Proposed Ballot Issues Bannockburn HOA Covenants Roofing and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

proposed ballot issues
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Proposed Ballot Issues Bannockburn HOA Covenants Roofing and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Proposed Ballot Issues Bannockburn HOA Covenants Roofing and Fencing Current roofing criteria for asphalt shingles is obsolete Additional proposals address common variance requests Attempt to better clarify property boundary


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Proposed Ballot Issues

Bannockburn HOA Covenants

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Roofing and Fencing

— Current roofing criteria for asphalt shingles is

  • bsolete

— Additional proposals address common variance requests — Attempt to better clarify property boundary specifications for fencing

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Roofing

— Remove new cedar wood shake roofs

— Not permitted by Douglas County

— Keep slate, ceramic, or cement tile shingles — Change asphalt shingle wording

— laminated three-dimensional — 30 year warranty

— Add metal rib metal roofing panels

— 26-guage steel — ¾” trapezoidal ribs on 9” centers — Coatings and paint — 40 year warranty

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Road Frontage Fencing

— Keep

— Stone — Split rail — Post and pole — Post and rail

— Add

— Vinyl ranch style fencing with 2, 3, or 4 rails — Clarification of road frontage to mean within 25 ft of the property line that faces the road

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Residential Lot Boundary Fencing

— Keep

— Any type allowed for road frontage — Woven wire or barbless wire — No electrical fences unless attached to the inside of an

  • therwise approved fence

— Add

— Clarification of residential lot boundary to mean within 25 ft of the property line that does not face a road

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Results of Animal Survey

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Participation

— 110 returned surveys — Not all sections were completed for each survey

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Horses

108 1 Horses Yes Horses No

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Donkeys

90 18 Donkeys yes Donkeys No

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Alpacas

88 20 Alpacas Yes Alpacas No

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Beef Animals

62 48 Beef Yes Beef No

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Goats

86 24 Goats Yes Goats No

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Chickens

87 23 Chickens Yes Chickens No

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusions

— There appears to be broad support for increasing the variety of animals permitted — Although beef animals are currently allowed, there is not significant current support

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Preferred Number of Animals

1 20 22 48 24 23 45 54 24 50 41 3 43 23 33 9 28 4 14 8 15 14 30 37

10 20 30 40 50 60

Horses Donkeys Alpacas Beef Goats Chickens

1 to 3 4 to 5 6 to10 11+

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Conclusions

— Support for 5 large animals is around 60%

— Horses — Donkeys — Alpacas — Beef — Goats

— Support for 10 chickens is around 60%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Proposed Animal Changes

— Allow 5 large animals per lot — Each large animal variety to be included will then be voted on separately — Allow 10 chickens per lot — Increase corral size to 3000 sq ft — Increase allowable outbuildings to 3 with no change in combined size of 3000 sq ft

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Voting Percentages

— Change the percentage of votes required to amend covenants from 66 2/3rds% to 51% — Based on feedback from other covenant committees and this committee’s experience

— Currently a minority of homeowners determine policy for the majority — Achieving 66 2/3rds% positive votes for any issue requires nearly full participation of homeowners — Historically it has been difficult to get this level of participation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Questions & Comments

Thank You!