Investor Presentation May 29, 2018
Krumovgrad Gold Project April 2018
May 29, 2018 DPM AN INNOVATIVE, GROWING GOLD PRODUCER Krumovgrad - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Investor Presentation May 29, 2018 DPM AN INNOVATIVE, GROWING GOLD PRODUCER Krumovgrad Gold Project April 2018 Forward Looking Statements Certain statements and other information included in this presentation and our other disclosure
Krumovgrad Gold Project April 2018
TSX:DPM
2
Certain statements and other information included in this presentation and our other disclosure documents constitute “forward looking information” or “forward looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, which we refer to collectively hereinafter as “Forward Looking Statements”. Statements that constitute Forward Looking Statements include, but are not limited to, certain statements with respect to the estimated capital costs, operating costs, key project operating costs and financial metrics and other project economics with respect to Krumovgrad; the timing of development, permitting, construction, commissioning activities and commencement of production in respect of Krumovgrad; timing of further optimization work at Tsumeb and potential benefits of rotary furnace installation; price of gold, copper, silver and acid; toll rates; metals exposure and stockpile interest deductions; the estimation of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources and the realization of such mineral estimates; the timing and amount of estimated future production and output, life of mine, costs of production, cash costs and other cost measures, capital expenditures, rates of return at Krumovgrad and other deposits and timing of the development
requirements for additional capital; government regulation of mining and smelting operations; success of permitting activities; environmental risks; reclamation expenses; potential or anticipated outcome of title disputes or claims; and timing and possible outcome of pending litigation. Forward Looking Statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “outlook”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or that state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward looking statements are based on certain key assumptions and on the opinions and estimates of management and Qualified Persons (in the case of technical and scientific information) as of the date such statements are made and they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any other future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward Looking Statements. In addition to factors already discussed in this presentation, such factors include, among others: the uncertainties with respect to actual results of current exploration activities, actual results of current reclamation activities, conclusions of economic evaluations and economic studies; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; possible variations in ore grade or recovery rates; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities; uncertainties and risks inherent to developing and commissioning new mines into production, such as the Krumovgrad project, which may be subject to unforeseen delays, costs or other issues; uncertainties inherent with conducting business in foreign jurisdictions where corruption, civil unrest, political instability and uncertainties with the rule of law may impact the Company’s activities; social and non-governmental organizations (“NGO”) opposition to mining projects and smelting operations; fluctuations in metal and acid prices, toll rates and foreign exchange rates; unanticipated title disputes; claims or litigation; limitation on insurance coverage; cyber attacks; failure to realize projected financial results from MineRP; risks related to operating a technology business reliant on the ownership, protection and ongoing development of key intellectual properties; as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in any other documents (including without limitation the Company’s most recent AIF) filed from time to time with the securities regulatory authorities in all provinces and territories of Canada and available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward Looking Statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward Looking Statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Unless required by securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update forward looking statements if circumstances or management’s estimates or
TSX:DPM
3
TSX:DPM
4
Gold and Copper Price Trend 2010 to Present
$1.80 $2.10 $2.40 $2.70 $3.00 $3.30 $3.60 $3.90 $4.20 $4.50 $4.80 $1,000 $1,100 $1,200 $1,300 $1,400 $1,500 $1,600 $1,700 $1,800 $1,900 $2,000 Apr-10 Apr-11 Apr-12 Apr-13 Apr-14 Apr-15 Apr-16 Apr-17 Apr-18 Gold Price Trend (US$/oz) Copper Price Trend (US$/lb)
Historical Relative Trading January 2017 – April 2018
(20%) 0% 20% 40% 60% Jan-17 Apr-17 Jul-17 Oct-17 Jan-18 Apr-18 C$DPM US$GDX US$GDXJ
26%
4%
(1%)
TSX:DPM
5
Share Price / 52 week low-high (C$ per share) $3.37 / $2.13 - $3.60 Shares Outstanding – Current 178,492,566 Market Capitalization – Current $464 M P/NAV (23) 0.51x (consensus) Metals contained in concentrate produced Gold Copper 197,684 oz 35.8 Mlbs AISC/oz Au (1,2) $729 Adjusted EBITDA $92 M + Krumovgrad starting in Q4 2018 + 85,700 oz/yr Cash $15 M Investment portfolio (21) $36.8 M Undrawn RCF $242 M Debt $33 M
2017 Quick Glance Production & Financial Metrics
Dundee Corporation 20.38% GMT Capital Corporation 12.47% EBRD 9.9% USAA Asset Mgmt. 3.18% Kopernik Global Advisors 2.91%
Low cost production with 50% growth starting in Q4 2018 Strong liquidity position Long term shareholders Attractive Valuation
1, 2, 21 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
Share Capital (@ May 25, 2018) Liquidity Position (@ March 31, 2018) Top Five Shareholders (@ May 25, 2018)
TSX:DPM
6 Timok Gold Project Serbia Tsumeb Smelter Namibia Chelopech Mine Bulgaria Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. Nunavut, Canada Krumovgrad Gold Project Bulgaria
Operating assets Development asset Late stage exploration assets Early stage exploration assets
Malartic JV Quebec, Canada
Chelopech
35.8 Mlbs Cu
Krumovgrad
Tsumeb
Timok Sabina Gold & Silver
Corporate Head Office Toronto, Canada
18 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
TSX:DPM
7
diamonds
5 years according to the Fraser Institute
TSX:DPM
8
1.9 Moz 0.8 Moz
Proven and probable
Total Gold Ounces
Proven and Probable
Total Copper
1.4 Moz 0.01 Moz 1.7 Moz 3.8 Moz
Measured & Indicated Inferred
Total Gold Ounces
2.7 Moz 376 Mlbs
Measured & Indicated Inferred
Total Copper
2.8 Bnlbs
311 Mlbs
Krumovgrad Chelopech Chelopech Timok Krumovgrad Chelopech Chelopech
3.1 Moz
0.12 Moz
Chelopech Tulare Tulare
2.8 Bnlbs
29 Mlbs
3.9 Moz
3, 4, 5, A, B. See footnotes contained in Appendix on slides 48 & 49
TOTAL MINERAL RESERVES (3,5,A) TOTAL MINERAL RESOURCES (4,5,A) Exclusive of Reserves
As of December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2017
TSX:DPM
8
Location: Chelopech, Bulgaria Ownership: 100% 2017 Production: 197,684 oz Au; 35.8 Mlbs Cu Mine Life: 8.5 years Operation: Underground
TSX:DPM
10
57 133 196 153 118 99 87 108
300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 50 100 150 200 250 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Cash Cost / tonne of ore processed (US$/t) (6) Ore Mined (Mt)
1.09 1.31 1.81 2.03 2.05 2.04 2.21 2.22
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E
56 55 46 40 40 37 33 34 37
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E
Adjusted EBITDA (US$M) (7) 2006 2015 2016 2017
21.5 21.5 14.1
Total ore mined since 2006 (Mt) Ore Reserve (Mt)
16.3 19.8
Gold price trend
6, 7, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48 Copper price trend (AuEq)
2.1-2.2 37-40
9 9
18.8 18.5 0.558
TSX:DPM
11
139 172 140-170 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E
Payable gold in concentrate sold (000s oz) (8) Metals contained in concentrate produced (8)
166 198 165-195 38.5 35.8 33.7-40.4 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E Gold (000s oz) Copper (Mlbs)
8, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
All in sustaining cost (US$/oz gold sold)
9 9 9
57.3 9.3 35.2 747 729 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E 640-855 696
TSX:DPM
12
Change in mining method 0.5 mtpy 1.0 mtpy Underground crushing and conveying; “Taking the lid off the mine” 1.0 mtpy 2.0 mtpy
Digital transformation
Phase 1 2003-2008 Phase 2 2009-2014
Phase 3 2015+
2018 2020 2019 Key benefits:
TSX:DPM
13
Drilling demonstrates excellent potential for hosting additional resources:
hole in Q1 include:
TSX:DPM
13
Location: Tsumeb, Namibia Ownership: 100% 2017 concentrate smelted: 219,000 tonnes Operation: Specialty smelter
TSX:DPM
15
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E 2019F 2020F 2021F 2022F
(2)
Total Capital Expenditures (US$M)
63 140 130 44 19 8.6
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E
219 240- 265 196 198 152 159 265- 300 200 300- 370
Production (‘000s tonnes)
Cash cost/t of con smelted (net of by product credits) Third Party con supplied to smelter (000s) Chelopech concentrate supplied to smelter (000s) Potential future capacity
$440-$500 240- 265
Growth Capital Sustaining Capital
Secured processing outlet for Chelopech Growing cash flow generating custom toll business
6, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
9 9 9 9 (6)
Major investment phase complete Major investment phase complete
220- 250 12-18
9 9
TSX:DPM
16
200 219 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E
Complex Concentrate Smelted (‘000s t) Adjusted EBITDA (US$M) (7) Sustaining Capital (US$M) (6)
6, 7, 9 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
9 9
54 220 – 250 10 14 2 2016 2017 Q1 2018 11 7 12-18 2016 2017 Q1 2018 2018E 4
TSX:DPM
16
Location: Southern Bulgaria Ownership: 100% Stage: Construction Production: 103,000 oz (yrs 1-5 avg) Mine life: 8 years Operation: Open pit Commissioning: Q4 2018
April 2018
TSX:DPM
18
Production and Operating Costs (10, B) Annual tons processed 775,000 t Gold grade 4.04 g/t Strip ratio 2.6:1 waste:ore (t:t) Annual gold production 85,700 oz Year 1 to 5 average 103,020 oz Annual silver production 38,700 oz Total cash cost per oz AuEq $403 Average Annual EBITDA (7) $66 million Year 1 to 5 average $85 million Construction capital $164 - $168 million NPV (5%) (@ April 30, 2018) $318 million (adjusted for capital spent) First concentrate production Q4 2018 LOM 8 years
7, 10, B See footnotes contained in Appendix on slides 48 & 49
TSX:DPM
19
Milestone
Actual/Expected Completion Construction permit RECEIVED AUGUST 9, 2016 Mobilize earthworks contractor to site and commence earthworks Q4 2016 Commenced main civil/mechanical/electrical construction Q3 2017 Commissioning and start up Q3 2018 First concentrate production Q4 2018 Construction capital spent (@ Apr. 30, 2018) / remainder to be spent in 2018 $101 million / $63-$67 million Percent complete (@ April 30, 2018) 65%
Vertimills for fine grinding – April 2018 Krumovgrad site – April 2018
Project Progress
Krumovgrad Project Facility
TSX:DPM
20
TSX:DPM
21
22 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slides 38 & 39 Previous exploration work at the Surnak Prospect, which includes over 10,800 metres of trenching and drilling, has been used to outline an exploration target of 80,000 to 160,000 oz Au contained within 1.8 to 2.4 Mt grading 1.5 to 2 g/t Au. The exploration target potential was derived upon review of historic Mineral Resource estimates at Surnak, in combination with
The potential ranges of tonnes and grade are conceptual in nature are based on previous drill results that defined the approximate length, thickness, depth and grade
There has been insufficient exploration to define a current Mineral Resource and the company cautions that there is a risk further exploration will not result in the delineation
KUPEL NORTH Discovery Hole KPDD009 8m at 12.81 ppm Au & 4.95 ppm Ag SKALAK SYNAP KUKLITSA KUPEL SURNAK SURNAK EXPLORATION TARGET Exploration target potential of 80,000 to 160,000 oz Au contained within 1.8 to 2.4 Mt grading 1.5 to 2 g/t Au ADA TEPE Proven and Probable Reserves Au: 806 Koz at 4.05 g/t Ag: 443 Koz at 2.2g/t
Chelopech Mine, Bulgaria
TSX:DPM
20
TSX:DPM
23
Total Indicated Mineral Resources 1.72 Moz Au @ 1.54 g/t contained within 34.7 MT Inferred Mineral Resources 0.02 Moz Au @ 1.4 g/t contained within 0.4 MT
Indicated Mineral Resource for Bigar Hill (19) 1.16 Moz Au @ 1.57 g/t contained within 22.97 MT Indicated Mineral Resource for Korkan (19) 0.33 Moz Au @ 1.55 g/t Contained within 6.71 MT Indicated Mineral Resource for Pester (19) 0.23 Moz Au @ 1.40 g/t contained within 5.06 MT
TSX:DPM
24
surface
2017
strike length of 220 m
West and other targets started in April
resource and scoping study
KORKAN BIGAR HILL
KW Zone KO Zone
46 37 33 47 41 45 42 35 39 166 168 173
Timok Gold Project Indicated Mineral Resources 1.72 Moz Au at 1.54 g/t Inferred Mineral Resources 0.02 Moz Au at 1.4 g/t KORKAN WEST DISCOVERY
167 169 171 38 170 172 40 36 43 44
KWDD016
TSX:DPM
25
Val-d’Or
to 71% following an additional $3.5 M expenditure in the following 3 yrs
holes included 2m of 5.53 g/t gold within a 10m wide vein zone
upside potential to mine life
Sabina Gold and Silver Corp. Back River Project, Nunavut DPM Ownership – 10.2% (18) Malartic Property, Quebec Joint Venture
TSX:DPM
24
TSX:DPM
27
Chelopech
Record gold production
drilling
transformation
transformation
Tsumeb
Stable production Transition to free cash flow
agreements for expansion
expansion
expansion construction
Krumovgrad
Construction 50% complete
and commissioning (Q3)
production (Q4)
satellite deposits
production
Timok
Drilling of Korkan West targets
drilling
Prefeasibility study
TSX:DPM
28
US$95M US$95M
2016 2017 2018 Guidance 2018F + Krumovgrad 747 640-855 607
Krumovgrad gold production commences Q4 2018 2016 2017 2018 Guidance midpoint 2018F + Krumovgrad Au Cu Ag
(based on metals contained in concentrate produced)
254 369 264 280
1, 9, 15, 17, 20, See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
(9) (9, 20) (9, 20) (9) (15) (15)
Annual EBITDA Less: Sustaining Capex From Operating Assets
Total ~$183M ~ US$81M Chelopech
(FYE Dec 31, 2017)
Krumovgrad (20)
(years 1 to 5)
Tsumeb
(FYE Dec 31, 2017)
~ US$7M Total ~$102M Tsumeb
(FYE Dec 31, 2017)
Chelopech
(FYE Dec 31, 2017)
US$7M 2017 With Krumovgrad
(years 1 to 5) (years 1 to 5)
729
TSX:DPM
29
845 560 844 845 848 900 959 964 980 991 998 1,011 1,121 1,292
DPM + Krum DPM Saracen Premier Guyana Roxgold Ramelius Argonaut Alacer TMAC Resolute Teranga Alio Asanko
640
$3,212 $2,069 $5,667 $4,093 $3,860 $3,246 $2,945 $2,861 $2,833 $2,000 $1,959 $1,826 $1,461 $1,426
Alacer TMAC Premier Guyana DPM Saracen Roxgold Resolute DPM + Krum Teranga Argonaut Asanko Ramelius Alio
2018E All In Sustaining Costs (US$/oz) 6,12 EV/Reserves ($/oz) 12
(11)(13)
EV/2018E Gold Production ($/oz)
Undervalued on Mineral Reserves… … and Cash Flow … and Production … with AISC in lowest quartile
6, 11,12, 13 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
(11) (13)
EV/2018E AdjCF 12
(12)(13)
$161 $440 $429 $339 $180 $171 $165 $153 $128 $119 $89 $74 $51
Roxgold Saracen Ramelius Alacer TMAC Resolute DPM Guyana Premier Teranga Alio Argonaut Asanko
10.0x 4.3x 45.7x 31.9x 20.0x 15.0x 14.1x 14.0x 7.5x 7.1x 7.0x 6.3x 6.0x 3.9x
Premier Alacer Resolute TMAC Asanko Teranga DPM Saracen Alio Guyana Argonaut Roxgold DPM + Krum Ramelius
TSX:DPM
30
Leverage Ratio 12 Debt to Capital 2018E P/NAV 12
Stability in operating jurisdictions Tsumeb capital program complete & transitioning to FCF Balance sheet deleveraged Krumovgrad permitting & near term growth DPM valuation
With a strong balance sheet… … and undervalued on P/NAV
Historical concerns have been addressed:
12 See footnotes contained in Appendix on slide 48
Klondex Roxgold Asanko Guyana Teranga Argonaut Premier Resolute Alacer DPM
1.22x 1.09x 0.80x 0.91x 0.67x 0.80x 0.74x 0.51x 0.63x 25% 25% 13% 11% 6% 6% 5% 2% 1%
Asanko Roxgold Alacer Guyana Klondex Premier DPM Resolute Teranga Argonaut
27% 0.63x
consensus
23
TSX:DPM
31
TSX:DPM Corporate Head Office: One Adelaide Street East, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2V9 T: 416 365-5191 Investor Relations T: 416 365-2549 jreid@dundeeprecious.com TSX:DPM www.dundeeprecious.com
30
TSX:DPM
31
Business Strategy …………………………………………………………… 34 Mineral Resource and Reserve Base…………………………………….... 35 2018 Guidance……………………………………………………………….. 36 Krumovgrad Open pit design and phases………………………………….37 Mine plan summary……………………………………………38 Process plant flowsheet……………………………………….39 Plant area……………………………………………………….40 Integrated mine waste facility…………………………………41 CSR……………………………………………………………...45 Hedge Position…………………………………………………………...........47 Mine RP…………………………………………………………………………48 Summary………………………………………………………………………..49 Footnotes and Disclaimers……………………………………………….......50
TSX:DPM
34
TSX:DPM
35
Mineral Resources (4,14,A,B) Million Tonnes Au (Moz) Cu (Mlbs) Au (g/t) Cu (%) Chelopech M&I Inferred 12.9 1.4 1.400 0.121 311 29 3.39 2.7 1.10 0.93 Krumovgrad Inferred (Upper Zone) 0.3 0.013 1.3 Timok Indicated Inferred 34.7 0.4 1.720 0.000 1.54 1.4 Tulare Inferred (Kiseljak) Inferred (Yellow Creek) 459.0 88.0 3.000 0.800 2,200 600 0.2 0.3 0.22 0.3 Total Mineral Resources Measured & Indicated Inferred 47.6 549.1 3.120 3.934 311 2,829 Mineral Reserves (4,14,A,B) Million Tonnes Au (Moz) Cu (Mlbs) Au (g/t) Cu (%) Chelopech Proven Probable 10.5 8.3 0.965 0.921 216 160 2.86 3.46 0.93 0.88 Krumovgrad Proven (Upper Zone) Proven (Wall) Probable (Upper Zone) Probable (Wall) 1.1 1.5 3.5 0.1 0.124 0.325 0.337 0.020 3.46 6.83 3.00 5.54 Total P&P Mineral Reserves 25.00 2.692 376 3.36
4, 14, A, B See footnotes contained in Appendix on slides 48 & 49
TSX:DPM
36
US millions, unless otherwise indicated Chelopech Tsumeb Consolidated (5) Ore mined/milled (‘000s tonnes) 2,100-2,200
Complex concentrate smelted (‘000s tonnes)
220-250 Metals contained in concentrates produced (1)(2) Gold (‘000s ounces) 165-195
Copper (million pounds) 33.7-40.4
Payable metals in concentrate sold (1) Gold (‘000s) 140-170
Copper (million pounds) 31.0-37.0
Cash cost per tonne of ore processed ($) (3)(4) 37-40
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold ($) (3)(4)(5)
Cash cost per tonne of complex concentrate smelted, net of by-product credits ($) (3)(4)
440-500 General & administrative expenses (3)(6)
Exploration expenses (3)
Sustaining capital expenditures (3)(4) 17-21 12-18 29-39
1) Gold produced includes gold in pyrite concentrate produced of 47,000 to 55,000 ounces and payable gold sold includes payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold of 30,000 to 35,000 ounces. 2) Metals contained in concentrate produced are prior to deductions associated with smelter terms. 3) Based on foreign exchange rates and, where applicable, metal prices that approximate current rates and prices after reflecting existing 2018 copper and ZAR hedges. In particular, 56% of 2018 payable copper production has been hedged at a fixed price of $2.62 per pound and 28% of ZAR denominated operating expenses have been hedged at a fixed rate of 13.59. 4) Cash cost per tonne of ore processed, all-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold and cash cost per tonne of complex concentrate smelted, net of by-product credits, and sustaining capital expenditures have no standardized meaning under GAAP. Refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of the MD&A for reconciliations to IFRS. 5) Includes the treatment charges, transportation and other selling costs related to the sale of pyrite concentrate, and payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold. Cash cost per ounce of gold sold, net of by-product credits, excluding payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold and related costs, is expected to be between $550 and $600 in 2017. All-in sustaining cost per ounce of gold, excluding payable gold in pyrite concentrate sold and related costs, is expected to be between $630 and $855 in 2018. 6) Excludes mark-to-market adjustments on share-based compensation and MineRPs’ general and administrative expenses.
TSX:DPM
37
Open Pit Design
Y1 Y2
Long Section Showing the Four Mining Phases
Y1 Y2
Phase Maximum Elevation (mRL) Minimum Elevation (mRL)
1 480 405 2 470 370 3 460 360 4 455 340 Minimum and Maximum Elevations of Each Mining Phase
TSX:DPM
38
TSX:DPM
39
KRUMOVGRAD PROCESS FLOWSHEET Ore Run of mine pad Primary crushing SAG mill Primary regrind Pebble crusher Roughers Scavengers Thickened tailings plant IMWF Tailings deposition Ultra-fine grinding Process water tank RPWR / SWOR Water Treatment Environ- ment Cleaner 1 Concentrate thickener Filter press Final concentrate Cleaner scavenger Cleaner 2 Crusher Thickener Mill Filter Flotation Water Legend:
TSX:DPM
40
Crushing (0100) Coarse ore Storage (0100) and Pebble Crushing (0200) Flotation (0300) Conc Thickening and Filtration (0400) Grinding (0200) Tailings Thickening Plant (1400) and HV Area (0900/1050)
TSX:DPM
41
TSX:DPM
42
TSX:DPM
43
TSX:DPM
44
TSX:DPM
45
Production Hedges - Swaps Year Volume Hedged (lbs) % Hedged Average fixed price ($/lb) Payable copper Balance of 2018 14,375,225 53% $2.62 QP Hedges Year Volume Hedged % Hedged Average fixed price Payable gold Balance of 2018 5,995 oz 100% $1,343.07/oz Operating Cost FX Hedges Year Foreign Currency Amount Hedged % Hedged Average exchange rate ZAR Balance of 2018 359,075,750 33% 13.6791 Production Hedges - Options Year Volume Hedged % Hedged Avg Ceiling Price Floor Price Payable copper Balance of 2018 9,523,958 lbs 35% $3.32/lb $2.80/lb Capital Expenditure FX Hedges Year Foreign Currency Amount Hedged % Hedged Average exchange rate (Foreign currency/US$) Euro Balance of 2018 36,151,000 100% 1.1467 Production Hedges - Prepaid Forward Gold Sale Year Volume Hedged (oz) % Hedged Avg Forward Price Payable Gold Payable Gold 2019 2020 18,013 27,969 9% 11% $1,390 $1,425
TSX:DPM
46
innovation
mining operations
diluted) for an investment of ~US$20 million in cash and Terrative assets
support working capital and growth initiatives
Strategic Highlights Transaction Overview
the mining industry
communications technology developed at Chelopech
TSX:DPM
47
~$95 MM EBITDA Less: Sustaining (1) / yr $81 MM first 5 yrs EBITDA Less: Sustaining (2) / yr (~$61 MM LOM)
~US$176 MM EBITDA Less: Sustaining (1)(2) / yr
replacement
Sabina Equity (Incl. warrants) $36.8 M equity value (stock price at May 14, 2018, warrants at Mar. 31, 2018) Tsumeb Timok Other Assets Debt
Market Cap: $464 M Share Price: C$3.37
significant operating leverage and modest capital 1.7 MM oz resource in Serbia
Marlartic JV, Tulare and other Serbian licenses, Armenian JV, Kapan NSR, MineRP (78%) $33M (as at March 31, 2018)
1 Based on FYE Dec. 31, 2017 audited annual financial statements. 2 Based on NI 43-101 technical report entitled “Revised NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad Project, Bulgaria” dated November 7, 2017
Cash $15M (as at March 31, 2018)
TSX:DPM
48
1. AISC per ounce of gold represents cost of sales at Chelopech less depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items plus treatment charges, penalties, transportation and other selling costs, sustaining capital expenditures, rehabilitation related to accretion expenses and an allocated portion of the Company’s G&A expenses less by-product revenues in respect of copper and silver including realized gains on copper derivative contracts divided by the payable gold in copper and pyrite concentrates sold. Based on metals prices that approximate current rates. 2. Chelopech figures as per 2017 public filings; AISC includes gold production in pyrites 3. Effective dates for Reserves – contained in the 2017 Annual Information form dated March 28, 2018 for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on SEDAR at www.SEDAR.com and available on our website at www.dundeeprecious.com 4. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are in addition to Mineral Reserves 5. See slide 35 in Appendix for detailed Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates 6. A non-GAAP measure. Refer to the “non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of the Q4 2017 MD&A for reconciliations to IFRS 7. Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted for impairment charges, unrealized losses/gains on derivative contracts and investments at fair value, minus interest income 8. Includes gold in pyrite concentrate produced 9. Forecast/guidance information is subject to a number of risks. 2018E is based on guidance issued February 15, 2018. See “Forward Looking Statements” on slide 2 10. Krumovgrad figures as per June 6, 2016 press release. 11. Source DPM Guidance issued February 15, 2018 12. Source RBC Capital Markets, May 8, 2018 - Au US$1,307/oz, Ag US$17.32/oz, Cu US$3.24/lb; DPM balance sheet as at March 31, 2018; Adjusted cash flow defined as cash flow from operations before sustaining capital
13. Includes DPM 2018E plus Krumovgrad LOM average as per June 6, 2016 press release using RBC Capital Markets’ metal prices 14. Contained in the 2017 Annual Information Form dated March 28, 2018, filed on sedar at www.SEDAR.com and available on our website at www.dundeeprecious.com 15. Based on Au of $1,250/oz, Cu of $2.75/lb, Euro/US$ = 1.15 16. Calculated using Au production 17. AISC based on 2018 guidance for concentrate smelted 18. Source: Technical report for the Initial project Feasibility Study on the Back River Gold Property, Nunavut, Canada, Dated October 28, 2015, filed on sedar at www.SEDAR.com 19. Source: Timok Gold Project, Serbia – Updated Mineral Resource contained in the 2016 Annual Information Form, Dated March 28, 2017, filed on sedar at www.SEDAR.com 20. Based on NI 43-101 technical report entitled “Revised NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad Project, Bulgaria” dated November 7, 2017, filed on sedar at www.SEDAR.com; Using gold price $1,250/oz 21. Includes 5 million warrants valued at US$3.4M as at March 31, 2018 22. For more information regarding the company’s current Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates, please refer to Dundee Precious Metals Annual Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Statement as at December 31, 2017 contained in our Annual Information Form, dated March 28, 2018, which is available on our website at http://www.dundeeprecious.com and on sedar at www.SEDAR.com 23. P/NAV consensus based on most recent analyst reports (April and/or May 2018): CIBC 0.4x (5%), RBC 0.75x (8%), Paradigm 0.45x (5%), GMP 0.35 (5%), Scotiabank 0.6x (5%)
TSX:DPM
49
A. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for Chelopech and other scientific and technical information which supports this presentation was prepared by Petya Kuzmanova, MIMMM, CSci, Senior Resource Geologist, of the Company, under the guidance of CSA Global (UK) Ltd. (“CSA”), in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and were reviewed and approved by, as relates to Mineral Resources, Maria O’Connor, BSc, MAusIMM, MAIG, Principal Resource Geologist of CSA, Ross Overall, Senior Corporate Resource Geologist, of the Company, and as relates to Mineral Reserves, Karl van Olden, BSc (Eng), GDE, MBA, FAusIMM, Mining Manager of CSA. Maria O’Connor, Ross Overall and Karl van Olden are Qualified Persons (“QP”), as defined under NI 43-101 and are independent of the company, with the exception of Mr. Overall who is not independent of the company. Ross Overall, Senior Corporate Resource Geologist, of the company, who is a QP, as defined under NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the contents of this presentation. B. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates for the Krumovgrad project and other scientific and technical information which supports this presentation was prepared by CSA Global (UK) Ltd. (“CSA”), in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and were reviewed and approved by, as relates to Mineral Resources, Galen White, BSc (Hons) FAusIMM FGS, Director and Principal Consultant of CSA, and Julian Bennett, BSc ARSM FIMMM CEng, as relates to Mineral Reserves. Both Galen White and Julian Bennett are independent Qualified Persons (“QP”), as defined under NI 43-101. The NI 43-101 technical report (the “Krumovgrad Technical Report”) entitled “Revised NI 43-101 Technical Report, Ada Tepe Deposit, Krumovgrad Project, Bulgaria” dated November 7, 2017, in respect of the study for the construction and operation of its Krumovgrad gold project disclosed herein, was filed November 7, 2017 on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Simon Meik, former Corporate Director Processing of the Company, and Edgar Urbaez, formerly Corporate Director, Technical Services, both of DPM, who are QPs and not independent of the Company, have reviewed and approved the contents of this presentation. The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates contained herein may be subject to legal, political, environmental or other risks that could materially affect the potential development of such Mineral Resources. See the Krumovgrad Technical Report for more information with respect to the key assumptions, parameters, methods and risks of determination associated with the foregoing Mineral Resource estimates.
Qualified Person Disclosure
Cautionary note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Mineral Resources. These estimates have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. The terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in NI 43-101 and recognized by Canadian securities laws but are not defined terms under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Guide 7 (“SEC Guide 7”) or recognized under U.S. securities laws. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be upgraded to mineral reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all
investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Accordingly, these mineral resource estimates and related information may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, including SEC Guide 7.