mmd 2018 summit st louis union station
play

MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 Afte rno o n Se ssio n Co ho rt 1 ~;~ ~ Small- We st Mid- South Cadre LINN CO. R-I POPLAR BLUFF R-I Mid.East Mid.South ., Mid.West MOUND CITY R-II WILLOW


  1. MMD 2018 Summit St. Louis Union Station T hursda y, 05.31.2018 Afte rno o n Se ssio n Co ho rt 1

  2. ~;~ ~ Small- We st Mid- South Cadre LINN CO. R-I POPLAR BLUFF R-I • Mid.East • Mid.South ., • Mid.West MOUND CITY R-II WILLOW SPRINGS R-IV Small.East :··· ; • Small.West CAMERON R-I MCDONALD CO. R-I i--- - --- ----- ·-- --- --- - --- -- - --- .•.. -- -- - --- -- ---- -- - -- ---- --- -- --- -- -·-··-. ::· .. -· • Urban/Suburban \... >/ Participating Buildings SHELDON R-VIII : 1 · -., 5 lll1nc -- .... __ .. . t, 10 -~~- LINN CO . R -1 15 . ( CAMERON R·I 20 23 Small- E ast Mid- E ast 3/ 21 BE LTON 124 • GREEN FOREST R-II FARMINGTON R-VII STRAIN-JAPAN R-XVI MERAMEC VALLEY R-III SEDA LI A 200 MISSOUrl STRAIN-JAPAN R-XVI .. HAYTI R-II ROLLA 31 .. • ·--··- .. ·- ... ROLLA 31 MALDEN R-I FARMINGTON R- V II \ SH ELDON R-VIII GREEN FOREST R- 11 .. ., l < SPRINGFIELD R ·X II • •-::•{. WILLOW S PRI NGS R- IV • '• Mid- We st Ur ban/ Subur ban ~--· - ·-··· · ·· ··· ·· ······················· · ··· ·· · ·· · ·· ························· :;;{::·: MALD EN R·I .f MCDONALD CO . R·I BELTON 124 FT. ZUMWALT R-II ,( .. HAYTi R. 11 --~ .~-:'! , ... SEDALIA 200 PATTONVILLE ::~ \- ·~· ·' UNIVERSITY ACADEMY SPRINGFIELD R-XII ( ,. :~:'.; ----------- -- -- -- RAYTOWN C-2

  3. Eng ngagement nt wi with th CS CST T thro hroug ugh Fe Feb 2 2018 8 217 I n-pe rso n a nd/ o r virtua l inte ra c tio ns b e twe e n CST a nd distric ts Ave ra g e numb e r o f inte ra c tio ns a c ro ss 21 distric ts with prio r CW e xpe rie nc e . Ave ra g e numb e r o f inte ra c tio ns a c ro ss 7 distric ts witho ut prio r CW e xpe rie nc e .

  4. E NGAGE ME NT WIT H CST : T OPICS 54% Effective teaching/learning practices 49% Collaborative teams 36% Data-based decision making 36% MMD expectations/logistics/DESE… 31% Alignment and systems planning 25% Common formative assessment 19% School-based implementation… 12% Leadership 20% Other

  5. Sta te wide c o lla b o ra tio n - - ...................... .. - - -----,,, \ . , \ \ , ' \ \ ) I

  6. Distric t fo c us % Hig h 0% 50% 100% % Mo de ra te E nsure tha t a ll sc ho o ls in the distric t a lig n the ir wo rk with distric t-e sta b lishe d g o a ls a nd pra c tic e s De plo y princ ipa ls to pro vide da ta -b a se d fe e db a c k to te a c he rs (b o th individua ls a nd te a ms) a b o ut the ir…

  7. Distric t fo c us % Hig h % Mo de ra te 0% 50% 100% Mo nito r the de g re e o f imple me nta tio n o f fo c use d impro ve me nt stra te g ie s… Use a lig ne d te a m struc ture s to suppo rt full imple me nta tio n o f… De fine fo r the b e ne fit o f a ll sta ff wha t full imple me nta tio n o f…

  8. What factors do you think were most associated with changes in the effective teaching and learning practices? Co mmo n F o rma tive Asse ssme nt # o f fa c ilita to r visits Size o f the sc ho o l Da ta -b a se d De c isio n- Stude nt-te a c he r Ma king Sc ho o l le ve l ra tio L e a de rship Ge o g ra phic lo c a tio n Po ve rty (F RL ra te ) Cha rte r o r ma g ne t P.D. sta tus CW hi sto ry T itle 1 sta tus Please vote for those you think are associated: 1. Open web browser, go to www.menti.com. 2. Use the code 601196. 3. Vo Vote. .

  9. We were able to predict 67% of the change for ETLP from just a few variables (and all of the others had no impact) Variable Effect Positive change in Common Formative Assessment domain + CWIS score Positive change in Data-based Decision making domain CWIS + score + Having a higher school Free and Reduced Price Lunch Rate Being located in a rural setting Being located in a remote setting ( more than 25/35 miles from an urban center )

  10. Impacts on Effective Teaching and Learning Practices Here are the results from that study: We were able to predict 67 percent of the change for ETLP from just a Nearly all of the change few variables (and all of the others had no impact) was explained by Variable Effect + Positive change in Common Formative Assessment domain CWIS score + Common Formative Positive change in Data-based Decision making domain CWIS score + Having a higher school Free and Reduced Price Lunch Rate Assessment Being located in a rural setting Being located in a remote setting ( more than 25/35 miles from an urban center )

  11. T hurs M M i i s s s s o o u u r r i M i M o o d d el el D D i i s s t t r r i i c c t t s: 2 : 2 0 0 1 1 8-2019 2019 05.31.2018  □ 12:30p Ove rvie w o f - CdlUtlfcadrettJ .l (cadre I) the Ye a r □ 2:30p Wo rld Ca fe Cohort 1: 16 districts □ 3:45p Clo sing 102 buildings Cameron (1 Buchanan Co (1) Smllhv,lle (3) Cohort 2: 53 districts zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 244 buildings Sherwood Cas,s (1) Sheldon (1) Total: 69 districts Aurorat5) 346 buildings @ Mo Mo de lDistric ts O v e r v i e w o f t h e Y e a r # MMDCha t

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend