March 30, 2017 Checklist Review what will learned so far Single - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

march 30 2017 checklist
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

March 30, 2017 Checklist Review what will learned so far Single - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

March 30, 2017 Checklist Review what will learned so far Single particle Hamiltonian: Harmonic Oscillator and Woods- Saxon Discussion on evidences of nuclear shell effects: Try to propose an alternate picture Evolution of shell


slide-1
SLIDE 1

March 30, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Checklist

  • Review what will learned so far
  • Single particle Hamiltonian: Harmonic Oscillator and Woods-

Saxon

  • Discussion on evidences of nuclear shell effects: Try to

propose an alternate picture

  • Evolution of shell structure in unstable nuclei
  • Shell model from a perturbation perspective
  • Homeworks and projects
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Key concepts we learned in the first section

  • Nuclear binding energy and separation energy
  • Hermitian operator
  • Commutation relation and representation
  • Parity
  • Angular momentum coupling
  • One-particle Hamiltonian (in one dimension)
  • Unbound states
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Single particle model (Independent-particle model) Spherical coordinates

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

Popular description http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Energy levels corresponding to an Harmonic oscillator potential 0s 0p 0d,1s 0f,1p 0g, 1d, 2s 0h, 1f, 2p 0i,1g,2d,3s Empirical formula for It is in the order of 10MeV

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Radial wave function

l, orbital angular momentum n, number of nodes The double folding factor is defined as

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

The average binding energy per nucleon versus mass number A Bave = B/A

nucleus bound tightly most the is and energy binding nucleon per MeV 8.8 has Fe

56 26

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Average excita,on energy of the first excited states in doubly even nuclei

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The neutron separation energies

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Spin-orbit interac.on

Maria Goeppert Mayer, On Closed Shells in Nuclei, Phys. Rev. 75, 1969 (1949) The spin-orbit poten,al has the form

slide-16
SLIDE 16

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1963/ The Nobel Prize in Physics 1963 was divided, one half awarded to Eugene Paul Wigner "for his contributions to the theory of the atomic nucleus and the elementary particles, particularly through the discovery and application of fundamental symmetry principles",the other half jointly to Maria Goeppert-Mayer and J. Hans D. Jensen "for their discoveries concerning nuclear shell structure".

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

The commutation relations

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Symmetries For a given state, n, l, j, s, jz(m), parity are good quantum numbers Parity for the system Angular momentum of the system

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

The spin orbit turns out to be mainly a surface effect, being a function of r and connected to the average potential through a relation of the form

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Coulomb effect

The spectra of proton and neutron are similar to each other

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Average nuclear potential well: Woods- Saxon

( ) ( ) [ ] { }

a R r V r V / exp 1 / − + − =

( ) ( )

2

2 2

= Ψ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − + ∇ ⋅ − r r V m ε

  • ( )

( ) ( )

s

m m

X Y r r u r ⋅ ⋅ = Ψ ϕ ϑ,

ℓ ℓ

( )

∑ ∑

< =

+ =

A j i j i A i i i

r r V m p H , ˆ 2 ˆ ˆ

1 2

( )

( )

( )⎥

⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − + ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ + =

∑ ∑ ∑

< = = A j i A i i j i A i i i i

r V r r V r V m p H

1 1 2

ˆ , ˆ ˆ 2 ˆ ˆ

slide-35
SLIDE 35

We can re-write the Hamiltonian by adding and subtrac,ng a one-body poten,al U(r) as H(0) is the single par,cle Hamiltonian describing an ensemble of independent par,cles moving in an effec,ve average poten,al. V is called the residual interac,on. In some cases it is also denoted as H(1) (recall the perturba,on theory). The very no.on of a mean field is fulfilled when H(1) is small.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The total Hamiltonian is a summation of all single-particle Hamiltonians

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Ψ(1,2,...,A) = ϕ(i)

i=1 A

The total wave function is a product of single particle wave functions

slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41

The single-particle states will be characterized by the good quantum numbers

Filling scheme

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Filled sub-shells have zero nuclear spin and positive parity (observed experimentally) All even-even nuclei have J=0, even when the sub-shell is not filled. (Pairing hypothesis) Last neutron/proton determines the net nuclear spin-parity.

  • In odd-A there is only one unpaired nucleon. Net spin can be

determined precisely

  • In even-A odd-Z/odd-N nuclides we have an unpaired p and an

unpaired n. Hence the nuclear spin will lie in the range |jp-jn| to (jp+jn). For the parity Pnucleus = Plast_p × Plast_n Spin-parity

Single-particle model can be used to make predictions about the spins of ground states

slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44

One-neutron separation energy (opposite of single-particle energy) protons: (1s1/2)2 (1p3/2)4 (1p1/2)2 neutrons: (1s1/2)2 (1p3/2)4 (1p1/2)2 (1d5/2)1

17O

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Single-particle energies

9 17 8O

Single-particle states observed in odd-A nuclei (in particular, one nucleon + doubly magic nuclei like 4He,

16O, 40Ca) characterizes single-particle energies of the shell-model picture.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Success of the extreme single-particle model

Ø Ground state spin and parity: Every orbit has 2j+1 magnetic sub-states, fully occupied orbitals have spin J=0, they do not contribute to the nuclear spin. For a nucleus with one nucleon outside a completely occupied orbit the nuclear spin is given by the single nucleon. n ℓ j → J (-)ℓ = π

slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51

0p3/2 0p1/2 0d5/2 1s1/2 0d5/2 0d5/2 1s1/2 1s1/2 1s1/2

slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54

Doubly magic neutron hole proton hole proton neutron

slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56
slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Paul Cottle,Nature 465, 430–431 (2010)

  • K. L. Jones et al., Nature 465, 454–457 (2010)

Single-particle states in 133Sn: Doubly magic nature of 132Sn

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Shell closure in superheavy nuclei (an open problem) Synthesis of a New Element with Atomic Number Z=117, PRL 104, 142502 (2010) According to classical physics, elements with Z >104 should not exist due to the large Coulomb repulsion. The occurrence of superheavy elements with Z>104 is entirely due to nuclear shell efgects. The nuclei in the chart decay by α emission (yellow), spontaneous fission (green), and β+ emission (pink). Physics 3, 31 (2010) http://physics.aps.org/articles/v3/31

slide-60
SLIDE 60

S.G. Nilsson and I. Ragnarsson: Shapes and Shells in Nuclear Structure, Cambridge Press, 1995

slide-61
SLIDE 61
slide-62
SLIDE 62

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

  • 12
  • 8
  • 4

1/2- 1/2+

15O 14N 13C 12B 11Be 10Li 9He

E* - Sn ( MeV ) Atomic Number Z

Island of Inversion

slide-63
SLIDE 63
slide-64
SLIDE 64

N=40

Shell evolution at drip lines

Ø A comprehensive review can be found in:

  • O. Sorlin, M.-G. Porquet, Prog. Part. Nucl.
  • Phys. 61, 602 (2008).
slide-65
SLIDE 65

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.6461v1.pdf

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Shell structure at the drip lines

Reduced SO Enhanced SO

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Ø Orbitals with higher l loses its energy faster when going towards the dripline I. Hamamoto, Phys.

  • Rev. C 85, 064329 (2012).

This naturally explains the disappearing of N=14 subshell in C and N isotopes [It is due to a complicated interplay between NN and NP interactions from a shell-model point of view, C.X. Yuan, C. Qi, F.R. Xu, Nucl. Phys. A 883, 25 (2012). ].

Ø Choice of the Central and SO potential

Mean-field for dripline nuclei

The standard WS potential

  • A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (Benjamin, New York, 1969), Vol. I.
slide-68
SLIDE 68

Single-particle structure of Ca isotopes

Ø HO magic numbers like N=8, 20 disappear; Ø New SO magic numbers like N = 6, 14, 16, 32 and 34 will appear; Ø The traditional SO magic numbers N = 28 and 50 and the magic number N = 14 will be eroded somehow but are more robust than the HO magic numbers; Ø Pseudospin symmetry breaks, resulting in new shell closures like N = 56 and 90; Ø HO shell closures like N = 40 and 70 will not emerge.

Simple rules of shell evolution

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Single-particle structure of Ca isotopes

Ø HO magic numbers like N=8, 20 disappear; Ø New SO magic numbers like N = 6, 14, 16, 32 and 34 will appear; Ø The traditional SO magic numbers N = 28 and 50 and the magic number N = 14 will be eroded somehow but are more robust than the HO magic numbers; Ø Pseudospin symmetry breaks, resulting in new shell closures like N = 56 and 90; Ø HO shell closures like N = 40 and 70 will not emerge.

Simple rules of shell evolution

slide-70
SLIDE 70
slide-71
SLIDE 71

71

Consider the atom to behave like a small magnet. Think of an electron as an orbiting circular current loop of I = dq / dt around the nucleus. The current loop has a magnetic moment µ = IA and the period T = 2πr / v. where L = mvr is the magnitude of the orbital angular momentum.

Magnetic Effects on Atomic Spectra—The Normal Zeeman Effect

slide-72
SLIDE 72

72

The angular momentum is aligned with the magnetic moment, and the torque between and causes a precession of . Where µB = eħ / 2m is called a Bohr magneton.

n Since there is no magnetic field to

align them, point in random

  • directions. The dipole has a

potential energy

The Normal Zeeman Effect

slide-73
SLIDE 73

73

The Normal Zeeman Effect

The potential energy is quantized due to the magnetic quantum number mℓ. When a magnetic field is applied, the 2p level of atomic hydrogen is split into three different energy states with energy difference of ΔE = µBB Δmℓ.

mℓ Energy 1 E0 + µBB E0 −1 E0 − µBB

slide-74
SLIDE 74
slide-75
SLIDE 75
slide-76
SLIDE 76
slide-77
SLIDE 77
slide-78
SLIDE 78
slide-79
SLIDE 79
slide-80
SLIDE 80
slide-81
SLIDE 81
slide-82
SLIDE 82
slide-83
SLIDE 83
slide-84
SLIDE 84
slide-85
SLIDE 85
slide-86
SLIDE 86
slide-87
SLIDE 87
slide-88
SLIDE 88
slide-89
SLIDE 89
slide-90
SLIDE 90
slide-91
SLIDE 91
slide-92
SLIDE 92
slide-93
SLIDE 93

Magne.c moments

µ = gj j µN, µN – nuclear magneton, gj – Lande g-factor

( 1) ( 1) ( 1) ( 1) ( 1) ( 1) 2 ( 1) 2 ( 1) IF 1/ 2 / 2 for 1/ 2 1 1 1 for 1/ 2 2 1 2 1

j l s j l s j l s

j j l l s s j j l l s s g g g j j j j j l jg g l g j l jg g j g j j l l l + + + − + + − + + + = + + + = ± = + = + ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ = + − = − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ + + ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

slide-94
SLIDE 94

gl = 1 for p and gl = 0 for n, gs ≈ +5.6 for p and gs ≈ -3.8 for n

1 5.6 2.8 for 1/ 2 2 1 1 2.3 1 5.6 1 for 1/ 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 3.8 1.9 for 1/ 2 2 1 1.9 3.8 2 1 1

proton proton neutron neutron

jg l j j l jg j j j l l l j jg j l j jg j l j = + × = + = + ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ = + − × = − = − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ + + + ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ = − × = − = + ⎛ ⎞ = × = ⎜ ⎟ + + ⎝ ⎠ for 1/ 2 j l = −

For a given j the measured moments lie between j = l -1/2 and j = l+1/2

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Magnetic moments for odd-proton nuclei

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Thank you!