Marc J. Levine, MD Rothman Institute Director Spine Surgery - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

marc j levine md rothman institute director spine surgery
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Marc J. Levine, MD Rothman Institute Director Spine Surgery - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Marc J. Levine, MD Rothman Institute Director Spine Surgery Program-Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital-Hamilton NONE SYMPTOMS MRI AXIAL 50% Low Back Pain 50% Right Leg Pain Neurogenic Claudication relieved sitting Failed


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Marc J. Levine, MD Rothman Institute Director Spine Surgery Program-Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital-Hamilton

slide-2
SLIDE 2

NONE

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

SYMPTOMS MRI AXIAL

50% Low Back Pain 50% Right Leg Pain

Neurogenic Claudication –relieved sitting

Failed Non-operative treatment

slide-5
SLIDE 5

LATERAL RECESS STENOSIS FORAMINAL STENOSIS

 Sagittal MRI  Sagittal MRI

slide-6
SLIDE 6

BACK PAIN LEG PAIN

 Facet Arthropathy  Micromotion  Degenerative Disc

Disease ANSWER FUSION

 Lateral Recess Stenosis  Facet arthropathy  Ligamentous hypertrophy  Foraminal Stenosis  Collapsed disc height

Positional

  • flexion better
  • extension worse

DECOMPRESSION DIRECT/INDIRECT

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Percutaneous Wire Placement

Unilateral Screw Placement

Facectectomy

Lateral and Foraminal Decompression

Disc Space Preparation

Interbody Graft and Device Placement

Rod Placement

Contralateral Construct Completion

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Back Pain(facet/micromotion/- Fusion Leg Pain

  • lateral recess (decompressed)
  • foraminal (direct and indirect)

Neurogenic -positional

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Decrease hospital days

Decrease hospital cost

Decrease 2 year cost

Quicker RTW

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Less Blood Loss

Less Transfusions

Less Pain Med Requirements

Less Muscle Dissection

Clinical Benefits 1-2 years

Similar Long Term Benefits

LESS PHYSICIAN WEAR AND TEAR

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Identify exiting L4 nerve root

Identify traversing L5 nerve root

Beware of abnormal anatomy

Beware of nerve “shift” with spondylolisthesis

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Learning Curve Retractor Choices Endplate Preparation Interbody Choices

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Djurasovic M, Rouben DP, Glassman SD, Casnellie MT, Carreon LY1.Clinical Outcomes

  • f Minimally Invasive Versus Open TLIF: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.Am J

Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Mar-Apr;45(3):E77-82.

  

Terman SW, Yee TJ, Lau D, Khan AA, La Marca F, Park P.J Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

  

Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta- analysis and systematic review.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

  

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and

  • utcomes.

Karikari IO, Isaacs RE.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15; 35(26 Suppl):S294-301.