master informatique universit paris sud 06 10 16
play

Master Informatique - Universit Paris-Sud 06/10/16 Outline What is - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Master Informatique - Universit Paris-Sud 06/10/16 Outline What is a theory? a model? Theories and Models Perception, action for Human-Computer Interaction Cognition, behavior Michel Beaudouin-Lafon - mbl@lri.fr Laboratoire de Recherche


  1. Master Informatique - Université Paris-Sud 06/10/16 Outline What is a theory? a model? Theories and Models Perception, action for Human-Computer Interaction Cognition, behavior Michel Beaudouin-Lafon - mbl@lri.fr Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique In Situ - http://insitu.lri.fr Interaction Software architectures What is a model? What is a theory? Model = simplification of reality Theory = (attempt to) explain reality – Goal: to be useful! – Often based on a model – Abstraction of reality: omit non-relevant details – Validity not only of the predictions of the model, but also of the model itself – Conflict between precision and generality: choose the level of abstraction Falsifiability (Popper) Power of a model – A scientific theory must be dispovable through experiments – Descriptive: ability to represent (aspects of) a phenomenon – A falsified theory can be refined into a “better” theory • Example : Newton -> Einstein – Predictive: ability to anticipate behavior Relativity refines (and includes) classical mechanics – Generative : ability to imagine new solutions to a problem Empirical law = observation of a regularity, without explanation Notation = description language – informal, incomplete, inconsistant – Example : UAN (User Action Notation) (c) 2011, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, mbl@lri.fr 1

  2. Master Informatique - Université Paris-Sud 06/10/16 Perception and action Pre-attentive perception Pre-attentive perception [Triesman] Observation : – Humans can recognize some visual features very rapidly: – Line orientation, blobs, length, thickness, size, curvature, cardinality, endings, intersections, inclusion, hue, blinking, Ecological theory of perception [Gibson] movement direction, depth, direction of light source … – There are interferences when combining several such changes Hick’s law, Fitts’ law Theory : pre-attentive perception (Triesman, 1985) – Parallel handling at the level of visual perception – Information that is not perceived pre-attentively Kinematic chain theory [Guiard] must be handled sequentially – Links with Gestalt theory (c) 2011, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, mbl@lri.fr 2

  3. Master Informatique - Université Paris-Sud 06/10/16 James J. Gibson Principles of Gestalt perception Ecological Theory of Perception Connectivity Fundamental hypotheses: Proximity – Co-evolution between organism and its environment Common – Behavioral pre-adaptation area – “Elegant” (and parcimonious) perceptual processes Ecological optics – Information is in the optical array and the optical flow – The organism is equiped to extract invariants Example : when moving, the only fixed point 1 indicates the direction of motion 2 1 3 3 Relativity of the environment 6 – Action-perception coupling 5 – “Affordances” 2 4 5 6 4 Yves Guiard Hick’s law, Fitts’ law Kinematic chain theory Empirical laws extracted from controlled observations Laterality of motor control – Classical psychology: “the left hand is a bad right hand” Hick’s law: time it takes to select an item in a set – Observations of bimanual control: – RT = a + b log 2 (n) the two hands have different roles a & b are constants, n is the number of items Kinematic chain: – Non-dominant hand: distal control Fitts’ law: time it takes to acquire a target • Acts first – MT = a + b log 2 (1 + D/W) • Establishes the frame of reference (context) for the dominant hand a & b are constants • Movements do not need to be precise D = distance to target (amplitude) – Dominant hand: proximal control W = pointing tolerance (width of the target) • Acts after the non-dominant hand, – Information-based theory of percpetion within the frame of reference it establishes • Precise movements This laws are valid only in precise experimental settings Falsification : – Some tasks are more efficient when the hands have symetric roles (c) 2011, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, mbl@lri.fr 3

  4. Master Informatique - Université Paris-Sud 06/10/16 Don Norman Cognition and behavior Action theory Action theory [Norman] Goal Input Output Situated action [Suchman] cognitive cognitive Intention Evaluation distance distance Execution Evaluation Specification Activity theory [Vigotsky, Bødker] distance distance Interpretation of actions Input Output Articulatory articulatory distance Execution Perception distance Cognitive dimensions [Green] System Vigotsky - Leontiev - Bødker Lucy Suchman Situated action Activity theory Classical cognitivist approach: Vigotsky: analysis of human activity – Cartesian model where all actions are planned – Subject-object relationship is mediated by tools (technical and human action is explained by cognitive processes instruments) or signs (psychological instruments) – Examples : action theory, task analysis, mental models Leontiev : emphasis on the role of the community – Rules and rituals, division of labor Ethnomethodological approach: – Detailed analysis of work practices in order to determine the causal 3 levels of activity: chains implied by the observed actions – Why – Activity: responds to a need (materialistic or intellectual) Situated action: – What – Actions: executed consciously to reach an explicit goal set by the subject – Human action takes place in a complex context that creates constraints – How and dependencies and affects the actions being undertaken – Operations: executed unconsciously or semi-consciouly to execute actions – If there is a plan, at best it is used as a guide – Action adjusts to the context at hand and at the same time modifies it (c) 2011, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, mbl@lri.fr 4

  5. Master Informatique - Université Paris-Sud 06/10/16 Thomas Green Activity theory Cognitive dimensions Levels of activity: Notation : – Action -> operation: automation / internalisation – Tool to help interaction designers – Operation -> action: conceptualisation (e.g., in case of failure) – Evaluating a system according to certain criteria – Activity -> action: according to the context – Scientific foundation: importance of representation to solve a problem 6 types of activity: Instrument – Incrementation : add data – Transcription : copy from another source – Modification : change content, adapt to a new problem Subject Object – Exploration : trial and error to find a solution – Search: look for an object that may not exist – Comprehension : discover an unknown aspect of the system Division Rules Community of labor Cognitive dimensions Interaction Dimensions : aspects of the informational structure that can be Morphological analysis of input devices [Card et al.] analyzed according to the activity being studied. Some examples : UAN [Hartson] – Viscosity: resistance to change – Visibility: ability to see components easily – Premature commitment: constraints on the order of actions State machines [Newman] – Hidden dependencies: important but hidden links between entities – Role expressiveness: the role of an entitiy is easy to infer – Abstraction : types and availability of abstraction mechanisms GOMS [Card-Moran-Newell] – Consistency : similar semantics are expressed with similar syntax – etc. Instrumental interaction [Beaudouin-Lafon] (c) 2011, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, mbl@lri.fr 5

  6. Master Informatique - Université Paris-Sud 06/10/16 Card, Mackinlay & Robertson Morphological analysis of input devices Example Description of the properties of an input device: Radio : - Volume dial Transducer of physical properties into logical properties - AM/FM selector – M = Manipulation operation - Frequency selector • position/force, absolute/relative => P, F, dP, dF • linear/circular => X, Y, Z / rX, rY, rZ – In = Input domain – S = Current state of the device – R = Resolution function: In -> Out – Out = Output domain – W = Other properties of interest Composition of input devices: – Merge – Layout – Connect Taxonomy Comparison of input devices, including those studied by Foley and by Buxton (c) 2011, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, mbl@lri.fr 6

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend