Molecular simulations of DNA loop extrusion explain and predict - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

molecular simulations of dna loop extrusion explain and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Molecular simulations of DNA loop extrusion explain and predict - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Molecular simulations of DNA loop extrusion explain and predict human genome architecture Adrian Sanborn Stanford University; The Center for Genome Architecture at Baylor College of Medicine, Rice University FUNDAMENTAL PUZZLE: SAME GENOME


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Molecular simulations of DNA loop extrusion explain and predict human genome architecture

Adrian Sanborn

Stanford University; The Center for Genome Architecture at Baylor College of Medicine, Rice University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FUNDAMENTAL PUZZLE: SAME GENOME à DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE GENOME IS FULL OF “SPOOKY ACTION AT A DISTANCE”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

THE GENOME IS FULL OF “SPOOKY ACTION AT A DISTANCE”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

…CGTTTACGAAAATCGCAAAACTTTCGATACCCATAGGCTACTGATCATACGACCGTTTACGAAAATCGAAACCTTTCCGATCTAGGCTAC…

3 BILLION LETTERS 2 METERS

Nucleus

Cell

6 μm

THE HUMAN GENOME IS LONG

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10 bp 100 bp 1 Kb 10 Kb 100 Kb 1 Mb 10 Mb 100 Mb

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10 bp 100 bp 1 Kb 10 Kb 100 Kb 1 Mb 10 Mb 100 Mb

slide-8
SLIDE 8

HOW DOES THE GENOME FOLD?

  • 1. Experimental Technology
  • 2. Biology
  • 3. Physics
slide-9
SLIDE 9

PART I: 
 EXPERIMENTAL TECHNOLOGY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MICROSCOPY & FLUORESCENT IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION 


FISH

slide-11
SLIDE 11

MICROSCOPY & FLUORESCENT IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION 


FISH

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Lieberman-Aiden, van Berkum et al. Science 2009

HI-C MEASURES SPATIAL PROXIMITY OF THE FOLDED GENOME

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CONTACT MAPPING

Exploring structure via proximity

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

# of Pictures Together

SIMPSONS 


CONTACT MAP

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Lieberman-Aiden, van Berkum et al. Science 2009

HI-C MEASURES SPATIAL PROXIMITY OF THE FOLDED GENOME

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lieberman-Aiden, van Berkum et al. Science 2009

HI-C MEASURES SPATIAL PROXIMITY OF THE FOLDED GENOME

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Chromosome

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

Genome

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Genome

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Genome

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Genome

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Chromosome 8

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

700 Reads/250 kb2

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

700 Reads/250 kb2

slide-32
SLIDE 32

A A

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

700 Reads/250 kb2

slide-33
SLIDE 33

A A

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

700 Reads/250 kb2

slide-34
SLIDE 34

A B A B

Hi-C 


GENERATES GENOME- WIDE CONTACT MAPS

700 Reads/250 kb2

slide-35
SLIDE 35

30 million contacts

NEW CONTACT MAPS ARE AT KILOBASE RESOLUTION

slide-36
SLIDE 36

5 billion contacts 30 million contacts

NEW CONTACT MAPS ARE AT KILOBASE RESOLUTION

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-37
SLIDE 37

PART II: 
 BIOLOGY

Mary Ellen Scherl

slide-38
SLIDE 38

LOOPS IN CHROMATIN = PEAKS IN A CONTACT MAP

A A-2ε A-ε A+ε A+2ε B-ε B-2ε B B+ε B+2ε

slide-39
SLIDE 39

LOOPS IN CHROMATIN = PEAKS IN A CONTACT MAP

A A-2ε A-ε A+ε A+2ε B-ε B-2ε B B+ε B+2ε

slide-40
SLIDE 40

LOOPS IN CHROMATIN = PEAKS IN A CONTACT MAP

A A-2ε A-ε A+ε A+2ε B-ε B-2ε B B+ε B+2ε

slide-41
SLIDE 41

THE GENOME HAS ~10,000 LOOPS.

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-42
SLIDE 42

THE GENOME HAS ~10,000 LOOPS.

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-43
SLIDE 43

THE GENOME HAS ~10,000 LOOPS.

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-44
SLIDE 44

LOOPS ARE OFTEN CONSERVED ACROSS CELL TYPE…

slide-45
SLIDE 45

LOOPS ARE OFTEN CONSERVED ACROSS CELL TYPE…

slide-46
SLIDE 46

LOOPS ARE OFTEN CONSERVED ACROSS CELL TYPE…

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-47
SLIDE 47

…AND SPECIES.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

…AND SPECIES.

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-49
SLIDE 49

LOOPS TURN GENES ON AND OFF .

slide-50
SLIDE 50

LOOPS TURN GENES ON AND OFF .

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-51
SLIDE 51

LOOPS TURN GENES ON AND OFF .

slide-52
SLIDE 52

LOOPS TURN GENES ON AND OFF .

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-53
SLIDE 53

LOOPS DEMARCATE CONTACT DOMAINS…

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-54
SLIDE 54

LOOPS DEMARCATE CONTACT DOMAINS…

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-55
SLIDE 55

…WHICH PARTITION THE GENOME

slide-56
SLIDE 56

…WHICH PARTITION THE GENOME

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

slide-57
SLIDE 57

HOW DO LOOPS AND DOMAINS FORM?

slide-58
SLIDE 58

PART III: 
 PHYSICS

slide-59
SLIDE 59

CONTACT PROBABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GENOMIC DISTANCE

slide-60
SLIDE 60

CONTACT PROBABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GENOMIC DISTANCE

slide-61
SLIDE 61

FOLDED DNA IS NOT AT EQUILIBRIUM

Erez Lieberman-Aiden, Nynke van Berkum et al. Science 2009

slide-62
SLIDE 62

FOLDED DNA IS NOT AT EQUILIBRIUM

Erez Lieberman-Aiden, Nynke van Berkum et al. Science 2009

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

CONTACT PROBABILITY EXPONENT WITHIN DOMAINS IS -0.75

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

CONTACT PROBABILITY EXPONENT WITHIN DOMAINS IS -0.75

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

CONTACT PROBABILITY EXPONENT WITHIN DOMAINS IS -0.75

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

INTERNAL VERSUS EXTERNAL FORCES

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

INTERNAL FORCES à LINEAR COLLAPSE

slide-69
SLIDE 69

TENSION GLOBULE RECAPITULATES OBSERVED CONTACT PROBABILITY

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

Hi-C Tension globule

slide-70
SLIDE 70

INTERNAL FORCES ARE COMPUTATIONALLY INTENSIVE

slide-71
SLIDE 71

INTERNAL FORCES ARE COMPUTATIONALLY INTENSIVE

Polymer backbone Lennard-Jones forces

Simulate Langevin dynamics using LAMMPS package

slide-72
SLIDE 72

INTERNAL FORCES ARE COMPUTATIONALLY INTENSIVE

  • Simulations up to 50,000 beads (50 megabases)
  • Forces must be calculated between all pairs of beads
  • Hundreds of replicate structures must be simulated
  • GPU parallelization à ~10x speed-up
slide-73
SLIDE 73

LOOPS AND DOMAINS FORM WITHIN TENSION GLOBULES

slide-74
SLIDE 74

LOOPS ARE ANCHORED AT CONVERGENT CTCF SITES

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Rao & Huntley, et al., Cell 2014

LOOPS ARE ANCHORED AT CONVERGENT CTCF SITES

slide-76
SLIDE 76

LOOP FORMATION BY DIFFUSION

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-77
SLIDE 77

LOOP FORMATION BY DIFFUSION

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-78
SLIDE 78

LOOP FORMATION BY DIFFUSION

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-79
SLIDE 79

LOOP FORMATION BY DIFFUSION

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-80
SLIDE 80

LOOP FORMATION BY DIFFUSION

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-81
SLIDE 81

LOOP FORMATION BY DIFFUSION

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-82
SLIDE 82

DIFFUSION DOES NOT EXPLAIN CONVERGENT RULE

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-83
SLIDE 83

DIFFUSION DOES NOT EXPLAIN CONVERGENT RULE

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-84
SLIDE 84

DIFFUSION DOES NOT EXPLAIN WHY LOOPS TEND NOT TO OVERLAP

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-85
SLIDE 85

DIFFUSION DOES NOT EXPLAIN LACK OF FOCAL CONTACTS BETWEEN CHROMOSOMES

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-86
SLIDE 86

DIFFUSION LEADS TO ENTANGLEMENT

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

slide-87
SLIDE 87

LOOPS AND DOMAINS FORM VIA EXTRUSION

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-88
SLIDE 88

LOOPS AND DOMAINS FORM VIA EXTRUSION

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-89
SLIDE 89

LOOPS AND DOMAINS FORM VIA EXTRUSION

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-90
SLIDE 90

LOOPS AND DOMAINS FORM VIA EXTRUSION

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-91
SLIDE 91

LOOPS AND DOMAINS FORM VIA EXTRUSION

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-92
SLIDE 92

EXTRUSION EXPLAINS MANY KEY OBSERVATIONS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-93
SLIDE 93

EXTRUSION EXPLAINS MANY KEY OBSERVATIONS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

Loops at convergent CTCF sites

slide-94
SLIDE 94

EXTRUSION EXPLAINS MANY KEY OBSERVATIONS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

Loops at convergent CTCF sites Loops don’t overlap

slide-95
SLIDE 95

EXTRUSION EXPLAINS MANY KEY OBSERVATIONS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

Loops at convergent CTCF sites Loops don’t overlap Loops are intrachromosomal

slide-96
SLIDE 96

EQUATIONS FOR SIMULATING EXTRUSION

Polymer backbone Lennard-Jones forces Loop bonds

slide-97
SLIDE 97

A DAY IN THE LIFE OF AN EXTRUSION COMPLEX

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-98
SLIDE 98

A DAY IN THE LIFE OF AN EXTRUSION COMPLEX

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-99
SLIDE 99

A DAY IN THE LIFE OF AN EXTRUSION COMPLEX

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-100
SLIDE 100

LOOP EXTRUSION FORMS
 SPATIALLY SEGREGATED DOMAINS

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-101
SLIDE 101

LOOP EXTRUSION FORMS
 SPATIALLY SEGREGATED DOMAINS

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-102
SLIDE 102

LOOP EXTRUSION FORMS
 SPATIALLY SEGREGATED DOMAINS

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-103
SLIDE 103

LOOP EXTRUSION FORMS
 CHROMOSOME TERRITORIES

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-104
SLIDE 104

LOOP EXTRUSION FORMS
 CHROMOSOME TERRITORIES

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-105
SLIDE 105

LOOP EXTRUSION FORMS
 CHROMOSOME TERRITORIES

Najeeb Tarazi, Adrian Sanborn

slide-106
SLIDE 106

EXTRUSION ENABLES PREDICTION OF HI-C MAPS IN SILICO FROM CTCF CHIP-SEQ DATA

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-107
SLIDE 107

EXTRUSION ENABLES PREDICTION OF HI-C MAPS IN SILICO FROM CTCF CHIP-SEQ DATA

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-108
SLIDE 108

EXTRUSION ENABLES PREDICTION OF HI-C MAPS IN SILICO FROM CTCF CHIP-SEQ DATA

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-109
SLIDE 109

EXTRUSION ENABLES PREDICTION OF HI-C MAPS IN SILICO FROM CTCF CHIP-SEQ DATA

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-110
SLIDE 110

EXTRUSION ENABLES PREDICTION OF HI-C MAPS IN SILICO FROM CTCF CHIP-SEQ DATA

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-111
SLIDE 111

EXTRUSION ENABLES PREDICTION OF HI-C MAPS IN SILICO FROM CTCF CHIP-SEQ DATA

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-112
SLIDE 112

EXTRUDED DOMAINS RECAPITULATE CONTACT PROBABILITY EXPONENT

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

Hi-C Extrusion

slide-113
SLIDE 113

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-114
SLIDE 114

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-115
SLIDE 115

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-116
SLIDE 116

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-117
SLIDE 117

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-118
SLIDE 118

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-119
SLIDE 119

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-120
SLIDE 120

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-121
SLIDE 121

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-122
SLIDE 122

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-123
SLIDE 123

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-124
SLIDE 124

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-125
SLIDE 125

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

Sanborn, Rao et al., PNAS 2015

slide-126
SLIDE 126

Sanborn & Rao, et al., PNAS, 2015

EXTRUSION SIMULATIONS PREDICT GENOME REFOLDING UPON EDITING OF CTCF MOTIFS

slide-127
SLIDE 127

GOING FORWARD

slide-128
SLIDE 128

GOING FORWARD

  • Loop extrusion model shows tremendous promise
slide-129
SLIDE 129

GOING FORWARD

  • Loop extrusion model shows tremendous promise
  • Next steps:
  • Computationally generate 3D maps for many,

many new cell types

  • Release software for predicting how genomes

refold upon editing

slide-130
SLIDE 130

MAJOR CHALLENGE

slide-131
SLIDE 131

MAJOR CHALLENGE

  • Bond shifting disallowed during simulation
slide-132
SLIDE 132

MAJOR CHALLENGE

  • Bond shifting disallowed during simulation
  • Extrusion does not parallelize well on GPUs
slide-133
SLIDE 133

MAJOR CHALLENGE

  • Bond shifting disallowed during simulation
  • Extrusion does not parallelize well on GPUs
  • Need to redesign GPU implementation to integrate

bond shifting

slide-134
SLIDE 134

MAJOR CHALLENGE

  • Bond shifting disallowed during simulation
  • Extrusion does not parallelize well on GPUs
  • Need to redesign GPU implementation to integrate

bond shifting

  • Sound interesting?
slide-135
SLIDE 135

Mary Ellen Scherl

People

Suhas Rao* Su-Chen Huang Neva Durand Miriam Huntley* Andrew Jewett Ivan Bochkov Dharmaraj Chinnappan Ashok Cutkosky Jian Li Kristopher Geeting Andreas Gnirke Alexandre Melnikov Doug McKenna Elena Stamenova Eric Lander Erez Lieberman Aiden