1
Managing Startup Suppliers
CIPS-Event "Supply Chain Startups: Reality Check" Zurich, October 29, 2019
- Prof. Dr. Stephan M. Wagner
Managing Startup Suppliers CIPS-Event "Supply Chain Startups: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Managing Startup Suppliers CIPS-Event "Supply Chain Startups: Reality Check" Zurich, October 29, 2019 Prof. Dr. Stephan M. Wagner Chair of Logistics Management Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich 1 Agenda 1 Introduction
1
2
3
4
5
Examples
6
7
Sources: Web of Science Citation Report; Databases considered: SCI-Expanded and SSCI; timespan – 27.10.2019 Google Scholar; timespan – 27.10.2019
(27.10.2019: Σ 10.686, h=51) (27.10.2019: Σ 3.757, h=33)
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
8
9
Tracking und Tracing Technology: Blockchain, Low-Cost- Sensors, IoT, 5G
Source: Wagner (2019); Olsen & Tomlin (2019)
10
11
Investment in Startups Startup's Maturity Stage
Startup Developing
Startup Developing & Pilot Project
Acquiring the Startup and its technology
Integrating Startup in Supply Base or Co- Development
Network and Ecosystem Building Corporate Involvement
Financial Investment No financial Investment Source: Fink (2018)
12
13
New New Ventur Venture Partnerin e Partnering Capab Capabilit lity
Zaremba, Bode, & Wagner (Case Study)
Startup Supplier Programs Startup Supplier Programs
Kurpjuweit & Wagner (Case Study)
Sel Selectin ing Innovat g Innovative ive and Startup and Startup Suppl Supplier
Constantin Brachtendorf (Experiments)
Managi Managing Startup g Startup Suppliers ppliers Startup Supplier's IP Startup Supplier's IP Protection Protection
Fink & Wagner (Case Study)
Lever Leveragin ging Suppl Supply Chains y Chains for for New New Ventur Venture Growth e Growth
Ingmar Zanger (Case Study)
Strateg Strategic and and operat
ional l det determin rminants ants of
relationsh ship ip
with new ventur new venture e suppliers suppliers
Zaremba, Bode, & Wagner (Survey) Wagner, Kurpjuweit, & Choi (Case Study) CAPS Research, Arizona State University
Toward a Toward a bett better understanding er understanding
corporate accelerator models e accelerator models
Moschner, Fink, Kurpjuweit, Wagner, & Herstatt (Case Study) Collaboration with TU Hamburg
Lever Leveragin ging Startup's Startup's Suppl Supply Chains y Chains
Feng & Wagner
A Typolo A Typology gy of
Established Firms' Supp Firms' Suppli lier Sel Selection ion Approac Approaches hes
Kurpjuweit & Wagner (Case Study)
Logist Logistic ics Acceler s Accelerator tor
Fink, Räder,& Wagner (Case Study)
New New Kids on Kids on the the Block: Block: Sel Selectin ing New New Ventur Ventures as es as Supp Suppli liers ers
Zaremba, Bode, & Wagner (Survey)
Logist Logistics Startups ics Startups
Kurpjuweit, Klöckner, Seeßle, & Wagner (Case Study)
14
Source: Fink & Wagner (2019)
15
Example
Source: https://www.deutschebahn.com/en/Digitalization_new/startups/db_startups/weichen-3520602
16
Example
Source: https://aito-touch.com/
17
Example
Source: Wagner (2010)
18
Source: Wagner et al. (2017)
19
Goals: Start-up vs. other suppliers
n=123
Cost (reduction) Quality Delivery Flexibility Innovation
Equally emphasized More emphasized Less emphasized 14% 25% 61% 13% 47% 40% 8% 17% 75% 9% 16% 75% 12% 37% 51%
Source: Wagner et al. (2015)
20
"Product- priority" "Product- complexity"
36% 36% 14% 23% 20% 19% 41% 44% 68%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Profit impact Criticality for production Importance for firm Very low/low Medium High/very high
32% 30% 26% 27% 21% 22% 41% 49% 52%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Technical requirements Complexity Innovativeness Very low/low Medium High/very high
n=96 (start-ups selected)
Source: Wagner et al. (2015)
21
The start-up-supplier...
69% 55% 42% 44% 36% 28% 32% 33% 23% 19% 16% 7% 10% 14% 14% 13% 8% 8% 5% 9% 18% 25% 18% 21% 26% 22% 19% 24% 18% 17% 21% 16% 13% 9% 8% 8% 8% 7% 22% 27% 33% 39% 43% 46% 46% 48% 53% 64% 68% 72% 74% 74% 77% 79% 83% 83% 88% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
...was explicitly recommended by trusted business partner of ours ...had good relationships to a partner who provided financial support ...had an established firm as supplier ...has been successfully active in the market/industry for a… ...had an established firm as customer ...was able to provide comprehensible, documented relevant proof… ...had a very professional corporate design or similar ...committed a considerable portion of resources in the course of the… ...already possessed the essential (most important) administrative… ...already possessed the essential (most important) technological… ...had employees who possessed relevant experience in the… ...provided requested information in a timely manner ...had employees that left a good impression in personal meetings ...was a good fit to our corporate culture ...complied with the established standards and norms in our industry ...had (at least) one founder who possessed relevant experience in… ...constantly communicated with us in a transparent manner ...constantly acted openly (“played with open hands”) ...did signal great interest for the supply mandate
Does not apply/weakly applies Applies Strongly/fully applies
n=96 (start-ups selected)
Source: Wagner et al. (2015)
22
Source: Zaremba, Bode & Wagner (2017)
23
Source: Kurpjuweit, Wagner & Choi (2019)
24
(Gimmy et al., 2017)
25
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Identification Internal matchmaking Pilot project Transfer into the supply base Product development Sourcing Alternative routes:
supplier
Gate 1 (Preselection) Gate 2 (Market fit) Gate 3 (Pilot evaluation)
Source: Kurpjuweit and Wagner (2019)
26
27