MiFID II: One Year On The No. 1 Pan-European Equity Trading Venue - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mifid ii one year on the no 1 pan european equity trading
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MiFID II: One Year On The No. 1 Pan-European Equity Trading Venue - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MiFID II: One Year On The No. 1 Pan-European Equity Trading Venue European market share by exchange Cboe Europe market share by market 18 Markets Helsinki 29.49% Oslo Helsinki 25.95% 31.1% Other BME Stockholm 6% 3% 25.92% Cboe Europe


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MiFID II: One Year On

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

The No. 1 Pan-European Equity Trading Venue

Helsinki 31.1% Dublin 23.91% London 22.97% Milan 17.83% Paris 21.11% Brussels 25.2% Amsterdam 21.95% Oslo 25.95% Stockholm 25.92% Helsinki 29.49% Copenhagen 24.51% Frankfurt 19.27% Zurich 19.5% Vienna 25.51% Madrid 27.99% Lisbon 22.79%

Cboe Europe market share by market European market share by exchange

Warsaw (new) Prague (new) Budapest (new)

18 Markets

Cboe Europe 22% LSE 14% Borsa Italia 6% Euronext 16% Deutsche Borse 12% Turquoise 7% SIX 8% Nasdaq 6% BME 3% Other 6%

3,500+ equities 3,000+ ETPs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

MiFID II solutions that have emerged in the market have seen strong adoption

  • Improved execution outcomes for customers by differentiating and expanding our trading

platform offerings

  • Enhanced off-exchange services to help market participants meet new regulatory requirements
  • Positive feedback from both buy-side and sell-side firms

Cboe’s Product Suite Met MiFID II Requirements

Execution Size Time Horizon Smaller Shorter Larger Longer

Lit Order Books CXE & BXE Dark Order Books CXE & BXE Periodic Auctions Lit Order Book Large in Scale (LIS) Block Trading Services OTC Trade Reporting & Systematic Internaliser (SI) Services

Price Time Midpoint of Primary Pre-Negotiated IOI / Negotiation Ad Hoc or SI Trade Publication

Exchange Trade Reports (ETRs)

Price, Size

On-Exchange Off-Exchange

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Equity Trading Market Structure – Post MiFID II Q4 2017 vs. Q4 2018

Total “Addressable Only” EU market notional (Off-Exchange, OTC + On-Exchange) up 7.7% from ~€71.2bn to €76.7bn per day over the period

Off-Exchange On-Exchange

OTC On-Book | Lit On-Book | Dark Off-Book | Reported

Dark Books

(Reference Price Match), Double Volume Caps, No Bid/Offer

2017 ADV: €2.9B 4.0% 2018 ADV: €2.3B 3.0%

BCN

Disappeared

Periodic Auctions

(Price, Size)

2017 ADV: €30.1M 0.04% 2018 ADV: €957.6M 1.3%

Source: big xyt

No longer permitted post-MiFID II

OTC Trades

Ad hoc, irregular, infrequent

2017 ADV: €15.2B 21.3% 2018 ADV: €6.0B 7.9%

Closing Auctions

(Listing Markets)

2017 ADV: €7.0B 9.9% 2018 ADV: €8.6B 11.3%

Continuous Lit Books

(Price, Time), Standardised Tick Sizes

2017 ADV: €33.5B 47.1% 2018 ADV: €33.8B 44.0%

Systematic Internaliser

Must be on risk (prop)

2017 ADV: €998.8M 1.4% 2018 ADV: €13.2B 17.2%

Large In Scale Block

(IOI Negotiation)

2017 ADV: €945M 1.3% 2018 ADV: €1.3B 1.7% 2017 ADV: €10.2B 14.4%

Trade Reports

(Off Book, Negotiated Trade), 4%, 8% Caps, LIS possible

2018 ADV: €9.9B 13.0% 2017 ADV: €442.9M 0.6%

Other Auctions

(Opening, Intraday)

2018 ADV: €467.5M 0.6%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Periodic Auctions – Lit Market, Low Market Impact

Time from Trade in Milliseconds Probability for a Mid Price Change in %

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Emerging Trends Under MiFID II

Enhanced transparency + market data

  • Improved accuracy of SI and OTC trade reporting/data throughout 2018
  • Data will continue to improve; regulator clarification on trade reporting flags
  • Collaborated with industry organisations to implement and advocate for best practices

Growth of low market impact venues

  • Periodic Auctions, Block Trading, Systematic Internalisers (SI)
  • Clients want to trade with as little market impact as possible, not all order flow suited for lit

markets Evolution of Systematic Internalisers

  • Still early days, but volume increasing for both bank/broker and ELP SIs

Rising volumes in Closing Auctions

  • National exchange monopoly; high cost to trade

Consolidated Tape

  • High cost of market data from national exchanges remains key barrier to creation of

consolidated tape in Europe

  • Expect regulators may start to consider radical moves to create a consolidated tape in the

European equities market Brexit’s impact

  • An evolving regulatory landscape