measurement tools for improvement efforts
play

Measurement Tools for Improvement Efforts Jane A. Taylor, Ed.D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measurement Tools for Improvement Efforts Jane A. Taylor, Ed.D. Improvement Advisor to IHI As part of our extensive program and with CPD hours awarded based on actual time spent learning, credit hours are offered based on attendance per


  1. Measurement Tools for Improvement Efforts Jane A. Taylor, Ed.D. Improvement Advisor to IHI

  2. As part of our extensive program and with CPD hours awarded based on actual time spent learning, credit hours are offered based on attendance per session, requiring delegates to attend a minimum of 80% of a session to qualify for the allocated CPD hours. • Less than 80% attendance per session = 0 CPD hours • 80% or higher attendance per session = full allotted CPD hours ME Forum 2019 Orientation Total CPD hours for the forum are awarded based on the sum of CPD hours earned from all individual sessions. Conflict of Interest The speaker(s) or presenter(s) in this session has/have no conflict of interest or disclosure in relation to this presentation.

  3. Tools for Improvement • View systems and processes • Gather information • Organize information • Understand variation • Understand relationships

  4. VIEW SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES MAPPING

  5. System View: Design and Re-design Consumer research A B Service Outputs Suppliers Delivery Consumers Inputs C Test of procedures and D methods Adapted from OUT OF THE CRISIS by W.E. Deming

  6. Flow Charts 3 Simple Symbols

  7. GATHERING INFORMATION DATA COLLECTION FORMS OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS

  8. Data Collection Forms – Answer specific questions posed in the planning phase of the improvement cycle – Make the recording of observations easy, efficient and accurate – Facilitate data analysis during the study phase of the improvement cycle – Always TEST form first

  9. Form for Collecting Data PIN HOLE TINT SPOT BUBBLE STONE SMUDGE TOP DRIP TOTAL

  10. Data Collection Forms

  11. Data Collection Forms – Variables for Stratification § Stratification Monthly data Stratify by surgeon summarizing surgical Stratify by age complications Stratify by OR

  12. Operational Definitions What is a fall? What is a ventilator associated pneumonia? What is discharge within 2 hours of medically ready? What is on-time? What is clean? Operational definitions allow for consistent and accurate data collection. Gives communicable meaning to a concept

  13. Components of Operational Definition Developing an operational definition requires agreement on two things: 1. A method of measurement – Which device? (clock, wristwatch, stopwatch?) – To what degree of precision (nearest hour, 5 minutes, minute, second?) 2. A set of criteria for judgment – What is “late”, “error”, “a fall”? Page 37 13

  14. The Importance of Operational Definitions • If data are collected differently by different people, or differently each time collected, it makes it hard to know whether changes in the data are due to the changes tested or from inconsistencies in data collection. Page 37 14

  15. Qualitative Data Interviews 1:1 • What was it like? Not, did you like it? • What did you feel, hear, sense? • What did it mean to you when this happened? Focus - limit to 5 questions, similar users • General question • More specific re the issue you want to learn about • Ask the group, what other questions you might ask? • Feedback with, “all things considered (provide summary) • Ask if you captured the conversation accurately

  16. Observation � Stand where the work is done long enough and you will figure out what needs to be done. � attributed to Taiichi Ohno

  17. Taiichi Ohno � s Seven Wastes Overproduction Time on Hand Defective Products (Waiting) MUDA Transportation Movement Stock on Hand Processing (Inventory)

  18. Other qualitative data Observation Introduce yourself It is about watching the work process not the person Make notes: waste, overproduction, rework, items not fit for use, communication gaps Draw pictures – spaghetti diagram

  19. Spaghetti Diagram: Before

  20. Spaghetti Diagram: After

  21. ORGANIZING INFORMATION DIAGRAMS: DRIVER, AFFINITY, CAUSE AND EFFECT, INTERRELATIONSHIP

  22. Driver Diagram: Best theory to date to get results • Primary drivers: systems, processes, structures and norms that need to change to get improvement • Secondary drivers: places in the system or processes where changes need to occur or discrete moments in time where improvements are needed • Changes: ideas based on evidence, observation, or experience that get results

  23. Driver Diagram Example from NZ What’s Your Theory? Bennett and Provost. July 2015 QP 37

  24. Secondary Changes Primary Aim Drivers Drivers Screen at WIC visits Develop reliable screening & referral process to schools Develop registry to follow up with referrals Clinics Create shared consent agreements Focus on access to services Hire staff who reflect culture groups Coordinate with other schools Refer to EL Programs By July 4, Schools Develop follow through core services 2020 Carefully follow those not on track @ 3 Use Medicaid funding for referrals; cooperate with DHS to bill for Improve services for those without IEP or IFSP Cross Sector school Connect screening, id of problems with access to resources and Family readiness Work with family partners for messaging the value and import of screening and services for children Collaboration Develop cultural humility and incorporate into approaches of color and ID early learning resources eg, Head Start, Libraries, ECE Family Screen at places families and children frequent; engage American families most underserved Indian Support transition out or service (Part C) Inform policy for system coordination eg, data sharing children to less than Track referrals at reliable intervals 10% Establish follow up protocol Internal Connect with families for follow up support Share project status with leadership Communication Recruit leader to communicate project status in-and external Communicate referral outcomes and status to referring providers External Share project status, result, partnerships, barriers (storyboard)

  25. Cause and Effect Diagram or Fishbone Diagram Wikipedia

  26. Affinity Diagram

  27. Interrelationship Diagram

  28. UNDERSTANDING VARIATION RUN AND CONTROL CHARTS; FREQUENCY PLOTS; PARETO CHART

  29. Sources of Data (Figure 2.1) Data are documented observations or the results of performing a measurement process. Data can be obtained by perception (for example, observation) or by performing a measurement process. Page 26 29

  30. 30 Shewhart’s Theory of Variation (1931) Common Causes —those causes Special Causes —those causes inherent in the system over time, not part of the system all the time affect everyone working in the or do not affect everyone, but system, and affect all outcomes of arise because of specific, the system assignable circumstances

  31. 31 Run Chart Graphical display of data plotted in some type of order. Also has been called a time series or a trend chart. Page 67

  32. Analyzing a Run Chart 32 • Starts with a simple visual analysis. • Direction of goodness? • They are testing changes here. Do they have improvement yet?

  33. May Display More Than One 33 Measure on a Graph

  34. 34 Figure 3.13 Page 78 78

  35. 35 When Do We Start a Run Chart?

  36. Why a run chart? Why not just a table? Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Measure 83 80 81 84 83 85 68 87 89 92 91 100 Run Chart of Measure 95 Goal 90 85 Percent 80 75 70 65 60 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Monthly Measure – Goal = 90% HC Data Guide , p 68 36

  37. How Should We Look at Data? Before and After Test 9 8 7 Delay Time (hours) 6 5 4 3 2 made change 1 0 4 11 37

  38. How Should We Look at Data? Before and After Test 9 8 7 Delay Time (hours) 6 5 4 3 2 made change 1 0 4 11 38

  39. How Should We Look at Data? Before and After Test 9 8 7 Delay Time (hours) 6 5 4 3 2 made change 1 0 4 11 39

  40. How Should We Look at Data? Before and After Test 9 8 7 Delay Time (hours) 6 5 4 3 2 made change 1 0 4 11 40

  41. How Should We Look at Data? Before and After Test 9 8 7 Delay Time (hours) 6 5 4 3 2 made change 1 0 4 11 41

  42. How Should We Look at Data? Before and After Test 9 8 7 Delay Time (hours) 6 5 4 3 2 made change 1 0 4 11 42

  43. We are increasingly realizing not only how critical measurement is to the quality improvement we seek but also how counterproductive it can be to mix measurement for accountability or research with measurement for improvement. 43 March, 1997 The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement , Vol 23, No 3.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend