M C I NTIRE I NVESTMENT I NSTITUTE A T THE U NIVERSITY OF V IRGINIA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

1

MCINTIRE INVESTMENT INSTITUTE

AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA

Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) – Long

Shreyas Hariharan | Adam Rathgaber | Naveed Mostaghimi | Nick Galdos | 10/28/2014

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

AGENDA

2

Business Overview Misperception Thesis Points Macro Tailwinds Comps & Valuation Risks & Catalyst

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

3

“We’re a company run by shareholders for shareholders. ”

• Richard Kinder Founder, Kinder Morgan
• Kinder Morgan Inc. is the largest midstream and 3rd largest energy company in

North America.

• Owns and operates 80,000 miles of pipelines that transport natural gas, gasoline,

crude oil, carbon dioxide and other products

• Over 180 terminals that store petroleum products and chemicals

KMI has exceeded dividend target in each of the last 3 years.

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

STOCK PERFORMANCE

• Current: $38.93
• 52 week: 30.81 - 42.49
• Market Cap: $40.21B
• EPS: $1.20
• DivYield: 1.76 (4.60%)
• P/E: 35.25

4

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

MISPERCEPTION #1: OVER-LEVERAGED

REASON THE MARKET BELIEVES THIS

5

Misperception: KMI has been over-aggressive in acquisitions and is over-leveraged.

KMI INDUSTRY MEDIAN Assets to equity 5.74 3.30 Debt to equity 2.59 1.18 EVIDENCE THAT THIS MISPERCEPTION IS MANIFESTED IN THE MARKET

14.6% of float is short despite gross and operating margins way higher than industry average.

KMI INDUSTRY AVERAGE Gross Margin 47% 43% Operating Margin 29% 13%

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

MISPERCEPTION #1: OVER-LEVERAGED

6

WHY ARE KMI’S ACQUISITIONS ARE ACTUALLY VERY BENEFICIAL?

• Industry is going through natural phase of market consolidation.
• Small players are going to be bought out in pipeline industry because:

Ø Operating revenue doesn’t cover costs when operations are small scale Ø Economies of scale kick in only after certain miles of pipelines are owned

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

MISPERCEPTION #2: NATURAL GAS AND CRUDE OIL PRICES

7

Misperception: KMI’s revenue is affected by natural gas and crude oil prices.

EVIDENCE THAT THIS MISPERCEPTION IS MANIFESTED IN THE MARKET

KMI’s stock prices have fluctuated with fluctuating oil and natural gas prices, driven primarily by market sentiment about the pipeline industry.

REASON THE MARKET BELIEVES THIS Ø Fall in natural gas prices reflect a decrease in demand for natural gas Ø This will reduce total revenue of natural gas pipeline companies (elastic demand)

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

MISPERCEPTION #2: OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRICES

8

WHY IS KMI RELATIVELY UNAFFECTED BY NATURAL GAS AND OIL PRICES IN THE SHORT-MEDIUM RUN? § KMI has long-term contracts (4-5 years) with its clients. § These are take-or-pay contracts. § KMI’s fee structure involves minimum payments irrespective of whether customer chooses to use the pipelines over the period of the contract. § Hence, demand for KMI’s pipelines is relatively inelastic in the short-medium run. KMI INDUSTRY AVERAGE Gross Margin 47% 43% Operating Margin 29% 13%

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

MISPERCEPTION #3: RENEWABLE ENERGY

§ “Two factors that prevent investment in renewable energy in the short- medium run: 1) load factor, because we don’t have it all the time and 2) renewable energy sources are not profitable yet because net present value is still negative.”- Carlos Pascual, Special Envoy, International Energy Affairs and Former United States Ambassador to Mexico and Ukraine.

9

Misperception: Renewable energy will significantly impact conventional energy market in the near future.

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

10

MISPERCEPTION #3: RENEWABLE ENERGY

§ Natural gas is still growing § Domestic coal consumption is switching to other sources

500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2007 2009 2011

Coal and Natural Gas US Total Output (in thousand mega-watt-hours)

Coal Natural Gas Renewables Linear (Coal) Linear (Natural Gas) Linear (Renewables)

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

The ability to depend on renewable energy is hindered by:

11

MISPERCEPTION #3: RENEWABLE ENERGY

§ Availability § Peak demand § High investment costs

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

§ Terminal activities provided 13.4% of Kinder Morgan’s revenue in 2012 § Terminal operating margins continue to increase

12

THESIS POINT #1: COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 2011 2012 2013 2014*

KM Terminal Operating Margins

*projected 2014 operating margin

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

THESIS POINT #1: COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

13

Continued investment into opening new terminals

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

Terminals give Kinder Morgan exposure to different energy sources:

§ Crude oil § Domestic/International coal § Chemicals

14

THESIS POINT #1: COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

Kinder Morgan provides a safer environment overall than its competitors:

1.54 vs 5.7 average competitor TRIR

According to the BLS, the industry-wide TRIR is 4.8

15

THESIS POINT #1: COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

Terminal contracts are relatively long term:

§ Liquids average: 3.8 years § Bulk average: 3.5 years

16

THESIS POINT #1: COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

New port terminals provide access to vital coal demand around the world

17

THESIS POINT #1: COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

• 1. High start-up costs

§ Operating revenue will cover costs only when operations are large- scale § FC will be distributed among large units when operations are large. § Due to over 32 acquisitions, KMI enjoys economies of scale.

18

THESIS POINT #2: BARRIERS TO ENTRY

*projected 2014 operating margin

KMI INDUSTRY AVERAGE COGS/ Miles of Pipeline $0.10 $0.57 Gross Margin/ Miles of Pipeline $0.406 $0.322

• 2. Regulation

§ Environmental and zoning restrictions make new companies building pipelines practically impossible. § In a specific region, competitors cannot build pipelines if they exist. § Regulation promotes monopoly for KMI.

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

• 3. Customer Loyalty

§ Region specific customers § Customers are likely to renew contracts with KMI after the 4-5 year period.

• 4. Competitive Advantage (explained)

§ Terminals § Safer environment § Terminals and pipelines for crude oil, coal, chemicals, natural gas.

19

THESIS POINT #2: BARRIERS TO ENTRY

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

MACROECONOMIC TAILWINDS

20

• Continued increases in demand as natural gas consumption has

risen from 22% to 27% of US energy use (mostly at the expense of

• il)

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

MACROECONOMIC TAILWINDS

• According to the 2015 Farmers’ Almanac , the 2014-2015 winter is

expected to be severe with below-normal temperatures for three quarters of the US, resulting in an increased demand for natural gas

21

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

REGULATION

• KMI recently received all of the necessary regulatory approvals for

its long-awaited acquisition of all three of its MLPs

• New regulations prevent drillers from flaring in the Bakken and

Three Forks formations, perpetuating the need for increased pipeline infrastructure

22

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

RISKS & POTENTIAL CATALYSTS

RISKS § Investors will face a significant tax burden (losing around 4% of investment value) with Rich Kinder’s $44B consolidation plan POTENTIAL CATALYSTS

• The US lifts the ban on exporting oil and gas
• Russia/China’s recent 30 year $400 B oil and gas supply deal

could be a huge catalyst in lifting the ban

• Increased TAM as infrastructure will be needed regardless
• Beating Earnings Call 1/15/15
• Berlin v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP lawsuit regarding

consolidation of MLPs

23

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

RISKS AND POTENTIAL CATALYSTS

• VAR 1: “KMI’s big already but earnings should grow around 20%
• ver the next 5 years. Its organizational management is a little

complicated and the dropdown to MLPs on pipelines is the in-vogue thing to do these days because it allows for a better valuation and is more tax-friendly.”

• Zach Pancratz (DRZ: Alternative Strategies Analyst)
• VAR 2: “The energy sector along with the whole market has sold off

huge in the past 6 weeks. Underperformance in energy can be attributed to the huge selloff in oil (peak in June at $107 to current levels of $82). The oil names got absolutely smoked and the natural gas names got indiscriminately lumped in with them since most energy names have a mix of oil and gas. With the recent selloff and colder weather on the way you’ll definitely see a bump in natural gas prices.”

• John Race Jr. (Iberia Capital Partners: Institutional Sales)

24

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

VALUATION- ASSUMPTIONS

25

Revenue Assumption ¡ 8% ¡ Margin Assumption ¡ 27% ¡ Exit Multiple ¡ 12.1 ¡

• Revenue Growth based on analyst estimates and corporate guidance
• Margin assumption is a conservative estimate based on historical figures

and our analysis and predictions for future operations

• Exit multiple is a conservative figure taken to be KMI’s current EV/

EBITDA, which is below comparable company averages

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

VALUATION – DCF TARGET PRICE

26

EV ¡ $85.725 B ¡ Debt ¡ $36.193 B ¡ Cash ¡ $ 598 M ¡ Market Cap ¡ $50.13 B ¡ # of Shares ¡ 1.028 B ¡ Target Price ¡ $48.76 ¡

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

VALUATION EV/EBITDA

27

Comps' Median EV/ EBITDA ¡ 14.5 ¡ KMI EBITDA ¡ $5,796 B ¡ Enterprise Value ¡ $84,042 B ¡ Market Cap ¡ $48,447 B ¡ Price ¡ $47.12 ¡

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

VALUATION – WEIGHTED TARGET PRICE

28

Comps Target Price ¡ $47.12 ¡ DCF Target Price ¡ $48.76 ¡ Weight ¡ 50% ¡ Weight ¡ 50% ¡ Final Target Price ¡ $47.94 ¡ Upside ¡ 23% ¡ Current Price ¡ $39.03 ¡

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

EV PER PIPELINE MILE

29

KMI ¡ Comp Median ¡ EV/Pipeline Mile ¡ 0.94 ¡ 1.68 ¡

• One of KMI’s biggest

strength is its superior size and scope

• However, we believe that

this size has not been totally factored in to its price (shown by EV/Pipeline Mile)

• KMI has used economies of

scale to decrease its costs and prices, better positioning it to expand revenue and market share

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

CONSOLIDATION, TAX BENEFITS

• KMI has been consolidating

its MLPs under its own corporation

• The move will cause the

company to lose the corporate-tax breaks enjoyed by MLPs

• However, the KMI estimates

that the restructuring will actually save the company $20 billion in taxes over the next 14 years by increasing its deductions due to depreciation

30

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

COMPENSATION

• Richard Kinder proudly

states that he makes a salary of $1, as well as a 23% stake in KMI

• Other Executives have

below average salaries and above average performance bonuses

• This provides great

incentive to perform well for KMI’s very competent management team

31

Richard Kinder Title: CEO, Chairman, Kinder Morgan Salary: $1 Total Pay: $1

M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

RECOMMENDATION

32

Initiate a long position on KMI at an entry price below $40.