michael palladino september 19 2011
play

Michael Palladino September 19, 2011 1 Todays Agenda Review of the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Michael Palladino September 19, 2011 1 Todays Agenda Review of the main drivers for change External bandwidth capacity Full campus wireless connectivity Potential funding model changes Short term (Options 2 & 3)


  1. Michael Palladino September 19, 2011 1

  2. Today’s Agenda  Review of the main drivers for change  External bandwidth capacity  Full campus wireless connectivity  Potential funding model changes  Short term (Options 2 & 3)  Longer term (Option 4)  Status of the main drivers  Next steps 2

  3. Drivers For Change  Internet and Internet 2 external connections will need to increase significantly over the next 5 years  10-fold campus backbone increase  Most wired connections moving from 10 to 100 or 1000Mbps  Rates for wired 1000Mbps continue to go down  FY’10 - $30, FY’11 - $20, FY’12 - $15, FY’13 -likely $10/month  More cloud services will be used  Need for full-campus wireless access  Need to further simplify our funding model and the way we bill for networked devices, especially as more and more consumer products are connected to PennNet 3

  4. External Connectivity  There will be significant increases in Internet and Internet 2 connectivity needs when servers and services shift to the cloud and applications are not housed on PennNet infrastructure  In the last 11 years  Internet usage has grown from 100 Meg to 2000 Meg  Internet 2 usage has grown from 45 Meg to 400 Meg  Unit costs have gone down, but they are not free  Internet- $4/Meg month (Gig $48k/year)  Internet 2- $20/Meg month (Gig $240k/year) 4

  5. Internet Current Bandwidth Usage 5

  6. Internet Projected Bandwidth Usage 12000 10000 8000 Mbps 6000 4000 2000 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 6

  7. External Connectivity: Internet  Next steps  We continue to monitor usage and will make adjustments as bandwidth grows  Currently have three, 1 Gig pipes under contract with 2 vendors  We will continue to secure reliable, low-cost and flexible options with 2 different Internet Service Providers with diverse fiber routes back to campus  Eventually two-10 Gig interfaces  Ability to scale bandwidth as needed at known rate increases  2-3 year terms to lock in low rates 7

  8. Internet 2 Current Bandwidth Usage 8

  9. External Connectivity: Internet 2  Next steps  We continue to monitor usage and will make adjustments as bandwidth grows  Currently have 500 Meg contract under contract, burstable to 1000 Meg  The ION/DYNES service will soon be available which should divert some research bandwidth to this lower-cost option  By FY’13 or FY’14 Internet 2 rates will be decreasing  We could bill significant consumers, however, we prefer not to due to complexity, additional cost and disincentive to research computing 9

  10. Wireless Current Status  Access point growth  1760 APs on 09/01/2010  2592 APs on 09/15/2011  832 APs added (47% increase)  34,018 distinct users in last 6 months  55,619 distinct devices in last 6 months 10

  11. Full-Campus Wireless Connectivity  Earlier this year, there was a NPTF consensus that Penn should have full-campus wireless solution by FY’14 to support:  Increasing mobile demands  Exponential growth of consumer devices  Use of mobile devices integrated into classroom instruction 11

  12. Full-Campus Wireless Connectivity  Current Status  Residential (100%)  College House/Sansom Towers/Greeks(Penn-owned)  Schools  General coverage (nearly 100%)  High density coverage (100% where there is programmatic need)  Administrative areas (15-20%)  Outside (10%)  Penn Park recently completed 12

  13. Wireless AP Projected Growth 6000 5000 4000 # of Aps 3000 2000 1000 0 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 13

  14. Full Campus Wireless Issues  Given Penn’s decentralized nature and the current funding model for wireless, we have issues to address  Who owns the mobile users as they consume AP bandwidth capacity and IP addresses?  Who is owner of outside and public spaces?  How should we prorate costs in shared buildings?  Should we put wireless in non-Penn owned buildings?  Science Center 14

  15. Full Campus Wireless  Goal  Have a full campus wireless network by FY’14 (Sept. ‘13)  Next steps  Fully articulate strategy  Finalize design, plans and costs  Operating costs increase by at least $1M annually  We will need over 2500 new access points  Obtain peer data  Seek faculty and student support  Seek central funding in the fall of 2011 15

  16. Full Campus Wireless  Are there other alternatives that should be investigated?  Eliminate wireless on campus and just have vendor solutions from wireless providers (3G and 4G)  Is this like the modem pool was years ago when good service was available from commodity providers and we shifted the cost to users?  Is this still very much a strategic investment for Penn?  Should we outsource an on-campus solution?  At our current rates with 5000 access points and 50000 users, ISC could deliver the service at about $3/user/month 16

  17. Drivers For Changing the Current Funding Model  IP billing for the non-headcount CSF charge is 20% or a little over $1M annually  The current method is too cumbersome  Over 1000+ folks involved-tracking and thinking about fiscal aspect of getting an IP address  Some client behavior in managing down IP address costs, reflects historical rates ($11.40/month) rather than the current $1.46  If we keep the same funding model, we would need to do a programming effort to bill for IPv6 addresses 17

  18. IP FUNDING MODEL CHANGE OPTIONS  Option 1  No change on billing for the Central Infrastructure Bundle of Services (80% headcount-20% IP addresses)  Wireless IP charges frozen at February 28, 2011 levels  ISC opening address ranges to accommodate substantial growth  Option 2  Eliminate all wireless IP addresses (about 12000) from IP billing pool and increase the CSF rate  Option 3  Eliminate all IP charges and just have a 100% headcount model  Option 4  Increase Central Infrastructure Bundle to include more services  Viewed as a potential longer term approach 18

  19. Option 1: No Change  Advantages  No changes necessary and bills stay the same  Disadvantages  The arbitrary date of February 28, 2011 to fix the wireless IP pool was not equal for all schools and centers  Increases costs for IPv6 billing development  Wasted time for 1000 folks involved in tracking, approving and managing IP costs in schools and centers  Higher cost for ISC to bill than 100% headcount model 19

  20. Option 1: Current Summary Costs CSF FY'12 Budget $5,205,607 FY'12 Projected # of IP addresses 59,400 Headcount Factor 80% Headcount Dollars $4,164,486 IP Factor 20% IP Dollars $1,041,121 IP rate/year $17.53 IP rate/month $1.46 20

  21. Option 1: Current School/Center Charges Total Headcount % of total IP Counts @ IP charge Total FY 12 FY'12 Adjusted based charge headcount 11/30/10 (1.46 month) Charge Headcount (80% of NW cost)* Annenberg Center For Performing Arts 17 0.07% 2,911 77 1,350 4,261 141 0.58% 24,140 602 10,551 34,691 Annenberg School for Communication Audit Compliance and Privacy 21 0.09% 3,652 39 684 4,336 260 1.07% 44,513 720 12,620 57,133 Business Services Campus Services 49 0.20% 8,446 369 6,468 14,914 40 0.16% 6,849 308 5,398 12,247 College Houses and Academic Services Development and Alumni Relations 334 1.37% 57,185 517 9,062 66,247 Division of Finance 246 1.01% 42,176 750 13,145 55,321 170 0.70% 29,107 277 4,855 33,962 Division of Public Safety Division of Recreation & Intercollegiate Athletics 129 0.53% 22,085 547 9,587 31,672 27 0.11% 4,679 129 2,261 6,940 Executive Vice President Facilities and Real Estate Services 864 3.55% 147,987 737 12,918 160,905 899 3.69% 153,850 948 16,616 170,466 Graduate School of Education Human Resources 63 0.26% 10,728 126 2,208 12,936 Information Systems and Computing 278 1.14% 47,598 600 10,516 58,114 13 0.05% 2,226 53 929 3,155 Institute of Contemporary Art International Programs 26 0.11% 4,508 89 1,560 6,068 628 2.58% 107,551 1,323 23,189 130,740 Law School Morris Arboretum 43 0.18% 7,417 106 1,858 9,275 President's Center 183 0.75% 31,387 507 8,886 40,273 Provost Interdisciplinary Programs 42 0.17% 7,246 1,027 18,001 25,247 Provost's Center 367 1.51% 62,835 801 14,039 76,874 5,752 23.65% 984,913 9,272 162,513 1,147,426 School of Arts and Sciences School of Dental Medicine 731 3.01% 125,198 1,961 34,371 159,569 496 2.04% 84,845 1,144 20,051 104,896 School of Design School of Engineering and Applied Science 1,734 7.13% 296,855 5,671 108,248 405,103 Perelman School of Medicine 4,958 20.38% 848,876 9,764 171,137 1,020,013 School of Nursing 875 3.60% 149,854 1,321 23,154 173,008 School of Social Policy and Practice 276 1.13% 47,179 211 3,698 50,877 1,079 4.44% 184,725 2,492 43,678 228,403 School of Veterinary Medicine Student Activities 1 0.00% 171 225 3,944 4,115 255 1.05% 43,712 1,860 32,601 76,313 Student Services University Library 260 1.07% 44,449 2,614 45,816 90,265 University Museum 101 0.41% 17,235 324 5,679 22,914 Wharton School 2,964 12.18% 507,399 7,164 125,566 632,965 Total 24,323 100.00% 4,164,487 54,675 1,041,121 5,205,607 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend