Managing Audit Risks For the year ended 30 June, 2018 Presented by - - PDF document

managing audit risks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Managing Audit Risks For the year ended 30 June, 2018 Presented by - - PDF document

Managing Audit Risks For the year ended 30 June, 2018 Presented by Belinda Aisbett CA. BAcc. SSA SSAud Director Super Sphere Pty. Ltd. Slide No: 1 Introduction o Asset valuation risks o Cost base relief hangover risks o


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Slide No: 1

Managing Audit Risks

For the year ended 30 June, 2018

Presented by

Belinda Aisbett CA. BAcc. SSA SSAud

Director Super Sphere Pty. Ltd.

  Slide No: 2

Introduction

  • Asset valuation risks
  • Cost base relief hangover risks
  • Contribution cap risks
  • Earning allocations
  • Asset segregation
  • ECPI calculations
  • NALI

Slide No: 3

Introduction

  • TRIS & Part IVA considerations
  • Contribution splitting and member

balance equalisation

  • LRBA
  • Legal considerations
  • 3-year audit cycle
slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Slide No: 4

Asset Valuation Risks

  • Incorrect asset valuations to distort

member balances

  • Chopping and changing between

member choice and pooled investments to distort member balances

  • Incorrect asset valuations to distort CGT

relief

Slide No: 5

Example

  • Distortion of asset values as at 30 June,

2017 to manipulate member account balances

  • SMSF:
  • 30 June, 2016 property worth $17m
  • 30 June, 2017 property worth $6.4m
  • 30 June, 2017 4 pension members

Slide No: 6

Example

  • Distortion of asset values as at 30 June,

2017 to manipulate CGT cost base relief

  • SMSF held shares as at 30 June, 2017 worth

$1.60

  • Shares were connected to an IPO being

finalised post year end, where shares were expected to be worth $2.60

  • Fund wanted to report investment at $2.60

to maximise CGT relief

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Slide No: 7

Example

  • Distortion of asset values as at 30 June,

2017 to manipulate CGT cost base relief

  • 14 properties held
  • $’000 of repairs and maintenance costs

incurred

  • All capitalised to obtain greater cost base

relief.

Slide No: 8

Provision for Disposal Costs?

  • Appropriate?
  • Possible?
  • Audit risks?

Slide No: 9

Asset Valuations

  • Regulation 8.02B of SIS requires all

assets to be reported at market value at year end

  • Regulation is signed off on in the audit

report, so this must be reviewed by the auditor

  • Sufficient appropriate audit evidence

must be on file

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Slide No: 10

Hangover Risks

  • Cost base re-setting
  • You become aware an asset had the cost

reset when the asset was not eligible

  • Deferred last year, but disposals calculated
  • n uplifted cost to proceeds only
  • Discounting is incorrectly applied

Slide No: 11

Member Account Manipulation

  • Earnings allocated disproportionately

between members

  • Contributions being mis-allocated

between members

  • Impact on earning allocations post

manipulation of asset valuations or contributions

Slide No: 12

Example

  • Two member fund
  • Mum and Dad now going through a

nasty divorce

  • Past 3 years contributions from family

business were split 50/50 between members

  • If not split Dad would have been

excessive

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Slide No: 13

Example

  • Dad now claiming wife never worked

for the family business, so the contributions should have been allocated 100% to him

  • Dad claiming auditor was not

independent because auditor has a connection to the wife’s family

Slide No: 14

Example

  • Dad wants member statements re-stated

showing 100% of family business contributions being allocated to his member account

  • Property disposal allocation was

distorted because member balances were wrong

  • Earning allocations to also be re-stated

Slide No: 15

Audit Risks

  • Litigation risk – Dad is considering legal

action against the auditor

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Slide No: 16

Contribution Cap Audit Risks

  • Essential that the audit file contains

audit evidence as to who the contributions belong to, to ensure allocation to member accounts is correct

  • What about historical issues?
  • Representation letter considerations

Slide No: 17

Earning Allocation

  • Must be done on a fair and reasonable

basis

  • Must not advantage one member over

another

  • Is signed off on in the audit report, so

must be checked by the auditor

Slide No: 18

Example

  • Two member fund
  • 75 year old mum
  • 40 year old son
  • 5 years ago, land was sold
  • Profit allocated 100% to son’s account
  • nly
  • Now realise son can’t access profits until

age 65

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Slide No: 19

Example

  • Mum now wants to re-state earning

allocation & re-do financials for previous 5 years

Slide No: 20

Audit Risks

  • Can this even be done?
  • What about minimum pension
  • bligations if Mum’s account is restated?
  • Can ECPI be claimed by mum on her

pension account?

  • Is this being done now purely to lower

the son’s balance to allow more contributions?

Slide No: 21

Asset Segregation post 1 July

  • Member investment choice is still

permitted, however earnings on all assets are grouped for tax purposes

  • Allocation of earnings to member accounts

and the associated tax needs to be reviewed by the auditor

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Slide No: 22

Asset Segregation post 1 July

  • Funds are not permitted to use the

segregation method for pension members with balances greater than $1.6m

Slide No: 23

Actuarial Certificates

  • Disregarded small fund assets
  • If at 30 June of the prior year a member has

more than $1.6m in super (across all funds and all account types), the fund must use the unsegregated method to claim ECPI and must obtain an actuarial certificate

Slide No: 24

Asset Segregation post 1 July

  • Circumstances now where a fund with

100% pension accounts will still need to

  • btain an actuarial certificate
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Slide No: 25

Actuarial Certificates

  • Needed if a member’s pension account

exceeds the transfer balance cap, for example:

  • SMSF $1,600,000 on 1 July, 2017
  • Earnings $96,000
  • Pension drawn $64,000
  • Balance $1,632,000 at 30 June, 2018

The SMSF still needs an actuarial certificate

Slide No: 26

Multiple Funds – ATO Issue

  • Minimal risk to the auditor
  • Auditor will need to be aware of other

super balances held by each member

  • This should be an annual question for every

fund audit

Slide No: 27

TBAR and the Auditor

  • Should the auditor even review?
  • How will the auditor obtain comfort that

TBAR information is up to date?

  • Should the auditor try to keep track of

the member transfer balance cap?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Slide No: 28

Non-Arm’s Length Income

  • Major risk to the auditor if not identified
  • Financial statement balances will be

materially mis-stated

  • Where identified ensure communicated

to the trustee directly (not just via the referring accountant), even if balance is immaterial in year 1

Slide No: 29

Part IVA Risks

  • TRIS pensions commenced to obtain cost

base relief only to be commuted on 1 July, 2017

  • Consider reasons for commutation,
  • therwise there may be Part IVA risks

Slide No: 30

Contribution Splitting

  • Expect an increase in splitting in 2018
  • nwards as funds try to equalise their

balances between spouses

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Slide No: 31

Additional Audit Risks

  • Members have manipulated the

proportion to be split to gain a greater allocation to one spouse

Slide No: 32

LRBA Risks

  • Documentation still not stacking up
  • Some problem LRBA’s include
  • Custodian has the debt, and the fund agrees

to be responsible

  • Bank loan does not say limited in recourse,

but given there are no guarantees accountant thinks this is implied

  • Guarantees in place are not limited in

recourse

Slide No: 33

LRBA and Total Super Balance

  • Total super balance will include the
  • utstanding loan amount of an LRBA

that starts after 1 July, 2018 where the member has:

  • Satisfied a nil cashing restriction; or
  • It is a related party LRBA
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Slide No: 34

Reserves

  • Be aware this is an area of focus for the

ATO, refer SMSFRB 2018/1

  • Sole purpose test
  • Part IVA
  • Contribution reserves still ok

Slide No: 35

Legal Considerations

  • Lessons from Cam & Bear
  • Ensure financial report disclosures are

appropriate

  • Don’t simply rely on representations for

matters you could test directly

  • Be careful on whose representations you

place reliance

  • Don’t exclude the trustee from important

conversations or communications

Slide No: 36

Managing Legal Risks

  • Key is to remember the use of

professional scepticism

  • If in doubt…
  • Emphasis of matter
  • Qualification of Part A opinion
  • Communicate with the trustee directly
  • Consider wording of specific issue

representation letters

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Slide No: 37

Legal Considerations

  • Lessons from Cam & Bear
  • Time for a PI insurance review?

Slide No: 38

3 Year Audit Proposal

  • SMSF with a history of good record

keeping and compliance can move to a year 3 year cycle

  • Suggested that a 3 year cycle will reduce

red tape and save on costs for the SMSF

Slide No: 39

Proposed Triggers

  • Commencement of a pension
  • Death of a member
  • Roll out of member, or admittance of

new member

  • Receipt of NALI*
  • LRBA
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Slide No: 40

Proposed Triggers

  • Acquisition of an asset from a related

party

  • Investment, loan or leases with a related

party

  • In-specie lump sum payments*

Slide No: 41

Further Trigger Suggestions

  • Cryptocurrency investments
  • Payment split between divorcing couple
  • Contribution splitting
  • Derivatives investments

Slide No: 42

Proposed Operation

  • 3 year cycle is proposed to be self

assessing

  • Trustees do not have to opt in if they are

eligible

  • If a trigger event, audits need to be done,

so if an event in year 2, audits for year 1 and year 2 need to be done before year 2 SAR is lodged

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Slide No: 43

Opinion….

  • Most people I speak to think it is a bad

idea

  • Few who think it will be good
  • Couple “free years” to run rampant
  • Simple fund, it should save on costs
  • Few who think SMSF’s shouldn’t be

audited at all!

Slide No: 44

Opinion….

  • Impact on the sector
  • Impact on the integrity of the system

Slide No: 45

What’s Next?

  • Await Treasury response to submissions
  • Discuss with clients & gauge their

position or thoughts

  • Prepare for 2020
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Slide No: 46

2018 / 2019 Audits

  • Review deeds for audit requirements

and make a management letter point where the deed will need to be updated before the trustee can elect a 3 year audit cycle

  • Review fund in light of proposed trigger

events & communicate these

Slide No: 47

2020 Audits

  • Workflow and staff management will be

paramount and completely dependent

  • n the rollout of the proposal

Slide No: 48

Questions?

  • Feel free to e-mail me at

baisbett@supersphere.com.au

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Slide No: 49

Super Sphere Pty. Ltd.

  • Super Sphere provides audit, training

and consulting services specifically in relation to SMSF audit issues.

  • An SMSF Audit Toolkit is available for

$550 to assist professionals compile and complete an audit file.

  • For more information visit

www.supersphere.com.au