Management of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Management of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Management of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer Debates and Didactics in Hematology and Oncology July 29, 2017 Elisavet Paplomata, MD Assistant Professor Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Outline Background
Outline
- Background
- Current guidelines
- Definition of endocrine resistance
- First line therapy
- Recent progress with cell cycle pathway targeting
- 2nd line therapies
- The role of mTOR inhibition
- What is the optimal sequencing?
Background
- Appr. 2/3 of breast cancers are HR positive
- Endocrine therapy, with AIs in
postmenopausal patients has been the standard of care for metastatic HR + BC
- However many cancers develop resistance
- 2nd line mTOR inhibition has been studied
- Recent advances in 1st line therapy and
beyond have improved PFS
- What is the optimal sequence?
NCCN Guidelines 2.2017
Stage IV HR + breast cancer Premenopausal Postmenopausal Visceral crisis OFS plus endocrine therapy as for postmenopausal women Or Selective ER modulators Aromatase inhibitor
- r
Selective ER modulators
- r
Palbociclib + letrozole (category 1)
- r
Ribociclib + letrozole (category 1) Consider 1st line chemotherapy 1st line Endocrine Therapy (ET)
Response then progression
2nd line ET
Response then progression
3rd line ET
1st line AI
Author Treatment AI (mo) TAM (mo) AI + FAS (mo) Nabholtz et al. 2000 Anastrozole vs TAM 11.1 5.6 Bonneterre et al. 2001 Anastrozole vs TAM 8.2 8.3 Mouridsen et al. 2001 Letrozole vs TAM 9.4 6 Paridaens et al. 2008 Exemestane vs TAM 9.9 5.8 Mehta et al. 2012 AI vs AI + FAS 13.5 15 Bergh et al. 2012 AI vs AI + FAS 10.2 10.8
Endocrine resistance
Adjuvant Endocrine therapy (ET) Early relapse x 1 year Late relapse Endocrine resistant Endocrine sensitive Endocrine resistant
2 years
> 2 years of ET Primary endocrine resistance Secondary (acquired) endocrine resistance
First 6 months of 1st line ET for MBC
≥ 6 months on ET for MBC ESMO guidelines for ABC Dec 2016
Recent advances in the first line setting
- Combination endocrine therapy AI + FAS 250
Mehta et al NEJM 2012 FACT SWOG Bergh et al JCO 2012
Mehta et al NEJM 2012
John F R Robertson et al. 2017
FALCON: FAS 500 vs AI
CDK4/6 inhibition
- Dysregulation of the cell cycle is one of the defined hallmarks of
cancer
- For a cell to divide, it has to go through strictly predefined stages,
and this has to happen in a orderly fashion to avoid genetic damage; this is called the cell cycle
- Cyclin- dependent kinases (CDKs) are a large family of serine
threonine kinases that together with their regulatory protein partners, the cyclins, have a crucial role in the controlled progression through the cell cycle
- CDK 4/6 have a pivotal role in the G0/G1-to- S phase cell cycle
transition
- Palbociclib, abemaciclib and ribociclib are orally active, potent
and highly selective inhibitors of CDK4 and CDK6
O’Leary et al. 2016 Nature reviews
Classical model of cell cycle
1.EstrogenCDK 4/6 + Cyclin D 2.CDK4/6 +Cyclin D RB1 3.RB1 E2F A, E, CDK 2 4.Cyclin E+CDK2 HYPER- phosphorylate RB1E2F G1- to- S phase.
1 2 3 4
Chemical structure of selective CDK4/6 inhibitors
O’Leary et al. 2016 Nature reviews
Clinical trials
- Paloma-1: 1st line MBC + LET
- Paloma-2: 1st line MBC + LET
- Paloma-3: >1st line MBC + FAS
Palbociblib
- Monarch-1: > 1st line MBC
- Monarch-2: 1st line ABE+ FAS
Abemaciclib
- Monaleesa -2: 1st line + LET
Ribociclib
Paloma-1 and 2
Advanced ER + HER2 – Breast cancer No prior treatment P1 n= 165 P2 n=666 Palbociclib 125 mg daily po for 3 weeks q28 d Letrozole 2.5 mg /day po Letrozole 2.5 mg /day po Progression Intolerance Withdrawal Death Placebo Primary endpoint: PFS 2ary endpoints: Response, OS, safety, biomarkers
Paloma 1- Primary endpoint PFS
Median PFS: 20·2 months vs 10·2 months
Paloma-2 – Primary endpoint Progression-free Survival.
Finn RS et al. 2016 N Engl J Med
Palbociclib: Pooled analysis
Rugo HS et al. SABCS 2016 P4-22-03
Monaleesa-2
Advanced ER + HER2 – Breast cancer No prior treatment n=668 Ribociclib 600 mg QD po for 3 weeks q28 d Primary endpoint: PFS 2ary endpoints: OS, ORR, CBR, safety Randomized 1:1 Placebo OR Letrozole 2.5 mg QD Letrozole 2.5 mg QD
Monaleesa-2
Hortobagyi et al. 2016 NEJM
Hortobagyi et al. 2016 NEJM
2nd line therapy and beyond
EGFR/HER2neu IGF1R
IRS PI3K Akt
PTEN
TSC1/2 mTORC1 mTOR Raptor
PRAS40 mLST8 Gene expression Anti-apoptosis Cell Proliferation Angiogenesis Rapamycin S6K1/4EBP1
mTORC2 mTOR Rictor
Estrogen Receptor
Ras Raf MAPK NFκB
Src mLST8
Rheb GSK3-β Cyclin D1 Cyclin E Cell membrane
DEPTOR DEPTOR
Estrogen FGFR MET
Bolero-2
Advanced/met astatic ER + HER2 – Breast cancer Progressed on non-steroidal AI Everolimus 10 mg po QD N=485 Primary endpoint: PFS 2ary endpoints: OS, ORR, QoL, safety Randomized 2:1 Placebo N=239 OR Exemestane 25 mg QD Exemestane 25 mg QD
BOLERO 2
- Panel A shows
progression-free survival on the basis
- f local assessment
- f radiographic
studies, and Panel B shows central assessment
Baselga J et al 2012 NEJM
Baselga J et al 2012 NEJM
Paloma-3
Advanced ER + HER2 – Breast cancer Progressed on prior treatment or within 12 mo
- f adjuvant ET
1 or more prior chemo Palbociclib 125 mg daily po for 3 weeks q28 d PLUS FAS 500 mg N=347 Placebo PLUS FAS 500 mg N=174 Randomized 2:1 OR
Paloma-3
Cristofanilli M et al 2016 TheLancet
Cristofanilli M et al 2016 TheLancet
Monarch-1
Phase II, single arm,
- pen label,
Single ABE HR+/HER2− ABC progressed while receiving prior ET, within 1 year from adjuvant AND had 1-2 chemo for MBC Dickler et al. CCR 2017 ABE 200 bid N= 132
Monarch-1
Dickler et al. CCR 2017
Monarch-1
Dickler et al. CCR 2017
Dickler et al. CCR 2017
Monarch-2
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled study FAS +/- ABE HR+/HER2− ABC progressed while receiving prior ET, within 1 year from adjuvant Randomized 2:1 ABE 150 mg bid daily q28 d PLUS FAS 500 mg N=446 Placebo PLUS FAS 500 mg N=223 OR Primary endpoint: PFS 2ary endpoints: ORR, BCR, safety, tolerability Sledge et al. JCO 2017
Monarch 2 results
Investigator assessed Central assessment Sledge et al. JCO 2017
Sledge et al. JCO 2017
Sledge et al. JCO 2017
EVE + FAS
Kornblum Noah et al SABCS 2016
Kornblum Noah et al SABCS 2016
Everolimus in hormone resistant MBC
Postmenop ausal ER + Hormone Resistant (6 mo) Her2- negative (IHC +1 or +2) MBC
Continue Most Recent Endocrine Therapy (ET)
R A N D O M I Z E*
EVE
10 mg daily
TRAS
every 21 days P R O G R E S S I O N Add TRAS Add EVE
* In 2014 based on interim results, the protocol was amended and the TRAS arm was closed. All patients were treated with EVE and TRAS was added upon progression
Poster presented at SABCS December 6-10, 2016
Treatment on trial
Endocrine Agent on Trial (%) Everolimus (n=30) Trastuzumab (n=24) Non-steroidal AI 5 (16.7) Tamoxifen 5 (16.7) 7 (29.2) Fulvestrant 10 (33.3) 8 (33.3) Exemestane 8 (26.7) 9 (37.5) Megace 2 (6.7)
Poster presented at SABCS December 6-10, 2016
PFS (mo) 1st progression
Poster presented at SABCS December 6-10, 2016
PFS (mo) 2nd progression- after crossover
Poster presented at SABCS December 6-10, 2016
What is the optimal sequence?
NCCN Guidelines 2.2017
Stage IV HR + breast cancer Premenopausal woman Postmenopausal woman Visceral crisis OFS plus endocrine therapy as for postmenopausal women Or Selective ER modulators Aromatase inhibitor
- r
Selective ER modulators
- r
Palbociclib + letrozole (category 1)
- r
Ribociclib + letrozole (category 1) Consider initial chemotherapy Prior ET? If yes, when???
No
Prior Adjuvant ET?
AI Sel ER modulators FAS+AI Palbociclib/Ribocicli b +AI Yes Early relapse within 1 year Late relapse
Prior TAM AI FAS AI+CDK4/6 Prior AI FAS+CDK4/6 EXE+EVE FAS+EVE EXE TAM
Prior TAM AI FAS+/-AI AI+CDK4/6
TAM
Prior AI AI AI+CDK4/6 FAS TAM 1st line
Conclusions and remaining questions
- New agents recently approved and under
clinical trials
- Do all patients need combination therapy
upfront?
- What do you use after progression on CDK4/6
inhibitor?
- The choice depends on cancer biology, patient