[PPT] - May 15, 2019 37 Ove rvie w Why T SMO Ne e d fo r a Ne w Pe rspe PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

May 15, 2019

37

SLIDE 2

Ove rvie w

Why T SMO – Ne e d fo r a Ne w Pe rspe c tive Ma ste r Pla n Ove rvie w

Stra te g ic Pla n Pro g ra m Pla n Se rvic e L a ye r Bro c hure s

Ne xt Ste ps

38

SLIDE 3

Why T SMO – Ne e d for a Ne w Pe rspe c tive

39

SLIDE 4

Cha lle ng e s we fa c e :

Sa fe ty | Co ng e stio n | F

unding

Cr a she s a r e Inc re a sing

I n 2016, fa ta lity ra te = 1.56 fa ta litie s pe r 100 millio n VMT vs 1.19 na tio na l a ve ra g e (F HWA, 2018)

40

SLIDE 5

Cha lle ng e s we fa c e :

Sa fe ty | Cong e stion | F unding

Cong e stion is Inc re a sing

T T I we nt fro m 1.16 in 2011 to 1.82 in 2017 (NPMRDS)

41

SLIDE 6

Cha lle ng e s we fa c e :

Sa fe ty | Co ng e stio n | F

unding

F ue l Ec onomy Goa ls E le c tric a nd Hybrid Ve hic le s Ga s T a x is unsusta ina ble funding mode l

Pa y little / no g a s ta x 2016 – 35.5 mpg 2025 – 54.4 mpg

42

SLIDE 7

Ga s T a x for T ra nsporta tion F unding – HB2

http:/ / www.aldailynews.com/ ivey-signs-gas-tax-increase-into-law/

Re c e nt e xtra 10 c e nt pe r g a llo n ta x will pro vide a ppro xima te ly $380 millio n a nnua lly.

GRE AT ST ART – NOW, WE HAVE T O WORK SMART E R

43

SLIDE 8

Cha ng e Your Pe rspe c tive

44

SLIDE 9

Ne e d for a Ne w Pe rspe c tive

F
c us o n CIT

IZE N ne e ds no t a g e nc y ne e ds

Pro mo te INNOVAT

ION

OPT

IMIZE e xisting infra struc ture

Cre a te PART

NE RSHIPS Consiste nt with HB1 – Joint T ra nsporta tion Committe e

45

SLIDE 10

Ne e d for a Ne w Pe rspe c tive – T ra nsporta tion Bill (HB1)

“…to o pe rate at maximum e ffic ie nc y with g re ate r re turns in hig hway be ne fits fo r the amo unt o f public funds e xpe nde d…” “…e ffe c tive hig hway state plans are we ll o rg anize d with de fine d pro c e sse s fo r ide ntifying all po te ntial so urc e s o f inno vatio n, inc luding b y no t limite d to , bro ad stake ho lde r e ng ag e me nt and partne rships, share d pe rfo rmanc e me tric s and e vide nc e d-b ase d prac tic e s, ado ptio n o f the mo st c o st e ffe c tive te c hno lo g y in mate rials and c o mpo ne nts o f ro ad and b ridg e c o nstruc tio n, and c o st e ffe c tive and e ffic ie nt o rg anizatio nal struc ture s and

pe ratio ns…”

46

SLIDE 11

Spe nding vs Inve sting

47

SLIDE 12

A Diffe re nt Pe rspe c tive : F

c us on OPE

RAT IONS

“T r anspor tation is a utility,

e sse ntial fo r o ur ac c e ss to b asic ne c e ssitie s, i.e ., fo o d, she lte r, public safe ty and se c urity, e duc atio n, and re c re atio n. I t sho uld be tre ate d like … wate r, e le c tric ity, waste dispo sa l, natural g as, te le pho ne , e tc .”

– E ric Pe te rso n, F

rme r De puty Administrato r o f

the Re se arc h and I nno vative T e c hno lo g y Administratio n at the U.S. DOT , E no Bo ard o f Adviso rs

48

SLIDE 13

Avo id situa tio ns like this…

T r anspor tation Syste ms Manage me nt and Ope r ations (T SMO)

An inte g rate d se t o f strate g ie s to o ptimize the pe rfo rmanc e o f e xisting infrastruc ture thro ug h the imple me ntatio n o f multimo dal and inte rmo dal, c ro ss-jurisdic tio nal syste ms, se rvic e s, and pro je c ts de sig ne d to pre se rve c apac ity and impro ve se c urity, sa fe ty, and re liab ility o f the transpo rtatio n syste m. MAP-21, SE CT I ON 1103 (a ) (30) (A)

Building more c an’t be the only a nswe r

49

SLIDE 14

So re a lly, wha t is T SMO?

Optimizing the use o f e xisting fa c ility
Ma ximizing pe rfo rma nc e o f the syste m
T

a rg e te d so lutio ns to sa fe ty/ c o ng e stio n c a use s

Co mple me nt to c a pa c ity pro je c ts

T E CHNOL OGY COL L ABORAT ION DAT A

50

SLIDE 15

Inc re a se d Re turn on Inve stme nt, Re duc e d Costs

51

SLIDE 16

SIGNIF ICANT Sa fe ty Be ne fits

E xa mple s inc lude :

T

ra ffic Inc ide nt Ma na g e me nt

30 – 40% re duc e d inc ide nt dura tio n
T

ra ffic Sig nal Optimiza tio n

30% c ra sh re duc tio n
T

ra ve le r I nfo rma tio n

4 – 10% drive r stre ss re d uc tio n

52

SLIDE 17

Be tte r Custome r Se rvic e – Work Zone Ma na g e me nt

T

MC Ope ra tio ns

Sa fe ty Se rvic e

Pa tro ls

T

ra ve le r I nfo rma tio n

T

ra ffic Sig na l Co o rdina tio n

53

SLIDE 18

Be tte r Custome r Se rvic e – Spe c ia l E ve nt Ma na g e me nt

T

MC Ope ra tio ns

Sa fe ty Se rvic e Pa tro ls
T

ra ve le r I nfo rma tio n

T

ra ffic Sig nals Optimiza tio n

Re g io na l T

ra ffic Ope ra tio ns Pro g ra m – T usc a lo o sa

Tuscaloosa TM C

Source: Gresham Smith

54

SLIDE 19

Ma ste r Pla n Ove rvie w

55

SLIDE 20

Ma ste r Pla n Ove r vie w

56

SLIDE 21

Stra te g ic Pla n

57

SLIDE 22

Stra te g ic Pla n – Busine ss Ca se for T SMO

Alabama Crash Severity, 2013–2017 (ADVANCE, 2018)

Sa fe ty

|

Co ng e stio n | Funding

58

SLIDE 23

Stra te g ic Pla n – T SMO Vision

Manag e and o pe rate a safe , re liab le ,

ptimize d transpo rtatio n syste m fo r all

use rs thro ug h the c o llab o rative e ffo rts o f stake ho lde rs, te c hno lo g y-b ase d so lutio ns, and inno vative strate g ie s.

59

SLIDE 24

Stra te g ic Pla n – Goa ls a nd Obje c tive s

60

SLIDE 25

Prog ra m Pla n

61

SLIDE 26

Prog ra m Pla n Re c omme nda tions

T

SMO Prog ra m Struc ture

T

SMO Prog ra mma tic Proc e sse s

T

SMO Prog ra m Suc c e ss

62

SLIDE 27

Prog ra m Struc ture : L e a de rship a nd Org a niza tiona l

Cre a tio n o f a Sta te T

SMO E ng ine e r a nd Re g io na l Suppo rting Sta ff

States with Senior Leadership Positions focused on Traffic Operations

63

SLIDE 28

Prog ra m Struc ture : L e a de rship a nd Org a niza tiona l

E

xa mple wo rk c ha rt:

Colorado DOT

64

SLIDE 29

Prog ra m Struc ture : L e a de rship a nd Org a niza tiona l

E

xa mple wo rk c ha rt:

New J ersey DOT

65

SLIDE 30

Prog ra m Struc ture : Prog ra m Support

De dic a te d funding fo r:

Ca pita l,
Ope ra tio ns, a nd
Ma inte na nc e .

66

SLIDE 31

Prog ra mma tic Proc e sse s: Inte g ra tion

Re vise Guide fo r De ve lo ping

Co nstruc tio n Pla ns (GDCP) to inc lude T SMO re pre se nta tio n

Inte g ra te T

SMO stra te g ie s into ST IP pro c e ss

Wo rk with MPOs/ RPOs/ lo c a l jurisdic tio ns

to inte g ra te T SMO stra te g ie s into the ir pla nning pro c e sse s

67

SLIDE 32

Prog ra mma tic Proc e sse s: Proje c t De ve lopme nt Me thodolog y

DAT A DRIVE N NE E DS IDE NT IF ICAT ION

68

SLIDE 33

De mo nstra te s fisc a l

re spo nsib ility

Co nsiste nt me tho do lo g y
Da ta drive n a ppro a c h

Prog ra mma tic Proc e sse s: Proje c t Prioritiza tion Me thodolog y

69

SLIDE 34

35% 25% 20% 15% 10%

Prog ra mma tic Proc e sse s: Proje c t Prioritiza tion Me thodolog y

70

SLIDE 35

Prog ra mma tic Proc e sse s: Proje c t Prioritiza tion Me thodolog y

71

SLIDE 36

Prog ra m Suc c e ss

Culture of Colla bora tion
Pe rforma nc e Me a sure me nt
Innova tion

72

SLIDE 37

Prog ra m Pla n Imple me nta tion

Ne a r T

e rm – F Y20

Sho rt T

e rm – F Y21-22

Mid T

e rm – F Y23-25

73

SLIDE 38

Prog ra m Cyc le

74

SLIDE 39

Se rvic e L a ye r Broc hure s

75

SLIDE 40

Se rvic e L a ye r Broc hure s

Ge ne ra l Ove rvie w
L

a yma n’s T e rms

Brie f Disc ussion of Be ne fits

76

SLIDE 41

SE RVICE L AYE R BROCHURE S

77

SLIDE 42

Ne xt Ste ps

78

SLIDE 43

Wha t Ne xt?

Prog ra mma tic Org a niza tiona l Cha ng e s
Proc e ss Inte g ra tion a nd Imple me nta tion
Culture of Colla bora tion
Prog ra m Support – Budg e t

79

SLIDE 44

80