May 29, 2018 DPM AN INNOVATIVE, GROWING GOLD PRODUCER Krumovgrad - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

may 29 2018
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

May 29, 2018 DPM AN INNOVATIVE, GROWING GOLD PRODUCER Krumovgrad - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Investor Presentation May 29, 2018 DPM AN INNOVATIVE, GROWING GOLD PRODUCER Krumovgrad Gold Project April 2018 Forward Looking Statements Certain statements and other information included in this presentation and our other disclosure


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Investor Presentation May 29, 2018

Krumovgrad Gold Project April 2018

DPM – AN INNOVATIVE, GROWING GOLD PRODUCER

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TSX:DPM

2

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements and other information included in this presentation and our other disclosure documents constitute “forward looking information” or “forward looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, which we refer to collectively hereinafter as “Forward Looking Statements”. Statements that constitute Forward Looking Statements include, but are not limited to, certain statements with respect to the estimated capital costs, operating costs, key project operating costs and financial metrics and other project economics with respect to Krumovgrad; the timing of development, permitting, construction, commissioning activities and commencement of production in respect of Krumovgrad; timing of further optimization work at Tsumeb and potential benefits of rotary furnace installation; price of gold, copper, silver and acid; toll rates; metals exposure and stockpile interest deductions; the estimation of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources and the realization of such mineral estimates; the timing and amount of estimated future production and output, life of mine, costs of production, cash costs and other cost measures, capital expenditures, rates of return at Krumovgrad and other deposits and timing of the development

  • f new deposits; results of economic studies; success of exploration activities; success of permitting activities; permitting time lines; currency fluctuations;

requirements for additional capital; government regulation of mining and smelting operations; success of permitting activities; environmental risks; reclamation expenses; potential or anticipated outcome of title disputes or claims; and timing and possible outcome of pending litigation. Forward Looking Statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “outlook”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or that state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward looking statements are based on certain key assumptions and on the opinions and estimates of management and Qualified Persons (in the case of technical and scientific information) as of the date such statements are made and they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any other future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward Looking Statements. In addition to factors already discussed in this presentation, such factors include, among others: the uncertainties with respect to actual results of current exploration activities, actual results of current reclamation activities, conclusions of economic evaluations and economic studies; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; possible variations in ore grade or recovery rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities; uncertainties and risks inherent to developing and commissioning new mines into production, such as the Krumovgrad project, which may be subject to unforeseen delays, costs or other issues; uncertainties inherent with conducting business in foreign jurisdictions where corruption, civil unrest, political instability and uncertainties with the rule of law may impact the Company’s activities; social and non-governmental organizations (“NGO”) opposition to mining projects and smelting operations; fluctuations in metal and acid prices, toll rates and foreign exchange rates; unanticipated title disputes; claims or litigation; limitation on insurance coverage; cyber attacks; failure to realize projected financial results from MineRP; risks related to operating a technology business reliant on the ownership, protection and ongoing development of key intellectual properties; as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in any other documents (including without limitation the Company’s most recent AIF) filed from time to time with the securities regulatory authorities in all provinces and territories of Canada and available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward Looking Statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward Looking Statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Unless required by securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update forward looking statements if circumstances or management’s estimates or

  • pinion should change. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

TSX:DPM

3

Investment Highlights

Operating in mining friendly jurisdictions Strong resource and reserve base High quality, low cost, flagship asset Near term, low cost growth in gold production Growing exploration pipeline Strong balance sheet Strong management team Attractive valuation

Strong Asset Base, Near Term Growth & Attractive Valuation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

TSX:DPM

4

Metal Prices and DPM Share Price

Gold and Copper Price Trend 2010 to Present

$1.80 $2.10 $2.40 $2.70 $3.00 $3.30 $3.60 $3.90 $4.20 $4.50 $4.80 $1,000 $1,100 $1,200 $1,300 $1,400 $1,500 $1,600 $1,700 $1,800 $1,900 $2,000 Apr-10 Apr-11 Apr-12 Apr-13 Apr-14 Apr-15 Apr-16 Apr-17 Apr-18 Gold Price Trend (US$/oz) Copper Price Trend (US$/lb)

Historical Relative Trading January 2017 – April 2018

(20%) 0% 20% 40% 60% Jan-17 Apr-17 Jul-17 Oct-17 Jan-18 Apr-18 C$DPM US$GDX US$GDXJ

26%

4%

(1%)

  • DPM has outperformed benchmarks but still trades at discounted valuation multiples
slide-5
SLIDE 5

TSX:DPM

5

Company Overview

Share Price / 52 week low-high (C$ per share) $3.37 / $2.13 - $3.60 Shares Outstanding – Current 178,492,566 Market Capitalization – Current $464 M P/NAV (23) 0.51x (consensus) Metals contained in concentrate produced Gold Copper 197,684 oz 35.8 Mlbs AISC/oz Au (1,2) $729 Adjusted EBITDA $92 M + Krumovgrad starting in Q4 2018 + 85,700 oz/yr Cash $15 M Investment portfolio (21) $36.8 M Undrawn RCF $242 M Debt $33 M

2017 Quick Glance Production & Financial Metrics

Dundee Corporation 20.38% GMT Capital Corporation 12.47% EBRD 9.9% USAA Asset Mgmt. 3.18% Kopernik Global Advisors 2.91%

Low cost production with 50% growth starting in Q4 2018 Strong liquidity position Long term shareholders Attractive Valuation

1, 2, 21 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

Share Capital (@ May 25, 2018) Liquidity Position (@ March 31, 2018) Top Five Shareholders (@ May 25, 2018)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

TSX:DPM

6 Timok Gold Project Serbia Tsumeb Smelter Namibia Chelopech Mine Bulgaria Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. Nunavut, Canada Krumovgrad Gold Project Bulgaria

DPM’s Global Portfolio of Assets

Operating assets Development asset Late stage exploration assets Early stage exploration assets

Malartic JV Quebec, Canada

Chelopech

  • Location: Chelopech, Bulgaria
  • Ownership: 100%
  • 2017 Production: 197,684 oz Au;

35.8 Mlbs Cu

  • Mine Life: 8.5 years
  • Operation: Underground

Krumovgrad

  • Location: Southern Bulgaria
  • Ownership: 100%
  • Stage: Construction
  • Production: 103,000 oz (yrs 1-5 avg)
  • Mine life: 8 years
  • Operation: Open pit
  • Commissioning: Q4 2018

Tsumeb

  • Location: Tsumeb, Namibia
  • Ownership: 100%
  • 2017 Concentrate Smelted: 219,000 tonnes
  • Operation: Specialty smelter
  • Location: Serbia
  • Ownership: 100%
  • Stage: Advanced exploration
  • Resource: 1.72 Moz

Timok Sabina Gold & Silver

  • Location: Nunavut, Canada
  • Ownership: 10%
  • Stage: Pre-construction
  • Production: 240,000 Au (yrs 1-8) (18)
  • Operation: Open pit/underground
  • DPM’s equity stake: $36.8 M

Corporate Head Office Toronto, Canada

18 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TSX:DPM

7

Bulgaria…

  • Overview:
  • Uninterrupted operations since 2003
  • Member of the EU since 2007
  • 4th largest gold producer in Europe
  • Stable regulatory environment & government
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 10%
  • Chelopech Royalty Rate: 1.5% of gross Cu, Au and Ag
  • Krumovgrad Royalty Rate: 1% - 4% of gross value
  • GDP Forecast: +2.8% in 2017 (IMF)
  • Mining industry forms 5% of the GDP (2016)

Namibia…

  • Overview:
  • Political party stability
  • 5th largest producer of uranium and 9th largest producer of

diamonds

  • Ranked in top 10 as Africa’s most attractive countries over last

5 years according to the Fraser Institute

  • Glencore, Rio Tinto, Anglo American, Paladin Energy, etc.
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 0% (Export Processing Zone status)
  • GDP Forecast: +5.3% in 2017 (IMF)
  • Mining industry forms 11.5% of the GDP (Jan. 2017)

Serbia…

  • Overview:
  • EU candidate since 2012
  • 3rd largest copper producer in Europe
  • Industry benefits from high level government support
  • Corporate Tax Rate: 15%
  • GDP Forecast: +3.0% in 2017 (IMF)
  • Mining industry forms 2% of the GDP (2013)

Operating in Mining Friendly Jurisdictions

slide-8
SLIDE 8

TSX:DPM

8

Strong Mineral Resource and Reserve Base

1.9 Moz 0.8 Moz

Proven and probable

Total Gold Ounces

Proven and Probable

Total Copper

1.4 Moz 0.01 Moz 1.7 Moz 3.8 Moz

Measured & Indicated Inferred

Total Gold Ounces

2.7 Moz 376 Mlbs

Measured & Indicated Inferred

Total Copper

2.8 Bnlbs

311 Mlbs

Krumovgrad Chelopech Chelopech Timok Krumovgrad Chelopech Chelopech

3.1 Moz

0.12 Moz

Chelopech Tulare Tulare

2.8 Bnlbs

29 Mlbs

3.9 Moz

3, 4, 5, A, B. See footnotes contained in Appendix on slides 48 & 49

TOTAL MINERAL RESERVES (3,5,A) TOTAL MINERAL RESOURCES (4,5,A) Exclusive of Reserves

As of December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2017

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TSX:DPM

8

HIGH QUALITY, LOW COST, FLAGSHIP ASSET

Chelopech

Location: Chelopech, Bulgaria Ownership: 100% 2017 Production: 197,684 oz Au; 35.8 Mlbs Cu Mine Life: 8.5 years Operation: Underground

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TSX:DPM

10

57 133 196 153 118 99 87 108

300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 50 100 150 200 250 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Cash Cost / tonne of ore processed (US$/t) (6) Ore Mined (Mt)

1.09 1.31 1.81 2.03 2.05 2.04 2.21 2.22

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E

56 55 46 40 40 37 33 34 37

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E

Adjusted EBITDA (US$M) (7) 2006 2015 2016 2017

21.5 21.5 14.1

Total ore mined since 2006 (Mt) Ore Reserve (Mt)

16.3 19.8

Gold price trend

  • Growing throughput in recent years with
  • pportunity to optimize further
  • Continuing to optimize through innovation
  • 2018E slightly higher due to FX
  • Stronger EBITDA due to grades & metal prices
  • Exploration successful in replacing reserves

6, 7, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48 Copper price trend (AuEq)

Chelopech – Continually Improving

2.1-2.2 37-40

9 9

18.8 18.5 0.558

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TSX:DPM

11

139 172 140-170 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E

Chelopech Highlights

Payable gold in concentrate sold (000s oz) (8) Metals contained in concentrate produced (8)

166 198 165-195 38.5 35.8 33.7-40.4 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E Gold (000s oz) Copper (Mlbs)

  • Record gold production in 2017
  • Guidance for another strong year in 2018
  • Focused on mine and process plant optimization

8, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

All in sustaining cost (US$/oz gold sold)

9 9 9

57.3 9.3 35.2 747 729 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E 640-855 696

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TSX:DPM

12

Chelopech – Next Phase of Optimization Underway

Change in mining method 0.5 mtpy 1.0 mtpy Underground crushing and conveying; “Taking the lid off the mine” 1.0 mtpy 2.0 mtpy

Digital transformation

Phase 1 2003-2008 Phase 2 2009-2014

Phase 3 2015+

  • Dynamic mine planning
  • Intelligent use of data
  • Digital collaboration
  • Smart centre
  • Automating mining process

2018 2020 2019 Key benefits:

  • Recovery improvement in 2017
  • Deep understanding of Reserve base
  • Optimization of material & asset flow
  • Improved anticipation of failures
  • Increase automation
  • Real time monitoring of performance
  • vs. plan
slide-13
SLIDE 13

TSX:DPM

13

Chelopech – Near Mine Exploration

Drilling demonstrates excellent potential for hosting additional resources:

  • New zone of breccia pipes
  • Found over 1500 m & is open to the east
  • Large areas remain between drilled sections
  • Similar geology to Central and Western orebodies
  • Opens up whole new area
  • 10,000 m infill drill program proposed for at SEBP zone initiated in January. Results from the first drill

hole in Q1 include:

  • 25 m averaging 4.53 g/t AuEq from start of the hole followed by 132 m averaging 0.49 g/t AuEq
  • 5,000 m of drilling planned for Krasta target
slide-14
SLIDE 14

TSX:DPM

13

TRANSITIONING TO FREE CASH FLOW

Tsumeb

Location: Tsumeb, Namibia Ownership: 100% 2017 concentrate smelted: 219,000 tonnes Operation: Specialty smelter

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TSX:DPM

15

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E 2019F 2020F 2021F 2022F

(2)

Tsumeb – Increased Stability with Growth Potential

Total Capital Expenditures (US$M)

63 140 130 44 19 8.6

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E

219 240- 265 196 198 152 159 265- 300 200 300- 370

Production (‘000s tonnes)

Cash cost/t of con smelted (net of by product credits) Third Party con supplied to smelter (000s) Chelopech concentrate supplied to smelter (000s) Potential future capacity

$440-$500 240- 265

Growth Capital Sustaining Capital

 Secured processing outlet for Chelopech  Growing cash flow generating custom toll business

  • Focused on stable operations at current throughput
  • Option to expand to 370k tpa in the future
  • Will evaluate strategic partnership alternatives

6, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

9 9 9 9 (6)

Major investment phase complete Major investment phase complete

220- 250 12-18

9 9

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TSX:DPM

16

200 219 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E

Tsumeb Smelter Highlights

Complex Concentrate Smelted (‘000s t) Adjusted EBITDA (US$M) (7) Sustaining Capital (US$M) (6)

  • Stable performance in 2017
  • Continued optimization of facility
  • Focused on improving availability of oxygen plant and unit cost reductions
  • Generated free cash flow of US$7 million in 2017

6, 7, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

9 9

54 220 – 250 10 14 2 2016 2017 Q1 2018 11 7 12-18 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E 4

slide-17
SLIDE 17

NEAR TERM, LOW COST GROWTH

TSX:DPM

16

Krumovgrad

Location: Southern Bulgaria Ownership: 100% Stage: Construction Production: 103,000 oz (yrs 1-5 avg) Mine life: 8 years Operation: Open pit Commissioning: Q4 2018

April 2018

slide-18
SLIDE 18

TSX:DPM

18

Krumovgrad – Robust Economics

Project Economics Robust with a 28% After-Tax IRR *

Production and Operating Costs (10, B) Annual tons processed 775,000 t Gold grade 4.04 g/t Strip ratio 2.6:1 waste:ore (t:t) Annual gold production 85,700 oz Year 1 to 5 average 103,020 oz Annual silver production 38,700 oz Total cash cost per oz AuEq $403 Average Annual EBITDA (7) $66 million Year 1 to 5 average $85 million Construction capital $164 - $168 million NPV (5%) (@ April 30, 2018) $318 million (adjusted for capital spent) First concentrate production Q4 2018 LOM 8 years

  • High grade low strip ratio open pit gold mine
  • Operating synergies with Chelopech
  • Fully funded with near term production in Q4 2018
  • @ US$1,250/oz Au
  • Based on midpoint of updated construction capital

7, 10, B See footnotes contained in Appendix on slides 48 & 49

slide-19
SLIDE 19

TSX:DPM

19

Krumovgrad – Project Progress

Milestone

Actual/Expected Completion Construction permit RECEIVED AUGUST 9, 2016 Mobilize earthworks contractor to site and commence earthworks Q4 2016 Commenced main civil/mechanical/electrical construction Q3 2017 Commissioning and start up Q3 2018 First concentrate production Q4 2018 Construction capital spent (@ Apr. 30, 2018) / remainder to be spent in 2018 $101 million / $63-$67 million Percent complete (@ April 30, 2018) 65%

Vertimills for fine grinding – April 2018 Krumovgrad site – April 2018

Project Progress

Krumovgrad Project Facility

slide-20
SLIDE 20

TSX:DPM

20

Krumovgrad – Construction Progress

slide-21
SLIDE 21

TSX:DPM

21

Krumovgrad – Exploration (22)

Surnak Exploration Target

22 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slides 38 & 39 Previous exploration work at the Surnak Prospect, which includes over 10,800 metres of trenching and drilling, has been used to outline an exploration target of 80,000 to 160,000 oz Au contained within 1.8 to 2.4 Mt grading 1.5 to 2 g/t Au. The exploration target potential was derived upon review of historic Mineral Resource estimates at Surnak, in combination with

  • ngoing development of the 3D geologic model at Surnak.

The potential ranges of tonnes and grade are conceptual in nature are based on previous drill results that defined the approximate length, thickness, depth and grade

  • f the portion of the historic Mineral Resource estimate.

There has been insufficient exploration to define a current Mineral Resource and the company cautions that there is a risk further exploration will not result in the delineation

  • f a current Mineral Resource.

KUPEL NORTH Discovery Hole KPDD009 8m at 12.81 ppm Au & 4.95 ppm Ag SKALAK SYNAP KUKLITSA KUPEL SURNAK SURNAK EXPLORATION TARGET Exploration target potential of 80,000 to 160,000 oz Au contained within 1.8 to 2.4 Mt grading 1.5 to 2 g/t Au ADA TEPE Proven and Probable Reserves Au: 806 Koz at 4.05 g/t Ag: 443 Koz at 2.2g/t

  • Surnak is one of six registered Commercial Discoveries within the mine concession
  • Located 3 km west of Ada Tepe
  • Sediment-hosted low sulphidation epithermal gold veins like Ada Tepe
  • Last explored by DPM in 2004-5
  • 6,000 m diamond drill program planned for 2018. Results from first holes include:
  • SUDD028: 13m at 1.29 g/t gold from 106m
  • SUDD029: 15m at 1.22 g/t gold from 130m
  • Additional 1,600 m drilling on regional licences
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria

FUTURE GROWTH PIPELINE

TSX:DPM

ADVANCED EXPLORATION

20

Location: Serbia Ownership: 100% Stage: Advanced exploration Resource: 1.72 million ounces (19)

Timok

  • 19. See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
slide-23
SLIDE 23

TSX:DPM

23

Serbia Advanced Exploration

Timok Gold Project

Total Indicated Mineral Resources 1.72 Moz Au @ 1.54 g/t contained within 34.7 MT Inferred Mineral Resources 0.02 Moz Au @ 1.4 g/t contained within 0.4 MT

Indicated Mineral Resource for Bigar Hill (19) 1.16 Moz Au @ 1.57 g/t contained within 22.97 MT Indicated Mineral Resource for Korkan (19) 0.33 Moz Au @ 1.55 g/t Contained within 6.71 MT Indicated Mineral Resource for Pester (19) 0.23 Moz Au @ 1.40 g/t contained within 5.06 MT

  • 19. See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
  • Previously assumed sulphide resource
  • Potential for oxides within previous resource
  • Initial bottle roll tests indicate recoveries of:
  • 90-95% for Korkan and Bigar Hill oxides
  • 75% for Korkan West oxides
  • 50-55% for Korkan transitional zone
  • Potential to improve economics
slide-24
SLIDE 24

TSX:DPM

24

Serbia Exploration (22)

Timok Gold Project: Korkan West Discovery

  • Near resource target drilled Nov. 2016
  • KW016: 105m at 1.21 g/t gold from

surface

  • Two phases of drilling at KW during

2017

  • 41 holes for 6,770 m
  • Gold mineralization found over a

strike length of 220 m

  • Almost all reported intervals are oxide
  • 11,500 m drilling program at Korkan

West and other targets started in April

  • If successful proceed to updated

resource and scoping study

KORKAN BIGAR HILL

KW Zone KO Zone

46 37 33 47 41 45 42 35 39 166 168 173

Timok Gold Project Indicated Mineral Resources 1.72 Moz Au at 1.54 g/t Inferred Mineral Resources 0.02 Moz Au at 1.4 g/t KORKAN WEST DISCOVERY

167 169 171 38 170 172 40 36 43 44

  • 22. See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

KWDD016

slide-25
SLIDE 25

TSX:DPM

25

Additional Upside Potential Through Equity Interests

  • 35km2 of prospective Abitibi geology located 25 km west of

Val-d’Or

  • $2.5 M within first 3 yrs to earn 51% with option to increase

to 71% following an additional $3.5 M expenditure in the following 3 yrs

  • Winter scout drilling program completed. Results of first three

holes included 2m of 5.53 g/t gold within a 10m wide vein zone

  • Value of DPM stake May 14, 2018 = ~$36.8M (incl. warrants)
  • M&I resource – 5.3M oz Au
  • Inferred resource – 1.85M oz Au
  • Targeting Au production Q1 2021
  • Production of ~240k oz Au/year (yrs 1 through 8)
  • Success at Umwelt Vault Zone and Llama extension provides

upside potential to mine life

  • Proceeding with pre-construction activities for 2018

Sabina Gold and Silver Corp. Back River Project, Nunavut DPM Ownership – 10.2% (18) Malartic Property, Quebec Joint Venture

  • 18. See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
slide-26
SLIDE 26

SUMMARY

TSX:DPM

GROWTH OPTIMIZATION INNOVATION

24

slide-27
SLIDE 27

TSX:DPM

27

Chelopech

 Record gold production

  • Digital transformation
  • 15,000 m regional drilling
  • 30,000 m resource

drilling

  • Digital

transformation

  • Digital

transformation

Tsumeb

 Stable production  Transition to free cash flow

  • Further optimize
  • EIA approval
  • Commercial

agreements for expansion

  • Decision on

expansion

  • Commence

expansion construction

Krumovgrad

 Construction 50% complete

  • Construction completion

and commissioning (Q3)

  • First concentrate

production (Q4)

  • 6,000 m drilling on

satellite deposits

  • Ramp-up (Q1)
  • Commercial

production

Timok

 Drilling of Korkan West targets

  • 11,500 m Korkan West

drilling

  • Resource update (Q3)
  • Metallurgical testwork
  • Scoping study
  • PEA or

Prefeasibility study

2017 2018 2019 2020

Key Value Generating Catalysts

slide-28
SLIDE 28

TSX:DPM

28

US$95M US$95M

DPM Outlook – A Growing Low Cost Producer

AuEq Production Growing to >350,000 oz at $600/oz

2016 2017 2018 Guidance 2018F + Krumovgrad 747 640-855 607

All-in Sustaining Cost (US$/oz) (1, 17)

Krumovgrad gold production commences Q4 2018 2016 2017 2018 Guidance midpoint 2018F + Krumovgrad Au Cu Ag

Gold Equivalent Production (000s oz) (15)

(based on metals contained in concentrate produced)

254 369 264 280

1, 9, 15, 17, 20, See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

(9) (9, 20) (9, 20) (9) (15) (15)

Annual EBITDA Less: Sustaining Capex From Operating Assets

Total ~$183M ~ US$81M Chelopech

(FYE Dec 31, 2017)

Krumovgrad (20)

(years 1 to 5)

Tsumeb

(FYE Dec 31, 2017)

~ US$7M Total ~$102M Tsumeb

(FYE Dec 31, 2017)

Chelopech

(FYE Dec 31, 2017)

US$7M 2017 With Krumovgrad

(years 1 to 5) (years 1 to 5)

729

slide-29
SLIDE 29

TSX:DPM

29

845 560 844 845 848 900 959 964 980 991 998 1,011 1,121 1,292

DPM + Krum DPM Saracen Premier Guyana Roxgold Ramelius Argonaut Alacer TMAC Resolute Teranga Alio Asanko

640

$3,212 $2,069 $5,667 $4,093 $3,860 $3,246 $2,945 $2,861 $2,833 $2,000 $1,959 $1,826 $1,461 $1,426

Alacer TMAC Premier Guyana DPM Saracen Roxgold Resolute DPM + Krum Teranga Argonaut Asanko Ramelius Alio

Attractive Valuation

2018E All In Sustaining Costs (US$/oz) 6,12 EV/Reserves ($/oz) 12

(11)(13)

EV/2018E Gold Production ($/oz)

Undervalued on Mineral Reserves… … and Cash Flow … and Production … with AISC in lowest quartile

6, 11,12, 13 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

(11) (13)

EV/2018E AdjCF 12

(12)(13)

$161 $440 $429 $339 $180 $171 $165 $153 $128 $119 $89 $74 $51

Roxgold Saracen Ramelius Alacer TMAC Resolute DPM Guyana Premier Teranga Alio Argonaut Asanko

10.0x 4.3x 45.7x 31.9x 20.0x 15.0x 14.1x 14.0x 7.5x 7.1x 7.0x 6.3x 6.0x 3.9x

Premier Alacer Resolute TMAC Asanko Teranga DPM Saracen Alio Guyana Argonaut Roxgold DPM + Krum Ramelius

slide-30
SLIDE 30

TSX:DPM

30

Attractive Valuation

Leverage Ratio 12 Debt to Capital 2018E P/NAV 12

Stability in operating jurisdictions Tsumeb capital program complete & transitioning to FCF Balance sheet deleveraged Krumovgrad permitting & near term growth DPM valuation

With a strong balance sheet… … and undervalued on P/NAV

Historical concerns have been addressed:

12 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48

Klondex Roxgold Asanko Guyana Teranga Argonaut Premier Resolute Alacer DPM

1.22x 1.09x 0.80x 0.91x 0.67x 0.80x 0.74x 0.51x 0.63x 25% 25% 13% 11% 6% 6% 5% 2% 1%

Asanko Roxgold Alacer Guyana Klondex Premier DPM Resolute Teranga Argonaut

27% 0.63x

consensus

23

slide-31
SLIDE 31

TSX:DPM

31

Investment Highlights

Operating in mining friendly jurisdictions Strong resource and reserve base High quality, low cost, flagship asset Near term, low cost growth in gold production Growing exploration pipeline Strong balance sheet Strong management team Attractive valuation

Strong Asset Base, Near Term Growth & Attractive Valuation

slide-32
SLIDE 32

THANK YOU

TSX:DPM Corporate Head Office: One Adelaide Street East, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2V9 T: 416 365-5191 Investor Relations T: 416 365-2549 jreid@dundeeprecious.com TSX:DPM www.dundeeprecious.com

30

slide-33
SLIDE 33

APPENDICES

TSX:DPM

31

Business Strategy …………………………………………………………… 34 Mineral Resource and Reserve Base…………………………………….... 35 2018 Guidance……………………………………………………………….. 36 Krumovgrad Open pit design and phases………………………………….37 Mine plan summary……………………………………………38 Process plant flowsheet……………………………………….39 Plant area……………………………………………………….40 Integrated mine waste facility…………………………………41 CSR……………………………………………………………...45 Hedge Position…………………………………………………………...........47 Mine RP…………………………………………………………………………48 Summary………………………………………………………………………..49 Footnotes and Disclaimers……………………………………………….......50

slide-34
SLIDE 34

TSX:DPM

34

Business Strategy

slide-35
SLIDE 35

TSX:DPM

35

Mineral Resources (4,14,A,B) Million Tonnes Au (Moz) Cu (Mlbs) Au (g/t) Cu (%) Chelopech M&I Inferred 12.9 1.4 1.400 0.121 311 29 3.39 2.7 1.10 0.93 Krumovgrad Inferred (Upper Zone) 0.3 0.013 1.3 Timok Indicated Inferred 34.7 0.4 1.720 0.000 1.54 1.4 Tulare Inferred (Kiseljak) Inferred (Yellow Creek) 459.0 88.0 3.000 0.800 2,200 600 0.2 0.3 0.22 0.3 Total Mineral Resources Measured & Indicated Inferred 47.6 549.1 3.120 3.934 311 2,829 Mineral Reserves (4,14,A,B) Million Tonnes Au (Moz) Cu (Mlbs) Au (g/t) Cu (%) Chelopech Proven Probable 10.5 8.3 0.965 0.921 216 160 2.86 3.46 0.93 0.88 Krumovgrad Proven (Upper Zone) Proven (Wall) Probable (Upper Zone) Probable (Wall) 1.1 1.5 3.5 0.1 0.124 0.325 0.337 0.020 3.46 6.83 3.00 5.54 Total P&P Mineral Reserves 25.00 2.692 376 3.36

Strong Mineral Resource and Reserve Base

4, 14, A, B See footnotes contained in Appendix on slides 48 & 49

slide-36
SLIDE 36

TSX:DPM

36

2018 Guidance

US millions, unless otherwise indicated Chelopech Tsumeb Consolidated (5) Ore mined/milled (‘000s tonnes) 2,100-2,200

  • 2,100-2,200

Complex concentrate smelted (‘000s tonnes)

  • 220-250

220-250 Metals contained in concentrates produced (1)(2) Gold (‘000s ounces) 165-195

  • 165-195

Copper (million pounds) 33.7-40.4

  • 33.7-40.4

Payable metals in concentrate sold (1) Gold (‘000s) 140-170

  • 140-170

Copper (million pounds) 31.0-37.0

  • 31.0-37.0

Cash cost per tonne of ore processed ($) (3)(4) 37-40

  • 37-40

All-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold ($) (3)(4)(5)

  • 640-855

Cash cost per tonne of complex concentrate smelted, net of by-product credits ($) (3)(4)

  • 440-500

440-500 General & administrative expenses (3)(6)

  • 20-24

Exploration expenses (3)

  • 10-15

Sustaining capital expenditures (3)(4) 17-21 12-18 29-39

1) Gold produced includes gold in pyrite concentrate produced of 47,000 to 55,000 ounces and payable gold sold includes payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold of 30,000 to 35,000 ounces. 2) Metals contained in concentrate produced are prior to deductions associated with smelter terms. 3) Based on foreign exchange rates and, where applicable, metal prices that approximate current rates and prices after reflecting existing 2018 copper and ZAR hedges. In particular, 56% of 2018 payable copper production has been hedged at a fixed price of $2.62 per pound and 28% of ZAR denominated operating expenses have been hedged at a fixed rate of 13.59. 4) Cash cost per tonne of ore processed, all-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold and cash cost per tonne of complex concentrate smelted, net of by-product credits, and sustaining capital expenditures have no standardized meaning under GAAP. Refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of the MD&A for reconciliations to IFRS. 5) Includes the treatment charges, transportation and other selling costs related to the sale of pyrite concentrate, and payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold. Cash cost per ounce of gold sold, net of by-product credits, excluding payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold and related costs, is expected to be between $550 and $600 in 2017. All-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold, excluding payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold and related costs, is expected to be between $630 and $855 in 2018. 6) Excludes mark-to-market adjustments on share-based compensation and MineRPs’ general and administrative expenses.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

TSX:DPM

37

Krumovgrad – Open Pit Design and Phases

Open Pit Design

Y1 Y2

Long Section Showing the Four Mining Phases

Y1 Y2

Phase Maximum Elevation (mRL) Minimum Elevation (mRL)

1 480 405 2 470 370 3 460 360 4 455 340 Minimum and Maximum Elevations of Each Mining Phase

slide-38
SLIDE 38

TSX:DPM

38

Krumovgrad – Mine Plan Summary

slide-39
SLIDE 39

TSX:DPM

39

Krumovgrad – Process Plant Flowsheet

KRUMOVGRAD PROCESS FLOWSHEET Ore Run of mine pad Primary crushing SAG mill Primary regrind Pebble crusher Roughers Scavengers Thickened tailings plant IMWF Tailings deposition Ultra-fine grinding Process water tank RPWR / SWOR Water Treatment Environ- ment Cleaner 1 Concentrate thickener Filter press Final concentrate Cleaner scavenger Cleaner 2 Crusher Thickener Mill Filter Flotation Water Legend:

slide-40
SLIDE 40

TSX:DPM

40

Krumovgrad – Plant Area

Crushing (0100) Coarse ore Storage (0100) and Pebble Crushing (0200) Flotation (0300) Conc Thickening and Filtration (0400) Grinding (0200) Tailings Thickening Plant (1400) and HV Area (0900/1050)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

TSX:DPM

41

Krumovgrad – Integrated Mine Waste Facility (IMWF)

Integrated Mine Waste Facility (IMWF) Open Pit IMWF Haul Roads and sump access road Raw and Process Water Reservoir / Storm water Overflow Reservoir Grout Curtain Pump station

General Overview

slide-42
SLIDE 42

TSX:DPM

42

Krumovgrad – IMWF

South Valley Starter Berm North Valley Starter Berm First ‘Lifts’ First ‘Lifts’ Sumps

slide-43
SLIDE 43

TSX:DPM

43

Krumovgrad – IMWF

  • Design is compliant with BGN, EU, and international standards
  • High level of confidence in structural stability
  • Contingency measures and safety features built into design
  • Meets all EIA commitments

Key Outcomes:

slide-44
SLIDE 44

TSX:DPM

44

Krumovgrad – CSR – Community Relations

  • Memorandum of Understanding with Municipality of Krumovgrad signed
  • Stakeholders Engagement Plan
  • Social Management Plan

Proactive Company Actions

  • Company information center
  • Local Consultative Forums - operating at 8 settlements
  • Grievance Mechanisms
  • Training of local business is part of project development
slide-45
SLIDE 45

TSX:DPM

45

Hedge Position at March 31, 2018

Production Hedges - Swaps Year Volume Hedged (lbs) % Hedged Average fixed price ($/lb) Payable copper Balance of 2018 14,375,225 53% $2.62 QP Hedges Year Volume Hedged % Hedged Average fixed price Payable gold Balance of 2018 5,995 oz 100% $1,343.07/oz Operating Cost FX Hedges Year Foreign Currency Amount Hedged % Hedged Average exchange rate ZAR Balance of 2018 359,075,750 33% 13.6791 Production Hedges - Options Year Volume Hedged % Hedged Avg Ceiling Price Floor Price Payable copper Balance of 2018 9,523,958 lbs 35% $3.32/lb $2.80/lb Capital Expenditure FX Hedges Year Foreign Currency Amount Hedged % Hedged Average exchange rate (Foreign currency/US$) Euro Balance of 2018 36,151,000 100% 1.1467 Production Hedges - Prepaid Forward Gold Sale Year Volume Hedged (oz) % Hedged Avg Forward Price Payable Gold Payable Gold 2019 2020 18,013 27,969 9% 11% $1,390 $1,425

slide-46
SLIDE 46

TSX:DPM

46

Creating a Leading Technology Provider MineRP

  • Faster deployment of Terrative
  • Complementary technologies
  • Establishes DPM at the forefront of digital

innovation

  • Unique opportunity for DPM shareholders
  • Positions DPM to remain focussed on its core

mining operations

  • DPM acquired a 78% interest (70% fully

diluted) for an investment of ~US$20 million in cash and Terrative assets

  • 22% held by MineRP management
  • US$5 million of additional financing to

support working capital and growth initiatives

MineRP Holdings Inc.

+ =

Strategic Highlights Transaction Overview

  • Independent software vendor ("ISV") for

the mining industry

  • Industry leading platform
  • Improves productivity in planning and
  • perations by integrating applications
  • Headquartered in South Africa
  • Wireless underground

communications technology developed at Chelopech

slide-47
SLIDE 47

TSX:DPM

47

DPM Summary

Chelopech Krumovgrad Subtotal

~$95 MM EBITDA Less: Sustaining (1) / yr $81 MM first 5 yrs EBITDA Less: Sustaining (2) / yr (~$61 MM LOM)

~US$176 MM EBITDA Less: Sustaining (1)(2) / yr

  • Exploration / mine life extension
  • Consistent track record of reserve

replacement

Sabina Equity (Incl. warrants) $36.8 M equity value (stock price at May 14, 2018, warrants at Mar. 31, 2018) Tsumeb Timok Other Assets Debt

Market Cap: $464 M Share Price: C$3.37

  • Transitioning to FCF positive
  • $7 MM in EBITDA Less: Sustaining (1)
  • 370 Ktpa potential capacity with

significant operating leverage and modest capital 1.7 MM oz resource in Serbia

  • Exploration
  • Oxide potential

Marlartic JV, Tulare and other Serbian licenses, Armenian JV, Kapan NSR, MineRP (78%) $33M (as at March 31, 2018)

  • Exploration on original license

1 Based on FYE Dec. 31, 2017 audited annual financial statements. 2 Based on NI 43-101 technical report entitled “Revised NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad Project, Bulgaria” dated November 7, 2017

Cash $15M (as at March 31, 2018)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

TSX:DPM

48

Footnotes and Disclaimers

1. AISC per ounce of gold represents cost of sales at Chelopech less depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items plus treatment charges, penalties, transportation and other selling costs, sustaining capital expenditures, rehabilitation related to accretion expenses and an allocated portion of the Company’s G&A expenses less by-product revenues in respect of copper and silver including realized gains on copper derivative contracts divided by the payable gold in copper and pyrite concentrates sold. Based on metals prices that approximate current rates. 2. Chelopech figures as per 2017 public filings; AISC includes gold production in pyrites 3. Effective dates for Reserves – contained in the 2017 Annual Information form dated March 28, 2018 for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on SEDAR at www.SEDAR.com and available on our website at www.dundeeprecious.com 4. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are in addition to Mineral Reserves 5. See slide 35 in Appendix for detailed Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates 6. A non-GAAP measure. Refer to the “non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of the Q4 2017 MD&A for reconciliations to IFRS 7. Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted for impairment charges, unrealized losses/gains on derivative contracts and investments at fair value, minus interest income 8. Includes gold in pyrite concentrate produced 9. Forecast/guidance information is subject to a number of risks. 2018E is based on guidance issued February 15, 2018. See “Forward Looking Statements” on slide 2 10. Krumovgrad figures as per June 6, 2016 press release. 11. Source DPM Guidance issued February 15, 2018 12. Source RBC Capital Markets, May 8, 2018 - Au US$1,307/oz, Ag US$17.32/oz, Cu US$3.24/lb; DPM balance sheet as at March 31, 2018; Adjusted cash flow defined as cash flow from operations before sustaining capital

  • expenditures. Analysts consensus for DPM NAV (RBC for peers) with P/NAV range of 0.4x-0.73x

13. Includes DPM 2018E plus Krumovgrad LOM average as per June 6, 2016 press release using RBC Capital Markets’ metal prices 14. Contained in the 2017 Annual Information Form dated March 28, 2018, filed on sedar at www.SEDAR.com and available on our website at www.dundeeprecious.com 15. Based on Au of $1,250/oz, Cu of $2.75/lb, Euro/US$ = 1.15 16. Calculated using Au production 17. AISC based on 2018 guidance for concentrate smelted 18. Source: Technical report for the Initial project Feasibility Study on the Back River Gold Property, Nunavut, Canada, Dated October 28, 2015, filed on sedar at www.SEDAR.com 19. Source: Timok Gold Project, Serbia – Updated Mineral Resource contained in the 2016 Annual Information Form, Dated March 28, 2017, filed on sedar at www.SEDAR.com 20. Based on NI 43-101 technical report entitled “Revised NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad Project, Bulgaria” dated November 7, 2017, filed on sedar at www.SEDAR.com; Using gold price $1,250/oz 21. Includes 5 million warrants valued at US$3.4M as at March 31, 2018 22. For more information regarding the company’s current Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, please refer to Dundee Precious Metals Annual Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statement as at December 31, 2017 contained in our Annual Information Form, dated March 28, 2018, which is available on our website at http://www.dundeeprecious.com and on sedar at www.SEDAR.com 23. P/NAV consensus based on most recent analyst reports (April and/or May 2018): CIBC 0.4x (5%), RBC 0.75x (8%), Paradigm 0.45x (5%), GMP 0.35 (5%), Scotiabank 0.6x (5%)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

TSX:DPM

49

Footnotes and Disclaimers Cont’d

A. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for Chelopech and other scientific and technical information which supports this presentation was prepared by Petya Kuzmanova, MIMMM, CSci, Senior Resource Geologist, of the Company, under the guidance of CSA Global (UK) Ltd. (“CSA”), in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and were reviewed and approved by, as relates to Mineral Resources, Maria O’Connor, BSc, MAusIMM, MAIG, Principal Resource Geologist of CSA, Ross Overall, Senior Corporate Resource Geologist, of the Company, and as relates to Mineral Reserves, Karl van Olden, BSc (Eng), GDE, MBA, FAusIMM, Mining Manager of CSA. Maria O’Connor, Ross Overall and Karl van Olden are Qualified Persons (“QP”), as defined under NI 43-101 and are independent of the company, with the exception of Mr. Overall who is not independent of the company. Ross Overall, Senior Corporate Resource Geologist, of the company, who is a QP, as defined under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the contents of this presentation. B. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for the Krumovgrad project and other scientific and technical information which supports this presentation was prepared by CSA Global (UK) Ltd. (“CSA”), in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and were reviewed and approved by, as relates to Mineral Resources, Galen White, BSc (Hons) FAusIMM FGS, Director and Principal Consultant of CSA, and Julian Bennett, BSc ARSM FIMMM CEng, as relates to Mineral Reserves. Both Galen White and Julian Bennett are independent Qualified Persons (“QP”), as defined under NI 43-101. The NI 43-101 technical report (the “Krumovgrad Technical Report”) entitled “Revised NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad Project, Bulgaria” dated November 7, 2017, in respect of the study for the construction and operation of its Krumovgrad gold project disclosed herein, was filed November 7, 2017 on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Simon Meik, former Corporate Director Processing of the Company, and Edgar Urbaez, formerly Corporate Director, Technical Services, both of DPM, who are QPs and not independent of the Company, have reviewed and approved the contents of this presentation. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates contained herein may be subject to legal, political, environmental or other risks that could materially affect the potential development of such Mineral Resources. See the Krumovgrad Technical Report for more information with respect to the key assumptions, parameters, methods and risks of determination associated with the foregoing Mineral Resource estimates.

Qualified Person Disclosure

Cautionary note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Mineral Resources. These estimates have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. The terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in NI 43-101 and recognized by Canadian securities laws but are not defined terms under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Guide 7 (“SEC Guide 7”) or recognized under U.S. securities laws. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be upgraded to mineral reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all

  • r any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever by upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian securities laws, estimates of “inferred mineral resources” may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. U.S.

investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Accordingly, these mineral resource estimates and related information may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, including SEC Guide 7.