major pipeline expansions proposed
play

MAJOR PIPELINE EXPANSIONS PROPOSED Routing, conversions, reversals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MAJOR PIPELINE EXPANSIONS PROPOSED Routing, conversions, reversals Is a new regulatory scheme needed? PST New Orleans Conference 11/21/13 Observations based on information readily in the public domain 2 Accufacts Inc. 11/21/13 Pipeline


  1. MAJOR PIPELINE EXPANSIONS PROPOSED Routing, conversions, reversals – Is a new regulatory scheme needed? PST New Orleans Conference 11/21/13 Observations based on information readily in the public domain

  2. 2 Accufacts Inc. 11/21/13 Pipeline Projects • The era of multibillion $ pipeline projects • Time value of money takes on new “urgent” meaning • Continued merger/acquisition mania • Bigger isn’t necessarily better • Space Shuttle Syndrome in Risk Management • Pressures to “launch” overrules safety considerations • Routing and permitting can seriously affect startup timing • ROW “creep” of new vs old • Many existing pipelines “rebalancing” in North America • Imbalances from gas and liquid shale production • Condensates • Canadian Dilbit

  3. 3 Accufacts Inc. 11/21/13 Existing Regulations Weak or Moot • Conversions Not Transparent Nor Very Public • Can depend on the state • Routing and Safety Disconnected • Very long history of detachment • Integrity Management (“IM”) Regs First Generation • Too many missing records or data negating IM approach • Not integrating the important data • Negligent risk management approaches • Rush of Pipeline Conversions and Safety • Gas to Liquid and visa versa • Interstate commerce clauses aren’t safety!

  4. 4 Accufacts Inc. 11/21/13 Existing Pipeline Fed Safety Regs • Old “Conversion of Service” Sections Not Adequate • Misses process safety management approach • Hydrotesting regs (Subpart E or J) very inadequate • IM vs MOP/MAOP tests • Line Reversal Changes Pressure and/or Temperature Profiles and Threat Risks • For example, very different cracking threat effects • When Reversed - Not All Pipe Segments the Same in Risk Management

  5. 5 Accufacts Inc. 11/21/13 Existing Pipeline Safety Regs • Gas & Liquid IM 1.0 needs serious improvement/ clarification • Too many ruptures below MOP/MAOP • Legal loophole approaches not grasping process safety intent • Risk Assessments seriously deficient • In some cases even reckless • Engineering Assessments (EAs) very incomplete • WAAs and WAGs a real risk • Assessment limitations not quantified in regs

  6. 6 Accufacts Inc. 11/21/13 New Regulatory Scheme Needed for Pipeline Conversions/Reversal • A shift to more prescriptive (clarification) in pipeline safety regs warranted • Some operator’s loosing control of pipelines • Make conversions/reversals info more public and transparent • Report anomalies by type/time to remediate • IM II Needed – Now! • Should be highest priority within PHMSA • IVP is a good start for a long process • Believe PHMSA technical gets it • Run gas and liquid reg IM advancements concurrently • Address MOP/MAOP hydrotest vs IM hydrotest • Don’t oversell the technology! • Something wrong with Fitness for Service approaches

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend