MMUSIC WG 47th IETF 30 March 2000 - Adelaide 30 March 2000 MMUSIC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

30 March 2000 MMUSIC WG 1

MMUSIC WG

47th IETF 30 March 2000 - Adelaide

30 March 2000 MMUSIC WG 2

MMUSIC Agenda

1530 Agenda Bashing & Status Update (chair, 5) 1535 SAPv2 Review -06 (Perkins, 15)

draft-ietf-mmusic-sap-v2-06.txt

1550 Issue: SAP Server Access Protocol (chair, 5) 1555 SDP Directory Type (Finlayson, 15)

draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-directory-type-00.txt

1610 SDP Source Filter List (Thaler, 20) 1630 ATM QoS in SDP (Taylor, 10)

draft-rajeshkumar-mmusic-sdp-atm-00.txt

1640 SDP Codec Capability Attribute (Beser, 10)

draft-beser-mmusic-capabilities-00.txt

30 March 2000 MMUSIC WG 3

MMUSIC Agenda

1650 RTSP Fixes & Clarifications (Rao, 10) RFC 2326 1700 RTSP Extensions (10) draft-sheedy-mmusic-rtsp-ext-00.txt 1710 RTSP Caching (15) draft-periyannan-rtsp-caching-06.txt 1725 Moving forward with RTSP (chair, 5) 1730 Wrap up

30 March 2000 MMUSIC WG 4

WG Status Update

• Mailing list is about to move

– mmusic@informatik.uni-bremen.de – Majordomo administered list

• Please subscribe to the new list

– there will be no automatic transfer – mails will be forwarded from confctrl@isi.edu for some time to come

• Details to be announced after IETF

30 March 2000 MMUSIC WG 5

MMUSIC Charter

Well, we should have a new charter by now… But: Scope may be perceived too broad. Right now… Working with IESG to sort this out. More to be seen on the list shortly.

30 March 2000 MMUSIC WG 6

SAP Issue: Server Access

• SAP is really a Server-Server protocol

– SAP announcements infrequently – takes time to learn about sessions – announcements often depend on eg SDR processes to stay around

• SAP Server Access Protocol needed

– allow client to initiate announcement – receive (selected) SAP announcements

• unsolicited or on-demand

– support for directories?, security, ...

30 March 2000 MMUSIC WG 7

RTSP (1)

• Cleaning up the spec (for draft?)

– Fix inconsistencies – Fix bugs – Provide clarifications where needed

• Overview of implementations

– What is really implemented?

• Remove unnecessary parts from the spec

– Demonstrate interoperability – Satisfy preconditions to go to Draft

30 March 2000 MMUSIC WG 8

RTSP (2)

How many documents?

• Base spec for Draft?

– Limits requiring a cycle in Proposed?

• Extensions for other Transports

– Generalization needed – Necessary fixes to go into base spec – Remaining stuff: separate doc (if any)

• Caching

– keep as separate spec