Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
NASDAQ: MDGL
3/5/2017 1
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. NASDAQ: MDGL 3/5/2017 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. NASDAQ: MDGL 3/5/2017 1 Forward-Looking Statements Any statements, other than statements of historical facts, made in this presentation regarding our future financial or business performance, conditions, plans,
3/5/2017 1
3/5/2017 2 Any statements, other than statements of historical facts, made in this presentation regarding our future financial or business performance, conditions, plans, prospects, trends, or strategies and other financial and business matters; our ability to obtain additional financing; the estimated size of the market for our product candidates, the timing and success of our development and commercialization of our anticipated product candidates; and the availability of alternative therapies for our target market, are, or may be deemed, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “design,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek” or the negative of these words and similar expressions and their variants may identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations, are based on certain assumptions and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which change over time. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements due to various factors. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, risks related to securing and maintaining relationships with collaborators; risks relating to our clinical trials; risks relating to the commercialization, if any, of our proposed product candidates (such as marketing, regulatory, product liability, supply, competition, and other risks); dependence on the efforts of third parties; dependence on intellectual property; and risks related to our cash resources and ability to obtain working capital to fund our proposed operations. Further information regarding on the factors that could affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations are contained our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available at www.sec.gov. These forward-looking statements represent management’s expectations as of the date hereof only, and we specifically disclaim any duty or obligation to update forward-looking statements as a result of subsequent events or developments, except as required by law.
3/5/2017 3
3/5/2017 4
lowering and treatment of NASH) and avoiding safety issues
companies had done (simple receptor binding assay)
this assay and, like thyroid hormone, activate the THR-α receptor equally well as the β receptor
chronic toxicology or ALT increases in human studies
J Med Chem. 2014;57(10):3912-3923
Thyroid Gland Liver T4 T3 T4 T3 Nuc Thyroid Hormone Receptor α or β
TSH
Thyroid Hormone Pathway T4 T4, prohormone T3, active hormone TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
500 1500 2500 3500 4500
Thyroid Hormone (T3) MB07811 (GC1) MGL-3196 Eprotirome
less α potent
more ß selective
α-potency (nM) β/α relative to T3 KB GC-1
3/5/2017 5
(*Clinical Gastroenterology,2003;37(4):340-343; **J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2016; 101(8:3204-3211)
2014;155(11):4591-4601)
3/5/2017 6
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0
Cholesterol (mg/dl±s.d.)
Cholesterol
Control MGL-3196 .3 mg/kg MGL-3196 1 mg/kg MGL-3196 3 mg/kg MGL-3196 10 mg/kg
*** *** *** ***
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0
Cholesterol (mg/dl±s.d.)
Cholesterol
Control T3 : 10 ug/kg T3 : 30 ug/kg T3 : 100 ug/kg
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
Bone Density (g/cm*cm)
Bone Mineral Density p<.05* p<.01** P<.001***
*** *** ***
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
Bone Density (g/cm*cm)
Bone Mineral Density
*** *** **
T3 MGL-3196
24d study in 40 week old diet-induced obese (DIO) mice on High Fat Diet (HFD) for 38 weeks BMJ 2011;342:d2238
3/5/2017 7
Control MGL-3196 .3mg/kg MGL-3196 1mg/kg MGL-3196 3 mg/kg Rosiglitazone: 10 mg/kg
20 40 60 80 100 120
60 120 % Time 0 Glucose Time, (min)
1 2 3 4 5
Liver % Body Weight
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Triglycerides mg/g Upper panels: 24d study in 17 wk old DIO mice (po, qd) on high fat diet (HFD) 13 wks; lower panels: 24d study in 40 wk old DIO mice on HFD 35 wks
Liver Size
MGL-3196
Liver Triglycerides
*** p<0.001 ** p<0.01* p<0.05
Liver Fat (Histology) Insulin Tolerance Test (0.5 U/kg insulin)
* p<0.05
50 100 150 200 250 300 IU/L Control MGL-3196 .3mg/kg MGL-3196 1mg/kg MGL-3196 3mg/kg MGL-3196 10mg/kg
ALT
3/5/2017 8
TIMP1 tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase CTGF connective tissue growth factor SMA smooth muscle actin SAA serum amyloid A CRP C-reactive protein
“HFD”, lane 1 mean HFD gene expression normalized to mean Lean; Lanes (2-7) mean gene expression normalized to mean of DIO; “Rosi” (rosiglitazone, 3 mg/kg, 24 wks) Red, higher expression; blue decreased expression
Inflammation
HFD Lean 0.1 0.3 1 3 Rosi
MCP-1/CCL2 MIP-2α/CXCL2 MIP-2ß/CXLCL3 A20/TNFaip3 CRP Annexin 2 SAA1
Fibrosis
Collagen 1 Galectin-3 TIMP1 Collagen 4a2 SMA Collagen 4a1 CTGF Keratin 18 Collagen 3 Galectin-1 25 week study in lean control mice and HFD mice treated with Vehicle, 0.1 to 3 mg/kg MGL-3196 or Rosiglitazone (3mg/kg)
Bad Good
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
MGL-3196 (mg/kg) 3/5/2017 9
3/5/2017 10
3/5/2017 11
PLoS ONE 5(1): e8710, 2010
µ ± ± µ α α β ± α β µ ± β ± ´
α β β α β β β β β β β
Atherosclerosis 230 (2013) 373-380
3/5/2017 12
Once daily oral treatment led to highly significant and dose-dependent up to ~30% reduction of apolipoprotein B (ApoB), total, LDL, non-HDL cholesterol; Strong trends in triglyceride reduction up to 60%; Near maximal effect at 80mg dose
Change from Baseline (CFB) by mean % CFB calculated for each individual subject 24h after 14th dose; baseline value obtained just prior to first dose; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; Chol, total cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol directly measured; Non-HDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol; TG, triglycerides (median %CFB)
10 20
Chol LDL-C ApoB Non-HDL-C TG %Change From Baseline MGL-3196, Placebo Subtracted
5mg 20mg 50mg 80mg 100mg 200mg
*** p<0.001 ** p<0.01 * p≤0.05 “p≤0.1
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ** ** ** ** ** ** * * * * “ “
Atherosclerosis 230 (2013) 373-380
3/5/2017 13
✔Benefit ✓Small benefit Green = Good Decrease
Lancet 385:956-65; 2015 Gastroenterology Feb 11 2016; pii:S0016-5085(10)00140-2 Tobira press release July 25, 2016 Ann Intern Med. doi:10.7326/M15- 1774 2016
3/5/2017 14 Target compound NAS Score Fibrosis Score Liver Lipids NASH
Prevention
Insulin
Sensitivity
LDL TGs CV Risk Side Effects FXR ✔ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✔
—
LDL-C
Pruritus Anti-fibrotic ? ✔
—
✖ —
— —
? Unknown PPARαδ ✓ ✖ — ? ✔
PPARα/δ Well-tolerated Anti-inflam ✓ ? — — —
— —
? Well-tolerated Pioglitazone ✔ ✓ ✔ ✓ ✔
PPAR CHF, bone,weight MGL-3196 ✔ ✓ ✔ ✔ ✔ CV Benefit Well-tolerated
3/5/2017 15
3/5/2017 16
European Heart Journal doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu274; 2014
3/5/2017 17
HoFH
Mipomersen (Kynamro, anti-ApoB) may have safety issues
ezetimibe) some HeFH still not achieving goal
intolerance in some and elevated Lp(a)
*Kynamro, Juxtapid FDA label, prescribing information
HoFH Lipid Lowering Therapy LDL decrease Conventional Statins Up to 28% Ezetimibe <10% LDL apheresis 20-40% New Treatment Options Lomitapide Up to 50% Mipomersen 25% PCSK9 inh 23%
3/5/2017 18
** Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol2014; 2: 455–63 * Endocrinology 2012 Nov;153(11):5143-9
3/5/2017 19
3/5/2017 20
3/5/2017 21
3/5/2017 22
3/5/2017 23
3/5/2017 24