MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mmd 2018 summit st louis union station
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 Afte rno o n Se ssio n Co ho rt 1 ~;~ ~ Small- We st Mid- South Cadre LINN CO. R-I POPLAR BLUFF R-I Mid.East Mid.South ., Mid.West MOUND CITY R-II WILLOW


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MMD 2018 Summit

  • St. Louis Union Station

T hursda y, 05.31.2018 Afte rno o n Se ssio n Co ho rt 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2 .,

:··· ; i------------·------------------.•.. ----------------------------------·-··-.

::· .. -·

\...

>/

·

  • .,

:

  • -.... __
... t, LINN CO. R-1

lll1nc

  • ~~-
. ( CAMERON R·I BELTON 124 • SEDALIA 200 MISSOUrl STRAIN-JAPAN R-XVI

..

  • ..
~;~

·--··-..

·-...

~ FARMINGTON R-VII \ ROLLA 31 SHELDON R-VIII GREEN FOREST R-11 .,

..

< SPRINGFIELD R·XII
  • -::•{.

l

WILLOW SPRINGS R-IV
  • '•

~--·-

·-·······································································

:;;{::·:

MCDONALD CO. R·I MALDEN R·I .f

,( ..

HAYTi R.11
  • -~

.~-:'!

, ...

::~

\-·~·

·'

(

,.

:~:'.; -----------------

Cadre
  • Mid.East
  • Mid.South
  • Mid.West
Small.East
  • Small.West
  • Urban/Suburban
Participating Buildings 1 5 10 15 20 23

Small- We st Mid- South

LINN CO. R-I POPLAR BLUFF R-I MOUND CITY R-II WILLOW SPRINGS R-IV CAMERON R-I MCDONALD CO. R-I SHELDON R-VIII

Small- E ast Mid- E ast 3/ 21

GREEN FOREST R-II FARMINGTON R-VII STRAIN-JAPAN R-XVI MERAMEC VALLEY R-III HAYTI R-II ROLLA 31 MALDEN R-I

Mid- We st Ur ban/ Subur ban

BELTON 124

  • FT. ZUMWALT R-II

SEDALIA 200 PATTONVILLE UNIVERSITY ACADEMY SPRINGFIELD R-XII RAYTOWN C-2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Eng ngagement nt wi with th CS CST T

thro hroug ugh Fe Feb 2 2018 8

217 I

n-pe rso n a nd/ o r virtua l inte ra c tio ns b e twe e n CST a nd distric ts

21

Ave ra g e numb e r o f inte ra c tio ns a c ro ss distric ts with prio r CW e xpe rie nc e .

7

Ave ra g e numb e r o f inte ra c tio ns a c ro ss distric ts witho ut prio r CW e xpe rie nc e .

slide-4
SLIDE 4

E NGAGE ME NT WIT H CST : T OPICS

Effective teaching/learning practices Collaborative teams Data-based decision making MMD expectations/logistics/DESE… Alignment and systems planning Common formative assessment School-based implementation… Leadership Other

54% 49% 36% 36% 31% 25% 19% 12% 20%

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • ......................
..
  • -----,,,
\ . , \ \ ,

' \

\

)

I

Sta te wide c o lla b o ra tio n

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Distric t fo c us

% Hig h 0% 50% 100% % Mo de ra te E nsure tha t a ll sc ho o ls in the distric t a lig n the ir wo rk with distric t-e sta b lishe d g o a ls a nd pra c tic e s De plo y princ ipa ls to pro vide da ta -b a se d fe e db a c k to te a c he rs (b o th individua ls a nd te a ms) a b o ut the ir…

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Distric t fo c us

% Hig h % Mo de ra te 0% 50% 100% Mo nito r the de g re e o f imple me nta tio n o f fo c use d impro ve me nt stra te g ie s… Use a lig ne d te a m struc ture s to suppo rt full imple me nta tio n o f… De fine fo r the b e ne fit o f a ll sta ff wha t full imple me nta tio n o f…

slide-8
SLIDE 8

sto ry

What factors do you think were most associated with changes in the effective teaching and learning practices?

Co mmo n F

  • rma tive

Asse ssme nt # o f fa c ilita to r visits Size o f the sc ho o l Da ta -b a se d De c isio n- Stude nt-te a c he r Ma king Sc ho o l le ve l ra tio L e a de rship Ge o g ra phic lo c a tio n Po ve rty (F RL ra te ) Cha rte r o r ma g ne t P.D. sta tus CW hi T itle 1 sta tus

Please vote for those you think are associated:

  • 1. Open web browser, go to www.menti.com. 2. Use the code 601196. 3. Vo

Vote. .

slide-9
SLIDE 9

+ + +

We were able to predict 67% of the change for ETLP from just a few variables (and all of the others had no impact)

Variable Effect Positive change in Common Formative Assessment domain CWIS score Positive change in Data-based Decision making domain CWIS score Having a higher school Free and Reduced Price Lunch Rate Being located in a rural setting Being located in a remote setting (more than 25/35 miles from an urban center)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

We were able to predict 67 percent of the change for ETLP from just a few variables (and all of the others had no impact)

Positive change in Common Formative Assessment domain CWIS score Positive change in Data-based Decision making domain CWIS score Having a higher school Free and Reduced Price Lunch Rate Being located in a rural setting

+ + +

Impacts on Effective Teaching and Learning Practices

Here are the results from that study:

Nearly all of the change

Variable Effect

was explained by Common Formative Assessment

Being located in a remote setting (more than 25/35 miles from an urban center)

slide-11
SLIDE 11 Cameron (1 Buchanan Co (1) Smllhv,lle (3) Sherwood Cas,s (1) Sheldon (1) Aurorat5)
  • CdlUtlfcadrettJ

.l (cadre I)

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

T hurs 05.31.2018

M M i i s s s s

  • u

u r r i i M M

  • d

d el el D D i i s s t t r r i i c c t t s: 2 : 2 1 1 8-2019 2019

□ 12:30p Ove rvie w o f

the Ye a r

□ 2:30p Wo rld Ca fe □ 3:45p Clo sing

Cohort 1: 16 districts 102 buildings Cohort 2: 53 districts 244 buildings Total: 69 districts 346 buildings

@ Mo Mo de lDistric ts # MMDCha t

O v e r v i e w o f t h e Y e a r