MIDWESTERN HIGHER EDUCATION COMPACT Cost Savings Student Access - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
MHEC in W isconsin October 5 , 2 0 0 6 MIDWESTERN HIGHER EDUCATION COMPACT Cost Savings Student Access Policy Research 1 MHEC in W isconsin MHECS MISSION Advancing Midw estern higher education through interstate cooperation and
1
2
3
22.4% of the nation’s population
20.8% of the nation’s two-year
23.4% of the nation’s four-year
22.9% of the nation’s Associates
25.6% of the nation’s Bachelors
4
MHEC is governed by a 55-member
Two Commissioners are appointed by
The Commission meets annually; and The Commission’s Executive
5
Alternate, President, Wisconsin
6
7
8
$222,006,781 $7,690,905 $229,697,686 $60,559,700 $18,136,333 $97,775,390 $211,778 $26,508,787 $4,086,929 $22,418,769
TOTAL
6,260,248 695,000 6,955,248 N/ A 620,887 5,825,330 1,263 N/ A 39,159 468,609
Wisconsin
April 18, 1994
31,637,618 835,500 32,473,118 N/ A 3,151,531 26,429,334 92,300 45,000 723,909 2,031,044
Ohio
878,826 487,500 1,366,326 252,900 28,800 971,326 192 N/ A 57,579 55,529
April 22, 1999
22,036,030 835,500 22,871,530 16,915,600 115,132 1,834,596 117 3,279,759 81,591 644,735
Nebraska
June 5, 1991
22,487,709 835,500 23,323,209 9,028,000 1,399,463 3,661,273 5,728 6,685,521 291,809 2,251,415
Missouri
May 9, 1990
19,168,033 835,500 20,003,533 2,712,800 3,743,565 7,033,742 12,533 5,674,999 290,515 535,379
Minnesota
April 26, 1990
55,530,733 835,500 56,366,233 7,308,500 2,457,168 36,906,408 11,283 5,073,064 711,872 3,897,938
Michigan
July 24, 1990
26,780,598 835,500 27,616,098 24,341,900 291,264 2,497,263 607 190,316 186,608 108,140
Kansas
April 25, 1990
N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
Iowa1
June 6, 2005
9,310,672 661,500 9,972,172 N/ A 273,308 4,192,515 36,439 N/ A 477,636 4,992,274
Indiana
27,916,315 833,905 28,750,220 N/ A 6,055,215 8,423,603 51,316 5,560,128 1,226,252 7,433,706
Illinois
Cumulative State Net Savings Cumulative Dues Paid Through 11/ 1/ 05 Cumulative State Gross Savings Midwest Student Exchange Program 8 Other I nitiatives7 Telecom & Technology ATAlliance6 Office Products Program 5 Master Property Program 4 Computing Software Program 3 Computing Hardware Program 2
Cum ulative Savings for MHEC Mem bers through June 2 0 0 5 Student Access Cost Savings Program s Mem ber States
1Iowa became a member of MHEC on June 6, 2005. 2Hardware program savings include those from Dell, Gateway, IBM & Xerox. 3Software program savings are from the Novell/ MHEC Collaborative Program. 4Based on premium & loss information as of June 30, 2005. 5Includes the first two quarters of the Office Products Program 6ATAlliance estimated savings for joint programs with the other regional higher education compacts & MiCTA. 7Sunsetted Programs: Academic Position Network, Academic Scheduling, Equipment Maintenance, Management,
Natural Gas, and MHEC Interactive Video.
8Student tuition savings through the academic year 2004-05.
9
W hat States Save
$9,807,600 $7,028,160 $211,778 $3,931,229 $1,531,787 $12,851,348 $34,536,901 $35,361,901 $825,000
TOTAL
NP8 561,725 1,263 NP8 24,911 388,726 894,125 976,625 82,500
Wisconsin
NP8 1,405,700 92,300 NP8 241,206 1,411,894 3,068,600 3,151,100 82,500
Ohio
111,200 118,800 192 NP8 25,515 20,867 194,074 276,574 82,500
3,131,100 134,800 117 428,443 32,734 117,129 3,761,823 3,844,323 82,500
Nebraska
1,973,300 385,700 5,728 988,932 93,983 1,475,796 4,840,939 4,923,439 82,500
Missouri
573,500 637,600 12,533 1,043,679 100,553 235,434 2,520,799 2,603,299 82,500
Minnesota
1,294,700 2,379,500 11,283 486,026 324,177 2,099,381 6,512,567 6,595,067 82,500
Michigan
2,723,800 198,500 607 40,090 86,908 49,956 3,017,361 3,099,861 82,500
Kansas
N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
Iowa1
NP8 431,600 36,439 NP8 144,446 2,847,877 3,377,862 3,460,362 82,500
Indiana
NP8 774,235 51,316 944,059 457,354 4,204,287 6,348,751 6,431,251 82,500
Illinois
Midwest Student Exchange Program 7 Telecom & Technology ATAlliance6 Office Products Program 5 Master Property Program (I nsurance) 4 Computing Software Program 3 Computing Hardware Program 2 Net Annual Savings Total Annual Savings Member State Annual Commitment to MHEC
W here States and Citizens Save MHEC Program Savings for 1 2 m onths W hat States Pay 2 0 0 4 -2 0 0 5 Mem ber States
1Iowa became a member of MHEC on June 6, 2005. 2Hardware program savings include those from Dell, Gateway, IBM & Xerox. 3Software program savings are from the Novell/ MHEC Collaborative Program. 4Based on premium & loss information as of June 30, 2005. 5Includes the first two quarters of the Office Products Program 6ATAlliance estimated savings for joint programs with the other regional higher education compacts & MiCTA. 7Student tuition savings through the academic year 2004-05. 8Non-participating state for 2004-2005.
10
11
Provides reduced tuition for students from KS, MI,
State approval required for institutions to
Institutions’ participation voluntary 140 campuses open their doors to MSEP students Since 1994, 17,000+ students have participated
12
13
14
Transfer between ETI members at reduced or no cost Participation in ETI Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Access to product upgrades and enhancements Standardized transcript format and data possible across
Best negotiated discount available without the need for
15
Midwest Policy Summit – November 2006, on U.S.
The Midwestern Higher Education to Workforce Policy
Wisconsin State Roundtable on Education to Workforce
Annual Midwest State Higher Education Executive
16
Two user-friendly and complementary online
State-level data searchable by state Policy resources database searchable by issue, sector
17
1Information in this table is from the National Center for Public Policy in Higher Education, Measuring Up 2004, with data from Thomas Mortenson and Postsecondary Education
OPPORTUNITY, U.S. Census Bureau, ACT, and the National Center for Education Statistics
2”Chance for college” is defined as the relative probability that a student entering ninth grade will finish high school in four years and proceed directly to college. 3The average of the five states nationally with the highest scores in a given area. 4The sample size for this measure was too small to provide an accurate percentage figure.
N/A 27.0% 16.1% 11.1% 0.6% 11.9% 19.1% U.S.
24.6% 13.1% 3.9%
1.4% MI
28.3% 10.6% 1.1% 1.5% 2.2% 15.6% KS
24.1% 12.9%
9.4% WI
Net migration rate of 22-29 year-olds with a bachelor’s degree
% of adult population with a bachelor’s degree
(2004)3 % of adult population with less than a high school diploma or equivalent (2004)3 Projected change in number of high school graduates 2002-20182 Projected change in 25-44 age group, 2000-20251 Projected change in 18-24 age group, 2000-20251 Projected change in total population 2000-20251 State
23.3% 13.4% 0.5%
3.4% OH
26.6% 10.6%
12.8% NE
24.0% 12.1%
13.6% ND
24.3% 13.7%
0.2% 11.7% MO 9.2% 29.7% 9.3% 0.7%
12.0% MN
21.5% 15.6% 25.7%
7.6% IN 11.1% 29.1% 14.8% 5.8%
3.3% 8.2% IL
23.9% 10.5%
3.9% IA
18
*State Higher Education Executive Officers, State Higher Education Finance, FY 2004. Tax revenue per capita includes revenue generated through taxation by both state and local governments. The Effective Tax Rate is equal to a state’s actual tax revenue divided by its total taxable resources.
9.2% 7.9% 13.9 3138 U.S.
9.7% 8.8% 11.2 3051 MI 8.7% 7.8% 18.9 2941 KS 8.7% 8.5% 29.1 3170 OH 8.8% 7.9% 20.9 3077 NE 8.3% 7.9% 27.0 2727 ND 7.6% 7.2% 26.9 2667 MO 10.1% 8.5% 17.5 3673 MN 8.6% 7.5% 17.0 2759 IN 8.6% 7.8% 18.9 3303 IL 9.5% 7.6% 10.4 2837 IA
Effective Tax Rate, 1992* Effective Tax Rate, 2002* Percent increase in tax revenue, 1992 to 2002 (adjusted for inflation)* Tax revenue per capita (2002)* State
19
1All data in the table are from the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, Measuring Up 2004. 2The average of the five states nationally with the highest scores in a given area.
81% 66% 41% 59% 94%
Top performing states2
81% 56% 36% 58% 89% WI
66% 36% 27% 40% 89% MI 61% 54% 23% 47% 87% OH 80% n/a 38% 61% 90% NE 73% 54% 35% 53% 97% ND 66% n/a 34% 55% 91% MO 92% n/a 30% 49% 93% MN 70% n/a n/a n/a 88% KS 79% 29% 30% 46% 89% IN 70% n/a n/a n/a 87% IL 80% n/a 39% 50% 94% IA 7th to 12th graders taught by teachers with a major in their field (1999-2000) 12th graders taking at least one upper-level math course (2001-02) 9th to 12th graders taking at least one upper-level science course (2001-02) 9th to 12th graders taking at least one upper-level math course (2001-02) 18-24 year-olds with a high school credential (2002) State
20
1Information in this table is from the National Center for Public Policy in Higher Education, Measuring Up 2004, with data from Thomas Mortenson and Postsecondary Education
OPPORTUNITY, U.S. Census Bureau, ACT, and the National Center for Education Statistics
2”Chance for college” is defined as the relative probability that a student entering ninth grade will finish high school in four years and proceed directly to college. 3The average of the five states nationally with the highest scores in a given area. 4The sample size for this measure was too small to provide an accurate percentage figure.
21 64% 84% 63% 5.4% 40% 52%
Top performing states3
15 54% 79% 47% 4.1% 38% 40% MI 18 50% 74% 51% 4.4% 37% 50% KS
20 57% 81% 49% 3.7% 31% 45% WI
Certificates, degrees, and diplomas awarded at all institutions per 100 undergraduates (2001-02) First-time, full-time students earning a bachelors within 6 years of enrollment (2001-02) First to second year persistence of full- time students at four-year institutions (2000-01) First to second year persistence of full- time students at two-year institutions (2000-01) 25-49 year-olds enrolled part-time in any type of postsecondary education 2001 18-24 year-olds enrolled in college (2002) Chance for college by age 19 (2000)2 State
17 54% 75% 55% 3.2% 34% 39% OH 18 50% 76% 52% 4.2% 38% 50% NE 19 44% 72% n/a4 2.3% 42% 58% ND 18 53% 76% 52% 3.9% 32% 39% MO 19 55% 80% 56% 3.7% 36% 53% MN 17 54% 77% 53% 3.2% 30% 41% IN 17 58% 79% 53% 4.9% 33% 42% IL 21 62% 79% 50% 3.0% 36% 52% IA
21
1National Center for Public Policy in Higher Education, Measuring Up 2004. (Data from U.S. Census Bureau). 2Institute for Higher Education Policy, The Investment Payoff (Data from Current Population Survey, 2004 or 2000).
*U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2002.
71% 96% 27% MI 44% 89% 26% OH 83% 75% 29% NE 80% 70% 27% ND 65% 73% 28% MO 47% 84% 31% MN 68% 71% 32% KS 61% 89% 24% IN 37% 89% 29% IL 76% 61% 28% IA 48% 93% 26%* U.S. Difference in unemployment rates, bachelors degree vs. high school diploma (2004)2 Difference in personal income, bachelors degree vs. high school diploma (2004)2 Population 25-64 years old with a BA or higher (2000- 2002 average)1 State
22
1National Center for Public Policy in Higher Education, Measuring Up 2004. Data from National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, National Center for Education Statistics,
U.S. Office of Postsecondary Education, and the U.S. Census Bureau.
2State Higher Education Executive Officers, State Higher Education Finance, FY 2004. 3Figures include both student and parent loans, but do not include loans originating from state sources or private loans (including credit card debt). The figure is therefore not an accurate
measure of total student borrowing, which would be higher than the figures listed.
$2,963 15% 44% 50% 45% 32% 22% MI
$3,076 17% 28% 38% 54% 22% 18% WI
Average federal undergraduate student loan, 20031,3 Percentage of average income needed for the poorest 20% of families to pay tuition at the states lowest-priced colleges, 2003-041 Family share of public higher education operating revenues (1994)2 Family share of public higher education operating revenues (2004)2 Percentage of average annual family income needed to pay for private 4-year college expenses minus financial aid, 2003-041 Percentage of average annual family income needed to pay for public 4-year college expenses minus financial aid, 2003-041 Percentage of average annual family income needed to pay for public 2-year college expenses minus financial aid, 2003-041 State
$3,380 22% 45% 49% 62% 36% 27% OH $3,096 13% 27% 38% 48% 24% 18% NE $2,793 22% 34% 40% 34% 25% 22% ND $3,240 15% 39% 38% 50% 28% 20% MO $3,050 20% 31% 42% 50% 23% 19% MN $3,204 14% 30% 36% 46% 23% 19% KS $3,231 18% 40% 49% 61% 29% 24% IN $3,615 14% 21% 27% 62% 30% 21% IL $2,961 19% 34% 47% 54% 28% 24% IA $3,344 14% 31% 36% 68% 29% 22% U.S.
23
1State Higher Education Executive Officers, State Higher Education Finance, FY 2004. Data is adjusted for regional cost of living, the relative mix of enrollments by institutional type,
and 2004 dollars
1State Higher Education Executive Officers, State Higher Education Finance, FY 2004. Adjusted to 2003 or 2004 dollars 3National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs 4Data by sector not available. Total need-based student aid awarded in Nebraska in 2003-04 was $8.74 million.
24.26 48.5 9.1 8.1
266
5609 95.9% 6.8% WI
66.61 30.72 8.2 8.3
244
5425 58.0% 8.5% MI 37.61 83.48 6.5 5.9 5.5 192
4277 72% 9.7% OH n/a4 n/a4 12.3 11.0
330
5256 100% 1,8% NE 0.268 1.08 14.3 11.8
316
4464 76.7% 0.9% ND 15.37 9.74 7.4 7.1 6.4 183
7185 60.9% 4.9% MO 39.38 62.34 8.6 7.1
254
5314 99.9% 9.4% MN 7.53 6.47 11.5 10.1
307 2.3 5586 100% 2.1% KS 62.16 85.87 8.3 7.7 3.8 220
4604 61.3% 18.1% IN 147.50 175.23 7.7 8.0 10.5 262 8.2 6487 91.3% 13.8% IL 40.96 3.26 10.4 9.7
265
4953 99.1% 6.7% IA 1481.9 2358.8 7.6 7.6 3.5 239
5721 73.8% 10.2% U.S.
Private Not-for-Profit In-State Public In-State 1993 2003 1994-2004 change 2004 1994-2004 change 2004 State Need-Based Grant Aid Awarded by Sector, 2003-04 (in millions)3 State and Local Appropriations for Higher Education as a Percentage
Proceeds (2003)2 State and Local Appropriations for Public Higher Education Operating Expenses per capita2 State and Local Appropriations for Public Higher Education Operating Expenses per FTE1 Percentage of Total Grant Aid Awarded Solely on the Basis of Need (2003-04) Total State Grant Expenditures (Need and Merit Based) as a %age of Higher Education Operating Expenses (2003-04) State
24
9-12 grade course-taking in math and science increasing Scores on advanced placement tests improving but still
Increasing percentage of secondary schools taught by
25
Chance for college by age 19 is high
Good college retention and completion rates Ethnic completion rate differences are comparatively low Percent of population with bachelor’s degree increased
26
Small percentage of 8th graders taking algebra Percent of adults enrolled in college work is declining Continued significant gap in ethnic participation rates
Investment in need-based aid is comparatively low but
Percent of family income needed to pay for college is
27
28