mete 256 assaying
play

METE 256 ASSAYING ore reserve calculations control of processes - PDF document

1/5/2017 Course Objective Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Kumasi, Ghana Determination of the constituents of ores and metallurgical products for: prospecting METE 256 ASSAYING ore reserve calculations


  1. 1/5/2017 Course Objective Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Kumasi, Ghana • Determination of the constituents of ores and metallurgical products for: – prospecting METE 256 ASSAYING – ore reserve calculations – control of processes (gravity concentration) – recovery calculations – smelter schedule Dr. Anthony Andrews – bullion sales, etc Department of Materials Engineering Faculty of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering College of Engineering www.knust.edu.gh Course Outline Course Assessment • Sampling • Quizzes – 10 points – Methods of sampling • Mid Exam – 20 points – Sampling dividing techniques – Weight of samples relative to size of particles • Final Exam – 70 points • Statistical evaluation of data • Metallurgical testing – Bottle roll test, Column leach test, Acid digestion, Fire assaying, Diagnostic leaching • Characterization and instrumental methods of analyses www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Fire Assaying - Introduction Fire Assaying - Background • Many methods have been developed and refined over the years, but “ Fire Assay ” remains a favoured method for determining the • The particular fire assay method under discussion is total gold content of a sample. aimed only at measuring • In this method, a pulverised mineral sample is dissolved using heat Gold and Precious Metals and fluxing agents. • Precious metals are extracted from the melted material using • Variations of fire assay can be used for other metals, molten Lead (Pb). however, in most instances other analytical methods are • The precious metals are then separated from the Lead in a favoured secondary process called “ cupellation ”. • The gold content of the precious metals collected is then determined, using a variety of analytical techniques. www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh 1

  2. 1/5/2017 Fire Assaying – Applications Traditional Fire Assay Method (After Sample Preparation) • Soil samples 1. Sub-sampling & Catch-weigh 2. Fluxing • Exploration drill samples 3. Firing 4. Cooling & Separation • Grade control 5. Cupellation 6. Parting & Dissolution • Mill solutions 7. Analysis • Tailings www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Sampling Significance of Sampling • A process of taking a portion from a bulk of material and • Convenience in size for transportation and testing using that portion to represent the bulk of material. Or • A sample is a small amount of material removed from a • Obtain the desired information at the smallest cost bulk, such that it contains all the components in the proportion in which they occur in the original lot. • Entire bulk may be inaccessible, too massive or too • Why Sample??? dangerous to deal with. E.g human blood www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Important Considerations in Categories of Sampling Sampling • Exploratory • Representative of the bulk – Samples taken during prospecting, exploration and proving of a • Results from analysis of the sample should be appropriate to mine predict the behaviour of the bulk • No sample can provide absolute information about the bulk • Controlled • Statistical technique – provide an estimate within probability limit – Samples taken to determine the content of specific constituents • All the components in the bulk should have equal chance of in a given environment reporting into the sample • Pre-sampling preparation to reduce biasness www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh 2

  3. 1/5/2017 Principles of Sampling Methods for Sampling Material in a Lab • The distribution of values in an ore body is never Stratified or Unstratified uniform • When is this sampling • The results of the sampling shall represent as truly as technique used? possible the average metallic content of the ore/bulk • Where will you take a sample material from? • Each single sample must represent a true average of that portion of bulk from which it is taken www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Methods for Sampling Material in a Methods for Sampling Material in a Lab Lab Grab sample Random – chance • Simplest, quickest, and most • Where will you take a sample flexible method • from? It can be carried out on small quantities using spatulas, or on large quantities using shovels Systematic – orderly • This method uses the least Mixing a sample on a rolling mat. equipment, but also is the most • Where will you take a sample Mix by first drawing corner A so that prone to human biases and has a the sample rolls towards C, then from? higher variance between samples drawing corner B to corner D, then than other methods. drawing corner C to corner A, then corner D to corner B, then repeat. www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Methods for Sampling Material in a Sample Dividing Methods Lab • The sample does not pass Composite sample through the sample device and hence prone to error • Individual samples combined as single sample • Sample is taken from the surface where it may not be typical of the mass. • Shake sample before Scoop sampling sampling. www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh 3

  4. 1/5/2017 Sample Dividing Methods Sample Dividing Methods Chute-Type Riffle Sampler Coning and quartering www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Sample Dividing Methods Comparison of Lab Sample Devices Rotary Riffle Splitter Standard Deviation of Sampling Method Samples (%) Cone & Quarter 6.81 Grab Sampling 5.14 Chute-Type Sample Splitter 1.01 Rotary Riffle 0.125 www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Sampling Problems and Sampling Problems and Requirements Requirements • Problems in sampling centers on: • Degree of representativeness is based on heterogeneity – Nature and efficiency of sampling process • Issues with variations in the distribution of components within the – Weight reduction in the lab bulk such as: – Size segregation – Correctness in the interpretation of data – Mineralogy – Reliability of results – Chemical composition – Accuracy of results – Grade – Precision of results – Moisture content – Biasness in sampling and measurement – Weight • Incorrectness of the above will result in sampling error – Shape www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh 4

  5. 1/5/2017 Size effect on sample integrity Sampling Calculations using Gy’s Method • Mineralogy, grade and moisture content may vary with size • This method is a general-purpose calculation to determine the minimum size of sample needed to ensure that it will be • Bulk material …Gross sample…Lab…Measurement representative of the whole lot, within specified limits. – Samples for lab measurement are obtained by standard techniques – Samples for lab measurement can be size-biased Before using, approximate estimates of the following will be needed: • Coarse samples presents challenges in size volume reduction • The content of the species of interest in the lot (assay) • Smaller volume samples are more representative when particle • The general shape of the particles size is fine • The densities of the various species and phases present • The particle size distribution • The degree of liberation, and the grain size www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Sampling Calculations using Gy’s Sampling Calculations using Gy’s Method Method Basic Equation: Basic Equation: When W is much larger than M, the equation is simplified to: www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh Gy’s Equation – Working out C Calculating with incomplete information 𝑁 − 1 1 𝑇 2 = 𝑔𝑕𝑚𝑛𝐸 3 Make the following conservative assumptions: 𝑀 • f = 0.5 (normal blocky particles); Where C is fglm • g = 0.75 (narrow size distribution. Use g = 1 if the sample is • f = particle shape factor (describes the shape of the particles) obviously monosized and 0.25 for broad size distribution); • g = granulometric factor (describes how much variation there is • l = 1 (grains are as large as the particles) in the size of particles) • l = liberation factor (how close to liberation the material has • The value of m will still need to be calculated, based on your best been ground) estimate of the assay of the sample and the densities of the • m = mineralogical composition factor (describes how much of components of interest. a rock is made up of the element of interest at a given grade) www.knust.edu.gh www.knust.edu.gh 5

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend