)(1+G0TR) ˜ T (R) = v+vGR ˜ T (R) Renormalized amplitude: T (R)z−1

R −

− − →

R→∞ T = TC +ψ(−) C | ˜

T (C)|ψ(+)

C

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Two-particle scattering

transition matrix T (R) = v+wR +(v+wR)G0T (R)

with long-range and Coulomb-distorted short-range parts T (R) = TR +(1+TRG0) ˜ T (R)(1+G0TR) ˜ T (R) = v+vGR ˜ T (R) Renormalized amplitude: T (R)z−1

R −

− − →

R→∞ T = TC +ψ(−) C | ˜

T (C)|ψ(+)

C

= TC + lim

R→∞z − 1

2

R [T (R) −TR]z − 1

2

R

short-range part: fast convergence with R

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Test: convergence with R in pp scattering wR(r) wC(r) = e−( r

R)n

1 1 2

r/R

n = 1 n = 4 n → ∞

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Test: convergence with R in pp scattering wR(r) wC(r) = e−( r

R)n

1 1 2

r/R

n = 1 n = 4 n → ∞ 50 52 10 20 30 40

η (deg) R (fm)

1S0 Ep = 3 MeV

↓ ↑

0.001%

exact n = 1 n = 4 n → ∞

  • ptimal choice: 3 ≤ n ≤ 8
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Limits of practical applicability

p → 0: κ = αM/p, σL = argΓ(1+L+iκ), and zR diverge, renormalization procedure ill-defined

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Limits of practical applicability

p → 0: κ = αM/p, σL = argΓ(1+L+iκ), and zR diverge, renormalization procedure ill-defined ⇒ slow convergence with R at low relative energies

45.5 46.0

1 MeV

6.5 7.0

η (deg)

0.1 MeV

0.0 0.5 20 100 500

R (fm) 0.01 MeV

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Three-particle scattering: short-range forces

Faddeev / Alt, Grassberger, and Sandhas equations Uβα = ¯ δβαG−1

0 +∑ σ

¯ δβσTσG0Uσα U0α = G−1

0 +∑ σ

TσG0Uσα Tσ = vσ +vσG0Tσ G0 = (E +i0−H0)−1 momentum-space partial-wave representation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

AGS equations with 3BF

V3BF =

3

α=1

uα Uβα = ¯ δβαG−1

0 +∑ γ

¯ δβγTγG0Uγα +uα +∑

γ

uγG0(1+TγG0)Uγα

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Three-particle scattering: including screened Coulomb

Faddeev / Alt, Grassberger, and Sandhas equations U(R)

βα = ¯

δβαG−1

0 +∑ σ

¯ δβσT (R)

σ G0U(R) σα

U(R)

0α = G−1 0 +∑ σ

T (R)

σ G0U(R) σα

T (R)

σ

= vσ +wσR +(vσ +wσR)G0T (R)

σ

G0 = (E +i0−H0)−1 momentum-space partial-wave representation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Three-particle scattering: including screened Coulomb

Faddeev / Alt, Grassberger, and Sandhas equations U(R)

βα = ¯

δβαG−1

0 +∑ σ

¯ δβσT (R)

σ G0U(R) σα

U(R)

0α = G−1 0 +∑ σ

T (R)

σ G0U(R) σα

T (R)

σ

= vσ +wσR +(vσ +wσR)G0T (R)

σ

G0 = (E +i0−H0)−1 momentum-space partial-wave representation Additional difficulties: quasi-singular nature of screened Coulomb potential slow partial-wave convergence

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Three-particle scattering: including screened Coulomb

Faddeev / Alt, Grassberger, and Sandhas equations U(R)

βα = ¯

δβαG−1

0 +∑ σ

¯ δβσT (R)

σ G0U(R) σα

U(R)

0α = G−1 0 +∑ σ

T (R)

σ G0U(R) σα

T (R)

σ

= vσ +wσR +(vσ +wσR)G0T (R)

σ

G0 = (E +i0−H0)−1 momentum-space partial-wave representation Additional difficulties: quasi-singular nature of screened Coulomb potential slow partial-wave convergence R → ∞ limit?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Three-particle scattering: R → ∞ limit

long-range part

  • W c.m.

αR

T c.m.

αR = W c.m. αR +W c.m. αR G(R) α T c.m. αR

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Three-particle scattering: R → ∞ limit

Split into long-range part

  • W c.m.

αR

T c.m.

αR = W c.m. αR +W c.m. αR G(R) α T c.m. αR

and Coulomb-distorted short-range part U(R)

βα = δβαT c.m. αR +[1+T c.m. βR G(R) β ] ˜

U(R)

βα [1+G(R) α T c.m. αR ]

U(R)

0α = [1+TρRG0] ˜

U(R)

0α [1+G(R) α T c.m. αR ]

[ρ is neutral]

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Three-particle scattering: R → ∞ limit

Split into long-range part

  • W c.m.

αR

T c.m.

αR = W c.m. αR +W c.m. αR G(R) α T c.m. αR

and Coulomb-distorted short-range part U(R)

βα = δβαT c.m. αR +[1+T c.m. βR G(R) β ] ˜

U(R)

βα [1+G(R) α T c.m. αR ]

U(R)

0α = [1+TρRG0] ˜

U(R)

0α [1+G(R) α T c.m. αR ]

[ρ is neutral]

Renormalized amplitudes: Uβα = δβαT c.m.

αC + lim R→∞Z − 1

2

R f [U(R) βα −δβαT c.m. αR ]Z − 1

2

Ri

U0α = lim

R→∞z − 1

2

R U(R) 0α Z − 1

2

Ri

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Three-particle scattering: R → ∞ limit

Split into long-range part

  • W c.m.

αR

T c.m.

αR = W c.m. αR +W c.m. αR G(R) α T c.m. αR

and Coulomb-distorted short-range part U(R)

βα = δβαT c.m. αR +[1+T c.m. βR G(R) β ] ˜

U(R)

βα [1+G(R) α T c.m. αR ]

U(R)

0α = [1+TρRG0] ˜

U(R)

0α [1+G(R) α T c.m. αR ]

[ρ is neutral]

Renormalized amplitudes: Uβα = δβαT c.m.

αC + lim R→∞Z − 1

2

R f [U(R) βα −δβαT c.m. αR ]Z − 1

2

Ri

U0α = lim

R→∞z − 1

2

R U(R) 0α Z − 1

2

Ri

short-range part: fast convergence with R

slide-31
SLIDE 31

r-space methods

Kohn VP + HH [Kievsky et al] differential Faddeev equations [Payne et al, Lazauskas et al, Suslov et al] integral Faddeev equations [Ishikawa]

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Screening and renormalization: variations

separable potentials, quasiparticle equations, effective two-body potentials, Coulomb distorted ffs, ... [Alt et al] "rigorous Coulomb treatment" [Oryu et al] no/different renormalization [Witała et al] in progress: separable potentials, unscreened Coulomb representation [Mukhamedzhanov et al, TORUS]

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Proton-deuteron scattering

Symmetrized Faddeev / AGS equations U(R) = PG−1

0 +PT (R)G0U(R)

U(R) = (1+P)G−1

0 +(1+P)T (R)G0U(R)

P = P12 P23 +P13 P23 Screening function with n = 4 Renormalized amplitudes: U = T c.m.

C

+ lim

R→∞Z−1 R [U(R) −T c.m. R

] U0 = lim

R→∞z − 1

2

R U(R) 0 Z − 1

2

R

slide-34
SLIDE 34

pd elastic amplitude (spin-diagonal)

  • 4
  • 2

2

Re U(R)

non-renormalized

2 4 60 120 180

Im U(R) Θc.m. (deg)

Ep = 10 MeV

R = 5 fm R = 10 fm R = 15 fm R = 20 fm

  • 4
  • 2

2

Re U U = TC

c.m. + ZR

  • 1(U(R)-TR

c.m.)

renormalized

2 4 60 120 180

Im U Θc.m. (deg)

R = 5 fm R = 10 fm R = 15 fm R = 20 fm

slide-35
SLIDE 35

pd elastic amplitude (spin-nondiagonal)

  • 0.2

0.0

Re U(R)

non-renormalized

  • 0.2

0.0 60 120 180

Im U(R) Θc.m. (deg)

Ep = 10 MeV

R = 5 fm R = 10 fm R = 15 fm R = 20 fm

  • 0.2

0.0

Re U U = ZR

  • 1 U(R)

renormalized

  • 0.2

0.0 60 120 180

Im U Θc.m. (deg)

R = 5 fm R = 10 fm R = 15 fm R = 20 fm

slide-36
SLIDE 36

pd breakup amplitude

0.0 0.1

Re U0

(R)

non-renormalized

R = 10 fm R = 20 fm R = 30 fm R = 40 fm

  • 0.1

0.0 0.1 5 10

Im U0

(R)

S (MeV)

Ep = 13 MeV

(50.5o,50.5o,120.0o)

0.0 0.1

Re U0

renormalized

U = zR

  • 1/2 U0

(R) ZR

  • 1/2

R = 10 fm R = 20 fm R = 30 fm R = 40 fm

  • 0.1

0.0 0.1 5 10

Im U0 S (MeV)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Convergence with R: pd elastic scattering

100 200 400

dσ/dΩ (mb/sr)

no Coulomb

R = 10 fm R = 20 fm R = 30 fm

0.00 0.02 0.04 60 120 180

Ay (N) Θc.m. (deg) Ep = 3 MeV

0.00 0.02

T21 Ep = 3 MeV

  • 0.05

0.00 0.05 60 120 180

T21 Θc.m. (deg) Ep = 10 MeV

slide-38
SLIDE 38

45 90 135 180

θc.m.[deg]

1 10 100 100 100 1000 45 90 135 180

θc.m.[deg]

  • 0.4

0.0 0.4 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.04 45 90 135 180

θc.m.[deg]

  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.0 0.2 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.02

dσ/dΩ [mb/sr] 3 MeV dσ/dΩ [mb/sr] 10 MeV dσ/dΩ [mb/sr] 65 MeV

Ay Ay Ay

iT11 iT11 iT11

Comparison with configuration-space results

pd elastic scattering:

—— Kohn variational principle (Pisa) —— screening and renormalization

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Convergence with R: pd breakup at Ep = 13 MeV

1.0 1.1 1.2 5 10

(50.5o,50.5o,120.0o)

no Coulomb

R = 10 fm R = 20 fm R = 30 fm

0.5 1.0 1.5 5 10

d5σ/dS dΩ1 dΩ2 (mb MeV-1sr-2)

(20.0o,35.0o,90.0o)

  • 0.05

0.00 0.05 5 10 15

Ay (N)

S (MeV)

(39.0o,62.5o,180.0o)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Convergence with R: pd breakup at Ep = 13 MeV

1.0 1.1 1.2 5 10

(50.5o,50.5o,120.0o)

no Coulomb

R = 10 fm R = 20 fm R = 30 fm

0.5 1.0 1.5 5 10

d5σ/dS dΩ1 dΩ2 (mb MeV-1sr-2)

(20.0o,35.0o,90.0o)

  • 0.05

0.00 0.05 5 10 15

Ay (N)

S (MeV)

(39.0o,62.5o,180.0o)

1 2 0.0 0.5 1.0

d5σ/dS dΩ1 dΩ2 (mb MeV-1sr-2)

Epp (MeV)

pp-FSI ↓

zR = exp(-2iαM/p [ln(2pR)-C/n])

(39.0o,39.0o,0.0o)

no Coulomb

R = 10 fm R = 20 fm R = 30 fm R = 40 fm R = 60 fm

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Coulomb vs 3NF: 1H(d,pp)n at Ed = 130 MeV

0.0 0.2

(15o,15o,160o)

0.0 0.2

(20o,15o,160o)

0.0 0.2

(25o,15o,160o)

0.0 0.2 0.4 d5σ/dS dΩ1 dΩ2 (mb MeV-1sr-2)

(30o,15o,160o)

0.0 0.1

(20o,20o,160o)

0.0 0.1

(25o,20o,160o)

0.0 0.1 50 100 150 S (MeV)

(30o,20o,160o)

AV18(nd) AV18(pd) AV18+UIX(pd) 0.0 0.1 50 100 150 S (MeV)

(25o,25o,160o)

0.0 8.0 50 100 150 S (MeV)

(13o,13o,20o)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

3He(γ, pn)p at Eγ = 55 MeV

40 80 120 160 200

d4σ/dΩ1 dΩ2 (µb/sr2)

Θp+Θn (deg)

Θp = 81.0o

5 10 15 20 20 40 60

d5σ/dS dΩ1 dΩ2 (µb MeV-1sr-2)

S (MeV)

Θn = 86.0o

with Coulomb

slide-43
SLIDE 43

3

He(

  • γ,n)pp at Eγ = 12.8 MeV

(MeV)

n

E 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 b/sr MeV) µ (

n

dE

n

Ω d σ

3

d

  • 10

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

  • =75

n

θ

(MeV)

n

E 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 b/sr MeV) µ (

n

dE

n

Ω d σ

3

d

  • 10

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

  • =75

n

θ (MeV)

n

E 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 b/sr MeV) µ (

n

dE

n

Ω d σ

3

d

  • 10

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

  • =90

n

θ

(MeV)

n

E 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 b/sr MeV) µ (

n

dE

n

Ω d σ

3

d

  • 10

10 20 30 40 50 60 70

  • =90

n

θ

(MeV)

n

E 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 b/sr MeV) µ (

n

dE

n

Ω d σ

3

d

  • 10

10 20 30 40 50 60

  • =105

n

θ

(MeV)

n

E 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 b/sr MeV) µ (

n

dE

n

Ω d σ

3

d

  • 10

10 20 30 40 50 60

  • =105

n

θ

parallel antiparallel

TUNL data [PRL 110, 202501]

  • - -

CD Bonn + ∆ (with Coulomb) (Lisbon) — AV18 + UIX (no Coulomb) (Cracow)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

4N scattering: symmetrized AGS equations

two-cluster 1+3 and 2+2 transition operators

U11 = −(G0 TG0)−1P34 −P34U1G0 TG0U11 +U2G0 TG0U21 U21 = (G0 TG0)−1(1−P34)+(1−P34)U1G0 TG0U11 U12 = (G0 TG0)−1 −P34U1G0 TG0U12 +U2G0 TG0U22 U22 = (1−P34)U1G0 TG0U12

Uj = PjG−1

0 +PjTG0Uj

P1 = P = P12 P23 +P13 P23 P2 = ˜ P = P13 P24 T = v+vG0T

scattering amplitude

T fi = Sfip fφf|Ufi|piφi

|φj = G0TPj|φj

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Screening and renormalization in 4N scattering

v → v+wR T, Uj, Ufi, T fi → T (R), U(R)

j

, U(R)

fi , T (R) fi

isolate long-range interaction

W c.m.

R

and Coulomb distortion between c.m. of two clusters

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Screening and renormalization in 4N scattering

v → v+wR T, Uj, Ufi, T fi → T (R), U(R)

j

, U(R)

fi , T (R) fi

isolate long-range interaction

W c.m.

R

and Coulomb distortion between c.m. of two clusters

Renormalization:

Tfi = lim

R→∞Z − 1

2

R f T (R) fi Z − 1

2

Ri

= δ fiT c.m.

Ci

+ lim

R→∞Z − 1

2

R f [T (R) fi

−δ fiT c.m.

Ri ]Z − 1

2

Ri

Coulomb-distorted short-range part: fast convergence with R

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Convergence with R: p-3He scattering at Ep = 4 MeV

100 200 300 400

dσ/dΩ (mb/sr)

no Coulomb

R = 0 fm R = 6 fm R = 8 fm R = 10 fm R = 12 fm

0.0 0.1

Czx

0.0 0.2 0.4 60 120 180

Ay Θc.m. (deg)

0.0 0.1 60 120 180

Cyy Θc.m. (deg)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

p-3He scattering

60 120 100 200 300 400 500 dσ/dΩ [mb/sr]

Famularo 1954 Fisher 2006 I-N3LO AV18 low-k

2.25 MeV 60 120 0.2 0.4 Ay0

Fisher 2006 George 2001

60 120 θc.m. [deg] 0.1 A0y

Daniels 2010

60 120

Mcdonald 1964 Fisher 2006

4.05 MeV 60 120

Fisher 2006

60 120 θc.m. [deg]

Daniels 2010

60 120 180

Mcdonald 1964

5.54 MeV 60 120 180

Alley 1993

60 120 180 θc.m. [deg]

Alley 1993 Daniels 2010

AGS/HH/FY (Lisbon/Pisa/Strasbourg, PRC 84, 054010)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

d +d → N +[3N] transfer at Ed = 3 MeV

20 40

dσ/dΩ (mb/sr) d+d → p+3H

N3LO INOY04 AV18 CD Bonn

d+d → n+3He

0.0 0.2 50 100 150

iT11 Θc.m. (deg)

50 100 150

Θc.m. (deg)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Screening and renormalization (DFS version)

standard scattering equations: transition operators, momentum space, partial waves, without separable approximation, straightforward extension to 4b scattering limitations in practical applicability: no more than 2 charged clusters for breakup, not too large screening radius and angular momentum, not too low energy and not too large charge [Deltuva,Fonseca,Sauer: PRC 71, 054005; PRC 72, 054004; PRC 73, 057001; PRL 98, 162502; PRC 80, 064002; EPJ WoC 3, 01003]