Macro II/Aussenwirtschaft Lecture Slides No 9 Gerald Willmann June - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

macro ii aussenwirtschaft lecture slides no 9
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Macro II/Aussenwirtschaft Lecture Slides No 9 Gerald Willmann June - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Macro II/Aussenwirtschaft Lecture Slides No 9 Gerald Willmann June 2020 c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University New trade theory dating from late 1970s early 1980s increasing returns to scale monopolistic competition much


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Macro II/Aussenwirtschaft Lecture Slides No 9

Gerald Willmann June 2020

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

New trade theory

  • dating from late 1970s early 1980s
  • increasing returns to scale
  • monopolistic competition
  • much better at explaining North-North trade
  • whereas old theories explained North-South trade

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Intra-industry vs inter-industry trade

  • North-North (little South-South) is intra-industry,

trade in both directions within the same industry

  • North-South is trade in opposite directions across different industries
  • one can measure the degree of intra-industry trade
  • use the Grubel-Lloyd index: 1 − |Xi−Mi|

Xi+Mi

  • ranges from zero (no intra-industry trade) to one

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-4
SLIDE 4

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Monopolistic competition trade model

  • due to Krugman (JIE 79)
  • Dixit-Stiglitz demand side
  • with lots of symmetry
  • monopolistically competitive industry
  • firms producing differentiated varieties
  • small monopolists in their respective niches
  • show that identical countries will trade

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-6
SLIDE 6

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Model setup

  • start with demand side
  • need demand elasticity to determine pricing behavior of firms
  • U = N

i=1 v(ci) with v′ > 0 and v′′ < 0

  • love of variety
  • budget constraint: w = pici
  • max U s.t. BC gives v′(ci) = λpi

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-8
SLIDE 8

c v 1 2 c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Solving for price elasticity

  • totally differentiate first order condition
  • v′′dc = dpiλ
  • dλ zero if infinitely many varieties
  • dc

dp = λ v′′

  • ηi = −dci

dpi pi ci = − λ v′′ v′(c) λ 1 ci = − v′ v′′cI > 0

  • assumption that dη/dc < 0
  • less convex than CES (AER 80 version has CES)

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-10
SLIDE 10

q p more elastic less c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Production side

  • (inverse) production fct: Li = α + βyi
  • simple form of IRS, fixed cost in terms of α
  • average cost AC = wLi

yi = wα yi + wβ

  • marginal cost MC = wβ
  • average cost converges down to constant marginal cost,

as fixed cost is spread across more and more units

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-12
SLIDE 12

y cost AC MC c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Monopolistic competition

  • profit maximization implies MR = MC
  • max π = piyi − w(α + βyi)
  • FOC: pi + dpi

dyiyi = wβ

  • pi
  • 1 −

1 −dyi

dpi pi yi

  • = wβ
  • or p

w = β η η−1

  • mark-up monopoly pricing

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Free entry

  • free entry implies zero profit in long term equilibrium
  • zero profit: AC = p = wα

yi + wβ

  • or p

w = α yi + β = α Lc + β

  • we now have two equations in two unknowns p/w and c
  • solve conceptionally in a diagram

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-15
SLIDE 15

zero profit pricing p/w c c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Slopes

  • downward slope of zero profit is clear
  • fixed cost spread across more units
  • p

w = fct(c) = βη(η − 1)−1

  • d(p/w)

dc

= (β(η − 1)−1 + βη(−1)(η − 1)−2)dη

dc

  • (negative + negative) x negative gives positive
  • higher demand → lower elasticity → higher mark-up

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Determine number of firms

  • use resource constraint
  • L = Li = (α + βyi) = N(α + βy)
  • so L = N(α + βLc)
  • or N =

1 α/L+βc

  • quantity c (from the diagram) determines N

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Trade

  • let’s use the model
  • how to model trade?
  • consider (identical) 2nd country with L∗ = L
  • allow the 2 to trade freely (can also do more than 2)
  • analyze integrated world market
  • well, we have of done that already
  • simply take model with ˜

L = 2L

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-19
SLIDE 19

zero profit pricing beta p/w c c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Effects of trade

  • per capital consumption of each variety lower
  • real wage increases/real price falls
  • number of varieties (available to consumers) increases
  • two sources of gains from trade: real income and variety
  • output per firm yi = Lci increases,

as L has doubled and c fallen by less than half

  • lower N per country (average)
  • scale and selection effect

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Time dimension

  • suppose liberalization/market integration happens overnight
  • economy takes time to adjust, especially number of firms
  • so in short term we have too many firms
  • who viciously compete down the price and make losses
  • only over time will some firms leave the market
  • and number of competitors reaches new equilibrium level
  • example of airline liberalization

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Number of firms/varieties

  • each firm produces more
  • but number of firms/varieties globally decreases
  • example: from 2 x 10 to 16
  • one is tempted to conclude 8 per country
  • but model silent on this - firms are identical
  • incentive to use subsidies to keep your firms alive
  • and let adjustment play out in the other country

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • only works if other country doesn’t react
  • subsidies could be discontinued once adjustment

(in other country) has taken place

c Gerald Willmann, Bielefeld University