MAC Prepayment Reviews and Rebilling Denied Inpatient Claims Kathy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mac prepayment reviews and rebilling denied inpatient
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MAC Prepayment Reviews and Rebilling Denied Inpatient Claims Kathy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MAC Prepayment Reviews and Rebilling Denied Inpatient Claims Kathy Reep April 17, 2013 Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) Prepayment Review Why a MAC Issue? RAC reporting at MAC level Recompete of MAC contracts Pay it right, the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MAC Prepayment Reviews and Rebilling Denied Inpatient Claims

Kathy Reep April 17, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) Prepayment Review

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why a MAC Issue?

  • RAC reporting at MAC level
  • Recompete of MAC contracts

Pay it right, the first time…

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Executive Order 13520

  • Reduce improper payments by –

– Refining error rate measurement processes – Improving system edits – Updating coverage policies and manuals – Conducting provider education efforts

  • 50 percent error rate reduction

– To 6.2 percent by 2012

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Inpatient Claim Reviews

  • Transition from QIO to FIs/MACs

– QIOs to focus on quality improvement

  • Will no longer do payment accuracy measurement
  • n inpatient claims

– FIs/MACs will review for inpatient medical necessity and coding

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Inpatient Claim Reviews

  • Not random reviews

– Targeted based on analysis

  • Pre- or post-payment basis
  • To use “clinical judgment”

– No specific screening tool to be required – Will involve physicians as needed

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Inpatient Claim Reviews

  • No payment for copying costs
  • Appeal rights as with other denials

– However, filed at initial level with contractor that reviewed the claim and issued denial

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MAC Prepayment Review Process

  • Data Analysis

– MACs identify provider billing practices and services posing greatest financial risk to Medicare – Use data analysis to identify issues to include in the medical review strategy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Preliminary Findings

  • InterQual criteria not met and record did

not otherwise support need for inpatient level of care

  • Cases continue to show lack of severity of

illness and/or intensity of service

  • MD orders observation services and case

manager writes inpatient status was appropriate and admission is converted

  • Admit for 3-day qualifying stay
slide-10
SLIDE 10

And for 2013…

  • Focus on elective surgical procedures
  • Length of stay not an element in record

selection

  • Pre-payment review (30-100%)
  • Post-payment review for associated Part B

services

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DRGs Subject to Prepayment Review (FCSO)

  • Added November 16, 2012:
  • 069 | 254
  • Added April 11, 2012:
  • MS-DRGs w/1-day LOS
  • Added March 21, 2012:
  • 153 | 328 | 357 | 455 | 473 | 517
  • Effective prior to March 1, 2012:
  • 226 | 227 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 247 | 251 | 253 | 264 |

287 | 313 | 392 | 458 | 460 | 470 | 490 | 552 | 641

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Documentation Requirements

  • Medical record must contain

– Documentation fully supporting medical necessity of the inpatient admission and justification of any procedures performed

  • History and physical
  • Discharge summary
  • Physician progress notes
  • Operative report
  • Other relevant information addressing coverage

criteria for episode of care prior to hospitalization

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Other Contractor Interventions

  • Exclusion of individual hospitals with

sustained low error rates from specific DRG edits beginning in June 2012

  • Post-payment recoupment of surgeon,

assistant surgeon and co-surgeon claims if the surgical procedure is deemed as not medically reasonable and necessary

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Patient Status

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Observation vs. Inpatient Status

  • CMS questions whether and how we might

improve our current instructions and clarify the application of Medicare payment policies…

– Whether it may be appropriate and useful to establish a point in time after which the encounter becomes an inpatient stay if the beneficiary is still receiving medically necessary care to treat or evaluate his or her condition;

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Observation vs. Inpatient Status

– Whether the agency should establish more specific criteria for patient status in terms of how many hours the beneficiary is in the hospital, or to provide a limit on how long a beneficiary receives observation services as an outpatient; – Whether the agency should provide additional clarity in the definition of an inpatient; and

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Observation vs. Inpatient Status

– Whether the agency should establish more specific clinical criteria for admission and payment, such as adopting specific clinical measures or requiring prior authorization for payment of an admission.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Looking at Patient Status

  • Proposed rule posted March 13

−Hospitals will only have limited time to refile

claims

  • Timely filing
  • Deadline for comments May 17, 2013
  • Administrative ruling also posted March 13

− Interim policy effective with release − In effect only until final rule issued

slide-19
SLIDE 19

King & Spalding

slide-20
SLIDE 20

King & Spalding

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Medicare Audit Improvement Act of 2013 H.R. 1250

  • Establish a consolidated limit for medical requests
  • Improve auditor performance by implementing

financial penalties, and by requiring medical necessity audits to focus on widespread payment errors

  • Improve RAC auditor transparency
  • Restore due process rights under the AB rebilling

demonstration

  • Require physician review for Medicare denials medical

necessity

  • Allow denied inpatient claims to be billed as outpatient

claims when appropriate

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Questions??

kathyr@fha.org