memory effect correlations in random scattering media
play

Memory effect correlations in random scattering media over space, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Memory effect correlations in random scattering media over space, angle and time Roarke Horstmeyer Charit Medical School, Humboldt University of Berlin ICERM Waves and Imaging in Random Media September 26, 2017 Challenge: controlling light


  1. Memory effect correlations in random scattering media over space, angle and time Roarke Horstmeyer Charité Medical School, Humboldt University of Berlin ICERM Waves and Imaging in Random Media September 26, 2017

  2. Challenge: controlling light deep within tissue Light randomly scatters within tissue Wavefront-shaping: "undo" scattering SLM

  3. Challenge: controlling light deep within tissue Light randomly scatters within tissue Wavefront-shaping: "undo" scattering SLM

  4. How do we form a focus deep within tissue? DOPC recording Technique #1: Optical Phase Conjugation Camera Modulator (SLM) Spa)al Light Light from Scattered "guidestar" wavefront Reference beam DOPC playback Camera Light returns to Phase guidestar location conjugate Modulator (SLM) Spa)al Light wave Reference beam

  5. Guidestar examples 3 2 1 4 R. Horstmeyer et al., "Guidestar-assisted wavefront-shaping methods for focusing light into biological tissue", Nature Photon. (2015)

  6. This talk: efficiently scanning focused light deep within tissue Scan FOV Goal: want to scan focus around Equivalent: maximize FOV of imaging with adaptive optics

  7. Talk Outline 1. The optical memory effect 2. The "shift/shift" memory effect 3. The generalized memory effect 4. Experimental demo of maximized scanning 5. Scanning further with time-gated light

  8. The optical memory effect • Well-known scattering correlation • Speckle at a distance shifts around but does not change shape Scattered field U Speckle V Plane wave

  9. The optical memory effect • Well-known scattering correlation • Speckle at a distance shifts around but does not change shape Tilt the wave Scattered field tilts Speckle shifts U(k- Δ k) V(x- Δ x) Δk Application: Imaging "through" thin scattering layers J. Bertolotti et al., "Noninvasive imaging through opaque scattering layers," Nature (2012) • O. Katz et al., "Noninvasive single shot imaging through opaque scattering layers and around corners," • Nature Photon. (2014) X. Yang et al., "Imaging blood cells through scattering tissue using speckle scanning," Opt. Express (2014) •

  10. The optical memory effect • Original approach 1 interested in intensity-intensity correlations: "Memory effect" I(k- Δ k a ) Δk a 1 S. Feng, C. Kane, P . A. Lee, and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 834 (1988).

  11. The optical memory effect • Original approach 1 interested in intensity-intensity correlations: "Memory effect" • We will work with field-field correlations 2 , the square root of C I (1) : Our primary interest 1 S. Feng, C. Kane, P . A. Lee, and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 834 (1988). 2 R. Berkovits, M. Kaveh and S. Feng, Phys. Rev. B 40, 737 (1989).

  12. The optical memory effect Tilt Tilt k a k b What does the memory effect look like within the transmission matrix? T(k a , k b ) k b k a

  13. The optical memory effect Tilt Tilt Scattering response to a point source: d x "Intensity propagator" k a k b x a x b Visualization of the optical memory effect possible in k and x: T(x a , x b ) T(k a , k b ) F 2D Banded x b k b structure in T x d x x a k a

  14. The optical memory effect: a simple derivation T(x a , x b ) x b <I(x b )> x a x b x a Assume we know the average magnitude of transmission matrix: Assume average intensity response to point source is shift-invariant:

  15. The optical memory effect: a simple derivation T(x a , x b ) x b <I(x b )> x a x b x a Recipe to measure the optical memory effect: 1. Put point source on input surface 2. Measure average intensity at output surface, <I(x b )> 3. Take Fourier transform to get C( Δ k) F 1D C( Δ k) <I(x b )> Optical memory Intensity effect propagator

  16. The shift/shift memory effect What happens if we switch x's and k's? T(x a , x b ) T(k a , k b ) F 2D x b k b x a k a

  17. The shift/shift memory effect T(k a , k b ) T(x a , x b ) F 2D k b x b k a x a

  18. The shift/shift memory effect: the Fourier dual Shift Shift Wavevector response to a plane wave: "k-space intensity propagator" <Î(k a ,k b )> x a x b k a k b T(k a , k b ) T(x a , x b ) F 2D k b x b Î(k) k a x a

  19. The shift/shift memory effect: the Fourier dual T(k a , k b ) k b <Î(k b )> k a k b k a • Identical derivation, x's and k's swapped • Recipe to measure the shift/shift memory effect: 1. Shine plane wave on input surface 2. Measure average wavevector spread at output 3. Take its Fourier transform to get spatial correlation C( Δ x) • Focus and scan within anisotropic material (e.g., tissue g ~ 0.92-0.98)

  20. Experimental demo of shift/shift memory effect Light from SLM (optical phase conjugation) B. Judkewitz, R. Horstmeyer et al., "Translation correlations in anisotropically scattering media," Nature Physics (2015)

  21. Experimental demo of shift/shift memory effect Light from SLM (optical phase conjugation) Green curve: focus intensity Black curve: FT plane wave response B. Judkewitz, R. Horstmeyer et al., "Translation correlations in anisotropically scattering media," Nature Physics (2015)

  22. The tilt/tilt and shift/shift memory effects Tilt/tilt correlation Shift/shift correlation <I(x b )> δ (x a ) δ (k a ) <Î(k b )> k-space impulse response Spatial impulse response Scanning in k Scanning in x How are these two effects connected?

  23. The generalized memory effect: combining tilts and shifts New input: "single ray"* + ) (x b + , k b δ (x a ,k a ) 0 ) <P <P(x b ,k b )> (x b 0 , k b - ) (x b - , k b *Actually defined via the Wigner distribution, paper has math details: G. Osnabrugge, R. Horstmeyer et al, "The generalized optical memory effect," Optica (2017)

  24. The generalized memory effect: combining tilts and shifts New input: "single ray"* Space-angle response <P(x b ,k b )> k b + ) (x b + , k b + ) (x b + , k b δ (x a ,k a ) 0 ) <P(x b ,k b )> <P (x b 0 , k b 0 ) (x b 0 , k b x b - ) (x b - , k b - ) (x b - , k b *Actually defined via the Wigner distribution, paper has math details: G. Osnabrugge, R. Horstmeyer et al, "The generalized optical memory effect," Optica (2017)

  25. The generalized memory effect: combining tilts and shifts New input: "single ray" Space-angle response <P(x b ,k b )> k b + ) (x b + , k b + ) (x b + , k b δ (x a ,k a ) 0 ) <P(x b ,k b )> <P (x b 0 , k b 0 ) (x b 0 , k b x b - ) (x b - , k b - ) (x b - , k b 2D Fourier transform of space-angle response gives tilt/shift correlation: G. Osnabrugge, R. Horstmeyer et al, "The generalized optical memory effect," Optica (2017)

  26. The generalized memory effect: combining tilts and shifts New input: "single ray" Space-angle response <P(x b ,k b )> k b + ) (x b + , k b + ) (x b + , k b δ (x a ,k a ) 0 ) <P(x b ,k b )> <P (x b 0 , k b 0 ) (x b 0 , k b x b - ) (x b - , k b - ) (x b - , k b 2D Fourier transform of space-angle response gives tilt/shift correlation: 4D Fourier transform used when scattering is not tilt/shift invariant: G. Osnabrugge, R. Horstmeyer et al, "The generalized optical memory effect," Optica (2017)

  27. The generalized memory effect: is it important? Space-angle response <P(x b ,k b )> Tilt/shift correlations C( Δ k, Δ x) k b Δ x F 2D x b Δ k • Tilting and shifting correlations generally not independent

  28. The generalized memory effect: is it important? Space-angle response <P(x b ,k b )> Tilt/shift correlations C( Δ k, Δ x) k b Δ x F 2D x b Δ k Only shifting Tilting and shifting • Tilting and shifting correlations generally not independent • Optimal tilt and shift combo can achieve larger scan range

  29. Experimental setup • Two experiments: 1. Pencil beam response, <P(x b ,k b )> 2. Shift/tilt correlation function (shift both diffuser & sample) • Tissue phantom samples (5 µm spheres in agar, g=0.97, 0.3 mm – 1 mm thick)

  30. Average space-angle scattering response to pencil beam 0.3 mm thick 0.5 mm thick

  31. Directly measured shift/tilt correlations FT 2D of <P(x b ,k b )> Direct measurement Simple simulation 0.3 mm thick 0.5 mm thick

  32. Directly measured shift/tilt correlations Shift-shift FT 2D of <P(x b ,k b )> Direct measurement Simple simulation 0.3 mm thick 0.5 mm thick

  33. Directly measured shift/tilt correlations Shift-shift FT 2D of <P(x b ,k b )> Direct measurement Simple simulation 0.3 mm thick Tilt/tilt[1] 0.5 mm thick [1] S. Schott et al., "Characterization of the angular memory effect of scattered light in biological tissue," Opt. Express (2015)

  34. Directly measured shift/tilt correlations Shift-shift FT 2D of <P(x b ,k b )> Direct measurement Simple simulation 0.3 mm thick Tilt/tilt[1] 0.5 mm thick Optimal shift/tilt [1] S. Schott et al., "Characterization of the angular memory effect of scattered light in biological tissue," Opt. Express (2015)

  35. Scanning distances and the optimal rotation plane Δ k a Δ x a Δ k a Δ x a L/3 L/3 L Δ x a L Δ k a /k /k 0 0 – Δ x a L Δ k a /k /k 0 Optimally tilt and shift = Tilt around plane L/3 deep

  36. Why is L/3 optimal? An intuitive picture Stack of semi-random phase plates

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend