Making sense a future perspective Making outcomes work SCOPE-DMD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

making sense a future perspective making outcomes work
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Making sense a future perspective Making outcomes work SCOPE-DMD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Making sense a future perspective Making outcomes work SCOPE-DMD Workshop Annemieke Aartsma-Rus London, May 26 2016 COST Action BM1207 core group meeting 2 Department of Human Genetics Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Meeting April 29


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Making sense – a future perspective “Making outcomes work” – SCOPE-DMD Workshop

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus

London, May 26 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Department of Human Genetics 2

COST Action BM1207 core group meeting

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Department of Human Genetics 3

Meeting April 29 2016

http://exonskipping.eu/media/videos-workshop-2015/

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Department of Human Genetics 4

Paper will be online June 6

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Department of Human Genetics 5

Take home messages

  • Need a collaborative and constructive dialogue

between all stakeholders

  • Need to develop and implement care standards
  • Involve all stakeholders to develop functional

and molecular outcome measures

  • Collect high-quality data for natural history and
  • utcome measures
  • Trial design
  • Regulatory approval
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Department of Human Genetics 6

Future directions (focus on OMs)

  • Define a core set of outcome measures for clinical

trials

  • Develop outcome measures for non-ambulant

patients

  • Involve regulators in development of outcomes

measures

  • Publish date on natural history and outcome

measures è This meeting

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Department of Human Genetics 7

Wrap up – Molecular biomarkers

  • DNA and serum biomarkers
  • Standardization and collaboration
  • MRI
  • Correlation with function and strength
  • Many trials now include MRI
  • Regulatory requirements
  • Efficacy measurements
  • Data and quality important (collect, collaborate and share!)
  • Training important (standardization/replication)
  • Secondary outcomes from patients important (PROM & QoL)
  • Come early and discuss – regulators are willing to help
  • Choose appropriate marker(s) (therapy and stage)
  • Involve patients
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Department of Human Genetics 8

Wrap up – Functional outcomes

  • Once scale cannot measure everything for all stages
  • Upper limb
  • Myotools, activity monitors, PUL, reachable workspace
  • Relation strength and function and quality of life
  • Decrease in upper limb function takes decades
  • Selection of outcome measures (stage related)
  • Collaboration with patients
  • Combined efforts: PUL and PROM (DMD-Upper PROM)
  • Collaboration with patients to develop scales and trial design

(drug development starts and ends with patients)

  • Meaningful
  • Regulators need data confirming correlation to function that

is important to patient

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus Department of Human Genetics 9

Thank you