Managing Moderately Injured Trauma Patients without Immediate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

managing moderately injured trauma patients without
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Managing Moderately Injured Trauma Patients without Immediate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Managing Moderately Injured Trauma Patients without Immediate Surgeon Presence: 10 years later Laura A Boomer, MD Jason Nielsen, MD, Wendi Lowell, Kathy Haley, MS, BSN, RN, Carla Coffey, BSN, RN, Katherine Nuss, MD, Benedict Nwomeh, MD, MPH,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Managing Moderately Injured Trauma Patients without Immediate Surgeon Presence: 10 years later

Laura A Boomer, MD

Jason Nielsen, MD, Wendi Lowell, Kathy Haley, MS, BSN, RN, Carla Coffey, BSN, RN, Katherine Nuss, MD, Benedict Nwomeh, MD, MPH, Jonathan Groner MD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • Trauma is common in children
  • Standard trauma team has included immediate

evaluation by a surgeon

  • Many have a two-tiered system of trauma

activation with different teams

  • Reduced resident work hours and decreasing

resident availability have made coverage challenging

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • In 2003, the Pediatric Emergency

Medicine physicians assumed responsibility as the team leader for level 2 trauma resuscitations

  • The surgical resident and attending

physician became consultants

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Purpose

To review a decade’s experience of eliminating immediate surgeon presence from the evaluation of moderately injured children

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Trauma Activation Criteria

  • Free standing level 1 pediatric trauma center

within a statewide trauma system

  • Trauma patients are triaged using a two-tiered

system

  • Trauma response is activated by an ED charge

RN or a TNL

  • Non-activated patients are evaluated by the ED

physicians

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Level I Activation Criteria

  • Trauma Arrest
  • Airway and Breathing
  • Airway or respiratory

compromise

  • Airway or breathing maintained

maneuvers, adjuncts or ETT

  • Pneumothorax
  • Facial or neck injury with

potential for airway or cervical spine injury

  • Circulation
  • Tachycardia with poor perfusion
  • Hypotension
  • Need for more than 2 fluid

boluses

  • Patients who require blood

products

  • Disability
  • GCS <9, or ‘P’ or ‘U’ on AVPU

scale

  • Paralysis
  • Smoke Inhalation with any of

the above criteria

  • 2° or 3° Burns > 30% TBSA
  • Penetrating wounds
  • Limb threatening injuries
  • Consider high risk

mechanisms of injury

  • Ejection from vehicle
  • Death of occupant of same

vehicle

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Level II Activation Criteria

  • Head
  • GCS 9-14, combativeness,

disorientation or confusion

  • Abdomen
  • Blunt abdominal trauma with

suspicion for intra-abdominal injury

  • Penetrating wounds
  • Through 2 or more distal

extremities

  • Burns
  • 2° or 3° burns, 15-30% TBSA
  • Extremity
  • Suspected or confirmed femur

fracture with high risk mechanism

  • Transfer Patients
  • Open or depressed skull

fracture or intracranial bleed

  • Pulmonary contusion
  • Known or suspected intra-

abdominal injury

  • Complex pelvic fractures
  • High Risk mechanisms of

injury

  • Struck, dragged, or run over

by a vehicle

  • MVC with high speed impact
  • r rollover
  • Falls > 20 feet
  • Motorized

cycle/dirtbike/bicycle

  • All terrain vehicles
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Materials and Methods

  • Prior to Jan 1, 2003, all trauma

resuscitations were run by a surgical PGY- 4, fellow or attending surgeon

  • After April 1, 2003, Pediatric EM

physicians assumed responsibility as trauma team leader for all level 2 activations

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Materials and Methods

  • Previously collected and published data of

admitted patients were used as a historical comparison

– Period 1 (April 1, 2001 – December 31, 2002)

  • Jan 1, 2003 through Mar 31, 2003 data

were excluded (transition period)

  • April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2013 data were

extracted from the trauma registry (Period 2)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results

  • Period 1: 714 admitted patients met

trauma criteria (88% level II activations)

  • Period 2: 7355 total patients met trauma

criteria (78% level II)

– 4976 admitted patients (70% level II)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Over-triage/Under-triage

  • Level 1 Alerts

– 10% downgraded to level II – 2.6% downgraded to non-alert

  • Level II Alerts

– 7% upgraded to level I – 8% downgraded to non-alert

  • Missed Alerts

– Period 1: 118 (5.6 per month) – Period 2: 124 (1 per month)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Over-triage/Under-triage

  • Level 1 Alerts

– 10% downgraded to level II – 2.6% downgraded to non-alert

  • Level II Alerts

– 7% upgraded to level I – 8% downgraded to non-alert

  • Missed Alerts

– Period 1: 118 (5.6 per month) – Period 2: 124 (1 per month)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Over-triage/Under-triage

  • Level 1 Alerts

– 10% downgraded to level II – 2.6% downgraded to non-alert

  • Level II Alerts

– 7% upgraded to level I – 8% downgraded to non-alert

  • Missed Alerts

– Period 1: 118 (5.6 per month) – Period 2: 124 (1 per month)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Activation Data by Year

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

level 2 admit level 2 total ED census

*

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results

Period 1 Period 2 p Total Patients (N) 627 2694 Male Sex 397 (63.3%) 1727 (64.1%) 0.7113 Age, in years <5 5-10 10-18 137 (21.9%) 203 (32.4%) 287 (45.8%) 617 (22.9%) 698 (25.9%) 1379 (51.2%) Overall: 0.0040 0.5709 0.0010 0.0146 Mechanism Blunt Penetrating 598 (95.4%) 10 (1.6%) 2472 (91.8%) 44 (1.6%) 0.0014

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results

Period 1 Period 2 p Total Patients (N) 627 2694 Male Sex 397 (63.3%) 1727 (64.1%) 0.7113 Age, in years <5 5-10 10-18 137 (21.9%) 203 (32.4%) 287 (45.8%) 617 (22.9%) 698 (25.9%) 1379 (51.2%) Overall: 0.0040 0.5709 0.0010 0.0146 Mechanism Blunt Penetrating 598 (95.4%) 10 (1.6%) 2472 (91.8%) 44 (1.6%) 0.0014

Patients were male in >60% of cases

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results

Period 1 Period 2 p Total Patients (N) 627 2694 Male Sex 397 (63.3%) 1727 (64.1%) 0.7113 Age, in years <5 5-10 10-18 137 (21.9%) 203 (32.4%) 287 (45.8%) 617 (22.9%) 698 (25.9%) 1379 (51.2%) Overall: 0.0040 0.5709 0.0010 0.0146 Mechanism Blunt Penetrating 598 (95.4%) 10 (1.6%) 2472 (91.8%) 44 (1.6%) 0.0014

Patients were more often older in age

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results

Period 1 Period 2 p Total Patients (N) 627 2694 Male Sex 397 (63.3%) 1727 (64.1%) 0.7113 Age, in years <5 5-10 10-18 137 (21.9%) 203 (32.4%) 287 (45.8%) 617 (22.9%) 698 (25.9%) 1379 (51.2%) Overall: 0.0040 0.5709 0.0010 0.0146 Mechanism Blunt Penetrating 598 (95.4%) 10 (1.6%) 2472 (91.8%) 44 (1.6%) 0.0014

Blunt trauma presenting mechanism in >90%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Results

Period 1 Period 2 P value Total patients 627 2694 ISS, mean + SD 8.5 + 7.3 8.0 + 6.0 0.048 CT Abdomen (N, %) 336 (53.6%) 1127 (41.8%) <0.001 ED LOS in min, mean 135 191 <0.05 Mortality (N, %) 1 (0.16%) 2 (0.07%) 0.52 Missed Abdominal Injuries (N)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Results

Period 1 Period 2 P value Total patients 627 2694 ISS, mean + SD 8.5 + 7.3 8.0 + 6.0 0.048 CT Abdomen (N, %) 336 (53.6%) 1127 (41.8%) <0.001 ED LOS in min, mean 135 191 <0.05 Mortality (N, %) 1 (0.16%) 2 (0.07%) 0.52 Missed Abdominal Injuries (N)

  • Significant reduction in CT scan usage
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Results

Period 1 Period 2 P value Total patients 627 2694 ISS, mean + SD 8.5 + 7.3 8.0 + 6.0 0.048 CT Abdomen (N, %) 336 (53.6%) 1127 (41.8%) <0.001 ED LOS in min, mean 135 191 <0.05 Mortality (N, %) 1 (0.16%) 2 (0.07%) 0.52 Missed Abdominal Injuries (N)

  • No missed abdominal injuries
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Changes

  • Trauma nurse leaders began making the

decision about level of activation

  • The AIS coding has changed, driving

some changes in ISS

  • Further restrictions in work hours
  • New hospital and trauma bays
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Limitations

  • Some details of discharged patients not

available

  • Information regarding reasons for

increased LOS not available

  • Possibility of alert creep

– Unable to define reason for increased number

  • f level 2 activations
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conclusions

  • Pediatric EM physicians serving as the

trauma team leader for level II alerts is safe and has led to:

– Reduced Abdominal CT scans – Reduced Admission Rate – Reduced Mortality Rate – NO Missed Abdominal Injuries – Increased ED LOS

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Thank You