management of patients with first relapse
play

MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH FIRST RELAPSE NON IgM LIGHT CHAIN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH FIRST RELAPSE NON IgM LIGHT CHAIN AMYLOIDOSIS: A FRENCH MULTICENTRIC RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Camille Villesuzanne 1 , Stephanie Harel MD 2 , Alexis Talbot, MD 2 , Bruno Royer MD 2 , Naelle Lombion MD 2 , Fabien Lebras MD 3


  1. MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH FIRST RELAPSE NON IgM LIGHT CHAIN AMYLOIDOSIS: A FRENCH MULTICENTRIC RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Camille Villesuzanne 1 , Stephanie Harel MD 2 , Alexis Talbot, MD 2 , Bruno Royer MD 2 , Naelle Lombion MD 2 , Fabien Lebras MD 3 , Nathalie Forgeard 2 , Mathilde Nouvier MD 4 , Lionel Karlin MD 5 , Arnaud Jaccard MD/PhD 1 and Bertrand Arnulf MD/PhD 2 1 Hematology Department, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; 2 Department of Hematology- Immunology, University Hospital APHP, Paris, France; 3 Hematology Department, Henri Mondor hospital, APHP, Créteil, France; 4 Nephrology department, Lyon sud hospital, Lyon, France; 4 Hematology department, Lyon sud hospital, Lyon, France IKMG May 2019

  2. Disclosure of conflict of interest • I do not have a relationship with a for-profit and/or a not-for-profit organization to disclose IKMG May 2019 2

  3. • Stage II and IIIA: • More rapid Upfront Bortezomib-MelDex reevaluation after or CyBorD 2 cycles. • If bone marrow • Stade IIIB: plasma cell > 10% ✓ Rapid switch if = upfront refractory disease to tritherapy CyBorD recommended ✓ dFLC measurement once a week 3 IKMG May 2019

  4. ISSUE = NO CONSENSUS AT RELAPSE..… OBJECTIVE Evaluate therapeutic options used in current practice in France at first relapse, in the management of patients suffering from systemic non-IgM AL amyloidosis MULTICENTRIC RETROSPECTIVE STUDY IKMG May 2019 4

  5. PATIENTS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT HISTOLOGICALLY PROVEN WITH CONVENTIONAL DOSE NON-IGM AL AMYLOIDOSIS CHEMOTHERAPY INCLUSION CRITERIA NO CRITERIA OF FIRST HEMATOLOGIC OR SYMPTOMATIC MULTIPLE CLINICAL RELAPSE MYELOMA (IMWG 2016) IKMG May 2019 5

  6. EFFICACY • Hematologic response criteria • Organ response criteria  NT-proBNP ≥30% ou ≥300 ng/l if 20≤ initial initial > 650 ng/l Initial dFLC > dFLC ≤ 50  50 mg/l NYHA ≥2 mg/l  Proteinuria ≥30% or CR = negative < 0,5 g/24h in the absence of serum and urine reduction in eGFR ≥25% IF and normal Low-dFLC K/ λ , response = dFLC ≤10 mg/l VGPR = dFLC <40  mg/l ≥50% in PAL or ≥2 cm of hepatomegaly PR =  dFLC ≥50% Palladini, G. et al. JCO 2012 ; Milani, P. et al. Blood Gertz, M. A. et al. Am. J. Hematol. 2005; Palladini, G. et al. 2017; Dittrich, T. et al. Blood 2017 JCO 2012; Palladini, G. et al. Blood 2014 6 IKMG May 2019

  7. RESULTS 5 108 2003 to hospital patients 2017 centers IKMG May 2019 7

  8. RESULTS MEDIAN TIME FROM DIAGNOSIS TO SECOND LINE THERAPY = 22,5 months {2-169} BITHERAPY (n=51) TRITHERAPY (n=56) CyD IxaD 2% 2% Others (VTD,CyTD,VMD, BendaD RevMD..) 10% 17% MelD RevD 10% VRD 45% 16% Dara D CyBorD 12% 67% VD 19% IKMG May 2019 8

  9. GLOBAL RESULTS 71% 50% 25% Global hematologic Hematologic response Organ response response rate rate ≥ VGPR Overall survival at relapse Progression Free Survival at relapse 100 100 Percent survival Percent survival Median= 54 {2-127} Median= 13 {1,2-91} 50 50 0 0 0 50 100 150 0 20 40 60 80 100 IKMG May 2019 9 Months Months

  10. TRITHERAPY OR BITHERAPY Hematologic response rate ≥ VGPR Organ response 68% 31% 30% 19% Bitherapy Tritherapy Progression Free Survival Overall survival Bitherapy Median= 12 {2-39} Median= 46 {4-126} Bitherapy 100 100 Tritherapy Percent survival Median= 63 {3,7-123} Tritherapy Median= 15 {2-91} Percent survival 50 50 p= 0,001 p= 0,31 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 50 100 150 Months Months IKMG May 2019 10

  11. PI or OTHER THERAPY Hematologic response rate ≥ VGPR Organ response 73% 27% 23% 21% PI Others Progression Free Survival Overall survival Median= 63 {3-111} Median= 17 {1,2-90} PI PI 100 100 Median= 46 {52,5-126} Median= 7,5 { 2-126} Others Others Percent survival Percent survival 50 50 p= 0,35 p< 0,0001 0 0 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 Months Months IKMG May 2019 11

  12. IMIDS OR OTHER THERAPY Hematologic response rate ≥ VGPR Organ response 63% 50% of organ response in IMIDs based treatment was 31% 26% tritherapy in association with 22% PI ++ IMIDs Others Progression Free Survival Overall survival Median= NA {2,5-NA} IMIDs Median= 11 {2-126} IMIDs 100 100 Other Median= 51 {3-114} Percent survival Other Percent survival Median= 14 {1-76} 50 50 p= 0,08 p= 0,17 0 0 0 50 100 150 0 50 100 150 Months Months IKMG May 2019 12

  13. RD or VRD Progression Free Survival Hematologic response rate ≥ VGPR Organ response RD Median= 11 ({2-126} 100 67% VRD Percent survival Median= 18,7 {5-91} 55% 50 p=0,007 21% 17% 0 0 50 100 150 RD (N=23) VRD (N=9) Months IKMG May 2019 13

  14. RE-TREATEMENT WITH PI (n=22) Hematologic response rate ≥ VGPR Organ response 73% 73% 45% 36% First line Second therapy PFS PI First line PFS PI Second line 100 100 Percent survival Percent survival Median= 23 {4-74} Median= 18,5 {2-91} 50 50 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 Months Months IKMG May 2019 14

  15. eGFR ≤30 ml/min/1,73 m 2 (n=26) BITHERAPY OR TRITHERAPY Hematologic response rate ≥ VGPR Organ response 86% 33% 27% 0% Bitherapy (n=11) Tritherapy (n=15) Progression Free Survival Overall survival Median= 7 {2,5-32} Median= 27 {4,9-51} Bitherapy Bitherapy 100 100 Median= 15 {3-63} Median= 63 {8-83} Tritherapy Percent survival Tritherapy Percent survival 50 p= 0,02 p= 0,07 50 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 Months Months IKMG May 2019 15

  16. eGFR ≤30 ml/min/1,73 m 2 (n=26) PI OR OTHER THERAPY Hematologic response rate ≥ VGPR Organ response 78% IMIDs= 80% severe toxicity 26% 14% 0% PI based therapy (n=19) Other (n=7) Progression Free Survival Overall survival Median= 15 {3-63} Median= 63 {8-83} PI PI 100 100 Median= 7 {2,5-25} Median= NA {5-39} Others Others Percent survival Percent survival p= 0,07 50 50 p= 0,4 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 Months Months IKMG May 2019 16

  17. CONCLUSION STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS FOR PFS IN FAVOUR OF A TRITHERAPY (and OS for eGFR ≤30 ml/min/1,73 m2 patients ) PROTEASOME INHIBITORS SEEM TO BE ESSENTIAL IMIDS SEEM TO BE TOXIC, PARTICULARLY IN THE MOST SEVERE PATIENTS WITH LOW HEMATOLOGICAL RESPONSE, CONSISTENT WITH THE LITERATURE IKMG May 2019 17

  18. DISCUSSION-PERSPECTIVES WHAT IS THE GOOD TIMING TO START SECOND LINE THERAPY? • Depends on initial organ gravity • Organ relapse => decrease OS (p=0,02) Hwa et al.Blood 2017 • « high risk dFLC progression » => 85% cardiac progression at 6 months, Palladini et al. Blood 2018 MRD, NEW RESPONSE CRITERIA TO TREATMENT? • MRD + en NGF= decrease PFS and organ response, Palladini et al. Blood 2016 • Impact decision for early retreatment? WHAT ABOUT MODERN THERAPIES? • Immunotherapy, NEW PI and BCL2 INHIBITORS FISH • CYTOGENETIC Impact for therapeutic decision? IKMG May 2019 18

  19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IKMG May 2019 19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend