Molecular analysis of bunch architecture in grapevine Eva Zyprian a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

molecular analysis of bunch
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Molecular analysis of bunch architecture in grapevine Eva Zyprian a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Molecular analysis of bunch architecture in grapevine Eva Zyprian a , Robert Richter a , Susanne Rossmann b , Klaus Theres b , Reinhard Tpfer a a Julius Khn-Institut, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833 Siebeldingen, Germany


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Molecular analysis of bunch architecture in grapevine

Eva Zypriana, Robert Richtera, Susanne Rossmannb, Klaus Theresb, Reinhard Töpfera

a Julius Kühn-Institut, Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof, 76833 Siebeldingen,

Germany

b Max Planck Institute, 50829 Cologne, Germany

GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why study bunch architecture?

Loose clusters

  • Dry off quickly
  • Don´t squeeze each other
  • Have less micro cracks
  • Have intact wax layers
  • Are better covered by protective

sprays

  • Are more resilient to Botrytis bunch

rot and other infections

  • Represent a physical factor of

resistance

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-3
SLIDE 3

QTL Analysis in population GF.GA- 47-42 x `Villard blanc´

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

  • 150 F1 individuals with considerable (transgressive) segregation of

cluster architecture traits

  • genetic map available (Zyprian et al., 2016)
  • eight vines per genotype
  • 46 females, 104 hermaphrodite plants

OIV class 1 Individual 0212 OIV class 9 Individual 0324

slide-4
SLIDE 4

QTL Analysis in population GF.GA-47-42 x `Villard blanc´

Sampling: 6 basally inserted clusters at 6 different trunks BBCH81 – BBCH87

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

Peduncle Pedicel Internodes Rachis Wing Berry

  • Image based assessment of sub-traits using

 BAT software for volume (Kicherer et al. 2013)  ImageJ for length parameters

  • Reference measurements: volume, weight
  •  in total 19 ampelometric

measurements

Phenotyping of cluster architecture sub-traits, over two to four years

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sub-trait [Unit]

Notation

2013 n=12 2014 n=3 2015 n=6 2016 n=6 2017 n=6

berry number per bunch

BN

x x x x sugar content of juice [°Bx]

Brix

x x berry weight [g]

BW

x x berry weight/rachis weight

BW/RW

x x

cluster weight [g]

CW

x x x x

mean single berry volume [cm³]

MBV

x x x x compactness

OIV204

x x x x

pedicel length [cm]

PED

x x x x peduncle length [cm]

PL

x x x x length 1st internode of rachis [cm]

L1I

x x x length 2nd internode of rachis [cm]

L2I

x x x length 3rd internode of rachis [cm]

L3I

x x diameter 2nd internode of rachis [cm]

RD

x x

rachis length [cm]

RL

x x x x rachis weight

RW

x x

shoulder length

SL

x x x total berry volume

TBV

x x x x total length of laterals

TLL

x x presence/ absence of a “shoulder”

Wing

x x

Cluster architecture sub-traits

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

Sub-traits with large effect on CA (OIV204) after statistical evaluation and modeling

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Flower sex affects cluster architecture: Females are more loose!

Statistical evaluation of cluster architecture sub-traits

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-8
SLIDE 8

23 QTLs for large effect sub-traits in eight clusters

rachis pedicel density berry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

Marguerit et al. 2009 hybrid cross Costantini et al. 2008 table grape Fanizza et al. 2005 table grape Correa et al. 2014 table grape Doligez et al. 2013 table/wine Cabezas et al. 2006 table grape

newly identified QTL region

Markers flanking QTL clusters are available

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Clones Group Trait Origin

French P.noir gene pool compact INRA / France ENTAV 777 Frank / Baden Frank Charisma Frank Classic mixed berries Geisenheim / Hessen Gm-20- 13 Freiburg / Baden Fr1801 loose M- /L-type Wädenswil WE- 171 Fr12-L / 13-L Geisenheim / Hessen Gm-1- 86 PN 40024

Expression Analysis in `Pinot noir´

Foto: Antes Foto: E. Wennesheimer Worms Foto: R.Richter , JKI Geilweilerhof

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Plants in three different locations

Hessen

Antes Heppenheim 1995 125AA /1,8m² Sibbus Jechtingen 1997 125AA/2,2m² JKI Siebeldingen 2005 125AA/1,8 m²

Freiburg Mannheim Hessen Pfalz Baden Pfalz Baden

Foto: google earth

Sampling harmonized according to degree/days (Molitor, 2014)

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Phenotyping in ‘Pinot noir’

  • Eight of 20 sub-traits show significant differences between clones
  • Grouping in loose and compact clustered clones reveals four

sub- traits as significantly different

Variance analysis (ANOVA) indicates

  • Berry volume
  • Pedicel length
  • Rachis length
  • Total berry volume

as determinants of CA

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Investigation of rachis elongation

Measurement of rachis length at Geilweilerhof each week from May to August 2015 and 2016 at the same bunch (n = 16)

Difference to week before 2015

compact MB loose compact MB loose

Weekly rachis length 2015 Weekly rachis length 2016 Difference to week before 2016

slide-14
SLIDE 14

0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 5,00

fold-change (compared toFrank Charisma) 2016 BBCH 71 Fold-change of GRF 6 expression in PN clones three bio repeats (endogeneous control: GAPDH)

RNA-Seq, RT-qPCR: Candidate gene expression in ‘Pinot noir’ clones

0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 7,00 8,00 Entav_777-Baden Entav_777-… Frank Classic-… Frank Classic-… Gm-20-13-Pfalz Gm-20-13-… Gm-20-13-Baden Freiburg-1801-… Gm-1-86-Hessen Gm-1-86-Pfalz WE-171-Pfalz Fold change (compared to Frank Charisma) Fold change of VIT_16s0039g01450 GRF6 expression in ‘Pinot Noir’ clones at BBCH 71 located at three field Trials (endogenous control: GAPDH) bars indicate SEM

2015 2016

compact MB loose compact MB loose

A candidate gene is consistently higher expressed in loose PN clones over three years and three locations

Mannheim Freiburg Hessen Pfalz Baden

Fold change Fold change 2015/ 2016/ 2017

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Zyprian et al., GBG 2018, Bordeaux, France, July 15-20, 2018

Conclusions

  • Eight QTL regions contain genetic determinants of cluster

architecture in GF.GA.47-42 x `Villard blanc´ Markers from these regions may now be tested for transferability of their linkage to the trait in extended breeding material

  • Two candidate genes are differentially expressed in loose versus

compact `Pinot noir´ clones, over three locations

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Thank you for your attention!

Doreen Gabriel Sarina Elser Florian Rist Margit Schneider Daniel Zendler Anna Schwandner Anna Kicherer Grapevine nursery Antes, Heppenheim Grapevine nursery Sibbus, Jechtingen Thanks to…