March 2019 Forward Looking Statements and Non-GAAP Measures In - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

march 2019 forward looking statements and non gaap
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

March 2019 Forward Looking Statements and Non-GAAP Measures In - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

March 2019 Forward Looking Statements and Non-GAAP Measures In keeping with the SEC's "Safe Harbor" guidelines, certain statements made during this presentation could be considered forward-looking and subject to certain risks and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

March 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Company Presentation // March 2019

Forward Looking Statements and Non-GAAP Measures

2

In keeping with the SEC's "Safe Harbor" guidelines, certain statements made during this presentation could be considered forward-looking and subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause results to differ materially from those projected. When we use the words "will likely result," "may," "anticipate," "estimate," "should," "expect," "believe," "intend," or similar expressions, we intend to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,

  • ur business and investment strategy, our understanding of our competition, current market trends and opportunities, projected operating results, and projected

capital expenditures. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated including, without limitation: general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common stock; changes in our business or investment strategy; availability, terms and deployment of capital; availability of qualified personnel; changes in our industry and the market in which we operate, interest rates

  • r the general economy, and the degree and nature of our competition. These and other risk factors are more fully discussed in the company's filings with the

Securities and Exchange Commission. EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA yield is defined as trailing twelve month EBITDA divided by the purchase price or debt amount. A capitalization rate is determined by dividing the property's net operating income by the purchase price. Net operating income is the property's funds from operations minus a capital expense reserve of either 4% or 5% of gross revenues. Hotel EBITDA flow-through is the change in Hotel EBITDA divided by the change in total revenues. EBITDA, FFO, AFFO, CAD and other terms are non-GAAP measures, reconciliations of which have been provided in prior earnings releases and filings with the SEC or in the appendix to this presentation. We adjust EBITDA to exclude certain additional items such as gain/loss on acquisition of PIM Highland JV and sale of hotel properties, impairment and uninsured hurricane related costs, write-off of loan costs and exit fees, other income/expense, transaction, acquisition and management conversion costs, legal judgment and related legal costs, dead deal costs, software implementationcosts, compensation adjustment related to modified employment terms and non-cash items such as amortization of unfavorable contract liabilities, gain /loss on insurance settlements, non-cash stock/unit-based compensation, unrealized gains/losses on marketable securities, derivative instruments, investment in securities investment fund, as well as our portion of adjustments to EBITDA of unconsolidated entities, this is Adjusted EBITDA. We exclude items from Adjusted EBITDA that are either non-cash or are not part of

  • ur core operations in order to provide a period-over-period comparison of our operations. Adjusted EBITDAre is calculated in a similar manner as Adjusted EBITDA,

with the exception of the adjustment for the consolidated noncontrolling interest’s pro rata share of Adjusted EBITDA. The rationale for including 100% of EBITDAre for consolidated noncontrolling interests is that the full amount of any debt of these entities is reported in our consolidated balance sheet and therefore metrics using total debt to EBITDAre provide a better understanding of the Company’s leverage. The calculation of implied equity value is derived from an estimated blended capitalization rate (“Cap Rate”) for the entire portfolio using the capitalization rate

  • method. The estimated Cap Rate is based on recent Cap Rates of publically traded peers involving a similar blend of asset types found in the portfolio, which is then

applied to Net Operating Income (“NOI”) of the company’s assets to calculate a Total Enterprise Value (“TEV”) of the company. From the TEV, we deduct debt and preferred equity and then add back working capital and the company’s investment in Ashford Inc. to derive an equity value. The capitalization rate method is one of several valuation methods for estimating asset value and implied equity value. Among the limitations of using the capitalization rate method for determining an implied equity value are that it does not take into account the potential change or variability in future cash flows, potential significant future capital expenditures, the intended hold period of the asset, or a change in the future risk profile of an asset. This overview is for informational purposes only and is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any securities of Braemar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. or any

  • f its respective affiliates, and may not be relied upon in connection with the purchase or sale of any such security.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Company Presentation // March 2019

Management Team

3

  • 21 years of hospitality

experience

  • 2 years with the Company
  • 15 years with Morgan Stanley
  • Cornell School of Hotel

Administration, BS

  • University of Pennsylvania

MBA

RICHARD J. STOCKTON Chief Executive Officer & President

  • 19 years of hospitality

experience

  • 15 years with the Company
  • 3 years with ClubCorp
  • CFA charterholder
  • Southern Methodist University

BBA

DERIC S. EUBANKS, CFA Chief Financial Officer

  • 14 years of hospitality

experience

  • 9 years with the Company (5

years with the Company’s predecessor)

  • 5 years with Stephens

Investment Bank

  • Oklahoma State University BS

JEREMY J. WELTER Chief Operating Officer

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Company Presentation // March 2019

Strategic Overview

4 Bardessono Hotel & Spa Yountville, CA Pier House Resort Key West, FL The Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas

  • St. Thomas, USVI

Focused strategy of investing in luxury hotels and resorts Grow organically through strong revenue and cost control initiatives Grow externally through accretive acquisitions of high quality assets Targets conservative leverage of Net Debt / Gross Assets of 45% with non-recourse property debt Highly-aligned management team and advisory structure

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Company Presentation // March 2019

2018 Q4 Hotel Operating Results

5

Comparable Hotel Operating Results(1) 2018 Q4 2017 Q4 % Variance

ADR $ 269.24 $ 255.23 5.5% Occupancy 75.6% 77.3% (2.2)% RevPAR $ 203.51 $ 197.23 3.2% RevPAR (not under renovation) $ 224.16 $ 209.56 7.0% Total Hotel Revenue(2) $ 98,871 $ 99,754 (0.9)% Hotel EBITDA(2) $ 26,923 $ 28,921 (6.9)% Hotel EBITDA Margin 27.2% 29.0% (1.8)%

(1) Includes: Bardessono, Hotel Yountville, Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas, Pier House, Marriott Seattle Waterfront, Capital Hilton, Sofitel Chicago, Hilton Torrey Pines, Courtyard San Francisco, Courtyard Philadelphia, Park Hyatt Beaver Creek, and Ritz-Carlton Sarasota (2) In thousands. (3) As reported in Earnings Releases: 2015, as reported on 2/25/2016; 2016 as reported on 2/22/2017; 2017 as reported on 2/28/2018; 2018 as reported on 2/27/2019

COMPARABLE HOTEL EBITDA(3) COMPARABLE REVPAR(3)

$199 $207 $219 $226

$175 $185 $195 $205 $215 $225 $235 2015 2016 2017 2018

$123.3 $121.1 $126.9 $136.7

$115 $120 $125 $130 $135 $140 2015 2016 2017 2018

(In millions)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Company Presentation // March 2019

2018 Q4 Highlights and Results

  • During the quarter, the Company completed a $40.0 million offering of its 8.25% Series D Preferred

Stock

  • Subsequent to quarter end, the Company entered into a new Enhanced Return Funding Program

agreement with Ashford Inc.

  • Subsequent to quarter end, the Company completed the acquisition of the 170-room Ritz-Carlton

Lake Tahoe in Truckee, California for $103.3 million

  • Subsequent to quarter end, the Company refinanced a mortgage loan on 2 hotels
  • Capex invested during the quarter was $26.0 million, bringing the total capex invested for the full

year to $77.6 million

QUARTERLY DIVIDEND PER SHARE AFFO PER SHARE ADJUSTED EBITDARE

Quarter Highlights

6

$95.1 $109.1 $111.1 $119.3 $80 $85 $90 $95 $100 $105 $110 $115 $120 $125 2015 2016 2017 2018

(In millions)

$0.26 $0.39 $0.46 $0.44 $0.62 $0.60 $0.50 $0.56 $0.42 $0.38 $0.37 $0.34 $0.20 $0.34 $0.31 $0.15 $0.00 $0.40 $0.80 $1.20 $1.60 $2.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 $0.05 $0.10 $0.16 $0.16 $0.10 $0.12 $0.16 $0.16 $0.10 $0.12 $0.16 $0.16 $0.10 $0.12 $0.16 $0.16 $0.00 $0.40 $0.80 2015 2016 2017 2018

Full Year Highlights

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Company Presentation // March 2019

Recent Developments

7

Enhanced Return Funding Program Implemented(1)

  • $50 million ERFP commitment from AINC

with ability to upsize to $100 million by mutual consent

  • Initial 2-year term with 1-year renewals
  • ERFP programmatically sized at 10% of

purchase price of new BHR asset acquisitions

  • ERFP funding anticipated to occur on all

new BHR hotel acquisitions(2)

  • Funding comes in the form of purchased

furniture, fixture & equipment (FF&E) by AINC for use at newly acquired or existing BHR hotels

  • ERFP agreement includes amendments to

advisory agreement

(1) Terms of the agreement are available in form 8-Ks that have been filed by both AINC and BHR with the SEC (2) Assumes AINC has available cash of $15 million post-proposed ERFP funding and the acquisition is an eligible one (see ERFP agreement for terms of eligibility)

$225M Mortgage Debt $225M BHR Equity $50M ERFP Allocation(2) Initial $500M Program Capacity Reduces equity requirement

  • n new qualifying

acquisitions by 18%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Company Presentation // March 2019

Recent Developments

(1) Excluding $8.3M of Capital Reserves and $8.4M for the adjacent developable parcel (2) Expected unlevered stabilized NOI yield (3) TTM at time of acquisition (4) 5-yr underwritten unlevered IRR, assumes exit cap rate of 6.0% (5) As of 9/30/2018 (6) Libor + 210bps (7) Assumes 10% of ERFP funding immediately at acquisition

Meets Defined Strategy

  • Further diversifies the portfolio while increases overall portfolio

RevPAR

  • Property is in excellent physical condition with limited capex

needs Property Financial Overview(3)

  • Hotel EBITDA $9.2 million
  • 10.2x Hotel EBITDA multiple(7)
  • Hotel Net Operating Income of $7.4 million
  • 9.5% Stabilized Yield(2),(7)

We recently acquired the 170-room Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe, in Truckee, California for $103.3 million(1) RevPAR(3): $371 Price per Key(7): $547,000

8

January 2019

Raised $40.0 million of perpetual preferred stock. Dividends accrue at a rate of 8.25% per annum. TTM Cap Rate(7): 8.0% Unlevered IRR(4)(7): 12.0%

443.4 443.4 40.0 124.1 124.1 754.2 817.6

TEV TEV (Pro Forma)

($ in Millions)

Equity Perpetual Preferred Convertible Preferred Net Debt RITZ-CARLTON LAKE TAHOE Deal WACC Capital ($000s) % Capital Cost of Capital Debt $54,000 52.3% 4.60%(6) Preferred 40,000 38.7% 8.25% Cash 9,300 9.0% 0.00% Total $103,300 100% 5.6%

11.5% Preferred

(5)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Company Presentation // March 2019

High-Quality Hotels in Leading Urban & Resort Markets

9

Non-Core Assets

Hilton Torrey Pines La Jolla, CA Bardessono Hotel & Spa Yountville, CA

Pier House Resort Key West, FL Renaissance Tampa Tampa, FL Capital Hilton Washington D.C.

Courtyard San Francisco San Francisco, CA Courtyard Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA Capital Hilton Washington D.C. The Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas
  • St. Thomas, USVI
Hotel Yountville Yountville, CA Park Hyatt Beaver Creek Beaver Creek, CO

Core Assets

The Ritz-Carlton, Sarasota, FL Pier House Resort Key West, FL Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile Chicago, IL Marriott Seattle Seattle, WA The Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe Lake Tahoe, CA
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Company Presentation // March 2019

  • Core portfolio quality unparalleled in the

public lodging REIT sector

  • Geographically diversified portfolio

located in strong markets

Portfolio Detail

10

Note: TTM Hotel EBITDA in thousands (1) TTM as of 12/31/2018 (2) Announced repositioning to Autograph Collection by Marriott Note: Does not include recently acquired Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe

$226

OVERALL REVPAR(1)

$236

CORE REVPAR(1)

Number of TTM TTM TTM TTM Hotel % of Core Location Rooms ADR(1) OCC(1) RevPAR(1) EBITDA(1) Total Bardessono Napa Valley, CA 62 $797 77% $612 $6,464 4.7% Hotel Yountville Napa Valley, CA 80 $558 75% $417 $6,418 4.7% Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas

  • St. Thomas, USVI

180 $283 79% $224 $10,291 7.5% Pier House Key West, FL 142 $432 81% $350 $10,907 8.0% Park Hyatt Beaver Creek Beaver Creek, CO 190 $429 62% $265 $9,238 6.8% Marriott Seattle Waterfront Seattle, WA 361 $284 85% $240 $15,885 11.6% Capital Hilton Washington D.C. 550 $234 84% $195 $13,748 10.1% Sofitel Chicago Magnificent Mile Chicago, IL 415 $216 79% $171 $7,663 5.6% Hilton Torrey Pines La Jolla, CA 394 $214 85% $183 $15,468 11.3% Ritz-Carlton Sarasota Sarasota, FL 266 $375 73% $275 $12,709 9.3% Total Core 2,640 $296 80% $236 $108,791 79.6% Non-Core Courtyard San Francisco Downtown San Francisco, CA 410 $286 87% $248 $13,834 10.1% Courtyard Philadelphia Downtown Philadelphia, PA 499 $186 83% $154 $14,038 10.3% Total Non-Core 909 $232 85% $196 $27,872 20.4% Total Portfolio 3,549 $278 81% $226 $136,663 100.0%

(2) (2)
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Company Presentation // March 2019

2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4

Bardessono Wildfires Rebound Hotel Yountville Wildfires Rebound Park Hyatt Beaver Creek Low Snowfall Rebound Sofitel Chicago New Rooms/New Mgmt. Pier House Irma Rebound Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas Irma Rebound Soft Opening Grand Opening Courtyard San Francisco New Rooms online/Moscone Open Autograph Grand Opening Courtyard Philadelphia Autograph Grand Opening Ritz-Carlton Sarasota Red Tide Rebound

2019 Potential Performance Catalysts

11

Year Over Year RevPAR Potential Comparisons(1)

(1) The timing, certainty, and degree of any potential RevPAR increase is subject to a number of variables and may not occur in this timeline or to the degree described or may not occur at all.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Company Presentation // March 2019

Courtyard San Francisco

  • Investment cost: $28.9 million
  • Expected RevPAR uplift: $50
  • Estimated unlevered IRR: 22%(1)

Upbranding Status Update – Autograph Conversions

12

Courtyard Philadelphia

  • Investment cost: $19.8 million
  • Expected RevPAR uplift: $25
  • Estimated unlevered IRR: 19%(2)

SAN FRANCISCO PHILADELPHIA

Construction Timing (Completion)

Guestrooms Done Restaurant 2/19 - 10/19 Lobby 2/19 - 10/19 Exterior 4/19 - 11/19

Construction Timing (Completion)

Guestrooms 10/18 - 6/19 Restaurant 1/19 - 6/19 Lobby 12/18 - 4/19

(1)
  • 5yr. underwritten unlevered IRR, assumes exit cap rate of 6.5%
(2)
  • 5yr. Underwritten unlevered IRR, assumes exit cap rate of 7.5%
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Company Presentation // March 2019

Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas Update

13

  • Launched central reservations on June 29, 2018

as St. Thomas Great Bay Resort to allow transient room nights to be booked directly on Marriott.com and OTA channels

  • Permanent roof work is completed
  • Guestroom model rooms were completed and

reviewed with brand in July 2018

NEW FACADE

  • Guestroom building work underway
  • Current construction timeline has

completion expected at the end of October 2019

NEW POOL

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Company Presentation // March 2019

EBITDA Contribution by Brand and Class

14

2018 Hotel EBITDA by Brand 2018 Hotel EBITDA by Class

47% 33% 20% Luxury Upper Upscale Upscale 49% 21% 17% 7% 6% Marriott Hilton Independent Hyatt Accor

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Company Presentation // March 2019

Why We Focus on Luxury – Historical Performance

15

Source: STR (1) CAGR from 12/31/1987 to 12/31/2018

Greatest long-term RevPAR growth of

4.0%(1)

LUXURY

Second greatest long- term RevPAR growth of

3.1%(1)

UPPER UPSCALE

RevPAR (Indexed)

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Jan-88 Nov-88 Sep-89 Jul-90 May-91 Mar-92 Jan-93 Nov-93 Sep-94 Jul-95 May-96 Mar-97 Jan-98 Nov-98 Sep-99 Jul-00 May-01 Mar-02 Jan-03 Nov-03 Sep-04 Jul-05 May-06 Mar-07 Jan-08 Nov-08 Sep-09 Jul-10 May-11 Mar-12 Jan-13 Nov-13 Sep-14 Jul-15 May-16 Mar-17 Jan-18 Nov-18

Luxury Class Upper Upscale Class Upscale Class Upper Midscale Class Midscale Class Economy Class

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Company Presentation // March 2019

Chain Scale Occupancy ADR RevPAR

Luxury (0.5) 3.8 3.3 Upper Upscale (1.0) 3.0 1.9 Upscale (0.8) 2.3 1.5 Upper Midscale (0.5) 1.7 1.2 Midscale (0.7) 1.9 1.2 Economy 0.0 2.3 2.4 Independent (0.3) 2.9 2.6 U.S. Total (0.4) 2.7 2.3

Luxury Outlook - 2019

16

In 2019, ADR growth is expected to continue to drive all of the RevPAR growth Luxury is expected to continue to outperform other chain scales in 2019

Source: PWC
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Company Presentation // March 2019

External Growth – Luxury Markets

17

TOP 15 LUXURY MARKETS BY ROOMS(1)

(1) Based on information provided by STR for luxury class as of 12/31/2018 (2) TTM as of 12/31/2018

Market Hotels Rooms Las Vegas, NV 18 26,108 New York, NY 63 15,435 Los Angeles/Long Beach, CA 62 12,535 Miami/Hialeah, FL 45 12,373 Hawaii 27 8,124 San Francisco/San Mateo, CA 44 7,970 Chicago, IL 22 7,712 San Diego, CA 39 7,414 Washington, DC-MD-VA 25 7,232 Orlando, FL 10 6,134 Atlanta, GA 19 5,658 Phoenix, AZ 13 5,039 New Orleans, LA 21 4,634 California Central Coast 53 4,301 New Jersey Shore 34 3,905

TOP 15 LUXURY MARKETS BY REVPAR(1)(2)

Market RevPAR Hawaii $ 443.5 Utah Area $ 388.2 New York, NY $ 384.2 San Francisco/San Mateo, CA $ 326.3 Los Angeles/Long Beach, CA $ 316.5 California Central Coast $ 313.8 California North $ 302.8 Boston, MA $ 296.5 Colorado Area $ 276.0 Miami/Hialeah, FL $ 250.0 Orlando, FL $ 240.4 Seattle, WA $ 229.1 Washington, DC-MD-VA $ 221.2 Austin, TX $ 204.6 Denver, CO $ 200.6

~270,000 total luxury hotel rooms in U.S.(1)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Company Presentation // March 2019

Target Market Analysis(1)

18

Source: STR, RCA, and Bloomberg (1) Based on internal analysis as of 9/30/2018

Market Size

Fundamentals

Pricing Desirability

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Fundamentals Market Size Pricing

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Company Presentation // March 2019

Long-Term Trading Premium(1)

19

Source: STR, SNL Top Quartile: BEE, PEB, LHO Peers: AHT, CLDT, CHSP, DRH, FCH, HT, HPT, HST, INN, RLJ, SHO (1) Data is from 1/1/2006 to 9/30/2018

The top quartile of lodging REITs (by RevPAR) have consistently had higher quality assets and traded at a premium relative to other peers over a long-term 10 year period

2.4

PREMIUM EBITDA TRADING MULTIPLE (TURNS)

5.0x 7.0x 9.0x 11.0x 13.0x 15.0x 17.0x 19.0x 21.0x 23.0x 25.0x 1/3/2006 1/3/2007 1/3/2008 1/3/2009 1/3/2010 1/3/2011 1/3/2012 1/3/2013 1/3/2014 1/3/2015 1/3/2016 1/3/2017 1/3/2018 Top Quartile Avg NTM EBITDA Multiple Peer Avg NTM EBITDA Multiple

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Company Presentation // March 2019

Asset Management Overview(1)

20

Senior Oversight

1 – Chief Operating Officer 8 – Asset managers 2 – Legal

1 – Director of Underwriting 1 – Analyst 2 – Revenue Optimization 1 – Analyst 4 – Capex specialists 1 – Property Tax specialist 1 – Analyst 3 – Risk & Insurance 1 – Analyst

Acquisition Underwriting Revenue Optimization Expense Control Risk Management

(1) Employees provided by Ashford Inc., our advisor, and provide their services to other companies in addition to ours.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Company Presentation // March 2019

Past Operating Performance Relative to Peers

21

Note: Comparable Results. Peers include CHSP, PEB, DRH, LHO (for years prior to 2018), and SHO (1) Due to Hurricane damage, St. Thomas Ritz-Carlton experienced a RevPAR decrease of 38.1% during the Q4 2017, but recorded $4.1M of Business Interruption (BI) insurance income (including Pier House Key West), which is reflected in hotel EBITDA. (2) Due to Hurricane damage, St. Thomas Ritz-Carlton experienced a RevPAR decrease of 53.6% YTD Q3 2018, but recorded $5.2M and $3.8M of BI insurance income in Q2 and Q3 2018 respectively, which is reflected in hotel EBITDA
  • Braemar has outperformed its REIT peers each of the past 4 years

(Braemar results in green or red; REIT averages in black)

2015 2016 2017 2018

8.5% 3.7% 0.2% 3.1% 8.3% 2.5%

  • 2.3%

1.9%

Comparable Hotel EBITDA Growth RevPAR Growth 2015 2016 2017 2018

7.3% 2.4%

  • 2.5%(1)
  • 1.6%(2)

4.9% 1.5% 0.4% 2.4%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Company Presentation // March 2019

Case Study – Pier House Resort

22

  • Braemar purchased the asset in early 2014 for $92.7 million
  • Remington had recently taken over property management & has a proven ability

to deliver superior results

  • Initial yield on cost was 7.4%, yield on cost at December 31, 2018 was 10.2%

2016

4.9% 170 206%

RPI GROWTH HOTEL EBITDA MARGIN INCREASE (BPS) HOTEL EBITDA FLOW- THROUGH

2017

0.6% 362 469%

RPI GROWTH HOTEL EBITDA MARGIN INCREASE (BPS) HOTEL EBITDA FLOW- THROUGH

Quarterly NOI and NOI Yield

(1) NOI yield based on gross book value

2018

  • 0.6%
  • 68
  • 19.9%

RPI GROWTH HOTEL EBITDA MARGIN INCREASE (BPS) HOTEL EBITDA FLOW- THROUGH

$2,854 $3,224 $3,385 $3,383 $3,570 $1,773 $2,104 $2,185 $2,493 $2,423 $1,116 $1,317 $1,480 $1,016 $1,523 $2,020 $2,157 $2,242 $3,152 $2,447

5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (In thousands $)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 NOI Yield*
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Company Presentation // March 2019

Case Study – Bardessono Hotel & Spa

23

  • Purchased for $85 million unencumbered by management. Installed Remington as

property manager.

  • Initial TTM cap rate was 4.6%, yield on cost at December 31, 2018 was 8.5%

2016 (First Full Year of Ownership)

9.7% 518 242%

REVPAR GROWTH HOTEL EBITDA MARGIN INCREASE (BPS) HOTEL EBITDA FLOW- THROUGH

2017

  • 4.2%
  • 147

52%

REVPAR GROWTH HOTEL EBITDA MARGIN INCREASE (BPS) HOTEL EBITDA FLOW- THROUGH

Quarterly NOI and NOI Yield

(1) NOI yield based on gross book value

2018

3.2% 773 102%

REVPAR GROWTH HOTEL EBITDA MARGIN INCREASE (BPS) HOTEL EBITDA FLOW- THROUGH

($438) $4 $93 $882 $1,025 $1,339 $1,369 $1,522 $1,566 $1,692 $1,915 $1,917 $1,061 $1,238 $357 $1,356

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% ($1,000) $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000

2015 2016 2017 2018 (In thousands $)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 NOI Yield (1)
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Company Presentation // March 2019

Conservative Capital Structure

24

45%

TARGET LEVERAGE Net Debt Gross Assets

Non-recourse debt lowers risk profile of the overall platform OVERVIEW Floating-rate debt typically provides a natural hedge to hotel cash flows Intended to Maximize flexibility in all economic environments Long-standing lender relationships

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Company Presentation // March 2019

Cash Management Strategy

25

(1) As of 12/31/2018 (2) At market value as of 2/27/2019 (3) Deducts preferred dividends and actual FF&E reserve payments which are between 4% and 5% of hotel revenue and adds back amortization of loan costs (4) GAAP reconciliation in appendix

NET WORKING CAPITAL(1)

10-15%

CASH TO GROSS DEBT TARGET

Defend our assets at financing maturity

BENEFITS

Hilton Torrey Pines La Jolla, CA

Opportunistic investments in severe economic downturn

$40.6M

CAD(1),(3),(4)

5.1%

DIVIDEND YIELD(2)

59%

CAD PAYOUT RATIO(1)

41%

AFFO PAYOUT RATIO(1)

Cash & Cash Equivalents $175.6 Restricted Cash $74.2 Accounts Receivable, net $12.1 Prepaid Expenses $4.2 Due from Third-Party Hotel Managers, net $3.4 Investment in Ashford Inc.(2) $11.9 Total Current Assets $281.4 Accounts Payable, net & Accrued Expenses $79.4 Dividends Payable 8.5 Due to Affiliates, net 4.2 Total Current Liabilities $92.1 Net Working Capital $189.3

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Company Presentation // March 2019

Laddered debt maturities(1)(2)

Debt Maturities

26

2020

NEXT HARD DEBT MATURITY

2.0x

FCCR(1)(2)

OVERVIEW

(1) As of 12/31/2018 (2) Pro forma for most recent refinancing of Capital Hilton and Hilton Torrey Pines, and most recent acquisition Ritz-Carlton Lake Tahoe.

Courtyard Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA

4.8%

WEIGHTED AVG. INTEREST RATE(1)(2)

$112.0 $0.0 $158.5 $100.0 $684.0

$0.0 $100.0 $200.0 $300.0 $400.0 $500.0 $600.0 $700.0 $800.0

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter (In millions) Fixed-Rate Floating-Rate

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Company Presentation // March 2019

Peer Operating Performance Analysis

27

$109 $95 $82 $83 $80 31.3% 32.3% 30.9% 32.4% 30.3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 BHR PEB SHO CHSP DRH 2018 EBITDAPAR (LHS) 2018 EBITDA Margins (RHS)

Comparable Hotel EBITDAPAR & Comparable Hotel EBITDA Margins 2018

Source: company filings
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Company Presentation // March 2019

BHR

DRH SHO CHSP PEB

Valuation

28 TEV / 2019E EBITDA MULTIPLE(2),(3) PRICE / 2019E AFFO / SHARE MULTIPLE(2),(3) TTM CAP RATE(2)

Discount to average peer trading cap rate (bps)

Valuation 2018 Comparable RevPAR(1)

100

Discount to average peer trading AFFO multiple (turns)

4.1

Discount to average peer trading EBITDA multiple (turns)

1.3

(1) As reported by company earnings releases (2) Balance sheet data as of 12/31/2018; stock price as of 2/27/2019, not adjusted for JV interest (3) Based on consensus estimates

$187 $192 $195 $205 $226

11.4x 11.6x 12.0x 12.9x 13.6x 14.6x 9.0x 10.0x 11.0x 12.0x 13.0x 14.0x 15.0x

SHO BHR DRH Peer Avg CHSP PEB

8.0% 7.6% 7.4% 7.0% 6.7% 6.4% 5.0% 5.5% 6.0% 6.5% 7.0% 7.5% 8.0% 8.5%

BHR SHO DRH Peer Avg CHSP PEB

8.4x 10.6x 12.5x 13.0x 13.0x 13.4x 4.0x 6.0x 8.0x 10.0x 12.0x 14.0x

BHR DRH Peer Avg CHSP SHO PEB
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Company Presentation // March 2019

Highly Aligned Management Team

29

Management has significant personal wealth invested in the Company

13.6%

Insider ownership 3.6x higher than REIT industry average

3.6x

Total dollar value of insider ownership (as of 2/27/2019)

$64M

REIT Avg includes: AHT, HT, APLE, CLDT, CHSP, RLJ, PEB, INN, HST, DRH, SHO, XHR, PK Source: Proxy and Company filings Note insider equity ownership for BHR includes direct interests and interests of related parties

16.8% 13.6% 9.4% 6.3% 3.8% 3.4% 2.6% 2.2% 2.1% 1.9% 1.6% 1.2% 0.9% 0.9% 0.4% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 20.0% AHT BHR HT APLE Peer Avg. CLDT CHSP PEB INN HST RLJ DRH SHO XHR PK

Highly-aligned management team is among highest insider equity ownership of publicly- traded Hotel REITs

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Company Presentation // March 2019

Key Takeaways

30 Bardessono Hotel & Spa Yountville, CA Pier House Resort Key West, FL The Ritz-Carlton St. Thomas

  • St. Thomas, USVI

Highest Quality Portfolio Amongst All Lodging REITs…In The Segment With Greatest Expected Growth Trajectory Growing Organically: Rigorous Asset Management While Mining Portfolio for Investment Opportunities Growing Externally: Redeploying Capital into Accretive Acquisitions Shares Are Significantly Undervalued vs Peers Highly Aligned Mgmt. Team That Is a Major Shareholder

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Appendix

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Company Presentation // March 2019

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Cash Available for Distribution

32

Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Three Months Ended TTM Ended December 31, 2018 September 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 March 31, 2018 December 31, 2018 Net income (loss) (13,913) $ (626) $ 12,854 $ 4,270 $ 2,585 $ (Income) loss from consolidated entities attributable to noncontrolling interest (274) (1,695) (89) 42 (2,016) Net (income) loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership 1,826 452 (1,235) (292) 751 Preferred dividends (2,083) (1,707) (1,708) (1,707) (7,205) Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders (14,444) (3,576) 9,822 2,313 (5,885) Depreciation and amortization on real estate 14,320 13,720 14,052 12,258 54,350 Impairment charges on real estate
  • 59
12 71 Net income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in operating partnership (1,826) (452) 1,235 292 (751) (Gain) loss on sale of hotel property 88
  • (15,711)
  • (15,623)
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entities (27) 81 62 3 119 Company's portion of FFO of OpenKey (78) (81) (63) (2) (224) FFO available to common stockholders and OP unitholders (1,967) 9,692 9,456 14,876 32,057 Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock dividends 1,707 1,707 1,708 1,707 6,829 Transaction and management conversion costs 2,000
  • 462
503 2,965 Other (income) expense 63 64 63 63 253 Interest expense accretion on refundable membership club deposits 300 226 150
  • 676
Write-off of loan costs and exit fees
  • 4,176
2 4,178 Amortization of loan costs 1,080 1,070 1,050 964 4,164 Unrealized (gain) loss on investments 4,672 (2,158) 6,024 (528) 8,010 Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (721) 578 298 (73) 82 Non-cash stock/unit-based compensation 1,295 1,674 1,442 2,593 7,004 Legal, advisory and settlement costs 426 277 197 (1,141) (241) Advisory services incentive fee (2,241) 1,380 691 170
  • Contract modification cost
  • Software implementation costs
  • Uninsured hurricane and wildfire related costs
  • (55)
467 412 Company's portion of adjustments to FFO of OpenKey 8 2 2
  • 7
Adjusted FFO available to the Company and OP unitholders 6,622 $ 14,512 $ 25,664 $ 19,603 $ 66,396 $ FFE reserve (net of noncontrolling interest) (4,336) (4,790) (5,400) (4,415) (18,941) Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock dividends (1,707) (1,707) (1,708) (1,707) (6,829) Cash available for distribution to the Company and OP unitholders 579 $ 8,015 $ 18,556 $ 13,481 $ 40,626 $
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Company Presentation // March 2019 33

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Comparable Hotel EBITDA

Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Three Months Ended TTM Ended December 31, 2018 September 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 March 31, 2018 December 31, 2018 Net income (loss) 6,525 $ 14,567 $ 38,623 $ 16,761 $ 76,476 $ Non-property adjustments (26)
  • (15,423)
12 (15,437) Interest income (61) (57) (39) (18) (175) Interest expense 4,342 4,100 4,335 3,123 15,900 Amortization of loan cost 284 279 277 199 1,039 Depreciation and amortization 15,092 14,474 14,811 13,006 57,383 Income tax expense (benefit) (353) (44) 382 154 139 Non-hotel EBITDA ownership expense 1,147 26 755 368 2,296 Hotel EBITDA including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interest 26,950 33,345 43,721 33,605 137,621 Less: EBITDA adjustments attributable to consolidated noncontrolling interest (1,519) (1,429) (2,366) (1,990) (7,304) Hotel EBITDA attributable to the Company and OP unitholders 25,431 $ 31,916 $ 41,355 $ 31,615 $ 130,317 $ Non-comparable adjustments (27) (135) (4,127) 3,331 (958) Comparable hotel EBITDA 26,923 $ 33,210 $ 39,594 $ 36,936 $ 136,663 $
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Company Presentation // March 2019 34

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDAre

Three Months Ended Year Ended December 31, December 31, 2018 2017 2018 2017 Net income (loss) $ (13,913) $ 28,444 $ 2,585 $ 28,324 Interest expense and amortization of loan costs 13,712 10,194 49,653 38,937 Depreciation and amortization 15,092 12,689 57,383 52,262 Income tax expense (benefit) (82) (856) 2,432 (522) Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated entity 88 — 234 — Company's portion of EBITDA of OpenKey (77) — (220) — EBITDA 14,820 50,471 112,067 119,001 Impairment charges on real estate — 60 71 1,068 (Gain) loss on sale of hotel property (27) (23,797) (15,738) (23,797) EBITDAre 14,793 26,734 96,400 96,272 Amortization of favorable (unfavorable) contract assets (liabilities) 52 44 195 180 Transaction and management conversion costs 2,000 74 2,965 6,774 Other (income) expense 63 85 253 377 Write-off of loan costs and exit fees — 1,531 4,178 3,874 Unrealized (gain) loss on investments 4,672 (6,314) 8,010 (9,717) Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives (721) 527 82 2,056 Non-cash stock/unit-based compensation 1,295 665 7,004 (1,327) Legal, advisory and settlement costs 426 203 (241) 3,711 Advisory services incentive fee (2,241) — — — Contract modification cost — — — 5,000 Software implementation costs — — — 79 Uninsured hurricane and wildfire related costs — 248 412 3,821 Company's portion of adjustments to EBITDAre of OpenKey 8 — 7 — Adjusted EBITDAre 20,347 $ 23,797 $ 119,265 $ 111,100 $