market environments stability and equlibria
play

Market environments, stability and equlibria Gordan Zitkovi c - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Market environments, stability and equlibria Gordan Zitkovi c Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Austin Linz, October 22, 2008 A Toy Model The Information Flow two states of the world: = { 1 , 2 } one


  1. Market environments, stability and equlibria Gordan ˇ Zitkovi´ c Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Austin Linz, October 22, 2008

  2. A Toy Model The Information Flow • two states of the world: Ω = { ω 1 , ω 2 } • one period t ∈ { 0 , 1 } • nothing is known at t = 0, everything is known at t = 1: F 0 = {∅ , Ω } , F 1 = 2 Ω . agents two economic agents characterized by • random endowments (stochastic income)  3 ff  1 ff E 1 = , E 2 = 1 4 • utility functions  x 1 ff U 1 ( ) = 1 2 log( x 1 ) + 1 2 log( x 2 ) x 2  x 1 ff 7 x 1 / 3 7 x 1 / 3 U 2 ( ) = 1 + 6 1 2 x 2

  3. A Toy Model The Information Flow • two states of the world: Ω = { ω 1 , ω 2 } • one period t ∈ { 0 , 1 } • nothing is known at t = 0, everything is known at t = 1: F 0 = {∅ , Ω } , F 1 = 2 Ω . agents two economic agents characterized by • random endowments (stochastic income)  3 ff  1 ff E 1 = , E 2 = 1 4 • utility functions  x 1 ff U 1 ( ) = 1 2 log( x 1 ) + 1 2 log( x 2 ) x 2  x 1 ff 7 x 1 / 3 7 x 1 / 3 U 2 ( ) = 1 + 6 1 2 x 2

  4. A toy example the financial instrument  1 ff S 0 = p , S 1 = , B 0 = B 1 = 1: 10 0 1 p 5 0 Market clearing 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 • The demand functions: ∆ i ( p ) = argmax U i ( E i + q ( S 1 − p )) q � 5 • Equilibrium conditions: ∆ 1 ( p ) + ∆ 2 ( p ) = 0

  5. A toy example the financial instrument  1 ff S 0 = p , S 1 = , B 0 = B 1 = 1: 10 0 1 p 5 0 Market clearing 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 • The demand functions: ∆ i ( p ) = argmax U i ( E i + q ( S 1 − p )) q � 5 • Equilibrium conditions: ∆ 1 ( p ) + ∆ 2 ( p ) = 0

  6. What happens when markets are incomplete and trading is dynamic? • In the IC&mp case, the S 11 p 1 equilibrium conditions determine S 12 both prices and the geometry (degree of incompleteness) of the S 21 market. S 22 p 2 • Another complication : no p 0 representative-agent analysis. S 23 The First Welfare Theorem does S 31 not hold anymore. S 32 p 3 S 33 • Instead of one price p ∗ , we need to determine the whole price process ( p 0 , ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 )). • C IC 1p * * mp * +

  7. What happens when markets are incomplete and trading is dynamic? • In the IC&mp case, the S 11 p 1 equilibrium conditions determine S 12 both prices and the geometry (degree of incompleteness) of the S 21 market. S 22 p 2 • Another complication : no p 0 representative-agent analysis. S 23 The First Welfare Theorem does S 31 not hold anymore. S 32 p 3 S 33 • Instead of one price p ∗ , we need to determine the whole price process ( p 0 , ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 )). • C IC 1p * * mp * +

  8. What happens when markets are incomplete and trading is dynamic? • In the IC&mp case, the S 11 p 1 equilibrium conditions determine S 12 both prices and the geometry (degree of incompleteness) of the S 21 market. S 22 p 2 • Another complication : no p 0 representative-agent analysis. S 23 The First Welfare Theorem does S 31 not hold anymore. S 32 p 3 S 33 • Instead of one price p ∗ , we need to determine the whole price process ( p 0 , ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 )). • C IC 1p * * mp * +

  9. What happens when markets are incomplete and trading is dynamic? • In the IC&mp case, the S 11 p 1 equilibrium conditions determine S 12 both prices and the geometry (degree of incompleteness) of the S 21 market. S 22 p 2 • Another complication : no p 0 representative-agent analysis. S 23 The First Welfare Theorem does S 31 not hold anymore. S 32 p 3 S 33 • Instead of one price p ∗ , we need to determine the whole price process ( p 0 , ( p 1 , p 2 , p 3 )). • C IC 1p * * mp * +

  10. Financial frameworks Information A filtered probability space (Ω , F , ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] , P ), where P is used only to determine the null-sets. Agents A number I (finite or infinite) of economic agents, each of which is characterized by • a random endowment E i ∈ F T , • a utility function U : Dom( U ) → R , • a subjective probability measure P i ∼ P . Completeness constraints A set S of ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales (possibly several-dimensional) - the allowed asset-price dynamics.

  11. Financial frameworks Information A filtered probability space (Ω , F , ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] , P ), where P is used only to determine the null-sets. Agents A number I (finite or infinite) of economic agents, each of which is characterized by • a random endowment E i ∈ F T , • a utility function U : Dom( U ) → R , • a subjective probability measure P i ∼ P . Completeness constraints A set S of ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales (possibly several-dimensional) - the allowed asset-price dynamics.

  12. Financial frameworks Information A filtered probability space (Ω , F , ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] , P ), where P is used only to determine the null-sets. Agents A number I (finite or infinite) of economic agents, each of which is characterized by • a random endowment E i ∈ F T , • a utility function U : Dom( U ) → R , • a subjective probability measure P i ∼ P . Completeness constraints A set S of ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales (possibly several-dimensional) - the allowed asset-price dynamics.

  13. The equilibrium problem Problem Does there exist S ∈ S such that X π i ˆ t ( S ) = 0 , for all t ∈ [0 , T ] , a.s, i ∈ I where Z T E P i [ U i ( E i + π i ( S ) = argmax ˆ π u dS u )] π 0 denotes the optimal trading strategy for the agent i when the market dynamics is given by S . Problem If such an S exists, is it unique? Problem If such an S exists, can we characterize it analytically or numerically?

  14. The equilibrium problem Problem Does there exist S ∈ S such that X π i ˆ t ( S ) = 0 , for all t ∈ [0 , T ] , a.s, i ∈ I where Z T E P i [ U i ( E i + π i ( S ) = argmax ˆ π u dS u )] π 0 denotes the optimal trading strategy for the agent i when the market dynamics is given by S . Problem If such an S exists, is it unique? Problem If such an S exists, can we characterize it analytically or numerically?

  15. The equilibrium problem Problem Does there exist S ∈ S such that X π i ˆ t ( S ) = 0 , for all t ∈ [0 , T ] , a.s, i ∈ I where Z T E P i [ U i ( E i + π i ( S ) = argmax ˆ π u dS u )] π 0 denotes the optimal trading strategy for the agent i when the market dynamics is given by S . Problem If such an S exists, is it unique? Problem If such an S exists, can we characterize it analytically or numerically?

  16. Examples of Completeness Constraints • Complete markets. S contains all ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales. (If an equilibrium exists, a complete one will exist). • Constraints on the number of assets. S is the set of all d -dimensional ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales. If d < n , where n is the spanning number of the filtration, no complete markets are allowed. • Information-constrained markets. Let ( G t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] be a sub-filtration of ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] , and let S be the class of all ( G t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales. • Partial-equilibrium models. Let ( S 0 t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] be a d -dimensional semimartingale. S is the collection of all m -dimensional ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales such that its first d < m components coincide with S 0 . • “Marketed-Set Constrained” markets Let V be a subspace of L ∞ ( F T ), satisfying an appropriate set of regularity conditions. Let S be the collection of all finite dimensional semimartingales ( S t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] such that Z T π t dS t : x ∈ R , π ∈ A} ∩ L ∞ ( F T ) = V, { x + 0

  17. Examples of Completeness Constraints • Complete markets. S contains all ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales. (If an equilibrium exists, a complete one will exist). • Constraints on the number of assets. S is the set of all d -dimensional ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales. If d < n , where n is the spanning number of the filtration, no complete markets are allowed. • Information-constrained markets. Let ( G t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] be a sub-filtration of ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] , and let S be the class of all ( G t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales. • Partial-equilibrium models. Let ( S 0 t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] be a d -dimensional semimartingale. S is the collection of all m -dimensional ( F t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] -semimartingales such that its first d < m components coincide with S 0 . • “Marketed-Set Constrained” markets Let V be a subspace of L ∞ ( F T ), satisfying an appropriate set of regularity conditions. Let S be the collection of all finite dimensional semimartingales ( S t ) t ∈ [0 ,T ] such that Z T π t dS t : x ∈ R , π ∈ A} ∩ L ∞ ( F T ) = V, { x + 0

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend